All sittings← 2021-06-182021-06-22 →
Monday, June 21, 2021 · sitting No. 122
House continues debate on budget bill amid ethics and security clashes
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on government orders for Bill C-30, the budget implementation act. Ms. Louise Chabot of the Bloc Québécois questioned whether the bill adequately protects workers and seniors, noting that many measures remain temporary. Mr. Kevin Lamoureux of the Liberal Party highlighted ongoing support programs for Canadians during the pandemic.
Question period featured sharp exchanges on ethics. Conservative MP Candice Bergen asked who instructed Liberal MPs to direct taxpayer funds to Tom Pitfield. Minister Pablo Rodriguez replied that the technology assists constituency casework and that Canadians are served well by their MPs.
Further clashes arose over documents from the Public Health Agency of Canada. Conservative MP Gérard Deltell pressed for unredacted records related to the Winnipeg lab, while Minister Patty Hajdu said sensitive materials had already gone to a secure committee.
Decided that day
- Bill C-10 report stage concurrence passed
- Several C-10 amendments passed or defeated
- Closure on Broadcasting Act proceedings adopted
- Bill C-30 report stage concurrence passed
- Bills C-33 and C-34 given royal assent
- S-209, S-227 and S-230 advanced one stage each
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – June 21, 2021. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2021-06-21
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act
Liberal MP Chris Bittle defended Bill C-12 as essential to meet Paris Agreement goals, while Conservative MP Dan Albas accused Liberals of mishandling committee collaboration.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP MP Rachel Blaney asked when the government would stop fighting First Nations children in court over discrimination findings; Minister Marc Miller said no child has had to testify and compensation talks continue.
Read the exchangeOfficial Languages
Bloc Québécois MP Christine Normandin pressed the government to let Quebec apply the Charter of the French Language to federally regulated businesses; Minister Mélanie Joly said the federal bill creates new rights to work and be served in French.
Read the exchangeThe Economy
Conservative MP James Cumming noted the economy lost jobs in March and May and asked for the new date to recover one million positions; Minister Sean Fraser pointed to stronger labour-force participation than in the United States.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Bloc Québécois MP Rhéal Fortin cited Justice Fish’s report on interference in military sexual-misconduct cases; Minister Harjit S. Sajjan said the government accepts all 107 recommendations and has begun implementing 36.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer praises MP work and technology use but never identifies who instructed the payments.
The technology that has been raised here today is used by our MPs to help manage their constituency casework.
- deflectedEthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to accusing Conservatives of blocking Parliament instead of naming any instructor.
We have very important bills ahead of us in Parliament that need to be voted on, and the Conservatives are trying to shut down Parliament.
- deflectedPublic SafetyCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims documents went to another committee but does not confirm tabling unredacted copies in the House.
The member knows full well that unredacted documents were provided to an appropriate committee of parliamentarians who have the expertise and clearance to review documents that are sensitive in nature.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the member and cites an expert instead of addressing whether the House order will be followed.
it is clear that the member opposite does not respect institutions, nor does the member opposite respect national security.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats the committee claim and quotes an expert but never agrees to table documents in the House.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states yes and links the request to ongoing modernization consultations.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer mentions CRB extensions in Bill C-30 but does not address targeted help for cultural-sector workers this summer.
Bill C-30 has measures in it that will extend the CRB, that will help out businesses and that will help out employers who want to retain their employees.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses compensation but avoids stating when the government will stop court proceedings.
every single first nation child who has been discriminated against by the broken child welfare system will be fairly, justly and equitably compensated.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses systemic racism and budget measures but does not address ending police violence or the specific demands.
We know that systemic racism exists within our institutions.
- partly answeredEthicsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.It explains the purpose of the technology but sidesteps the question of who instructed the payments.
The technology we are discussing here is used for MPs to help manage their constituency casework.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives for blocking bills instead of addressing the ethical payments question.
They are blocking, filibustering and wasting the time of the House.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the member on prorogation and blocking instead of addressing the payments order.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates the technology purpose and pivots to criticizing Conservatives for blocking bills.
the technology that has been raised here is used by MPs to help manage their constituency casework.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer responds with counter-questions about blocking bills rather than addressing payments to Pitfield.
can my colleague tell me when the Conservatives will stop blocking the budget?
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer counters with questions about who is blocking government bills instead of addressing the payments.
who on the other side is instructing members to block everything the government is doing?
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMs. Christine Normandin (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses protecting French in federally regulated businesses but does not engage with letting Quebec choose its regime.
We are recognizing new rights: the right to work in French and to be served in French in federally regulated businesses.
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMs. Christine Normandin (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Bloc's motives and agenda instead of addressing whether the government will respect Quebec's authority on French.
Obviously, the Bloc Québécois's objective is to always bicker with the federal government and find points of contention to advance its sovereignist agenda and defend the separatist cause.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMs. Christine Normandin (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the bill's approach to the Charter but avoids justifying why the party refuses to support the opposition bill.
Basically, if my colleague read the bill we introduced very carefully, she would know that we are willing to recognize the application of the Charter of the French Language to federally regulated businesses that have already signed up and to those who wish to do so and be subject to it.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. James Cumming (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to praising government supports and criticizing Conservative obstruction rather than confirming the job target.
I am disappointed, however, that the Conservative member and his colleagues are obstructing the proceedings of Parliament to prevent these benefits from reaching businesses and workers.
- misdirectedThe EconomyMr. James Cumming (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer accuses Conservatives of taking glee in job losses instead of addressing the missed job target or providing a new date.
with respect, it is disappointing but not surprising to see the Conservatives take such glee in Canadians who were put out of work in order to protect the lives of their families and neighbours.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. James Cumming (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer provides comparative statistics and examples but does not offer specific growth targets or timelines by sector.
if the hon. member wants to compare us to our G7 counterparts, I would point him to the fact that we have a 64.6% labour force participation rate in Canada, compared to 61.6% in the United States.
- answeredGovernment ProgramsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the basis for changes by outlining the extended benefits and new programs in budget 2021.
To continue supporting workers through this pandemic, we presented a plan in budget 2021 to extend the Canada recovery benefit up to 50 weeks and the Canada recovery caregiving benefit up to 42 weeks.
- answeredGovernment ProgramsMr. Daniel Blaikie (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms the cut from $500 to $300 and explains the structure of the extended benefit.
Yes, the first 42 weeks are at $500, and the last eight weeks are at $300, but they also have access to more flexible EI benefits and access to the wage subsidy.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes existing gun control measures but does not address the timeline for new action on illegal guns.
That is precisely why we have taken strong action to strengthen gun control, which is a different approach, whereas the Conservatives promised the gun lobby that they would weaken it.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Glen Motz (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' gun control stance instead of addressing rising violence or policy effectiveness.
once again, the Conservatives are demonstrating their absolute commitment to weakened gun control and to keeping their promises to the gun lobby.
- answeredPublic SafetyMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the devices pose no risk and affirms ongoing vigilance on the procurement concern.
I have been assured that the devices that the member references pose no risk to Canadian national security, but we will remain vigilant.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Kelly McCauley (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reiterates no risk but avoids committing to removing equipment or acting on the committee report.
this gives me an opportunity to clarify that I have been assured by our border service officers that the use of this equipment in no way compromises Canadian interests or data
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Rhéal Fortin (Bloc) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms acceptance of all 107 recommendations and notes implementation progress on 36.
We are accepting all the recommendations. In fact, we have actually started implementing 36 of the recommendations.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Rhéal Fortin (Bloc) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer blames opposition antics and avoids addressing the filibuster or timeline for the report.
The antics that the opposition continues to make are to prevent that work.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Lianne Rood (Conservative) asked Ms. Rachel Bendayan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general trade leadership but does not address specific market access concerns for farmers.
Canada has actually been playing a leadership role since the very beginning of this pandemic, whether at the World Trade Organization or elsewhere, to ensure that we keep our supply chains open
- partly answeredTourism IndustryMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights vaccine progress and quarantine changes but provides no comprehensive border reopening plan.
Today, there is good news for fully vaccinated Canadian travellers and others with right of entry to Canada: Because of their full vaccination status, they will be able to avoid some measures of quarantine
- deflectedThe EconomyKerry-Lynne Findlay (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to past job gains and child care investments without addressing responsibility for recent losses.
when the hon. member refers to job losses in the past couple of months, she ignores the fact that after the previous wave, we actually saw more than 560,000 jobs created.
- answeredFisheries and OceansMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Bernadette Jordan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the demand for action by detailing the collaborative strategy and funding.
This government is very proud of the fact that we are investing $647 million in that strategy.
- deflectedInfrastructureSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to support by stating they await a proposal instead of addressing the timeline.
With regard to the third link, we are still waiting for a proposal.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Jasraj Singh Hallan (Conservative) asked Marco Mendicino (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to general immigration achievements and past government criticism rather than addressing the backlog fix.
our government has an exceptional track record in meeting our immigration goals.
- answeredHealthMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer provides a clear timeline and plan for reopening based on vaccination status.
Starting July 5, fully vaccinated travellers who are currently permitted to enter Canada will not be subject to the existing quarantine requirements.
- answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Independent) asked Mr. Francesco Sorbara (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the CRA's audit selection process and denies faith-based targeting.
The CRA does not select registered charities for audit based on any particular faith or denomination.
- misdirectedResidential SchoolsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked The Speaker (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses a completely unrelated matter about document production and privileges instead of procedural rules for speaking.
Mr. Stewart, you are attending at the bar of the House on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada for failure to comply with the orders
- deflectedPoints of OrderMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). substantive question.The answer begins a new point of order without engaging the procedural question posed.
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order—
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). substantive question.The answer continues a discussion on parliamentary privileges unrelated to the point of order raised.
The Parliament of Canada Act states in section 4 that the privileges, immunities and powers of the two Houses are to be those that were held in 1867 by the House of Commons of the United Kingdom
- misdirectedPrivilegeMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the question about the Speaker's ruling and timing and instead requests permission for Mr. Stewart to leave.
I think it would be appropriate for the Speaker to allow him to leave now, so he can get back to the important work he has been doing over the last 15 months looking to protect this country.
- misdirectedPrivilegeMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mona Fortier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer does not engage the question on the ruling or House rights and instead offers to table an unrelated letter.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to table, in both official languages, the letter sent by the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons on this subject.
- answeredPrivilegeMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly engages the argument about who decides the balance between parliamentary rights and national security by quoting Speaker Milliken.
But what of the House's responsibility regarding the manner in which this right can or ought to be exercised?
- partly answeredPrivilegeMichelle Rempel Garner (Conservative) asked Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the compliance issue by invoking section 38 of the Evidence Act but shifts to unrelated commentary on the emotional difficulty of the bar appearance.
My understanding is that the Public Health Agency of Canada has been invoking a mandatory requirement under section s.38 of the Evidence Act.