All sittings← 2009-12-012009-12-03 →
Wednesday, December 2, 2009 · sitting No. 122
Self-employed gain EI benefits as House advances fairness bill
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on government orders for the Fairness for the Self-Employed Act. Parliamentary Secretary Ed Komarnicki told members the measure would extend maternity, parental and other special benefits to self-employed Canadians for the first time, fulfilling a 2008 pledge, and the bill advanced after limited committee changes.
In question period Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff pressed the government on whether Canada would adjust its Afghanistan strategy after President Obama's announcement of additional forces, and asked why Ottawa had still not named a high-level envoy for the region. Defence Minister Peter MacKay replied that the whole-of-government approach already in place had been endorsed and required no change. Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe accused the government of contradicting Quebec's climate targets in Copenhagen and Environment Minister Jim Prentice said Ottawa would harmonize its 2020 goal with the United States at 17 per cent below 2005 levels.
Decided that day
- Bill C-393 read a second time and referred to committee
- Northwest Passage motion passed
- Amendment to Northwest Passage motion passed
- Bill C-486 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2009-12-02
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Afghanistan
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said the government's approach had neglected political and diplomatic engagement and asked why Canada still refused to appoint a high-level envoy.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Bloc Québécois MP Bernard Bigras asked Environment Minister Jim Prentice to confirm that Quebec's emission reductions would not allow Alberta to increase its emissions with impunity.
Read the exchangeInfrastructure
Liberal MP Gerard Kennedy said the minister's budget for infrastructure stimulus had been cut by more than $1 billion and asked whether the minister would release all information on the failure of the job-creation program.
Read the exchangeOlympic Winter Games
Conservative MP Colin Mayes asked the Minister of State for Sport to share the Liberal Party's latest attempts to politicize the games.
Read the exchangeFirearms Registry
Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner said opposition members had embarrassed themselves by politicizing a sombre non-partisan event marking the Montreal massacre and chose the long-gun registry over respect.
Read the exchangeLabour Relations
Labour Minister Rona Ambrose confirmed that CN and the Teamsters had signed an agreement and thanked opposition labour critics for helping apply pressure on both sides.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses strategy change but ignores when Canadians will be informed.
there will be no change, per se, on the ground in Afghanistan.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Restates whole-of-government approach without addressing envoy appointment.
With respect to change, we have been pursuing a whole of government approach that is coupling with our efforts of diplomacy, coupling with the efforts of aid workers, all under the umbrella and rubric of security provided by Canadian Forces and NATO allies.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Praises unique Canadian approach and existing efforts instead of explaining refusal to appoint envoy.
We are taking a unique Canadian approach.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Lists prior reviews but does not address why the new judge-led inquiry proposal is refused.
the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan with members from all parties in this House is conducting a significant amount of meetings on this issue.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts to praising military and Obama speech instead of addressing the inquiry proposal.
The speech last night by President Obama and the changes taking place in Kandahar and southern Afghanistan speak volumes to the credibility and trust and confidence that our allies have for the men and women in uniform.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Notes Quebec inclusion in delegation but does not address plan contradiction.
We now know that the people appointed by the Government of Quebec will form an integral part of the Canadian delegation.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Attacks Bloc's goals and changes topic rather than addressing PM's statements on Quebec.
it is ironic to see the leader of the Bloc Québécois talk about a federalism that works, when we know his goal is to destroy that federalism.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Describes general policy without addressing Quebec-Alberta burden-sharing concern.
Our policy is simple, to enter into an agreement with the major emitters in Copenhagen and to harmonize our targets and regulations with our partner, the United States, while establishing a carbon trading system.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise but immediately shifts to a UN quote on US targets instead of addressing Quebec versus federal economic interests.
We have to develop a sustainable economy.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the inquiry and economic platform questions and instead lists past accountability measures and economic claims.
this government has done more to bring accountability to Ottawa, to this place, than any government in Canadian history.
- deflectedHarmonization TaxJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the HST heating fuel question and instead attacks the NDP's past tax positions.
This is the government that brought forward major tax reductions for Canadian families, major tax reductions for small businesses, major tax reductions with respect to the GST.
- misdirectedHarmonization TaxJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer attacks the NDP leader personally on tax history rather than addressing the HST or $30 billion claim.
Mike Harris will be very pleased to know that the leader of the NDP has now donned the label of the great tax fighter of Canada.
- deflectedAfghanistanUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses improvements to the transfer agreement but does not confirm or deny receipt of specific allegations in the stated period.
We improved an enhanced agreement.
- deflectedAfghanistanUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites generals and a quote from General Gauthier but does not address the specific May-July 2007 timeframe or confirm no allegations were received.
None of us would knowingly have ignored, disregarded, suppressed, covered up or put a cloak of secrecy over anything that we received from the field, especially on something as important as the detainee issue.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the core claim by stating there has never been a proven allegation of abuse of a transferred detainee.
There has never been a single, solitary proven allegation of abuse of a detainee, a Taliban prisoner, transferred by Canadian Forces.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites one official's statement of zero evidence but does not engage with the specific reports of beatings and electrocution mentioned.
Ms. Latouche was unequivocal that she and three colleagues from the Correctional Service of Canada who do the same work have seen zero evidence of torture or any abuse.
- answeredAfghanistanMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the mission ends in 2011, addressing the request for clarification.
the mission in Afghanistan, as far as the military combat mission is concerned, ends. In 2011, the mission ends.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to humanitarian work and instead criticizes the Bloc's stance on the mission.
it is clear that the member and the Bloc do not support this mission.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMrs. Josée Beaudin (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the Bloc for voting against previous measures rather than addressing the proposal to improve the system.
Every Bloc Québécois member of Parliament voted against every one of these measures to help the unemployed.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMrs. Josée Beaudin (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes existing plans and criticizes the question instead of addressing premium overpayment or fund diversion.
Why are they trying to prevent us from offering something that self-employed workers want—benefits when they are sick or when they must take care of a sick child or family member?
- deflectedInfrastructureJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the discrepancy in project implementation stats and instead quotes a positive FCM statement.
We have no complaints with the way things are going.
- misdirectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps spending details and mocks Liberal presence in Winnipeg instead of addressing the cost question.
I know there are not a lot of Liberals in Winnipeg any longer.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Gerard Kennedy (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids apologizing or addressing budget cuts and instead quotes a supportive mayor.
When you compare this [Conservative] government to the previous government, these guys don't want to just talk about it -- they want to get it done.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Gerard Kennedy (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the member's committee attendance rather than addressing the request to release information or be accountable.
I hope the member will show up, because he is not a frequent visitor to that committee, despite being a member.
- deflectedTax HarmonizationMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores treaty rights and first nations exemptions, pivoting instead to unrelated tax cut boasts.
We will take no lessons on taxes from that party.
- deflectedTax HarmonizationMr. John Rafferty (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the gas tax and HST questions by quoting an NDP leader and attacking the party.
That is the leader of the official New Democratic Party who stands in the House every day and talks about taxes, but the NDP members continue to fight against any tax cut that we put forward to help Canadians.
- answeredLabour RelationsMr. Luc Desnoyers (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the CN-Teamsters agreement and notes the role of opposition pressure.
yes, I can confirm that we just received word from CN and Teamsters that they have signed an agreement.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses collaboration with Quebec but does not address flexibility on the January 29 deadline.
we are working closely with the Government of Quebec.
- answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives a clear, one-word response to the investigation question.
- misdirectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the asker as being on a fishing expedition rather than answering the yes/no question about an investigation.
the member for Hull—Aylmer is once again on one of his fishing expeditions.
- deflectedTax HarmonizationMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the debate-shutdown question by touting tax cuts and criticizing the asker personally.
That member should know better, because after all, when he was a city councillor in Coquitlam he voted time and time again to increase taxes on homeowners.
- deflectedTax HarmonizationMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer evades the running-from-debate charge by restating the government's tax record.
we do not run from our record on taxes.
- misdirectedPickering LandsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer briefly notes health and safety but pivots to attacking the member rather than addressing eviction plans or moratorium.
The only objective of those of us on this side of the House is to eject that member from this House.
- deflectedDemocracyMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes the new agency and museum but avoids addressing whether it undermines Rights and Democracy.
I am pleased to talk about a non-partisan agency to promote democracy abroad.
- answeredPoint of OrderJack Layton (NDP) asked Jay Hill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly refutes contempt by detailing the exact tabling time and distribution to members.
The report was tabled with the clerk at 5:20 p.m. yesterday.
- answeredPoint of OrderRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Jay Hill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms Bill C-61 is unnecessary and states the next bill to be called.
It would be my intention following routine proceedings to call Bill C-56 for debate this afternoon.