All sittings← 2012-11-052012-11-07 →
Tuesday, November 6, 2012 · sitting No. 177
House debates time allocation on Canada-Panama trade bill
The House spent most of the day on a motion by government house leader Peter Van Loan to allot no more than two further sitting days to third reading of Bill C-24, the Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act. New Democrat house leader Nathan Cullen said the motion marked the 29th use of closure since the last election and questioned its justification given that trade with Panama represents 0.03 per cent of Canada's total. Van Loan replied that exports to Panama reached more than $110 million last year and that Canadian workers compete against American and European rivals in that market.
In Question Period, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether the nuclear cooperation agreement with India includes independent verification that Canadian material is used only for peaceful purposes. Foreign affairs minister John Baird said the agreement honours all international obligations. Mulcair also pressed the government on the timing and location of the announcement of the Canada-China foreign investment promotion and protection agreement.
Decided that day
- Canada-Panama Economic Growth and Prosperity Act passed third reading
- Bill C-24 passed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2012-11-06
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Veterans Affairs
NDP MP Irene Mathyssen asked whether every veteran deserves a proper burial service. Veterans affairs minister Steven Blaney said the government provides the program to more than 10,000 veterans and will not cut it.
Read the exchangeCorrectional Service Canada
NDP MP Randall Garrison asked the government to implement recommendations on mental health in prisons after the death of Ashley Smith. Public safety minister Vic Toews said individuals with mental health issues belong in professional facilities, not prisons.
Read the exchangeEmployment Insurance
Liberal MP Wayne Easter said the government eliminated five weeks of EI benefits for seasonal workers without study or consultation. Human resources minister Diane Finley replied that the pilot program had reached its natural end after job creation recovered.
Read the exchangeCanada Post Corporation
NDP MP Pierre-Luc Dusseault said Canada Post plans to charge $200 per address in new developments. Minister of state Steven Fletcher said Canada Post operates at arm's length and the government expects no taxpayer money to go into the corporation.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms general commitments but sidesteps the specific request for confirmation on verification guarantees.
the agreement the Prime Minister signed today will not only help create a lot of jobs in Canada, it will honour all of our international agreements to ensure that Canadian nuclear material does not make its way into a weapons program.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The response corrects a detail and pivots to positive outcomes without addressing the location or information disparity.
The Prime Minister announced a foreign investment promotion and protection agreement to ensure that Canadian businesses enjoy in China the same rights and privileges that Chinese businesses have in Canada.
- misdirectedForeign InvestmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise with sarcasm and shifts to unrelated benefits instead of addressing the investment rules or transparency.
there he goes again with his tinfoil hat predictions.
- partly answeredGovernment AccountabilityMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses accountability procedures but does not explain the low information provided to the PBO.
we continue to be accountable to Parliament in accordance with the usual procedures regarding estimates, quarterly financial reports and public accounts.
- misdirectedGovernment AccountabilityMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to security and attacks the NDP rather than addressing PBO information or limousine costs.
I want to say that all of us on this side of the House, when we have to deal with terrorism, when we have to deal with security, are going to take the advice of the RCMP over the NDP every single time.
- deflectedIntergovernmental AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past cooperation and job numbers but avoids confirming a first ministers meeting in Halifax.
the Prime Minister regularly meets with provincial premiers and territorial premiers from coast to coast to coast, all the time.
- deflectedIntergovernmental AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats past cooperation claims and job creation without addressing the refusal to hold a full first ministers meeting.
Since the bottom of the recession, we have seen the creation of some 800,000 net new jobs.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists Canadian advantages discussed but does not address what was said about Canadian investment rules or transparency.
He told them about our low tax plan to create jobs.
- deflectedCorrectional Service CanadaMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the tragedy and notes past spending but avoids any commitment to the specific recommendations.
our government continues to take concrete steps on the issue of mental health in prison.
- misdirectedCorrectional Service CanadaMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP for not speaking about victims instead of addressing the request to implement recommendations.
the NDP, while consistently speaking on behalf of prisoners, never speaks on behalf of the victims of these prisoners.
- misdirectedCorrectional Service CanadaThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer turns to attacking the questioner for silence on victims rather than responding to the point about Ashley Smith.
I would like to ask that member, who has never once stood and spoken for victims, why is it that he is always silent when it comes to victims outside of our prisons?
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms respect for veterans and notes the program covers more than 10,000 but does not directly state a belief about every veteran deserving a burial.
we are providing this program to more than 10,000 veterans.
- misdirectedLabourMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the NDP over union money and meetings instead of addressing the bill or meetings with lobbyists.
unlike the NDP, which by contrast has held 75 meetings combined, with the Canadian Labour Congress, CUPE and PSAC, three unions that together gave the NDP $61,000 in illegal union money.
- misdirected41st General ÉlectionMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing the NDP over union money instead of committing to the bill on election calls.
By contrast, in that very same election, the NDP was in possession of illegal union money that it had taken from workers without their consent.
- misdirected41st General ÉlectionMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP over union money and refuses to address giving more powers to the Chief Electoral Officer.
If NDP members want to support legislation in the House to crack down on that kind of law-breaking, why do they not stand and support more union financial transparency?
- misdirected41st General ÉlectionMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the NDP on unrelated union funding instead of addressing Conservative election fraud allegations.
By contrast, that member represents a party that campaigned on illegal union money, money the NDP members tried to cover up for half a decade.
- answeredCorrectional Service CanadaBob Rae (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains the timing and purpose of the Prime Minister's statement on the coroner's inquest jurisdiction.
It was for that reason that we made sure, through the Prime Minister 's statement, that the arguments with respect to the limited constitutional jurisdiction of the coroner were no longer pursued.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to personal anecdotes and past spending rather than addressing increased funeral funding for veterans.
This morning I met with two little girls, one in grade one and the other in grade four.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer provides program statistics but avoids committing to any funding increase.
Since 2006 this program has been provided to 10,000 veterans and their families.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes officer numbers and past commission call but does not address reversing habitat protection changes.
There are more than 650 fishery officers in over 100 locations across Canada who will be available to conduct investigations related to the fisheries protection provisions of the Fisheries Act.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends amendments and staffing allocation without explaining how reduced staff will handle increased workload.
To put our resources where they are needed the most makes the most sense.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.Answer insults the questioner and pivots to navigation versus fish instead of reconciling the Acts' administration.
if anyone is naive here, it is not on this side of the House.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Mylène Freeman (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites municipal consultations but dismisses broader public input without explaining why specific waterways were excluded.
We will not go into every place and every coffee shop to consult people, as the member is asking us to do.
- deflectedIntergovernmental AffairsMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to spending statistics instead of addressing the strategic plan.
what I can report on is the fact that the latest public accounts make it very clear that spending in ministers' offices has declined by 11.4%.
- deflectedIntergovernmental AffairsMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Peter Penashue (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers personal reflections on meetings but no report on positive outcomes.
I would like to say that this job has given me a great opportunity to spend time with the premiers and intergovernmental affairs ministers right across the country.
- partly answeredIntergovernmental AffairsMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Ms. Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reports on one key initiative from the justice meetings but does not cover broader results.
The ministers of justice and public safety met just last week with their provincial counterparts to further develop strategies, coordinate efforts and share expertise on this issue.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Ryan Cleary (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP and the asker rather than addressing the minister's election returns.
it was in fact his party that accepted $340,000 in illegal union money and that it was his leader who attempted to cover it up over months and months.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the end of the temporary EI pilot program and the reason for the change.
This temporary additional five weeks was a pilot program.
- deflectedService CanadaMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses past Liberal performance instead of current Service Canada wait times and hang-ups.
when I first came to the House and the Liberals were in power and they were in charge of EI, in my beautiful riding of Haldimand—Norfolk it was taking 10 weeks for people to get their cheques.
- deflectedCanada Post CorporationMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends arm's-length status and attacks NDP policy instead of addressing the new fee.
As a crown corporation, Canada Post operates at arm's length from the government and is responsible for its operational decisions.
- partly answeredCanada Post CorporationMr. Alex Atamanenko (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references the postal charter but does not commit to stopping the rural service reductions.
In regard to rural areas, we have the new Canada postal service charter and we expect Canada Post to follow it.
- deflectedForestry IndustryMs. Lise St-Denis (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer labels the question misleading and emphasizes past actions without addressing the request for future investments.
the questions are completely misleading.
- misdirectedAir TransportationMr. José Nunez-Melo (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to attacking the NDP's broader policies instead of addressing passenger rights protections.
My colleague would like the government to manage all the companies, bring in more workers and introduce a $21 billion carbon tax to provide the government with more money.
- misdirectedFinancial InstitutionsMr. Jasbir Sandhu (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer counters by attacking the NDP's voting record rather than addressing credit card fee regulation.
when will the NDP ever stand up to protect small businesses?
- deflectedGovernment SpendingMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as ridiculous and pivots to unrelated heritage investments.