House debates bill to regulate supervised injection sites

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   EthicsMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer opens with unrelated jobs news then pivots to senators without naming any PMO staff questioned by RCMP.many Canadian families received good news this morning, because there are a lot of new jobs.
2. partly answered
   EthicsMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states PMO is assisting RCMP but does not list requested documents.The Prime Minister 's Office is not under investigation, but of course we are assisting with the RCMP in this matter.
3. misdirected
   EthicsMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer gives a timeline but ignores the specific question about when PM learned of the initial $32k repayment plan.On February 13, when Senator Duffy came to the Prime Minister to try to justify his inappropriate expenses, the Prime Minister told him he had to repay those inappropriate expenses.
4. misdirected
   EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to attacking the opposition leader's legal fees instead of explaining the $13k payment details.The Leader of the Opposition accepted the same type of assistance from his party, with one exception: he had the judgment paid for.
5. deflected
   EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates Senate audit and motion without addressing the three-month delay in distancing from Wallin.We have been very clear that inappropriate expenses need to be repaid.
6. deflected
   EthicsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer mentions assisting the investigation but pivots to attacking Liberals on Senate reform instead of addressing Law Society reporting.We are continuing to assist officials in their investigation.
7. misdirected
   EthicsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks Liberal leader's comments on dictatorship and ignores the question about reporting Perrin and Hamilton.Last night, when he was asked what other kind of administration he admires, he stood up for a dictatorship.
8. deflected
   EthicsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims prior response then attacks Liberal leader on multiple policies without naming the second PMO lawyer.I think I have already answered that, but let me just quote the Liberal leader last night at his fundraiser.
9. deflected
   EthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates a later timeline instead of confirming the December 2012 statement or PM agreement.On February 13, Senator Duffy approached the Prime Minister to justify his inappropriate expenses.
10. deflected
    EthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats known facts about the TV appearance without naming any employee who gave advice.We obviously learnt that was not true on May 15 when it was reported in the media.
11. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking Duffy and opposition parties rather than listing documents provided to the RCMP.He might also take the opportunity to cut a cheque to the Canadian taxpayer for the thousands of dollars in expenses that he owes the Canadian people.
12. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the questioner and gives a vague reply instead of stating the exact date Wright last visited.let me suggest that this member take her acting classes, not from the member for Papineau , but from the member for Jeanne-Le Ber , because he is a much better actor than she is.
13. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member's tone and shifts to Senate reform and the economy instead of providing the conversation date.Come on, give me a break. I will tell the House what we are serious about.
14. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Dan Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mocks the questioner by comparing him to a grade-one child and pivots to trade and pipelines.My daughter sometimes asks me about that. She asks "When was the last time I talked to Natasha, Daddy? I had better giver her a call", but she is in grade one.
15. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Dan Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the member and redirects to Senate accountability instead of answering when the minister last spoke with Wright.He is probably not so tough in front of the TV cameras outside of this place.
16. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends personal family references and avoids naming any date of contact with Wright.It was my parents who gave me the confidence to be here, and unlike maybe some other members, it is for my kids that I am here every single day
17. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids naming anyone by claiming the speaker is not a police officer and deferring to an investigation.it might surprise the hon. member to learn that I am not actually a police officer.
18. deflected
    EthicsMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general assistance to authorities without confirming specific records were turned over.we are assisting all authorities on this matter and providing anything that is asked of us.
19. misdirected
    EthicsMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberal leader and references dictatorships instead of confirming the email or its possession.it is nice to be in a Parliament where these things can be discussed day in and day out, unlike the administrations that the hon. leader of the third party seems to support, dictatorships
20. misdirected
    EthicsMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing Liberals on access to information and praising Conservative policies rather than addressing Woodcock's RCMP contact.this member should know that it was actually the Liberals who exempted the Prime Minister's Office from access to information.
21. partly answered
    Veterans AffairsMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Mr. James Bezan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the release policy and references Bill C-11 but does not specify a timeline for the minister's action.we have been working with the Chief of the Defence Staff and the chief of military personnel to ensure that members of the Canadian Armed Forces are not released until they are prepared.
22. partly answered
    Veterans AffairsMr. Tarik Brahmi (NDP) asked Mr. James Bezan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains transition plans and accommodations but does not admit or correct any mistake regarding pensions.Every possible accommodation is made to ensure that soldiers are kept in the forces.
23. deflected
    Veterans AffairsMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights investments and attacks opposition voting records instead of addressing office closures.it is the Liberals and the NDP who have voted against new funding for mental health treatment, financial support and home care services.
24. deflected
    Veterans AffairsMr. John Rafferty (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes new service points and criticizes opposition votes rather than committing to keep offices open.I would also like to remind the hon. member and all opposition members that it is them and their party who have voted against every single initiative we have introduced as a government to support our veterans.
25. answered
    PensionsMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the reason for not enhancing CPP at this time.we do not believe that this is the time to add further burden onto Canadian employers and employees with higher premiums during this fragile economic recovery.
26. deflected
    PensionsMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mr. Andrew Saxton (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the question by attacking the NDP proposal instead of addressing provincial cooperation.We can assure the House that the NDP's plan to double the Canada pension plan premiums while the economy is still fragile is not a moderate proposal.
27. deflected
    Intergovernmental AffairsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the Canada job grant but does not address working with provinces on training programs.we believe that the best people who know what kinds of skills are required are employers.
28. partly answered
    Intergovernmental AffairsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses consultation with provinces but pivots to listing supporters of the program.the minister is meeting with the provinces in good faith.
29. misdirected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition for opposing oil sands rather than addressing environmental policy or market access.That is how many jobs the opposition members say no to when they oppose this important industry.
30. deflected
    TourismStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses tourism promotion in China but ignores the Bureau International des Expositions withdrawal and Toronto Expo bid.I recently went to China with the Canadian Tourism Commission to ensure that our Chinese friends can travel to Canada.
31. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges concerns and states willingness to work with opposition but does not address closing loopholes in Bill C-6.We are always very pleased to work with the opposition.
32. answered
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses interoperability exceptions and willingness to work on the bill.we are prepared to work with the opposition to create as strong a bill as possible, at the same time supporting the training of our military leadership when they have interoperability measures with the United States.
33. deflected
    Official LanguagesMs. Lise St-Denis (Liberal) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.The answer thanks the commissioner and restates commitment without addressing budget cuts or service reductions.I am proud of our government's unprecedented commitment to both of our official languages.
34. partly answered
    Regional Economic DevelopmentMr. François Lapointe (NDP) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.The response acknowledges concern and promises help but avoids committing to a special funding program.We are always concerned about regions that are struggling, and we will help them.
35. deflected
    Passport CanadaMr. Claude Patry (Bloc) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the benefits of the change to Service Canada but does not address keeping the specific office open.There will be no staff reductions as a result of this change.
36. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Bruce Hyer (Independent) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes the government's energy policy without addressing the accusation of shilling for U.S. interests.our government welcomes the prospect of transporting Canadian crude oil from western Canada to consumers and refineries in eastern Canada
37. partly answered
    Democratic ReformMr. Dean Del Mastro (Independent) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The response outlines the preference for reform or abolition but does not directly address considering a referendum.We continue to believe that the preferable option is democratic bicameralism, an elected Senate accountable to Canadians, representing the regions from coast to coast.