All sittings← 2012-12-042012-12-06 →
Wednesday, December 5, 2012 · sitting No. 192
Jobs and growth act advances unamended after report stage vote
The jobs and growth act 2012 advanced through report stage unamended after hours of votes forced by opposition members. The bill which implements the next phase of the government's economic plan will face a third reading vote later in the sitting.
In question period the leader of the opposition pressed the prime minister on random roadside breathalyzer tests and residential schools documents. The prime minister said the government had already disclosed nearly one million documents and remained open to court guidance on further releases.
Decided that day
- Extended 15th Justice committee report
- Referred C-428 to Aboriginal Affairs committee at second reading
- Passed C-45 at third reading
- Agreed to proceed to Orders of the Day
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2012-12-05
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose told Matthew Kellway that no funds had been spent on new aircraft and that a full options analysis would precede any replacement of the CF-18 fleet.
Read the exchangeSearch and Rescue
Gail Shea assured Jack Harris that a Canadian company now handles all marine medical emergency calls after an earlier interruption in service.
Read the exchangeThe Senate
Irene Mathyssen described a nightmare in which senators past present and future fed on taxpayer dollars while murmuring about maritime mergers and secondary residences.
Read the exchangeArctic Council
Leona Aglukkaq told Ève Péclet that Canada would consult northerners before setting its Arctic Council agenda and would focus on their interests rather than those of outside experts.
Read the exchangeFisheries and Oceans
Gail Shea confirmed to Robert Chisholm that the government would uphold the owner-operator and fleet separation policies and that controlling agreements would expire in March 2014.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives general assurances without addressing the specific proposal or inaction.
The government has brought in measures to deal with it.
- misdirectedJusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the asker and NDP instead of addressing the random testing proposal.
he might want to check out the Tackling Violent Crime Act in which we increased the penalties for impaired driving
- misdirectedJusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's past record rather than explaining current inaction on the proposal.
the NDP has ignored these issues for decades.
- deflectedThe EconomyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the source of projections but does not address whether they will be adjusted.
the budgetary and economic forecasts are determined through a survey of economic professionals.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses document disclosure but pivots to legal process instead of a direct yes or no.
the Government of Canada has already disclosed nearly one million documents to the commission.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's position on its duty to consult.
the government recognizes that the duty to consult, in many cases, is an absolute legal obligation of the government
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the questioner and restates general policy without addressing delegation specifics.
I actually think it is the questions of the leader of the Liberal Party that are nonsensical.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists investments but does not address the length of negotiations or lack of resolution.
We have made important investments into education, into safe drinking water, into homes for families
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly addresses document handover and court disagreement.
We have turned over almost a million documents.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to unrelated investments instead of addressing unfulfilled promises or documents.
We have invested $275 million for additional funding for education, an addition $330 million to improve the safety of first nations drinking water
- partly answeredSearch and RescueMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer covers current contractor status but avoids admitting recklessness or explaining the Italy decision.
We have a contract with a Canadian company that is taking all the medical calls.
- answeredSearch and RescueMr. Philip Toone (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses language services and no negative impact from Quebec City changes.
We are confident that the changes we are making in Quebec City will have no negative impact on the ability to respond to distress incidents on the water, quickly, effectively and in both official languages.
- answeredSearch and RescueMr. Ryan Cleary (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms policy that Canadian company takes all medical calls.
I can assure the hon. member that the policy is that a Canadian company will take all medical calls.
- answeredNational DefenceMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses reset process and no funds spent despite loaded premise about fantasy and deception.
We have set up a secretariat to do the due diligence necessary and do a full options analysis before we spend any funds on replacing the CF-18s.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains verification process and transparency steps for replacement.
we have set up a process to make sure that all of the costs for the F-35 are verified, that this be public and there be full transparency in this process.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes due diligence process but does not address industrial benefits shortfall or open competition.
We accepted his recommendation and we put in place a process to ensure there is full due diligence and transparency—
- deflectedGovernment ServicesDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes the government's economic plan without addressing the specific cuts to veterans, EI or food safety.
we continue to move forward with a plan that ensures that we will eliminate the deficit in the medium term and continue to make the investments that are necessary for our economy, job creation, research and development and commercialization of that research and development, training and making sure we have the properly skilled people in the right jobs across this country.
- deflectedGovernment ServicesDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends protecting services and removing waste but does not address the specific service cuts or debt figure cited.
the fact of the matter is that we have made sure that essential government services to the public have been ring-fenced and protected from our budget reviews, because we know that we have to deliver excellent public services to Canadians.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists environmental achievements then attacks the Liberals instead of addressing the listed cuts.
By contrast, the Liberals tell Alberta MPs to go home, to go back to where they came from.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the contractual relationship and audit steps but does not clarify how measures are made retroactive.
In terms of this general contractor, when specific allegations were made we brought in PricewaterhouseCoopers.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the integrity framework and contractual obligations without addressing transparency or subcontracting documents.
In the instance of this general contractor, our contract with them is covered by our integrity framework.
- deflectedMinister of State for Small Business and TourismMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the issue as a tempest in a teapot and reassures without addressing the judgment concerns raised.
once again, the opposition is trying to create a tempest in a teapot.
- deflectedMinister of State for Small Business and TourismMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the issue as a mountain out of a molehill and reassures without addressing the ethical standards or repeated incidents.
the opposition is making a mountain out of a molehill.
- misdirectedArctic CouncilMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition's voting record instead of stating Canada's priorities for the Arctic Council.
If the opposition members are concerned about the north, then perhaps they could start voting in favour of the north.
- misdirectedArctic CouncilMr. Dennis Bevington (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's voting record instead of addressing Arctic policy concerns.
I guess we should not be too shocked that the member for Western Arctic would not want us to listen to northerners.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references a prior statement without confirming the current commitment on controlling agreements.
I am sure that the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans did stand in this place and tell this House that we would uphold the owner-operator and fleet separation policies.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates policy support without addressing the expiration of controlling agreements.
A former minister of Fisheries and Oceans adopted PIIFCAF, which makes it illegal to have these controlling agreements.
- deflectedSearch and RescueHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends Coast Guard actions and attacks the prior Liberal government rather than addressing the base closure.
When this member's party was in government, the Coast Guard was tied to the wharf, rusting and underfunded.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses storage of tax information and privacy but ignores the premise on service cuts and debt.
This change will ensure the privacy and security of taxpayers' records, and will do so at a lower cost for Canadian taxpayers.
- misdirectedInternational Co-operationMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner for misstating facts instead of addressing knowledge of the Paris Declaration.
The member does not know what she is talking about.
- misdirectedInternational Co-operationMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP's positions rather than addressing CIDA's legal obligations on poverty reduction.
We know that the NDP is anti-investment, anti-business and anti-trade.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists aid results without addressing the minister's knowledge of aid effectiveness principles or legislation.
Under our government, we are achieving real results: 7.8 million chronically food insecure people have been given food in Ethiopia; 900,000 farmers and small business owners earn higher incomes in Bangladesh; and 7.8 million children have been vaccinated against polio in Afghanistan.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids enforcement responsibility by claiming arm's-length status and shifting to municipalities.
This is between the municipalities and the organizations.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the priority claim but reframes layoffs as beneficial without tackling security concerns raised.
This change will ensure the privacy and the security of taxpayers' records and will do so at a lower cost to taxpayers.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the call for balance by criticizing the PA instead of addressing Canada's position on settlements.
However, the PA's action and provocative rhetoric at the United Nations would obviously elicit a response from Israel.
- answeredPoints of OrderMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the voting record and chair's interpretation of the government's intent.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderBob Rae (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer corrects a procedural detail about records rather than addressing the substantive vote validity issue.
Journals, according to O'Brien and Bosc, is the official record of what is done in the House.