All sittings← 2016-04-112016-04-13 →
Tuesday, April 12, 2016 · sitting No. 37
Commons spends day on budget debate amid opposition attacks on spending
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on debate of the budget, with Liberal MP Marwan Tabbara defending measures that he said would deliver more child benefits to nine in ten families and lift 300000 children from poverty. Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu countered that middle-class households would lose more from the end of income splitting and tax credits than they would gain from the new child benefit and tax cut.
In Question Period, Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose pressed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the size of the deficit and lack of transparency, while Trudeau said the spending would create jobs through infrastructure and innovation. New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair raised the Panama papers and alleged sweetheart deals for KPMG clients at the Canada Revenue Agency.
An emergency debate on suicide in indigenous communities occupied nearly a third of the sitting, with NDP MP Charlie Angus calling for immediate closing of gaps in child welfare and mental-health services.
Decided that day
- The amendment was defeated
- Bills S-224 and S-225 were introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2016-04-12
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Business of the House
Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux secured unanimous consent for a motion limiting the bells for most Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday recorded divisions to 30 minutes for the rest of 2016.
Read the exchangePetitions
Green Party MP Elizabeth May presented petitions urging a national HIV/AIDS strategy based on treatment as prevention and reform of security-certificate procedures to avoid deportation to countries that practise torture.
Read the exchangeEthics
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to order Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to return proceeds from a Toronto fundraiser hosted by a law firm with clients before her department; Trudeau said all rules had been followed.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
NDP MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau pressed the government to enforce cheese compositional standards to protect dairy producers from diafiltered milk imports; Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay said talks with the industry were continuing.
Read the exchangeSearch and Rescue
NDP MP Randall Garrison asked the government to rule out privatizing search and rescue after reports it was under consideration; Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said the Canadian Armed Forces would retain the role.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe BudgetRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes budget investments without addressing transparency or whether the numbers add up.
budget 2016 puts forward significant, real help by putting money into the pockets of the middle class and by helping grow the economy in ways that, quite frankly, we have not had for 10 years.
- deflectedThe BudgetRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior government instead of addressing transparency or the parliamentary budget officer's access.
after 10 years of the kind of secrecy, of number-twisting, of obfuscation that Canadians got all too used to under the previous government, we put forward an open and transparent budget
- deflectedEmploymentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses a general pipeline process but does not commit to approving the named pipelines.
in the 21st century, getting those resources to market means doing it responsibly for communities, for indigenous peoples, and for the environment.
- partly answeredInfrastructureDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer cites the overall 10-year pledge and one transit announcement but does not reconcile the $30-billion deficit claim with the $2.9-billion figure.
during the election campaign, we promised to invest $60 billion over 10 years in infrastructure, and that is exactly what we are doing.
- deflectedInfrastructureDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats campaign attacks rather than addressing the parliamentary budget officer's missing information or transparency.
the official opposition party keeps repeating the same arguments that clearly failed to convince Canadians last fall.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends Liberal fundraising rules but does not address whether the Minister of Justice should return the donation.
We have always followed all the rules around fundraising.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states the budget funding for CRA enforcement but does not address an investigation into the revolving door or KPMG.
our budget includes a $440-million investment so that the Canada Revenue Agency can recover money lost as a result of tax avoidance and evasion.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats the CRA funding figure without addressing an investigation into KPMG's deal.
$440 million to the Canada Revenue Agency, in terms of going after tax evasion and avoidance, is significant action.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses EI improvements but ignores the specific eligibility statistics and promise to help all unemployed.
We promised to improve the employment insurance system and that is what we are doing across the country.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The response claims compliance with rules but pivots to attacking the previous government's fundraising practices.
Ministers in the previous government also raised money for the Conservative Party and used to brag about it one day not so long ago.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids clarifying the minister's role at the event and instead attacks the question as creating a nonexistent scandal.
The hon. member is trying to create a scandal where none exists.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The response dismisses the question with wordplay accusations and shifts to the opposition's past legal issues.
They, in fact, pleaded guilty and had to pay a $250,000 fine for a pay-to-play scheme to launder money in and out of riding associations.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's motives rather than addressing the request to release attendee lists.
the only thing that hurts the credibility of members of the House is that kind of feigned indignation where a member tries to create a scandal where none exists.
- misdirectedEthicsMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). loaded question.The response praises the organization and criticizes the opposition instead of addressing the ethics concerns about funding and lobbying.
For heaven's sake, I wish the other side would stop this. This kind of stuff is really disruptive.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the process but evades the core question of role dissociation by accusing the asker of repeating unfounded claims.
My colleague opposite wants to repeat the same accusations, hoping to create a scandal, but there is no scandal on this side of the House.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly acknowledges the crisis and outlines government investments and ongoing work with communities.
Our department and our government are ensuring that all the necessary services and programs are in place.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.Agrees on the crisis but offers no commitment to overhaul or new funding.
I will be working with my colleagues across the country to ensure that mental health services are included and improved, and ensure that we get that mental health care to the people who need it.
- partly answeredJusticeRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.Describes a new appointment process but does not address existing vacancies or delays.
we are moving forward with a new process, renovating the process, ensuring that the appointment of Superior Court judges across the country is not only based on merit but that it is based on diversity
- deflectedJusticeRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.Ignores the hiring and concurrence question entirely and pivots to court appointments.
we are moving forward with appointments, not only to the superior courts across the country but certainly, in the impending retirement of an honoured justice out of the Supreme Court of Canada
- deflectedSmall BusinessAlice Wong (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids the tax-increase claim by highlighting unrelated benefits instead.
this year small business taxes actually have gone down.
- deflectedSmall BusinessAlice Wong (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Sidesteps the broken-promise accusation by restating budget positives.
we had more pre-budget consultations than in the history of the country will ever have.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Attacks the NDP's positions rather than addressing the consultation promise.
unlike the NDP that condemns this deal without even reading it, we are keeping our election promise.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.States that work is underway but provides no timeline or concrete action.
we are working with the industry to resolve the issue.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.Responds by criticizing an earlier opposition comment instead of the question asked.
yesterday in the House the member for Grande Prairie—Mackenzie urged the government to approve a pipeline project before it even had been registered with the regulator.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes general sustainability principles without addressing the specific claim about blocking oil sands development.
That is why we are following a process that will consult with Canadians and give people the chance to understand that in this day and age we develop the economy sustainably
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses regulatory process confidence but avoids direct yes/no on supporting specific projects like Trans Mountain and Energy East.
That is why we have established a set of principles that we are confident will much more likely get us to that place than what happened with the previous government.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.Answer references budget supports for workers and green tech but does not confirm or deny Prime Minister's stance on pipelines.
our budget demonstrates in real terms how we support workers who are suffering from low commodity prices.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.Answer reassures on fair treatment and CRA actions but does not address why minister will not testify before committee.
Yesterday's announcement confirms our commitment to preventing entities from promoting such schemes.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Wayne Easter (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes discussion at committee and possible future appearance but confirms no current plans for minister to appear immediately.
the committee would consider bringing this minister before the committee after we hold the initial hearings on KPMG and CRA.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.Answer emphasizes international market confidence but does not specify any new investment timeline or national energy program.
It is our goal as the government to develop these energy sources, particularly in Alberta and Saskatchewan, which will make Canada, after these low commodity prices pass, again a major place of investment and confidence internationally.
- deflectedSmall BusinessMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer asserts a plan exists and points to budget but does not address broken promise on corporate tax rate for small businesses.
We have a plan that will work very well for Canadians and small businesses.
- partly answeredEmploymentMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). loaded question.Answer claims benefits for Edmonton workers via investments but does not address being out of touch or EI expansion exclusion.
the folks in Edmonton are going to benefit from the over $2-billion investment that we made in supports for all workers in all regions, including Edmonton
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. John Nater (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights past trade wins and consultations instead of committing to TPP ratification.
We are consulting on TPP, and that is the right thing to do as well.
- answeredSearch and RescueMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states that the current government is not pursuing privatization of search and rescue.
I can assure the member that this government is not, because the Canadian Armed Forces play a critical role in search and rescue.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer gives a general assurance of cooperation but declines to address the specific case mentioned.
in circumstances where international co-operation is required, most certainly CSIS, the RCMP, the CBSA, and every agency under the authority of the Government of Canada, co-operate fully with our international partners.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The response emphasizes general carbon reduction policy without addressing the premise about Quebec influence or the pipeline decision.
we have a regulatory strategy. Our government wants to work with the provinces and territories to reduce carbon pollution no matter what the energy system looks like in the different jurisdictions.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer lists job-creation outcomes from specific policies rather than engaging with the accusation of selling out principles.
our amendment to the Air Canada Public Participation Act will result in the creation of maintenance jobs in Quebec, Manitoba, and Ontario.