Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2013-11-082013-11-19 →

Monday, November 18, 2013 · sitting No. 18

Commons spends most of sitting debating supervised injection sites bill

The House devoted 43 per cent of its time to second reading of Bill C-2, the Respect for Communities Act, which would impose new conditions on supervised injection sites. NDP MP Megan Leslie said the bill should focus on saving lives and reducing harm rather than creating barriers, while Conservative MP Steven Fletcher said the sites are not safe and only Vancouver's Downtown Eastside has sought one.

Question period featured repeated exchanges on the Prime Minister's account of the Nigel Wright payment to Senator Mike Duffy. NDP MP Nycole Turmel asked which of the Prime Minister's three versions was accurate, and Liberal MP Ralph Goodale said the Prime Minister bore ultimate responsibility for the actions of his senior advisers.

The NDP also pressed the government on its handling of the 41st general election investigation, with NDP MP Charlie Angus accusing the Conservatives of stonewalling Elections Canada.

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2013-11-18

Government (Conservative)OppositionOver the day: government 29%, opposition 71% of the words spokenPrivate membersGovernment businessGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 11:0512:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:00Last speech 18:05Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 7 h 0 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
29Another sitting that went nowhereThe House devoted most of its time to debate on the Respect for Communities Act and other topics without advancing any bills or holding votes. Question Period saw far more deflected answers than direct ones, leaving the day heavy on words but empty of decisions.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

International Co-operation

NDP MP Megan Leslie asked the Prime Minister for an update on assistance to the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, and International Development Minister Christian Paradis said Canada had committed $20 million plus matching funds.

Read the exchange

Citizenship and Immigration

NDP MP Nycole Turmel called for priority processing of applications from typhoon-affected areas, and Conservative MP Costas Menegakis said the government was expediting passports and family-class applications for those from significantly affected regions.

Read the exchange

National Defence

NDP MP Jack Harris asked whether the government would add funds or scale back the national shipbuilding strategy after reports the Auditor General would cite insufficient budgets, and Public Works Minister Diane Finley said the government would respond once the report was released.

Read the exchange

Rail Transportation

NDP MP Olivia Chow said the government had failed to act on Transportation Safety Board recommendations after the Burlington derailment, and Parliamentary Secretary Jeff Watson said Transport Canada was implementing the recommendations and working on fail-safe controls.

Read the exchange

Veterans Affairs

Liberal MP Rodger Cuzner said veterans should not have to travel from Sydney to Halifax after office closures, and Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino said caseworkers and nurses make home visits and the government would deliver services wherever veterans live.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. answered
    International Co-operationMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly details all assistance measures requested.Right from the beginning, we committed $5 million in terms of immediate assistance.
  2. answered
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer specifies immigration measures including priority processing.We are also carrying out a number of immigration measures, including expediting passport processing for affected Canadians and providing priority processing for family members of Canadians and permanent residents who self-identify as being from areas that are significantly affected by Typhoon Haiyan.
  3. deflected
    EthicsMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids selecting which statement is true by referencing affidavits instead.I believe that Nigel Wright, in the affidavits that have been supplied to the court, identified the individuals who were involved in this plan.
  4. deflected
    EthicsMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps choosing among the three statements by restating the PM's position.We know that if the Prime Minister had known about this scheme, he would in no way have approved of such a plan.
  5. deflected
    41st General ElectionMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer does not address whether Sona is still viewed as the sole culprit.We are working closely with Elections Canada and providing any assistance we can.
  6. misdirected
    EthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberals and avoids confirming whether the PM asked his staff.It is only the Liberals who protect the status quo in the Senate.
  7. misdirected
    EthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the asker and pivots to attacking Liberals instead of addressing the query.here is another parliamentary tough guy who, in the confines of this room, will make all kinds of allegations knowing that he is covered by immunity, but when he comes outside of the chamber is afraid to say anything.
  8. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberals and does not confirm if Woodcock or Rogers remain employed.It is only the Liberals right now in the House who are standing up for these three disgraced senators.
  9. answered
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states no investigation is occurring before pivoting.Mr. Speaker, no. As the Prime Minister said, it is not, but we are continuing to assist authorities.
  10. deflected
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the non-investigation claim without addressing whether assistance equals participation.Mr. Speaker, again, the Prime Minister's Office is not under any investigation.
  11. deflected
    EthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids confirming any staff questioning and repeats prior non-response.Mr. Speaker, as I have said on a number of occasions, we are continuing to assist the authorities.
  12. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). rhetorical question.The question attacks the PM's consistency rather than seeking new facts; the answer shifts to unrelated Senate and policy attacks.What this is about is the fact that these three senators and disgraced former Liberal senator, Mac Harb, accepted payments that they did not incur.
  13. deflected
    41st General ElectionMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims assistance but immediately pivots to attacking the questioner's broken promise.Unfortunately, the member over there does not believe the same thing.
  14. deflected
    41st General ElectionMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses opposition of defending wrongdoers and avoids addressing non-cooperation claims.First, it is the senators who are the victims.
  15. deflected
    41st General ElectionMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats assistance but shifts to attacking NDP union funding instead of addressing non-cooperation.It was the NDP that accepted illegal contributions from its union buddies.
  16. deflected
    Employment InsuranceMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends existing rules and blames prior Liberal scandals without committing to review.We introduced rules after 13 years of scandals and mismanagement under the Liberals.
  17. deflected
    Employment InsuranceMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends existing law instead of addressing broken promise or timeline for new protection.the commissioner himself stated that whistleblowers "are adequately protected" by our legislation.
  18. misdirected
    41st General ElectionCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberals and changes subject to entitlements rather than addressing the delay or Elections Canada powers.They are trying to make victims out of the three current senators and disgraced former Liberal senator Mac Harb.
  19. misdirected
    41st General ElectionDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts to Liberal and NDP convictions instead of explaining witness selection or legislation delay.It is unfortunate the Liberals have a different standard.
  20. misdirected
    41st General ElectionDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal record on accountability and sponsorship scandal instead of addressing election fraud legislation.When it comes to accountability, the Liberals have nothing to tell Canadians about it because they have never stood up for accountable government.
  21. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer refuses to comment on numbers and pivots to general benefits without confirming costs.we do not comment on rumours or speculation, but after a decade of darkness under the Liberals, our government is committed to providing the men and women in the Royal Canadian Navy and the Coast Guard with the equipment that they need at the best value for taxpayers.
  22. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats job creation claims and avoids addressing budget shortfalls or scaling options.the national shipbuilding procurement strategy will generate approximately 15,000 jobs and $2 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years according to industry analysts.
  23. deflected
    Intergovernmental RelationsMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states port is arm's-length without confirming any departmental assessment or releasing documents.the Port of Quebec is an arm's-length organization as the member knows and as such is responsible for its own operational decisions.
  24. deflected
    Intergovernmental RelationsMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats arm's-length status and avoids committing to stopping work or holding consultations.On the contrary, Mr. Speaker, the Port of Quebec is an arm's-length organization, and as such is responsible for its own decisions.
  25. answered
    Rail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that Transport Canada continues to implement the recommendations and notes VIA Rail's action on recorders.Transport Canada continues to implement the Burlington report's recommendations.
  26. deflected
    Rail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the premise about positive train control and pivots to industry work instead of addressing the call to act.That is nonsense, Mr. Speaker.
  27. deflected
    Rail TransportationMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior points and again states positive train control is not recommended, avoiding a timeline for action.positive train control is not part of the Transportation Safety Board's recommendation.
  28. misdirected
    Champlain BridgeMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member's past position on the bridge rather than outlining any contingency plan.it is clear that this member would have closed the bridge long ago.
  29. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights military growth and criticizes Liberals but offers no guarantee on the specific battalion or base.we have grown the size of Canada's military men and women consistently, along with the equipment they need.
  30. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as far from the truth and shifts to job creation without addressing cost transparency.that is so far from the truth that it is hard to comment on it.
  31. deflected
    HealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states the policy against providing heroin but does not address the special access program change or expert advice.our policy is to take heroin out of the hands of addicts, not to put it in their arms.
  32. deflected
    HealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the program's integrity and reiterates opposition to illicit drugs without engaging the court challenge or reconsideration request.This program was not intended as a way to give illicit drugs to addicts.
  33. deflected
    Veterans AffairsMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes alternative services and accuses scare tactics without addressing the office closure.While the member opposite engages in scare tactics, we will continue to deliver services and support the veterans, no matter where they live in Canada.
  34. answered
    The EnvironmentMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly counters the premise by detailing specific regulatory actions taken on emissions.We have introduced new emissions regulations for vehicles, and we were the first major coal user to ban construction of traditional coal-fired plants.
  35. answered
    Intergovernmental RelationsMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that a meeting with provinces already occurred and explains the policy rationale.Ten days ago, I met with the provinces and expressed a great deal of personal interest.
  36. deflected
    Champlain BridgeMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the expired plan and provincial choices but avoids committing on the new fund or LRT.The Province of Quebec already knows roughly how much money it will get as part of the transfers to the provinces.
  37. deflected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Maria Mourani (Independent) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers a future update and shifts to general immigration policy without addressing the stay request.I will let her know as soon as I receive an update on this case.
  38. misdirected
    Foreign AffairsMr. Dean Del Mastro (Independent) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises the question then pivots to attacking the Liberal leader and listing Canadian achievements instead of addressing China.that is the best question I have had from a member outside the government caucus.