Commons limits debate on bill to regulate supervised drug sites

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. misdirected
   JusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to the judge's background instead of addressing the constitutional compliance or promise.This is about a judge who asked to be transferred to the Quebec Superior Court.
2. deflected
   JusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids answering the specific question about Mainville's appointment by restating general policy.at this point in time, there are no vacancies at the Supreme Court of Canada
3. deflected
   JusticeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The response dismisses the question as a conspiracy theory rather than addressing the appointments.Before the leader of the NDP moves to yet another conspiracy theory, let me just outline the facts.
4. deflected
   Natural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts to criticizing NDP ideology instead of addressing the pipeline decision.we all know that the NDP is ideologically opposed to all development of resources.
5. deflected
   Natural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Responds by attacking NDP position rather than clarifying the process or decision.that is an interesting way for the Leader of the Opposition to cover his own tracks.
6. deflected
   Natural ResourcesMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on Liberal hostility instead of committing to a decision on the pipeline.we know very well the leader of the Liberal Party 's and his party's deep hostility to Canada's energy sector.
7. partly answered
   Natural ResourcesMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Provides the criteria for decision without directly answering on the pipeline.We will not approve a project unless we can determine that it is safe for the environment and safe for Canadians.
8. deflected
   Natural ResourcesMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Emphasizes process without addressing the specific request to reject the project.We cannot make a decision before we know the facts.
9. deflected
   Natural ResourcesMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts to unrelated NDP scandal instead of addressing pipeline concerns.Speaking of reports, let us talk about the report from the Board of Internal Economy, which had but one recommendation: that the NDP pay back the $1.7 million it took from taxpayers.
10. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the call for BC MPs to oppose pipeline and pivots to NDP repayment demand.While we are on the topic of reports, let us talk about the report from the Board of Internal Economy. That report has one recommendation: that the NDP pay back the $1.17 million it took from taxpayers.
11. partly answered
    Natural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer addresses first nations role in resource development but avoids the pipeline rejection demand.first nations have and will continue to make important contributions as a full partner in the development of our natural resources.
12. answered
    Aboriginal AffairsMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Bernard Valcourt (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains government investments in first nations water infrastructure.since 2006, we have invested approximately $3 billion in first nations' water and waste water infrastructure and related public health activities.
13. answered
    Aboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Bernard Valcourt (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites the Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act as the response to the funding and standards issue.we passed the Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act, which will, for the first time, provide first nation communities with drinking water and waste water standards that are comparable to other communities in the country.
14. answered
    Aboriginal AffairsMr. Jonathan Genest-Jourdain (NDP) asked Bernard Valcourt (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states continued investment path and specific budget figures for water infrastructure.we will continue investing in aboriginal communities. Since 2006, we have invested approximately $3 billion in water and waste water infrastructure in aboriginal communities across the country.
15. answered
    Public Works and Government ServicesMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states no decision has been made and outlines review process for CF-18 replacement.as I have said many times, no decision has been made about replacing the CF-18 fleet.
16. partly answered
    National DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer acknowledges the Senate report but does not address spending or joining the missile defence program.I thank the Senate for this report. I point out that it was unanimous.
17. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids committing on missile defence participation and pivots to general safety monitoring.Our focus will always be on the safety and security of Canadian families.
18. misdirected
    JusticeMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as conspiratorial and denies Supreme Court intent rather than addressing release of advice.those are very convoluted, conspiratorial comments.
19. misdirected
    JusticeStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer counters by attacking the asker's record instead of clarifying the appointment process or constitutionality.this is coming from the architect of Kyoto and the stunning electoral victory of the Liberal Party, speaking of wrecking things.
20. deflected
    TourismJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the funding cut question and shifts to praising a recent conference.This event was a great success.
21. partly answered
    PrivacyMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the Spencer decision's impact on voluntary disclosures but does not explain why the bill was not split.The Supreme Court's decision actually confirms what the government has said all along, that Bill C-13's proposals regarding voluntary disclosures do not provide legal authority for access to information without a warrant.
22. partly answered
    PrivacyMs. Charmaine Borg (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the government's view on warrants but does not commit to splitting the bill.It is absolutely essential to review this Supreme Court decision and pass this bill.
23. deflected
    JusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats denial of Supreme Court linkage without addressing the constitutional analysis request.It had everything to do with the appeal court of Quebec.
24. misdirected
    JusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question by implying the asker sides with a Toronto lawyer rather than addressing eligibility criteria.I must admit, however, that the justice critic for the NDP from Quebec seems to be siding with a downtown Toronto lawyer who appears to be trying to block and limit the pool of jurists who are available to be appointed to superior courts in the province of Quebec.
25. deflected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the premise and supplies a total refugee count rather than the requested government-sponsored figure.once again that member is misinforming the House; his question is completely wrong.
26. deflected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). substantive question.The answer evades the specific count of the 200 promised refugees by shifting to unrelated totals and other nationalities.why do our hon. colleagues insist on focusing on such a small number when there are already 1,150 Syrian refugees in Canada?
27. misdirected
    Employment InsuranceMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the stated wait times without addressing the tribunal changes or their impact on claimants.the member is misleading the public in terms of the wait times.
28. misdirected
    Employment InsuranceMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses distortion and suggests contacting the tribunal instead of explaining the replacement of referees or resulting delays.Once again, Mr. Speaker, the member is completely distorting the facts, and it is disappointing.
29. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the member is misleading and pivots to signed agreements without addressing the 90% cut or Dodge's recommendation.once again, this member is misleading the House.
30. deflected
    InfrastructureCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists program components but ignores the claimed spending cut and the call for immediate investment.our Building Canada plan includes several components, which my colleague prefers to forget.
31. misdirected
    HousingMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the interpretation of the ruling and declares it a non-federal issue rather than committing to regulatory review.in fact, the ruling that was made recently in Quebec actually said the opposite of what that member asserts.
32. deflected
    AsbestosMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the policy defense by noting non-opposition to listing and shifting responsibility to the province.our government will not oppose the listing of chrysotile at Rotterdam.
33. deflected
    HealthMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes Vanessa's law instead of addressing the regulation of reprocessing medical devices.When it comes to medical devices or drugs, we work closely with the provinces and territories and health institutions to ensure that we can take action.
34. deflected
    Official LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Shelly Glover (Conservative). substantive question.The response highlights the funding amount without addressing the delays or timeline for disbursement.My colleagues also care about minority communities, and they are doing everything in their power to ensure that the roadmap money is spent as announced.
35. partly answered
    CopyrightMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.It mentions efforts on copyright for the disabled but avoids committing to the Marrakesh treaty.Of course, we are more than willing to look at ways to improve our copyright legislation to ensure that all Canadians recognize that their needs are met in Canadian law.
36. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Bruce Hyer (Green) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). rhetorical question.Notes absence of question then pivots to energy board review.I am not sure I caught a question there, but I appreciate the point the member tried to make, obviously, in principle about shipping western Canadian oil to eastern Canada as a possibility.