All sittings← 2017-06-122017-06-14 →
Tuesday, June 13, 2017 · sitting No. 193
NDP motion proposes independent process for officers of Parliament
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on an opposition motion by NDP MP Nathan Cullen to replace Standing Order 111.1 with a new process for appointing officers of Parliament. The proposal would refer proposed appointments to a subcommittee of the procedure and house affairs committee for up to 30 days of review before any House vote.
Liberal MP Anthony Housefather said the motion would exclude qualified candidates with party backgrounds and argued the existing process already allows input from all parties. Cullen replied that partisanship had created conflicts in recent cases, including the nomination of Madeleine Meilleur.
Conservative MP Scott Reid questioned how the subcommittee would function with only two recognized parties, while NDP MP Linda Duncan said the change would prevent future embarrassment for nominees and the government.
Decided that day
- Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-6 passed
- Opposition Motion (Canadian economy) failed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-06-13
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Taxation
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said new Liberal taxes on beer, wine and campsites were making summer vacations more expensive for families, and Finance Minister Bill Morneau replied that middle-class taxes had been cut by an average of $540 a family.
Read the exchangePublic Safety
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked why high-risk child sex offenders would not be listed on a public registry so parents could protect their children, and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said police already notify communities when an offender poses a danger.
Read the exchangeForeign Investment
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer pressed the Prime Minister to conduct a full national security review of the sale of Norsat to a Chinese buyer after U.S. concerns were raised, and Justin Trudeau said every such transaction is assessed by security agencies and allies.
Read the exchangeGovernment Appointments
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked the Prime Minister to adopt the opposition motion on appointments to remove partisanship after the Meilleur nomination, and Justin Trudeau said the government already uses a merit-based process that reflects Canada's diversity.
Read the exchangeFireamrs Registry
Conservative MP Bob Zimmer said RCMP testimony showed Quebec long-gun registry records were destroyed in 2015, contradicting the minister, and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale replied that the destruction occurred under the previous government.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTaxationMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes free parks and general tax cuts instead of addressing the specific taxes or vacation question.
as part of my summer plans, I am going to be doing what millions of Canadians will be doing, which will be enjoying Canada's national parks absolutely free of charge.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer gives general statements on protecting children without confirming disclosure to parents.
We take this responsibility very seriously, and we are working with police agencies to ensure that, if there are criminals or individuals who pose a threat, that information is known and appropriate measures are taken.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer criticizes prior proposals as unfunded rather than addressing disclosure to parents.
However, they put forward proposals that were unfunded and that were not able to be implemented.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states assessments occur but does not address what harm a review would do.
every transaction of this type is assessed by our national security agencies, and we also consult our allies.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats assessment process instead of giving yes or no on a full review.
Our national security experts assessed the deal and the technology and concluded that there were no national security concerns.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer claims a review occurred without addressing the distinction or lack of ministerial order.
every single transaction of this sort is subject to a national security review.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer asserts process was followed without addressing the absence of a statutory review.
we followed the process, that we exercised due diligence, and that we did our homework.
- partly answeredGovernment AppointmentsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer begins describing improvements to the nomination process but is cut off before fully addressing the proposal.
when we came to office, we did improve the nomination process, which is why we now have 60% of our nominees who are women, over 12% are visible minorities, and over 10—
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's process without addressing the specific proposal.
We consulted the opposition parties. We held a vote in the House of Commons on officers of Parliament.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The response rejects the premise without admitting any error.
I disagree with my colleague. National security is an absolute priority for our government.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Reiterates following process instead of addressing the alleged mistake.
unlike the member opposite, we actually value the advice given by the national security experts.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Defends actions without committing to a new review.
All transactions under the Investment Canada Act are subject to a national security review.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentTony Clement (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Emphasizes not compromising security without clarifying the decision process.
let me be absolutely clear. We never have and we will never will compromise on national security.
- answeredForeign InvestmentLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.Clearly states that national security agencies examined the deal and recommendations were followed.
did Canada's national security agencies examine this deal? Yes, they did.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Accuses the asker of speculation while defending the process.
the member can speculate, make innuendo, and come up with all these theories, but the bottom line is we followed the process.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.Focuses on anti-evasion efforts without addressing the specific agreement.
the government is strongly committed to protecting the fairness of the Canadian tax system.
- deflectedInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.Answer avoids any mention of chapter 11 or specific trade priorities.
We are going to stand up for Canadian values and our economic interests as we have always done.
- deflectedEthicsMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Casey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer defends staff expertise but never addresses whether the process will be independent or free from interference.
Ms. Church has always been completely transparent about her former employer, including with the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Kevin Waugh (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Casey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats defense of expertise without addressing the alleged conflict of interest.
She has been fully transparent about her former employment, including with the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
- partly answeredAccess to InformationMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains the referral process but does not address why it should not go to the director of public prosecutions.
Shared Services, whose management dealt with this issue directly, took the situation very seriously, immediately launched an investigation, and notified the Information Commissioner, who in turn referred this matter to the Attorney General of Canada, as is customary.
- misdirectedAccess to InformationMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks the opposition instead of addressing the call for referral to public prosecutions.
I can assure the hon. member that his unwarranted attacks on the independent public servants who go about their business every day and do things by the book are also very well-noted.
- deflectedFamilies, Children and Social DevelopmentMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer celebrates the agreement but does not address criticisms about funding levels or evidence-based quality.
I am delighted to be given the opportunity by our colleague to say how honoured and privileged I was yesterday to sign the first-ever national agreement on child care.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMs. Jenny Kwan (NDP) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists general refugee spending but does not address support for the specific NGO or the quoted statement about not being seen to support undocumented refugees.
We have provided over $700 million this year in the settlement of refugees and the services that we need to integrate them into our country.
- deflectedPublic SafetyRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses the existing registry but does not address funding for the high-risk child sex offender registry.
the critical tool in terms of public protection is the national sex offender registry, which was created and funded in 2004 by the former public safety minister, the Hon. Anne McLellan.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general partnerships without addressing the specific case or timeline requested.
the way to ensure that families and children and communities are safe is to make certain that national institutions like Correctional Service of Canada work closely with the police forces of Canada and the local communities to ensure that people have the information they need.
- deflectedFireamrs RegistryMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to the previous government's actions and the Information Commissioner instead of explaining the discrepancy.
That was the position taken by the Information Commissioner.
- misdirectedFireamrs RegistryMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer blames the previous administration rather than addressing the current status of the data or the contradiction.
If the member has a problem with that process, he should ask his colleagues who formerly occupied those cabinet positions.
- partly answeredGovernment AppointmentsMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes a new process but does not address ending partisan appointments or the specific cases mentioned.
we have implemented a new, open, transparent, and merit-based appointment process.
- deflectedCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Mr. Sean Casey (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights investments and study but avoids committing to sending the decision back to the CRTC.
We are currently studying the repercussions of the CRTC's decision.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean Rioux (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges ongoing exploration but does not clarify options or commit to an open competition.
We have not yet made a decision.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean Rioux (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates general defence policy without specifying aircraft or addressing transparency on the choice.
This acquisition will give the Royal Canadian Air Force enough aircraft to secure our vast airspace and maintain our ability to contribute to international operations.
- answeredCanadian Coast GuardMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly commits to no cuts and increased capacity for the stations in question.
on inland waterways, where we are currently providing a search and rescue service, there will be no cuts.
- deflectedTaxationMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses general tax reductions but ignores the specific alcohol tax hike raised in the question.
We reduced taxes on middle-class Canadians.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Richard Cannings (NDP) asked Mrs. Karen McCrimmon (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states no knowledge and offers to discuss further.
- partly answeredHealthMr. Gordon Brown (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the issue and committee work but provides no timeline or commitment on changing criteria.
We are reviewing its report, and I look forward to responding to it in due time.
- deflectedCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Mr. Sean Casey (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general arts funding instead of addressing the request to cancel the CRTC decision.
We are currently studying the repercussions of the CRTC's decision.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsHunter Tootoo (Independent) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to reconciliation but gives no specific response timeline for the letter.
Our government is fully committed to implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's calls to action.