All sittings← 2008-02-052008-02-07 →
Wednesday, February 6, 2008 · sitting No. 45
House rejects two Senate changes to Criminal Code bill
The House spent the largest share of its time on government orders for Bill C-13, an act to amend the Criminal Code on criminal procedure, language of the accused, sentencing and other matters. Conservative MP Rob Nicholson moved that the House accept Senate amendments numbered 2, 4, 5 and 6 but reject amendments 1 and 3 on grounds that amendment 1 would place an undue burden on judges and amendment 3 would require the minister of justice to prepare an annual report on language rights.
In question period the main exchanges centred on Afghanistan. Liberal leader Stéphane Dion pressed the prime minister to stop misleading Canadians about the mission while Conservative leader Stephen Harper said the mission rests on a United Nations mandate and that the choice is to stay and complete the work or withdraw. Liberal MP Michael Ignatieff said the prime minister waited until the eleventh hour to seek additional NATO troops.
Decided that day
- Motion on government reaffirmation passed
- Bill passed third reading
- Motion to put the question passed
- Bills C-3, C-11, C-41 advanced; C-501 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2008-02-06
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Health
Liberal leader Stéphane Dion said the government put business interests ahead of safety and asked whether the prime minister realized his government's incompetence caused the isotope crisis; Conservative leader Stephen Harper replied that the government took action with all-party support.
Read the exchangeFinance
Liberal MP John McCallum asked whether a $122,000 payment to a Conservative friend for writing the budget speech constituted value for money; Finance minister Jim Flaherty said value for money was provided and the administrative lapse had been corrected.
Read the exchangeEthics
Liberal MP Karen Redman said Elections Canada had caught the Conservative Party breaking the law and accused the government of shutting down the procedure committee to avoid hearings; Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan said the Liberals were hijacking parliamentary institutions for partisan purposes.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
Liberal MP Navdeep Bains said American lobby groups were using the billion-dollar payment left by the softwood agreement to sue Canada; International Trade minister David Emerson said the industry welcomed the protection and the cash the agreement delivered.
Read the exchangeChild Care
Liberal MP Ken Dryden reported that child-care providers in Napanee and Halifax-Dartmouth told him the taxable allowance had produced zero new spaces; Human Resources minister Monte Solberg said the government had committed to 33,000 new spaces through provincial agreements.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedCommunity DevelopmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the honesty accusation by restating the fund details and attacking the asker as partisan.
I do not know why, when Parliament is actually working together to accomplish something, the Leader of the Opposition would bring petty partisan politics back into it.
- deflectedHealthStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the incompetence claim by noting past support and criticizing the opposition's position change.
I regret that later, when the Leader of the Opposition returned abroad, they decided to change their position.
- deflectedAfghanistanStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the accusations of misleading and partisanship, instead restating the mission's UN/NATO basis and framing a binary choice.
The government has every intention of being very clear with Canadians, just as the former deputy prime minister has been clear with Canadians.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids explaining the delay in calls by contrasting Liberal reversals and listing ally contributions instead.
during the last two years, while the Liberal Party completely reversed itself and decided we should suddenly pull out of Afghanistan, the government was working with our allies to strengthen that mission.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer evades the call for dialogue by agreeing with the deputy leader's position and restating obligations and the Manley report.
when the deputy leader of the Liberal Party says that Canada should stay in Afghanistan, I am convinced that is indeed his position.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the motion timing indirectly by confirming it will set NATO conditions and encourage study, but does not confirm pre-summit vote.
The motion will set out the important conditions that we want from NATO.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the vote timing and budget questions by sarcastically noting the asker's prior complaint about debate length.
the last time we had a debate on Afghanistan here, the leader of the Bloc complained that the debate was too short.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer turns to attacking Liberals on Senate crime issues instead of clarifying detainee handling.
What I would really like to hear discussed is not potential crime or alleged crime in Afghanistan, but perhaps the Liberals could get their Senate colleagues to do something serious about tackling violent crime and do something serious for crime in Canada.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates talking points on arrangements and trust in forces without naming the guards.
The authority for detaining or not detaining, or transferring or not transferring rests with the Canadian Forces.
- partly answeredAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses accountability processes but not the specific request for Auditor General review.
The accountability in Afghanistan is triple-fold.
- deflectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims processes exist and Auditor General audits departments but avoids calling for a specific report.
The Auditor General audits all government departments.
- misdirectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the asker on GST instead of addressing the payment or apology request.
Many people in Canada disagree with the member for Markham—Unionville when he says that he wants to raise the GST by two full percentage points
- misdirectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to criticizing the asker on GST rather than addressing discipline or apology.
the member opposite says that the GST is nonsense.
- misdirectedEthicsKaren Redman (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer accuses Liberals of hijacking committees instead of addressing the in-and-out scheme.
for the Liberal Party all it is about is hijacking the institutions of Parliament for partisan purposes.
- misdirectedEthicsKaren Redman (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer counters by questioning what Liberals have to hide rather than addressing Conservative testimony.
Why will the Liberals not allow this investigation they want to apply to their party?
- deflectedAfghanistanMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists general processes and outcomes but does not explain tracing of funds in private banks.
as I said earlier, there are full processes for full audits, monitoring, reports and site visits.
- deflectedAfghanistanMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer details education funding but ignores the Manley report accountability question.
The results are there, the numbers are there, and $60 million will go a long way to improving the education system in Afghanistan.
- misdirectedThe FrancophonieMr. Richard Nadeau (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the Bloc Québécois record instead of addressing the minister's language choice.
What has the Bloc Québécois done for the French fact here in Ottawa in over 13 years? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
- misdirectedThe FrancophonieMr. Richard Nadeau (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shames the asker personally rather than addressing the apology request.
I would be ashamed of asking such a question in this House.
- misdirectedCanadian Grain CommissionRaymond Simard (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies and threatens legal action instead of clarifying the gag order memo.
If the member thinks the allegations are serious, he should take them outside.
- deflectedHealthMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer justifies the crisis response but avoids why Keen was fired over ministers.
There was a problem facing Canadians and we had to take action to protect their health.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises the agreement benefits without addressing lawsuits or lobbyist funding.
they are very happy to have the protection that the softwood lumber agreement provides them
- answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer gives a direct denial to the muzzling question.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends contract value without addressing dismissal of the minister.
value for money was provided. The work was performed for the Canadian people.
- misdirectedGovernment ContractsMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the contracting question entirely and pivots to unrelated tax relief.
In a time of slowing economy, this is equivalent to about 1.4% of Canada's economy.
- deflectedChild CareKen Dryden (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition instead of addressing the reported lack of new spaces.
- deflectedChild CareKen Dryden (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's record rather than clarifying the providers' statements.
the truth is that the member did not create a single space when he was the minister.
- partly answeredTourism IndustryMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). substantive question.The answer supplies spending figures but does not compare them to Nevada's promotion budget.
the fact of the matter is that this government spends $800 million a year promoting tourism.
- partly answeredTourism IndustryMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rebuts two specific claims but dismisses the rest with rhetoric.
the member opposite should not get carried away with his own overblown rhetoric.
- deflectedManufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights equalization and past budget measures instead of new manufacturing tax credits.
That means an additional $400 million this year, and more than $600 million, $700 million, $1.1 billion for Quebec under the equalization formula.
- deflectedManufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior tax cuts and insults the Bloc rather than addressing the 2008 surplus request.
I think the Bloc Québécois must have a screw loose.
- answeredManufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly lists training and community funding programs aimed at displaced workers.
That is why we have stepped up with the community development trust, which has won the support of the House.
- partly answeredEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the query by outlining the concrete step of commissioning Professor Johnston's inquiry into the settlement.
the government asked Professor Johnston to look into the matter and provide terms of reference for an inquiry
- deflectedLobbyistsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question's demand for a timeline and instead promotes the government's lobbying reforms.
in response to the abuses of the lobbying situation under the Liberals, this government took some of the strongest action of any government in the world