Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2012-04-242012-04-26 →

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 · sitting No. 110

Commons advances citizen's arrest bill after lengthy debate

The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to government orders on Bill C-26, the Citizen's Arrest and Self-defence Act. Members completed second-reading debate and the bill was referred to the public safety committee. Conservative and opposition speakers differed on whether the changes properly balanced expanded citizen powers against risks of vigilantism.

In Question Period the NDP pressed the government on whether Canada had received a request from the United States to extend the military training mission in Afghanistan beyond 2014. Prime Minister Stephen Harper said no such request had been received and that Parliament would decide any extension. Liberal leader Bob Rae challenged the Prime Minister on the existence of an F-35 contract and on ethics allegations involving the minister of international cooperation.

Decided that day

  • S-204 advanced through second reading
  • S-209 advanced through second reading
  • C-418 introduced
  • S-10 introduced

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2012-04-25

Government (Conservative)OppositionOver the day: government 32%, opposition 68% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodRoutine proceedingsGovernment businessPrivate members▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0015:0016:0017:0018:00Last speech 18:40Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 4 h 40 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
64Bills Creep Forward, Answers Mostly DodgeThe House spent most of its time on the Citizen's Arrest and Self-defence Act and advanced four bills through early stages. Question Period produced few direct answers while recorded votes and points of order stayed absent.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

National Defence

NDP MP Jack Harris asked National Defence Minister Peter MacKay's office to co-operate fully with the Parliamentary Budget Officer on a second review of F-35 costs. Associate Minister Rona Ambrose said the department would supply the documents required by the PBO and the Auditor General.

Read the exchange

Ethics

NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice asked why the minister of industry remained in cabinet while under ethics commissioner scrutiny. Government House leader Peter Van Loan replied that nothing new had been alleged and that the minister would assist the commissioner.

Read the exchange

Justice

Conservative MP Roxanne James asked Justice Minister Rob Nicholson for an update on the Bedford prostitution case. Nicholson said the government would seek leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal ruling to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Read the exchange

Fisheries and Oceans

NDP MP Fin Donnelly accused Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield of altering the Fisheries Act to speed industrial projects. Ashfield said the changes would focus protection on actual fisheries and would ease routine work for farmers and municipalities.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    AfghanistanMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing whether a request was received by restating general mission goals.Our troops are there to train the Afghan forces to assume greater responsibility for their own security.
  2. partly answered
    AfghanistanMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the request but pivots to national interests without fully resolving pressure.I have been told that we have not had that specific request from the United States.
  3. deflected
    AfghanistanMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response criticizes the NDP instead of answering when the mission ends.The NDP could not even make up its mind to support the World War II mission.
  4. answered
    AfghanistanMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to parliamentary consent for significant missions.Certainly, should there be any other significant military missions, we are committed to getting the consent of Parliament before we act.
  5. partly answered
    AfghanistanMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refers to keeping the promise without specifying the vote on this mission.We made a promise. We have kept that promise so far and we will continue to keep that promise.
  6. deflected
    National DefenceBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise of misleading without explaining the apparent contradiction.
  7. deflected
    EthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response shifts focus to spending less than the previous Liberal government.That is why, in all these categories, we spend vastly less than the previous Liberal government did.
  8. partly answered
    EthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer indicates action was taken but does not confirm repayment.The minister has apologized and has taken appropriate measures.
  9. partly answered
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer welcomes the PBO and assumes documents will be provided but does not explicitly commit to full cooperation.I assume the Department of National Defence will be forthcoming with all of the documents necessary that the PBO needs
  10. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to the Auditor General and a seven-point plan instead of addressing cooperation with the PBO.We have agreed with all his recommendations and his conclusions. We have put in place a seven-point plan to ensure full transparency and accountability.
  11. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats acceptance of Auditor General recommendations without addressing the RCAF concerns or plan B.We expect full transparency and accountability from the Department of National Defence when it comes forward to table its updated cost estimates on the F-35 to all parliamentarians.
  12. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question with faint praise and pivots back to the Auditor General without engaging the costing calculation.I appreciate the member's advice on this, but I do believe the Auditor General's recommendation is a sound one and a good one.
  13. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer first corrects the questioner's title and then deflects to the ethics commissioner without addressing the culture of impunity claim.I would point out that the title the hon. member used originally is actually not a title of any minister in this government. Therefore, I would ask him to be a bit more respectful in posing his questions in the House.
  14. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the specific scandals and pivots to general fiscal management talking points.That is why Canada is in a better position fiscally than any of the other major developed economies.
  15. partly answered
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the minister repaid expenses and apologized but does not address whether further repayment for limo rides will occur.as we have said before, the minister has repaid the inappropriate expenses in this matter and has apologized to the House.
  16. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the allegations and repeats fiscal talking points instead of addressing accountability or removal from cabinet.once again, the opposition member makes a number of accusations and allegations that are simply not correct.
  17. deflected
    EthicsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses repayment but avoids the aid cuts and funding question by comparing to Liberals.Our government's travel expenses are 15% lower than the former Liberal government's.
  18. misdirected
    EthicsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the asker's past ethics violations instead of addressing the seniors' pension or minister's expenses.That is an hon. member who made considerable violations of the rules of ethics in terms of her own expenses that she filed personally through the House of Commons
  19. deflected
    The EnvironmentMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). loaded question.Answer promotes new spending on safety but does not explain the regulatory changes or ideology claim.I am proud that the resource development legislation will enhance environmental protection in a very significant way.
  20. partly answered
    National DefenceMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer commits to tabling updated estimates and welcomes review but does not confirm compliance with the exact request.We fully expect the Department of National Defence to table its updated cost estimates for the F-35.
  21. deflected
    Canadian Broadcasting CorporationMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer asserts sufficient funding and notes NDP vote against budget but ignores the 10% cut question.the CBC has the necessary funding to fulfill its mandate under the Broadcasting Act.
  22. misdirected
    Arts and CultureMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks NDP copyright proposal instead of addressing cuts to artists and institutions.What he is talking about is the NDP proposal to amend our Copyright Act to impose a new tax on iPods, cellphones and BlackBerrys
  23. deflected
    Agriculture and Agri-FoodMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims no impact on safety and cites extra funding but does not identify which programs are cut.Our cost-saving measures will not affect food safety.
  24. deflected
    Agriculture and Agri-FoodMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats no compromise to safety and notes extra funding but avoids naming affected programs.what I said was that no cost-cutting measure will compromise food safety.
  25. deflected
    Fisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.Answer corrects facts and quotes third party but avoids addressing the pipeline accusation.This is not about paving the way for pipelines.
  26. deflected
    Fisheries and OceansMr. Philip Toone (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats municipal quote and denies facts without engaging the habitat or pipeline claims.that is two questions in a row where members had their facts entirely wrong.
  27. partly answered
    JusticeMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains private members' bill process but does not address why the Prime Minister is silent.That bill will be debated as all other private members' bills are debated in the House, in accordance with the rules of the House.
  28. deflected
    JusticeMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to attacking NDP muzzling instead of addressing the Prime Minister's stance on the bill.Unlike the NDP, we do not muzzle our members as that party now does.
  29. partly answered
    Rail TransportationRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer commits to legislation on service agreements but omits the six mandatory elements and spring timeline.our government is committed to introducing legislation that would provide shippers with a service agreement template and dispute resolution guidelines.
  30. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks Liberals' past costs instead of judging the $1000/day limo expense.A reasonable cost to us is one that is significantly lower than that under the Liberals, and that is what we have been doing.
  31. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats that only inappropriate costs were repaid without answering whether the limo was appropriate.The minister has repaid the inappropriate costs.
  32. deflected
    Regional Economic DevelopmentMs. Francine Raynault (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer highlights other Quebec visits but does not address reversing the office closures.We are streamlining administrative processes.
  33. deflected
    EthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates repayment without addressing the appropriateness of the specific expense raised.the minister has repaid all inappropriate funds.
  34. answered
    Foreign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the question by confirming the meeting occurs and explaining the balanced approach.I do in fact meet with him, and that is the position.
  35. deflected
    HomelessnessMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general housing policy without explaining the specific refusal of the subsidy to RAPSIM.We have had a substantive homelessness partnership strategy funded through to 2014.
  36. answered
    Government SubsidiesMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the query by clarifying that officials, not the government, decide funding at arm's length.The government does not make the decisions.