All sittings← 2012-06-122012-06-15 →
Wednesday, June 13, 2012 · sitting No. 140
Commons debates budget bill amid marathon votes on amendments
The House spent the largest share of its time on the concurrence motion for the third report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates concerning support for small and medium-sized enterprises. Liberal MP John McCallum moved concurrence and defended the report's recommendations on productivity and innovation. Conservative MP Bernard Trottier countered that the budget makes the Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program permanent with added funding.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the environment and ethics. NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair pressed the government on climate targets and the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, while Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended emission reductions. Liberal MP Bob Rae raised allegations concerning the parliamentary secretary for Peterborough and election expenses, which the prime minister dismissed as already resolved by Elections Canada.
Decided that day
- Bill C-38 passed
- Bill C-41 sent to Senate
- Bill C-40 sent to Senate
- Bill C-434 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2012-06-13
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Syria
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked the prime minister for an update on diplomatic efforts toward Russia over the Syrian crisis. Prime Minister Stephen Harper urged Russia to join binding sanctions against the Assad regime.
Read the exchangeEmployment Equity
NDP MP Peggy Nash said Bill C-38 deletes employment equity rules for federal contractors. Labour Minister Lisa Raitt replied that the program is strengthened by making equity plans a contractual obligation.
Read the exchangeVIA Rail
NDP MP Olivia Chow warned of leaked plans to reduce Toronto-Vancouver service to two trains weekly and cut other routes. Transport Minister Steven Fletcher said VIA Rail regularly reviews schedules for efficiency.
Read the exchangeOfficial Languages
NDP MP Tyrone Benskin called for bilingual officers of Parliament. Heritage Minister James Moore said the government's record on linguistic duality is without precedent and accused the NDP of inconsistency.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
NDP MP Carol Hughes cited a First Nations Information Governance Centre report showing worsening overcrowding and mould. Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan said the government is acting on housing and other priorities identified at the Crown-First Nations Gathering.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredSyriaMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the request for updates on diplomatic efforts including with Russia.
We have been working very hard, Mr. Speaker, as you know, with our allies to impose binding sanctions with other United Nations actors through the UN Arab League peace initiative.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the question about the reason for dismantling by focusing on emission reductions instead.
on the contrary, I note that the report indicates that the government made considerable progress last year with respect to its targets.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats prior points on emissions without addressing the Supreme Court reference or decision-making criticism.
The reality, as I said before, is that when this government came to office, the emissions of greenhouse gases were increasing rapidly.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general EI improvements and labour shortages but does not address consultation with workers.
The government is making improvements to the EI program to ensure that it is fair, continues to meet the needs of Canadians and is responsive to local labour market demands both now and in the future.
- answeredEmployment EquityMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly counters the claim by stating the program is being strengthened through contractual obligations.
What we are doing is we are actually making it a contractual obligation with the federal government to ensure that contractors have employment equity plans if they want to do business with us.
- deflectedFederal-Provincial RelationsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes general consultations but does not address the call for a first ministers meeting or national plan.
There were literally hundreds of consultations done in preparation for this year's economic action plan.
- deflectedFederal-Provincial RelationsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates regular consultations and economic results without addressing the refusal to meet premiers face-to-face.
As I just said, we consult regularly across the country, not just with provincial premiers but people who represent the public interest.
- misdirectedEthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to defending the member's honour and attacking the questioner's tone rather than addressing the specific allegations.
The member of Parliament not only won that election but has since won a subsequent election.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.Answer discusses past backlogs and general reforms but ignores the specific query on rejected applicants and reversal.
Thanks to the actions in this budget, in Bill C-38 , we will have a just-in-time immigration system.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.Answer refuses the request outright and pivots to criticizing NDP policy instead of addressing clause withdrawal.
no, absolutely not, because if we were to follow the NDP's policy, the processing times for immigration cases would go from eight years to 10, 12 or 15 years.
- misdirectedPensionsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.Answer states no reduction but then attacks NDP for lack of support rather than addressing the OAS/GIS attack claim.
I ask the NDP why it has never supported—
- deflectedPensionsMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats no reductions and defends the change but ends by attacking NDP instead of justifying the 2023 timeline.
Once again, I ask the NDP, why is it that we on this side of the House support sustainable social programs for this and future generations, and it does not?
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.Answer promotes government goals and one-review policy but sidesteps the environmental assessments reduction and debt question.
Our goal in this government is to strengthen world-class protection of the environment, even as we make Canada the most attractive country in the world for resource investment and development.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly addresses the specific project by stating it is under provincial assessment and no federal triggers apply.
At this point my officials have advised me that none of the triggers required to spark a federal intervention have been, or are likely to be, tripped.
- misdirectedEthicsMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats prior claims then pivots to attacking NDP on unrelated union donations instead of addressing the step-down request.
The New Democrats should be more open and transparent about telling Canadians how much union money they have accepted illegally and how much of that money they have paid back.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends the filings but shifts to demanding NDP explain illegal donations rather than engaging with the compromise or step-down demand.
By contrast, he has taken the stance that the NDP should come clean on the illegal union donations for which it was caught and for which it had to plead guilty.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the call to step down and instead attacks the asker while pivoting to unrelated economic talking points.
all I ask is for that hon. member to stop gnawing on his own ankles and join with me in an effort to raise the level of discourse around here.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses pipeline safety funding but sidesteps the request for the Prime Minister to personally explain the policy to the affected family.
through economic action plan 2012, which we will vote on tonight, our government will increase funding for pipeline safety by over $13 million.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general claims about enhanced protection without addressing the specific request to split the bill or the transfer of responsibilities.
the responsible resource development plan and our legislation to support it will enhance, in a very significant way, environmental protection.
- deflectedThe BudgetJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the attacks on the budget's impact on vulnerable groups and pivots to job creation and EI reforms.
our government's top priority is the economy, long-term prosperity and ensuring that Canadians have a job.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP's voting record instead of addressing the minister's alleged interference in the RCMP apology wording.
I do not need to take any lessons from NDP members who have consistently voted against victims' rights in the House.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the asker of failing victims rather than acknowledging or addressing the alleged political interference.
I find it quite amazing that the NDP is constantly asking me to take responsibility for the RCMP and to ensure that I do my job.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the asker of politicizing the issue and falsely claims full cooperation without addressing the withholding of documents.
As always, the member once again is trying to insert himself and politicize a serious investigation and process that is under way.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer calls the claims false and invokes solicitor-client privilege while attacking the member rather than explaining the document handling.
It is something called the Supreme Court of Canada, which has ruled repeatedly on the issue of solicitor-client privilege, which the member knows full well.
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMr. Tyrone Benskin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's bilingualism record instead of addressing the proposal on officers of Parliament.
If NDP members want to preach to others about bilingual standards, perhaps they ought to hold themselves to their own standards.
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP as two-faced rather than answering yes or no on Bill C-419.
It is the NDP that is two-faced on this issue with its unilingual anglophone members of Parliament in francophone ridings.
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the formula briefly but then attacks the member for inaction instead of clarifying the funding change.
Why has the member done nothing for francophones in her region in the past three years since we changed the formula?
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the concern and pivots to attacking the NDP's voting record rather than addressing the legacy or funding cut.
Why does the NDP constantly vote against our official languages action plans and against our commitments to protect francophone publications outside Quebec?
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Scott Andrews (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses filings then shifts to attacking Liberals and NDP on the economic action plan instead of the ethics request.
The real issue is that members of the Liberal Party, like their friends in the NDP, are voting against an economic action plan that has already helped to create 700,000 net new jobs
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Scott Andrews (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sarcastically thanks the asker then attacks opposition members instead of explaining the polling expenditures.
I would like to thank the hon. member for yet another thoughtful and mature question here on the floor of the House of Commons.
- misdirectedVIA RailMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes VIA reviews then attacks the NDP on foreign aid instead of confirming or denying the announced cuts.
I wonder if the members across the way could ask themselves why they want to send billions of dollars over to Europe, to countries that do not manage their funds properly, and not focus on Canada.
- misdirectedVIA RailMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mentions investments and reviews then pivots to attacking the NDP on Europe instead of addressing the specific service cuts.
Again, I wish the NDP would look at the world view and instead of advocating for billions of dollars for Europe—
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms bilingualism as an asset but avoids the yes/no question by shifting to unrelated regional round tables and an action plan.
We will also keep working on our action plan for official languages, not just here on the Hill, but across Canada, to protect both official languages in all regions of the country.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists ongoing actions on housing and related issues but does not address the claim that conditions have worsened under the government.
Concrete actions are being taken on education, economic development, housing, child and family services, access to safe drinking water, and matrimonial real property.
- deflectedGovernment SubsidiesMr. Pierre Dionne Labelle (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise as untrue then pivots to urging support for unrelated legislation on resource development.
We are calling on all of our colleagues across the floor to stand tonight and support a piece of legislation which, among other things, includes responsible resource development.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly rejects the request to withdraw provisions then explains the policy rationale.
the short answer to my colleague is no.