All sittings← 2015-05-122015-05-14 →
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 · sitting No. 213
Commons debates omnibus budget bill amid clashes over taxes and defence
The House spent the largest share of its time debating Bill C-59, the Economic Action Plan 2015 Act, No. 1, at second reading. Conservative parliamentary secretary Andrew Saxton said the measures would extend the tax-free savings account and support the mining sector. NDP MP Nathan Cullen called the bill an omnibus measure that hid contentious provisions, while Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said it favoured the wealthiest Canadians.
During question period the NDP pressed the government on sexual misconduct in the armed forces and on the absence of a status of forces agreement with Iraq. Conservative ministers replied that the Chief of the Defence Staff had accepted all recommendations of the Deschamps report and that talks with Iraqi authorities were continuing.
The NDP also asked the government to remove the tax on feminine hygiene products immediately and to speed passage of Bill C-58 on veterans benefits. Conservative ministers defended their record on child benefits and said the veterans legislation would reach committee.
Decided that day
- Motion to give second reading to a bill and refer it to the transport committee failed
- Bills C-677, C-678, C-679 and C-680 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2015-05-13
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said the Chief of the Defence Staff had ordered that key recommendations of the Deschamps report be ignored. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that the Chief of the Defence Staff had accepted all recommendations after the report was released.
Read the exchangeTaxation
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked the government to support an NDP amendment to end the tax on feminine hygiene products at once. Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the NDP's larger tax agenda included raising the GST.
Read the exchangeVeterans
NDP MP Peter Stoffer sought unanimous consent to send Bill C-58 on veterans benefits to committee immediately. Conservative minister Erin O'Toole said the bill would pass before summer and deliver new benefits.
Read the exchangeForeign Affairs
NDP MP Jack Harris said Canada still lacked a status of forces agreement with Iraq eight months into the mission. Conservative minister Jason Kenney said such treaties often take years and that talks with Iraqi authorities were under way.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the timing question by redirecting focus to court proceedings and Duffy.
It is Mr. Duffy's actions that are on trial before the courts.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the request to show declarations by restating rules and noting Duffy is on trial.
It is Mr. Duffy's actions that are on trial, and I will not comment on matters that are before the courts.
- answeredNational DefenceThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the premise by clarifying the timeline and acceptance of recommendations after the report.
After the report was released, the Chief of the Defence Staff accepted all of the recommendations.
- answeredNational DefenceThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms actions on all recommendations including the independent organization.
What we are going to do is move out on all 10 recommendations, including number three which is this independent, centralized organization.
- deflectedTaxationThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids supporting the amendment by attacking the NDP's broader tax agenda instead.
The fact of the matter, of course, is that the NDP's real agenda may be to give tiny tax cuts like that while raising the GST by some $10 billion on Canadian consumers.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer turns to criticizing the Liberal plan and its effects rather than addressing the benefit distribution question.
That is why, of course, he wants to take away from every single family their universal child care benefit; why he wants to take away income splitting, which has benefited both families and seniors; and why he wants to take away tax-free savings accounts.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to claims of tax hikes and deficits without engaging the specific benefit comparison.
what the Liberal plan means is tax hikes and massive deficits, plans that do not add up and will result in even more benefits being cut, just like they were when the Liberals were in office.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal proposals instead of responding to the fairness and benefit allocation question.
the leader of the Liberal Party wants to eliminate the universal child care benefit.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges ongoing work but offers no explanation for the delay.
We continue to work on a status of forces agreement.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains that such agreements take years to negotiate.
The status of forces agreements, of course, are binding treaty level international commitments that often take years to develop
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives a clear yes to the yes-or-no question posed.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer describes steps taken but does not address the timing of full implementation.
military officials received Justice Deschamps' report only last week, and they have already implemented some of the recommendations.
- deflectedChild CareMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's plan instead of addressing adoption of the NDP plan.
Our plan gives benefits to every family in Canada, regardless of how they decide to care for their children
- deflectedChild CareMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP rather than addressing whether the government will adopt the NDP plan.
Canadian families are tired of being insulted by the NDP and being told that if they do not use regulated daycare spaces, they do not deserve support.
- deflectedChild CareMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP for disrespect instead of addressing the request to adopt the NDP plan.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Mylène Freeman (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general tax reductions but does not address removing the tax on feminine hygiene products.
as has already been said in the House, this government is focused on lowering taxes.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promotes GST cuts and urges support for budget instead of addressing free vote on the specific tax.
I encourage the opposition to get on board and lower taxes for Canadians so they have more money in their pockets.
- misdirectedEmploymentMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to child benefit advertising and attacks Liberals rather than committing to redirect ad funds to student jobs.
The advertising, in part, is designed to inform them so that they can get those benefits.
- misdirectedEmploymentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Answer quotes a Liberal to deflect from youth job numbers and ad spending instead of addressing the question.
It is important to communicate with residents across the country.
- partly answeredPublic Service of CanadaMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses bargaining meetings and offers but does not restore fairness or show respect as asked.
my bargaining representatives have had close to 200 meetings with union representatives to date
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer expresses confidence in RCMP and attacks NDP on terrorism label instead of confirming if minister asked for delay.
When will the NDP come clear on that?
- answeredPublic SafetyMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly denies personal involvement and states operational decisions are RCMP's.
- deflectedVeteransMr. Sylvain Chicoine (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). loaded question.Answer notes committee review and urges support for bill instead of addressing partisan politics or lack of debate.
He should stop the rhetoric in the House, recognize that some of these recommendations were adopted by all sides
- deflectedVeteransMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). substantive question.Answer criticizes member's past opposition and commits to passage but avoids moving bill separately to committee.
I am not going to allow delays to stand in the way of veterans and their families getting these important benefits.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to a timeline and pivots to attacking the opposition's voting record.
Every time we do that, that member and her party vote against it.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates constitutional protections and attacks the opposition instead of addressing reconciliation or the bill.
Again, every time we bring forward new measures to give rights to people on reserve, such as matrimonial property rights on reserve, human rights on reserve, that party and that member vote against them.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the RCMP apology but sidesteps any apology or action from the minister.
I have to say that I agree with my colleague. Like her, I can confirm that the RCMP apologized and that that was the right thing to do.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists government actions and attacks the opposition rather than addressing the minister's alleged statements or offering an apology.
Every time we work to improve the lives of first nations living on reserve, that party votes against it.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer opens by attacking the question's premises before defending the government's record on implementation.
the hon. member does herself and this place a disservice by asking such a misleading question, filled with inaccurate premises.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly states acceptance of all ten recommendations and clarifies the timeline of orders.
I said that the government and the Canadian Armed Forces have accepted all 10 recommendations.
- deflectedPublic Service of CanadaMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise and emphasizes meetings held rather than addressing the budget bill's impact on bargaining rights.
nothing could be further from the truth.
- deflectedPublic Service of CanadaMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer reframes the issue around fairness to taxpayers without addressing the charter or collective bargaining rights.
when it comes to sick leave, it is important to have a system that is fair to both taxpayers and employees, of course.
- deflectedCanadian HeritageStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses IP reforms and appointments generally but ignores the specific question on board vacancies and delays.
Our recent budget includes changes to extend intellectual property rights for those in the creative classes in Canada.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly explains the independent review outcome that led to rejecting the claim.
Of course we relied on the advice of that independent third party expert in the conclusion that in fact the market was not depressed.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promises an objective review but does not address the urgent timeline request for a weekend response.
I assure the hon. member that a fair and equitable decision will be made.
- answeredJusticeMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses the staffing and resource claims with a direct quote from the prosecution service spokesman.
The Public Prosecution Service has sufficient resources to fulfill its mandate.