All sittings← 2017-02-152017-02-17 →
Thursday, February 16, 2017 · sitting No. 142
Commons debates opposition motion on religious discrimination after rejecting Islamophobia term
The House spent most of the day on a Conservative opposition motion moved by David Anderson that recognizes a climate of hate exemplified by the Quebec City mosque attack, condemns systemic racism and religious intolerance against multiple faiths, and instructs the Canadian Heritage committee to study a whole-of-government approach to eliminating discrimination. The motion stands referred to the committee after debate.
In Question Period the main clashes centred on trade, taxation and immigration. Rona Ambrose pressed the government on NAFTA changes and carbon taxes while Thomas Mulcair questioned the handling of refugee claims at the border and the stalled resettlement of Yazidi survivors.
Other exchanges included disputes over judicial appointments, infrastructure spending lapses and ethical concerns about Liberal fundraising and travel.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-02-16
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Business of Supply
Anthony Housefather offered to amend the motion to include a definition of Islamophobia as irrational hatred or fear of Muslims.
Read the exchangeImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Michelle Rempel said zero government-sponsored Yazidi refugees had arrived four months after the deadline.
Read the exchangeTaxation
Pierre Poilievre called on the government to release Department of Finance tables showing the impact of carbon taxes on families.
Read the exchangeDairy Industry
Denis Lebel asked whether the minister had put supply management on the table in talks with U.S. Speaker Paul Ryan.
Read the exchangeJustice
Michael Cooper noted that nearly half the spots on judicial advisory committees remain vacant.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
Romeo Saganash called for renaming the Langevin building because of its namesake's role in the residential school system.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedInternational TradeRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer reiterates trade importance without listing any specific NAFTA changes.
We will continue to make sure that we protect those jobs, we will continue in our discussions to ensure that we work to improve lives here in Canada, and we will, when NAFTA comes up, talk about that.
- deflectedTaxationRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims competitiveness but ignores the call to change course on tax hikes.
We will continue to focus on how we ensure that the Canadian economy is competitive, providing good jobs for middle-class Canadians and a good future for our country.
- deflectedTaxationRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes carbon pricing with quotes instead of addressing Ontario's economic issues.
unlike the party opposite, we understand that the environment and the economy go together.
- deflectedDairy IndustryDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights support programs without confirming if supply management was put on the table.
This government has supported and will continue to support and protect supply management.
- deflectedDairy IndustryDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats party history on supply management instead of answering yes or no.
We are the party that will protect and take care of supply management.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states no policy change and explains the asylum process.
The U.S. executive order has had no impact on domestic asylum policy.
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes ongoing contacts but provides no practical measures for communities.
Officers from the Canada Border Services Agency and U.S. customs and border protection are in regular contact on this issue
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses rules and repayments without stating the legal maximum donation.
Canada has strict rules when it comes to fundraising and political fundraising.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the ethics accusation and pivots to unrelated government consultations.
The Prime Minister has taken unprecedented levels of consultations and engagement with Canadians.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains carbon pricing rationale instead of addressing the request to release data tables.
I will once again explain why pricing pollution makes sense, because it is pricing what we do not want, which is pollution, and it is fostering what we do want, which is innovation and cleaner technology—
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats the carbon pricing explanation without engaging the claim about taxing the poorest to benefit the rich.
We have created a scheme where we put a price on pollution.
- deflectedSmall BusinessTony Clement (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general economic investments rather than responding to the hydro bill and tax impacts on small businesses.
What we have done is help middle-class Canadians so they can buy things that they need and want.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Dave Van Kesteren (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer justifies carbon pricing in principle but does not address the specific bill increases or business relocation threat.
We are putting a price on what we do not want, which is pollution, and putting a price on what we do want, which is good jobs in the economy of the future.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMs. Dianne L. Watts (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses project funding continuity but does not commit to redirecting the full lapsed amount via the gas tax fund.
The member opposite knows very well that money committed to specific projects continues to be available for those projects.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains project reimbursement and notes a $30 million gas tax transfer but avoids confirming the full $800 million redirection.
This year, $30 million was transferred through the gas tax to the municipalities.
- deflectedInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes CETA benefits without addressing the estimated job losses or inequality concerns raised.
CETA will create jobs, will increase our share of prosperity, and will help to grow the middle class.
- partly answeredDairy IndustryMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses compensation funds but avoids committing to a new solid plan.
I think my hon. colleague is fully aware that CETA will benefit the agricultural sector by $1.5 billion a year.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Response avoids the yes/no question by redirecting to the commissioner.
what is also clear is that the Prime Minister has stated time and time again that he will respond to any questions that the commissioner has.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the direct question and pivots to unrelated government priorities.
the Prime Minister and this government are committed to responding to the very real challenges that Canadians are facing
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Response sidesteps the specific discussion query by restating general rules.
I have no reason to doubt that the rules have been respected.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer changes subject to new appointments process instead of addressing the suspicion raised.
I will take this opportunity to talk about the new government-wide appointments process that is more open, transparent, and merit-based
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains the process but does not commit to immediate repeal.
we are absolutely committed to making sure that our national security framework keeps Canadians safe and puts safeguards in place to protect rights and freedoms.
- answeredHuman RightsMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.Response directly addresses the urgency and affirms support for passage.
I think it is incumbent upon all parliamentarians to do what they can to ensure its expedited passage so we can ensure that individuals, all Canadians in this country, are free to be themselves.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean Rioux (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the issue and states action is underway without confirming reversal.
An interdepartmental team is handling it.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promises future details without providing the requested number of Yazidi refugees.
I will be providing details in the near future.
- partly answeredJusticeRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists appointments made but does not address approaching the Prime Minister.
I am happy to stand up in this House to mention the 39 superior court justices I have appointed as well as 22 deputy judges across the country.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes the new process but does not specify when or how vacancies or committees will be filled.
That is why we introduced a new judicial appointments process, including judicial advisory committees with which we are in the process of ensuring the full complement to enable the judicial advisory committees to go through the application process
- partly answeredHousingMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Mr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes advice from provinces including those identified but does not detail steps for Quebec's specific concerns.
The critical issue here is to make sure that we get good advice from across the country, including the provinces and the communities identified by the member opposite
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Judy Foote (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references partnership and TRC implementation but avoids committing to renaming the building.
Any decision will be made in full partnership with indigenous peoples.
- partly answeredAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights CETA and dairy funds but does not explicitly commit to defending every sector in future deals.
I would remind the member that we have just signed CETA, which provides $1.5 billion of exports for our agriculture sector.
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. David Anderson (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes the issue will be addressed but does not confirm instructions given or actions on fees and surplus.
I have met with the commissioners and this issue will be dealt with fairly, to make sure the grain farmers in this country are treated fairly.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explains the carbon pricing plan and revenue return but does not address the tax impact on farmers or meetings with supporters.
Our government is committed to returning all the revenues to the provinces and territories and it is up to them to determine how to address the situation in their provinces.
- partly answeredTransportationMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms intent to expedite but provides no explanation for the lack of faster progress beyond collaboration.
We want to expedite the process and we are doing everything we can to do so.
- deflectedInternational DevelopmentMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). substantive question.The response outlines policy consultations and focus areas without addressing any commitment to increased funding levels.
I can assure the House that we are going to have a policy that leverages Canada's strengths and focuses on areas where we can make a real difference.
- answeredInternational DevelopmentMr. Tom Kmiec (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.The minister directly rebuts the premise by clarifying that most consultation participants were Canadian.
15,000 people participated in those consultations and most of them were Canadian.
- deflectedReligious FreedomMr. Mario Beaulieu (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to condemning Islamophobia and division without addressing whether Quebec society shows hatred and fear.
Members across the aisle are refusing to admit that Islamophobia is real.
- deflectedReligious FreedomMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The response agrees on dialogue but immediately shifts focus to naming Islamophobia rather than secularism debates.
The problem of Islamophobia exists, and refusing to give it a name will not make it go away.
- answeredPoints of OrderMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Mr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal). substantive question.The response acknowledges the interruption and explains the reason as frustration over prior Yazidi refugee discussion.
I will acknowledge that during the S. O. 31 by the member opposite, I did respond, but it was in exasperation and in frustration.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. Gordon Brown (Conservative) asked Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly lists the planned House business for the current and following week.
this afternoon we will continue to debate the Conservative opposition motion.