All sittings← 2026-04-282026-04-30 →
Wednesday, April 29, 2026 · sitting No. 113
Liberals defend deficit doubling amid Conservative attacks in question period
Oral questions on finance dominated the sitting, accounting for more than a third of the day. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre repeatedly pressed Prime Minister Mark Carney on the decision to double the deficit to $65 billion and on the resulting $60 billion in annual debt interest payments. Carney replied that the government had reduced the deficit by $11 billion in the face of tariff pressures and was on track for $60 billion in savings.
The House also spent substantial time on second reading of a bill amending the Weights and Measures Act. Liberal MP Karim Bardeesy said the changes would modernize trade instrumentation and consumer protections. Conservative MP Kelly McCauley questioned why large grocers had faced no penalties for inaccurate scales.
Decided that day
- Ways and means motion No. 10 passed
- Bill C-30 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – April 29, 2026. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2026-04-29
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
International Trade
Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said the economic statement offered no help for businesses hit by new U.S. tariffs and asked whether the Prime Minister would now provide assistance. Carney said measures for steel, aluminum and other sectors would be announced soon.
Read the exchangeLabour
Bloc Québécois MP Mario Simard said Ottawa had no jurisdiction over workforce training and should simply transfer funds to Quebec. Liberal MP Joël Lightbound replied that the government would respect existing agreements while delivering results for Quebeckers.
Read the exchangePreventing Coercion of Persons Not Seeking Medical Assistance in Dying Act
Conservative MP Garnett Genuis introduced Bill C-260 to make it an offence for non-medical officials to raise medical assistance in dying with people who have not requested information about it. Liberal MP Sean Casey asked for the evidentiary basis beyond anecdotes.
Read the exchangeImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Conservative MP Dan Mazier asked whether it was fair that rejected asylum claimants receive better federal health benefits than taxpayers. Liberal MP Maggie Chi said the interim federal health program serves as a temporary bridge that protects public health.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer ignores the specific deficit and interest figures to pivot to general future plans.
The economic update is the next step in our plan to make Canada stronger, more resilient and more independent.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer avoids the interest payment comparison by attacking the questioner's focus on the past.
I can sort of understand why the Leader of the Opposition is obsessed with my predecessor and obsessed with the past, but our government is focused on the future of this great country.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer lists unrelated fiscal claims instead of addressing whether any limit exists on deficits.
in the face of a tariff war, and in the face of an actual war, this government has reduced the deficit by $11 billion.
- misdirectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps the deficit comparison to promote unrelated affordability measures.
This government is focused on affordability.
- misdirectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the opposition's voting record rather than addressing the economic outcomes cited.
Canadians will not forget that the member opposite voted against child care, voted against pharmacare, voted against dental care and voted against the groceries and essentials benefit
- misdirectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). loaded question.Answer counters with personal attacks on the questioner instead of defending the listed policy positions.
he was wrong on crypto, wrong on Brexit and I could go on.
- partly answeredInternational TradeYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states that measures are being developed though without specifics or timeline.
The government is currently developing measures to assist workers and businesses in the steel, aluminum, copper and derivative industries.
- deflectedInternational TradeYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer gives a sarcastic assurance instead of confirming concrete actions or timelines.
it is always a good idea to believe the Prime Minister of Canada.
- answeredInternational TradeYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly commits to swift and sufficient measures matching the request for timely assistance.
our measures will be swift and sufficient.
- deflectedFinanceJasraj Hallan (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the deficit and spending critique to promote a trades program and attack the opposition's voting record.
I guess they will vote against those workers too.
- deflectedFinanceJasraj Hallan (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps unemployment and inflation claims by quoting union praise and shaming the opposition.
No matter what idea and no matter who endorses it, they vote against it. Shame on them.
- deflectedFinanceMark Strahl (Conservative) asked Gregor Robertson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the deficit and G7 performance questions by shifting to future training programs and attacking Conservative history.
while the Conservatives may be mired in the last decade or two of failure, this government is focused on the future
- misdirectedFinanceMark Strahl (Conservative) asked Gregor Robertson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner and past governments instead of addressing the doubled deficit or economic record.
Conservatives are attacking former mayors like they attack current mayors. They have no respect.
- deflectedFinanceScot Davidson (Conservative) asked John Zerucelli (Liberal). loaded question.The answer evades the spending and inflation critique by quoting a union member on trades support.
Let us hear from Russ Shewchuk from the IBEW, who said that this economic statement "will super charge the Skilled Trades across Canada
- deflectedFinanceScot Davidson (Conservative) asked John Zerucelli (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores debt interest and G7 rankings to claim fiscal responsibility and quote union support.
There has not been a single question today about workers. Let us hear from the workers.
- misdirectedFinanceJonathan Rowe (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the member's tone and constituents rather than addressing the deficit-to-GDP or health care spending comparison.
while the member opposite, the Conservative member from Newfoundland and Labrador, reads his prepared notes and likes his bit of theatre
- partly answeredLabourMario Simard (Bloc) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges jurisdiction and collaboration but avoids committing to a no-strings transfer of funds.
Obviously, we will respect Quebec's jurisdictions.
- misdirectedLabourMario Simard (Bloc) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking the Bloc Québécois instead of addressing the funding transfer question.
For 10 years, I have seen them constantly trying to start fights between Quebec and Ottawa.
- deflectedFinanceEric Lefebvre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer changes the subject to workforce training and infrastructure rather than addressing the sovereign wealth fund premise.
My colleague just mentioned the need for workforce training in Quebec and in the rest of the country.
- deflectedFinanceEric Lefebvre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the spending and debt questions to attack the opposition instead.
the only ones who are disappointed are that member, his inner circle and his party.
- deflectedFinanceDominique Vien (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to economic growth claims and historical references without addressing ending costly budgets.
We have the second-largest economic growth in the G7.
- deflectedFinanceDominique Vien (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to criticizing Conservatives and listing actions instead of addressing the debt and inflation concerns.
They would look at the trade war and twiddle their thumbs while standing back and doing absolutely nothing.
- deflectedFinanceGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Anna Gainey (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the deficit and debt questions to promote a training program instead.
in yesterday's economic update, we proposed investing over $6 billion to recruit and train more than 100,000 young people in the trades.
- deflectedFinanceRaquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Rebecca Chartrand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer changes the subject to jobs and infrastructure in Manitoba rather than fiscal restraint.
what Manitobans want, especially young people, is a job.
- deflectedFinanceRaquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Rebecca Chartrand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists government investments in Manitoba without addressing tariffs or red tape.
What is she not seeing here? We are strengthening Manitoba's aerospace sector.
- deflectedFinanceDan Albas (Conservative) asked Jill McKnight (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes B.C. projects and programs instead of addressing the false-promise framing or deficit claims.
We are bringing major projects, such as LNG train 2 and Red Chris mine, which are going to invest in our natural resources and build B.C.'s economy.
- deflectedFinanceDan Albas (Conservative) asked Jill McKnight (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats skilled-trades announcements without engaging the spending-increase or fiscal-responsibility challenge.
In yesterday's spring economic update, we announced that we are investing in the recruiting, training and hiring of more than 80,000 workers in the skilled trades.
- misdirectedFinanceGarnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's reading habits and pivots to a Shell CEO quote rather than addressing EI premium increases.
the Conservatives read only half the newspaper, obviously.
- deflectedFinanceGarnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims CPP cuts and new jobs while ignoring the page-122 EI premium increase and vocational-grants point.
maybe instead of reading the paper, the member should go online and see that we actually cut CPP deductions from paycheques.
- deflectedFinanceMike Lake (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer lists spending items and urges Conservatives to support them without addressing the debt-growth or balanced-budget contrast.
we are also delivering for Canadians: $6 billion for investing in the skilled trades; more than $700 million for athletics in this country, from playground to podium;
- partly answeredFinanceMike Lake (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states a reduced deficit figure but then pivots to listing programs the Conservatives did not support.
we have reduced the deficit by $11 billion, as announced yesterday.
- misdirectedFinanceGlen Motz (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.The answer insults the Conservatives' focus on a former prime minister instead of addressing deficit control or debt interest.
I know it is a lot to ask, but the Conservatives could finally give up their infatuation with our former prime minister and just face reality for once.
- deflectedFinanceMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's focus on the former prime minister instead of addressing the debt and relief question.
while the former prime minister lives rent-free in Conservatives' heads, the current Prime Minister is focused on an economy for all Canadians.
- deflectedFinanceMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Evan Solomon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses Conservatives of talking down Canada and promotes government investments without addressing relief for costs.
these guys will find any excuse to talk down Canada and talk down investing in Canada, even in a trade war.
- misdirectedFinanceMichael Guglielmin (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to auto sector investments and accuses Conservatives of not defending workers instead of addressing deficits and debt.
what is a bit rich is the fact that the Conservatives are not defending our auto workers.
- deflectedFinanceDan Muys (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer comments on the number of identical questions and opposition voting record rather than addressing the deficit and costs.
as we conclude this question period with about 32 identical questions from the Conservative Party straight off of the Leader of the Opposition 's desk, let us conclude it this way.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsGord Johns (NDP) asked Jill McKnight (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the policy change rationale but does not address lack of consultation or reversing the changes.
Today, this policy no longer meets the needs of veterans.
- answeredPrivilegeArnold Viersen (Conservative) asked Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the privilege matter by committing to review and report back to the House.
on the question of privilege that was raised, we would like to review the comments that the member put on the record and then report back to the House on the matter.