All sittings← 2013-11-082013-11-19 →
Monday, November 18, 2013 · sitting No. 18
Commons spends most of sitting debating supervised injection sites bill
The House devoted 43 per cent of its time to second reading of Bill C-2, the Respect for Communities Act, which would impose new conditions on supervised injection sites. NDP MP Megan Leslie said the bill should focus on saving lives and reducing harm rather than creating barriers, while Conservative MP Steven Fletcher said the sites are not safe and only Vancouver's Downtown Eastside has sought one.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the Prime Minister's account of the Nigel Wright payment to Senator Mike Duffy. NDP MP Nycole Turmel asked which of the Prime Minister's three versions was accurate, and Liberal MP Ralph Goodale said the Prime Minister bore ultimate responsibility for the actions of his senior advisers.
The NDP also pressed the government on its handling of the 41st general election investigation, with NDP MP Charlie Angus accusing the Conservatives of stonewalling Elections Canada.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-11-18
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
International Co-operation
NDP MP Megan Leslie asked the Prime Minister for an update on assistance to the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, and International Development Minister Christian Paradis said Canada had committed $20 million plus matching funds.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
NDP MP Nycole Turmel called for priority processing of applications from typhoon-affected areas, and Conservative MP Costas Menegakis said the government was expediting passports and family-class applications for those from significantly affected regions.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Jack Harris asked whether the government would add funds or scale back the national shipbuilding strategy after reports the Auditor General would cite insufficient budgets, and Public Works Minister Diane Finley said the government would respond once the report was released.
Read the exchangeRail Transportation
NDP MP Olivia Chow said the government had failed to act on Transportation Safety Board recommendations after the Burlington derailment, and Parliamentary Secretary Jeff Watson said Transport Canada was implementing the recommendations and working on fail-safe controls.
Read the exchangeVeterans Affairs
Liberal MP Rodger Cuzner said veterans should not have to travel from Sydney to Halifax after office closures, and Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino said caseworkers and nurses make home visits and the government would deliver services wherever veterans live.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredInternational Co-operationMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly details all assistance measures requested.
Right from the beginning, we committed $5 million in terms of immediate assistance.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer specifies immigration measures including priority processing.
We are also carrying out a number of immigration measures, including expediting passport processing for affected Canadians and providing priority processing for family members of Canadians and permanent residents who self-identify as being from areas that are significantly affected by Typhoon Haiyan.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids selecting which statement is true by referencing affidavits instead.
I believe that Nigel Wright, in the affidavits that have been supplied to the court, identified the individuals who were involved in this plan.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps choosing among the three statements by restating the PM's position.
We know that if the Prime Minister had known about this scheme, he would in no way have approved of such a plan.
- deflected41st General ElectionMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer does not address whether Sona is still viewed as the sole culprit.
We are working closely with Elections Canada and providing any assistance we can.
- misdirectedEthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberals and avoids confirming whether the PM asked his staff.
It is only the Liberals who protect the status quo in the Senate.
- misdirectedEthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the asker and pivots to attacking Liberals instead of addressing the query.
here is another parliamentary tough guy who, in the confines of this room, will make all kinds of allegations knowing that he is covered by immunity, but when he comes outside of the chamber is afraid to say anything.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberals and does not confirm if Woodcock or Rogers remain employed.
It is only the Liberals right now in the House who are standing up for these three disgraced senators.
- answeredEthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states no investigation is occurring before pivoting.
Mr. Speaker, no. As the Prime Minister said, it is not, but we are continuing to assist authorities.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the non-investigation claim without addressing whether assistance equals participation.
Mr. Speaker, again, the Prime Minister's Office is not under any investigation.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids confirming any staff questioning and repeats prior non-response.
Mr. Speaker, as I have said on a number of occasions, we are continuing to assist the authorities.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). rhetorical question.The question attacks the PM's consistency rather than seeking new facts; the answer shifts to unrelated Senate and policy attacks.
What this is about is the fact that these three senators and disgraced former Liberal senator, Mac Harb, accepted payments that they did not incur.
- deflected41st General ElectionMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims assistance but immediately pivots to attacking the questioner's broken promise.
Unfortunately, the member over there does not believe the same thing.
- deflected41st General ElectionMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses opposition of defending wrongdoers and avoids addressing non-cooperation claims.
First, it is the senators who are the victims.
- deflected41st General ElectionMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats assistance but shifts to attacking NDP union funding instead of addressing non-cooperation.
It was the NDP that accepted illegal contributions from its union buddies.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends existing rules and blames prior Liberal scandals without committing to review.
We introduced rules after 13 years of scandals and mismanagement under the Liberals.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends existing law instead of addressing broken promise or timeline for new protection.
the commissioner himself stated that whistleblowers "are adequately protected" by our legislation.
- misdirected41st General ElectionCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberals and changes subject to entitlements rather than addressing the delay or Elections Canada powers.
They are trying to make victims out of the three current senators and disgraced former Liberal senator Mac Harb.
- misdirected41st General ElectionDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts to Liberal and NDP convictions instead of explaining witness selection or legislation delay.
It is unfortunate the Liberals have a different standard.
- misdirected41st General ElectionDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal record on accountability and sponsorship scandal instead of addressing election fraud legislation.
When it comes to accountability, the Liberals have nothing to tell Canadians about it because they have never stood up for accountable government.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer refuses to comment on numbers and pivots to general benefits without confirming costs.
we do not comment on rumours or speculation, but after a decade of darkness under the Liberals, our government is committed to providing the men and women in the Royal Canadian Navy and the Coast Guard with the equipment that they need at the best value for taxpayers.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats job creation claims and avoids addressing budget shortfalls or scaling options.
the national shipbuilding procurement strategy will generate approximately 15,000 jobs and $2 billion in economic activity over the next 30 years according to industry analysts.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states port is arm's-length without confirming any departmental assessment or releasing documents.
the Port of Quebec is an arm's-length organization as the member knows and as such is responsible for its own operational decisions.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats arm's-length status and avoids committing to stopping work or holding consultations.
On the contrary, Mr. Speaker, the Port of Quebec is an arm's-length organization, and as such is responsible for its own decisions.
- answeredRail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that Transport Canada continues to implement the recommendations and notes VIA Rail's action on recorders.
Transport Canada continues to implement the Burlington report's recommendations.
- deflectedRail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the premise about positive train control and pivots to industry work instead of addressing the call to act.
That is nonsense, Mr. Speaker.
- deflectedRail TransportationMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior points and again states positive train control is not recommended, avoiding a timeline for action.
positive train control is not part of the Transportation Safety Board's recommendation.
- misdirectedChamplain BridgeMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member's past position on the bridge rather than outlining any contingency plan.
it is clear that this member would have closed the bridge long ago.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights military growth and criticizes Liberals but offers no guarantee on the specific battalion or base.
we have grown the size of Canada's military men and women consistently, along with the equipment they need.
- deflectedNational DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as far from the truth and shifts to job creation without addressing cost transparency.
that is so far from the truth that it is hard to comment on it.
- deflectedHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states the policy against providing heroin but does not address the special access program change or expert advice.
our policy is to take heroin out of the hands of addicts, not to put it in their arms.
- deflectedHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the program's integrity and reiterates opposition to illicit drugs without engaging the court challenge or reconsideration request.
This program was not intended as a way to give illicit drugs to addicts.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes alternative services and accuses scare tactics without addressing the office closure.
While the member opposite engages in scare tactics, we will continue to deliver services and support the veterans, no matter where they live in Canada.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly counters the premise by detailing specific regulatory actions taken on emissions.
We have introduced new emissions regulations for vehicles, and we were the first major coal user to ban construction of traditional coal-fired plants.
- answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that a meeting with provinces already occurred and explains the policy rationale.
Ten days ago, I met with the provinces and expressed a great deal of personal interest.
- deflectedChamplain BridgeMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the expired plan and provincial choices but avoids committing on the new fund or LRT.
The Province of Quebec already knows roughly how much money it will get as part of the transfers to the provinces.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Maria Mourani (Independent) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers a future update and shifts to general immigration policy without addressing the stay request.
I will let her know as soon as I receive an update on this case.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Dean Del Mastro (Independent) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises the question then pivots to attacking the Liberal leader and listing Canadian achievements instead of addressing China.
that is the best question I have had from a member outside the government caucus.