All sittings← 2017-02-162017-02-21 →
Friday, February 17, 2017 · sitting No. 143
House advances Rouge park bill to Senate amid carbon tax clashes
Environment Minister Catherine McKenna moved third reading of Bill C-18 to amend the Rouge National Urban Park Act. She thanked the environment committee for its review and urged support so the bill could proceed to the Senate. Conservative MP Jamie Schmale raised concerns about long-term leases for farmers and the phrase ecological integrity.
McKenna replied that the park would celebrate farmers and allow them to plan ahead while protecting the land. In Question Period, Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre pressed the government on blacked-out data about the carbon tax impact on families and claimed the levies are not revenue neutral. McKenna said the policy puts a price on pollution and funds transit and green infrastructure.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-02-17
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Parliamentarians Hockey Game for Charity
Liberal MP James Maloney congratulated Conservative colleagues on their win in the annual charity hockey game that raised nearly $6,000 for the Terry Fox Foundation.
Read the exchangeJustice
NDP MP Alistair MacGregor reported that the justice committee heard 28 witnesses over five meetings on Bill S-201 and that the government now seeks to delete most clauses at report stage.
Read the exchangeGovernment Appointments
Conservative MP Michael Cooper said more than 800 criminal cases are in jeopardy because the justice minister has left 60 judicial posts unfilled.
Read the exchangeAir Transportation
Conservative MP Alain Rayes asked whether the government plans to sell airports after Credit Suisse was hired to study the financial implications.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
Bloc Québécois MP Karine Trudel demanded a plan B after the Prime Minister received no assurances on softwood lumber during his meeting with the U.S. President.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to general policy talking points without addressing cover-up claim or tax promise.
we are fully implementing our promise to show that the environment and the economy go together.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores revenue neutrality and cover-up questions to discuss climate impacts instead.
I think maybe the member forgets that climate change is real, and it is happening right now, from floods to winter storms.
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to unrelated tax and benefit programs rather than addressing carbon tax offset or data cover-up.
I would like to remind the member opposite that it is this party that has actually lowered taxes for middle-income Canadians.
- partly answeredTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses competitiveness and tax rates but does not engage the specific Chamber of Commerce recommendation on new taxes.
Canada has a very competitive business environment.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer responds with counter-rhetorical question on environment instead of addressing opposition to wealth creators or new taxes.
why is the party opposite so opposed to taking action to protect our environment, to grow a clean economy, to create jobs, to foster innovation, and to ensure a more sustainable future for our children?
- answeredPrivacyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly cites the CBSA policy on device examinations to address privacy concerns at the border.
The CBSA's current policy is that such examinations should not be conducted as a matter of routine; they may only be conducted if there is a multiplicity of indicators that evidence of contraventions may be found on the digital device or media.
- answeredPublic SafetyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer corrects premise and explains pre-clearance protections under Canadian law.
Everybody who crosses the border is protected by the Canadian charter and Canadian law.
- deflectedInternational TradeMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes CETA benefits without addressing dairy compensation failures or upcoming US renegotiation surprises.
CETA is the most progressive trade agreement ever negotiated by Canada or the EU.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates general commitments and past actions without addressing the requested timeline or plan B.
We will continue to work closely with softwood lumber workers and producers, the provinces, and the territories.
- partly answeredInternational TradeGerry Ritz (Conservative) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the status of NAFTA talks but does not specify what Canada will put on the table.
If and when that happens, we will be ready.
- deflectedInternational TradeGerry Ritz (Conservative) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses caution in Asia-Pacific talks without committing to completing a TPP deal before China talks.
with respect to our interest in exploring talks with regard to the Asia-Pacific market, it is very important that we begin cautiously.
- deflectedSmall BusinessDiane Finley (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms support for small businesses but ignores the specific policy criticisms and does not refute the loaded premise.
Small businesses are job creators.
- partly answeredAir TransportationMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states priorities around passenger service but does not confirm or deny a privatization plan.
Service to passengers will remain our priority as we explore the options.
- misdirectedHousingMr. Ron Liepert (Conservative) asked Mr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to general housing investments instead of addressing the CMHC quote or mortgage rule impacts on young buyers.
That is why we have invested more than $2.3 billion over the next three years to do just that.
- misdirectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer lists specific investments but does not engage the rhetorical framing of Liberal indifference to Alberta job losses.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alistair MacGregor (NDP) asked Mr. Marco Mendicino (Liberal). loaded question.The answer emphasizes balance and charter values without addressing the claim of caving to insurance interests or gutting the bill.
It is about striking the right balance between the roles that should be played by the federal government and the provincial governments.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses ambassador appointment but ignores the candidate selection and alleged backroom deal.
The member well knows that it is the prime minister who makes decisions on who to appoint as ambassadors.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats the ambassador point and avoids any discussion of promises or candidate process.
I believe the member is mistaken.
- deflectedEthicsMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer notes the question was asked before but does not address whether the Prime Minister broke the law.
The member has asked the same question several times, so she will get the same answer.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to consultations and unrelated challenges instead of addressing the ethics investigation.
We are okay with it, because we are responding to the real challenges that Canadians are facing.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms commitment to reconciliation framework but does not commit to renaming the building.
Any decision will be made in full partnership with indigenous people.
- answeredForeign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states support for two-state solution and Canada's policy.
As a determined peace builder, Canada supports efforts to advance a two-state solution and create the conditions that will help the two states resume direct negotiations in order to achieve comprehensive, just, and lasting peace.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Jamie Schmale (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the previous government's record instead of addressing current tax and energy costs.
During 10 years, the previous government announced in 2007, with great fanfare, its sectorial policy to improve the environment.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. John Nater (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains past emissions drop and defends carbon pricing but does not address impact on rural Canadians.
I might want to explain why emissions went down under the previous Conservative government.
- deflectedTaxationMr. David Yurdiga (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the specific claim about taxing charities and pivots to general climate goals.
I would hope the member opposite would understand that polluting is not free, that we want to leave a cleaner future to our kids
- deflectedTaxationMr. Robert Kitchen (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists unrelated Liberal policies instead of addressing the carbon tax impact on farmers and families.
That is why we reduced taxes for middle-class Canadians and raised them on the 1%.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms study funding and timeline but does not commit to budget inclusion.
We are in the process of doing so. We are doing our homework and when we are finished, we will make an announcement.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights the existing program and Quebec's enthusiasm without stating numbers for the next budget.
We are also very pleased that it was the Province of Quebec that was the most enthusiastic of all the provinces.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Mr. Marco Mendicino (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the problem and mentions a review but gives no timeline for repealing zombie provisions.
Our government is undertaking that process.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Mr. Marco Mendicino (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends the government's approach to mandatory minimums without disclosing which ones will be removed or addressing vacancies.
Our government is committed to doing that so that we have an efficient, fair, accessible criminal justice system.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Len Webber (Conservative) asked Mr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly outlines ongoing diplomatic and legal engagement to secure the prisoner's release.
Our officials and myself have been engaged with this family. We have been working with his legal team and his family throughout this judicial review process.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer confirms a meeting on science and caribou but does not address the call for more data or reject activist influence.
We are going to talk about the woodland caribou, science, and how we can protect this species.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Ziad Aboultaif (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights investments and promises future news without addressing the $50 billion collection failure.
We have invested $444 million in order to prevent tax evasion and tax avoidance.
- answeredInfrastructureMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Mr. Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly explains why funds cannot be reallocated from specific projects to the gas tax fund.
With regard to the reallocation of funds, these funds are allocated to specific projects.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Mr. Marc Miller (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists approved projects and collaboration but ignores the call to release lump-sum uncommitted funds.
we have announced 61 projects in Quebec.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to general support for hydroelectric power across Canada instead of addressing the specific loan guarantee and Quebec taxpayer concerns.
We are in a transition period, and as part of that transition, we think it is very important to encourage the development of hydroelectric power, wherever it occurs in Canada.
- answeredHealthHunter Tootoo (Independent) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.Answer provides specific funding figures and commitments to address Nunavut health care funding disparities.
Nunavut will receive $11.2 million over 10 years in targeted federal funding to improve access to home care and mental health services.