All sittings← 2014-09-182014-09-22 →
Friday, September 19, 2014 · sitting No. 112
Commons debates bill to combat counterfeit products
The House spent the largest share of its time on debate of the Combating Counterfeit Products Act. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said the legislation responds to a fivefold rise in seized counterfeit goods over five years. NDP MP Peggy Nash said the bill would defend Canadian jobs but criticized the government for failing to assess the full economic impact of counterfeiting.
Question period featured exchanges on several files. NDP MP David Christopherson pressed the government on U.S. Steel pension shortfalls. Conservative MP Mike Lake replied that pensions fall under provincial jurisdiction. NDP MP Guy Caron said income splitting would cost Quebec about $200 million and shift the burden to provinces. Conservative MP Andrew Saxton said the measure forms part of the government's low-tax plan.
Decided that day
- The House passed a motion to proceed to first reading of Senate public bills.
- Bill C-591 advanced to second reading.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-09-19
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Health
NDP MP Libby Davies said Health Canada could not stop the import of unsafe drugs from an Apotex plant in India. Conservative MP Eve Adams said Vanessa's law would give the department mandatory recall powers once passed by the Senate.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
NDP MP Laurin Liu said the Prime Minister would skip the UN climate summit in New York. Conservative MP Leona Aglukkaq said Canada would attend and had already cut emissions in the electricity and transportation sectors.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
NDP MP Carol Hughes said families were dredging the Red River themselves because Ottawa refused a national inquiry. Conservative MP Susan Truppe said the government's action plan would raise awareness and engage men and boys.
Read the exchangeRegional Economic Development
NDP MP Claude Gravelle said the federal government had shown no leadership on the Ring of Fire project. Conservative MP Mike Lake said FedNor and FedDev Ontario were already supporting economic growth in northern Ontario.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedIndustryMr. David Christopherson (NDP) asked Mike Lake (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids federal role by redirecting to provincial jurisdiction without addressing Investment Canada Act enforcement.
the member knows this is a provincially regulated industry, and so too are the pensions.
- misdirectedIndustryMr. David Christopherson (NDP) asked Mike Lake (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the asker's provincial background then pivots to unrelated job creation statistics.
the hon. member was a provincial member. He knows that this is a provincially regulated industry.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. David Christopherson (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses auditor numbers but ignores the premise about targeting charities versus tax cheats.
Between April 1, 2006, and April 1, 2014, the overall number of auditors has actually increased by 750.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats auditor increase claim but sidesteps the double-standard accusation on tax evasion.
since 2006, we have substantially increased the amount of auditors at the CRA, and tax cheats are feeling the pressure like never before.
- misdirectedCanada Revenue AgencyMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.Answer dismisses the question as nonsense and repeats stats without engaging the substance.
quite frankly, that question is just nonsense.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal record on EI instead of addressing the credit's structural flaws.
They used EI premiums as a political slush fund and raided the account of nearly $60 billion when they were in government.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). loaded question.Answer focuses on past Liberal actions and stakeholder praise rather than the proposed EI holiday.
We will not take lessons from the Liberals.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). substantive question.Answer highlights government actions on EI rates but does not address the excess premiums or infrastructure cuts.
our government understands that small businesses create jobs and support families and our communities.
- answeredHealthMr. Dany Morin (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the mechanism via Vanessa's law to ensure drug safety.
That is why we introduced Vanessa's law, which is currently making its way through the Senate.
- deflectedHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids steps by blaming opposition instead of addressing the minister's actions.
it is interesting that the opposition would want to raise this issue considering it has stymied every opportunity to pass Vanessa's law before the summer recess.
- answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the Apotex case with specific actions taken despite the loaded framing.
regarding Apotex, Health Canada did ask the company to stop importing the suspect products, and Apotex refused.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general tax relief talking points without addressing provincial costs or fairness.
As a result of our low-tax plan, the average Canadian family pays nearly $3,400 less in taxes in 2014.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores compensation for provinces and pivots to unrelated tax reduction claims.
Unlike the high tax-and-spend NDP, our Conservative government believes in lowering taxes and leaving more money in the pockets of Canadians, where it belongs.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats senior/family tax relief points without addressing provincial revenue impacts.
as the Prime Minister said, income splitting was a good policy for Canadian seniors; it will be a good policy for Canadian families as well.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the regulatory approach but does not address the Prime Minister's absence at the summit.
We are taking a sector-by-sector regulatory approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer compares Canada to the US but avoids requiring major emitters to act.
Canada has one of the cleanest electricity systems in the world, with 77% of our electricity supply emitting no greenhouse gas emissions, compared to 33% in the United States.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates general claims and attacks NDP instead of addressing specific regulatory and summit questions.
Unlike the NDP, which thinks it can tax its way out of every problem, we are getting results without imposing a carbon tax.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Massimo Pacetti (Liberal) asked Mr. Peter Braid (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims record investments but does not address the 90% cut allegation or consensus calls for action.
The new building Canada plan is open for business.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal) asked Mr. Peter Braid (Conservative). substantive question.Answer corrects premise and details funding plan but does not address Hamilton-specific steel demand or 90% cut claim.
The new building Canada plan is a $53 billion plan over the next decade with stable, predictable funding.
- answeredEmploymentRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states the rule change and illegality of replacing Canadians with TFWs.
It is absolutely illegal and against the rules for any Canadian to be laid off and replaced by a temporary foreign worker
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer highlights modernization efforts but ignores decommissioning gaps and decade-long delays.
This includes the modernization of our 12 Halifax-class frigates, seven of which have already been completed with their refits.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks NDP record instead of addressing resupply ship cancellation and foreign reliance.
I want to remind the hon. member that every time we want to spend money on defence, New Democrats always oppose it.
- answeredForeign AffairsMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). loaded question.Answer explains removal based on new information and coordination with allies.
following receipt of the new information and further investigation and analysis, these entities are being removed from the list.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates overall sanctions strength but does not explain specific removals or tycoon omissions.
Canada has one of the strongest sanction regimes in the world, which has been coordinated with our allies to target key individuals and entities and isolate Russia, politically and economically.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). substantive question.The response promotes the government's action plan without addressing the request for a national inquiry.
We will continue to work with communities to develop safety plans to raise awareness and take measures to empower aboriginal women and girls.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists past actions then attacks the opposition for not supporting a bill instead of addressing the inquiry request.
Maybe the parties opposite should have supported the bill if they wanted to stand up for aboriginal women.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). substantive question.The response states no inquiry is needed and quotes support for the action plan instead of answering when an inquiry will occur.
we do not need a national inquiry. What we need is action.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). substantive question.The response quotes a family member endorsing the action plan rather than addressing the call for an inquiry.
This Action Plan is something that our families have been waiting for.
- answeredGovernment SpendingGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the error and explains the consolidation of billing and cost reductions taken to fix it.
That is why Shared Services Canada took action to consolidate billing down from 75,000 individual phone bills and ensured that nearly 99% of all phone bills are now paid on time.
- deflectedGovernment SpendingMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). loaded question.The response explains a review and management plan but does not address the request for an apology.
Following a review of the program, a management action plan was implemented and the minister has been advised that no further incidents such as this have since occurred.
- deflectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked Mike Lake (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general job creation and FedDev investments without addressing specific actions for the Ring of Fire.
Since its creation, FedDev and FedNor Ontario have helped build a prosperous Ontario region by investing in community and economic development programs.
- partly answeredRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The response addresses the question by stating funding is available if Ontario makes it a priority but avoids committing to immediate federal leadership.
If the province identifies the Ring of Fire as a priority, economic action plan 2013 allocates significant infrastructure funding for this kind of legacy resource development.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the question on sanctions by restating general claims of transparency instead.
as always, the member is mistaken.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Kennedy Stewart (NDP) asked Ms. Roxanne James (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the RCMP action and resolution but ignores the request for an apology or record assurance.
I also understand that this matter has been resolved.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Claude Patry (Bloc) asked Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers general policy assurances without addressing a timeline or specific compensation plan.
We will monitor the potential impact of this historic agreement on dairy producers' income and, if the level of protection is adversely affected, we will help the producers financially.
- answeredInternational TradeMr. Bruce Hyer (Green) asked Mr. Erin O'Toole (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the rationale and benefits of the agreement.
This will give these companies certainty in their contractual dealings in China.
- deflectedGovernment SpendingMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights payment improvements and savings but does not state any budgeted amount for late fees.
it is ensuring now that over 99% of all accounts are paid on time.