All sittings← 2011-11-222011-11-24 →
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 · sitting No. 52
Commons limits debate on wheat board bill amid protests
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to a government motion to allocate one further day at report stage and one day at third reading for Bill C-18, which would end the Canadian Wheat Board's single-desk marketing authority. Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved the motion, which passed. New Democrat House leader Joe Comartin and Liberal MP Wayne Easter condemned the move as an attack on farmers' right to a vote and on parliamentary debate.
In Question Period the NDP pressed the Prime Minister for scientific studies justifying the government's crime bill, while the Prime Minister cited support from NDP governments in Manitoba and Nova Scotia. The NDP also challenged the government on destruction of long-gun registry records, citing warnings from the Information and Privacy commissioners that the step could breach three statutes. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty defended the economic record against Liberal criticism that full-time employment remains below pre-recession levels.
Decided that day
- Bill C-18 passed
- Time allocation motion for Bill C-18 passed
- Bills C-354, C-27 and C-355 introduced
- S-3 advanced to second chamber
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-11-23
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
The Environment
Liberal MP Kirsty Duncan asked Environment Minister Peter Kent to confirm cuts to ozone science after an order-paper response showed no duplication in monitoring networks.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Christine Moore questioned National Defence Minister Julian Fantino on whether the F-35's communications system will be compatible with ground forces.
Read the exchangePoverty
NDP MP Jean Crowder cited Campaign 2000 data showing one in ten children in poverty and pressed Human Resources Minister Diane Finley on a national child-care plan.
Read the exchangeAirline Safety
NDP MP Olivia Chow criticized spending on empty government jets while safety inspectors are cut, and Transport Minister Denis Lebel replied that eight aircraft have already been sold.
Read the exchangeG8 Summit
NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice asked Treasury Board President Tony Clement to table documents showing his involvement in project selection for the G8 legacy fund.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids tabling studies and instead cites the electoral mandate and provincial support.
in tackling crime the government is pursuing the mandate given to us by the Canadian people.
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the request for studies and points to the mandate while attacking the NDP's consistency.
It is up to the NDP to explain why there is one position in Quebec and another in Nova Scotia and Manitoba.
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the call to listen to experts and instead repeats the mandate and provincial support talking points.
we are pursuing the mandate given by the Canadian people who do expect there to be serious penalties for, for instance, sexual predators and drug traffickers.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP rather than addressing why the government rejects evidence-based policy.
I cannot understand why that is always such a problem for the NDP.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses legal concerns by restating the intent to change the law and attacks the opposition's motives.
If given the chance, the opposition would once again use this data to target law-abiding citizens.
- partly answeredEmploymentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses job creation numbers but ignores the Auditor General's criticism about tracking.
since the end of the recession in July 2009, the net new job count in Canada is almost 600,000 jobs.
- deflectedEmploymentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists items the Liberals voted against instead of addressing the Auditor General's findings on job tracking.
They voted against flowing $1 billion in federal funding to provinces and territories for infrastructure 2011-12.
- misdirectedEmploymentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberals' electoral record rather than engaging the substance of the question.
They are sitting way down in that corner.
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses prior committee testimony instead of tabling the requested documents.
I answered all those questions fully and completely and to the best of my ability.
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refers to the Auditor General and prior committee answers without addressing the call for a parliamentary inquiry.
All those questions have been answered at committee, and I stand by my responses.
- partly answeredAirline SafetyMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses aircraft sales but does not engage with the safety inspector cuts or jet spending comparison.
Transport Canada has already sold eight of its aircraft, and we are always reviewing options to ensure that we are using tax dollars as efficiently as possible.
- deflectedAirline SafetyMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats safety claims and aircraft sales without addressing self-inspection or jet funding priorities.
Canada has one of the safest aviation systems in the world and we are very proud of it.
- deflectedAirline SafetyMr. Jamie Nicholls (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates aircraft sales and management rhetoric while ignoring the proposal to eliminate the jets.
We have sold eight of these aircraft and we will continue to review all the options because we always rigorously manage the tax dollars of this country.
- misdirectedAirline SafetyMr. Jamie Nicholls (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's consistency and pivots to defending safety without addressing rule-breaking or spending reduction.
in the previous question, the hon. member said that planes were flying around empty, and now he is saying that they are being used to transport public servants.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The answer corrects the compatibility claim but does not address launching an open bidding process.
Canada is scheduled to receive its entire delivery of F-35 aircraft equipped with the ability to locate and communicate with aircraft, ships and ground forces.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the question as rhetoric and fearmongering without addressing plan B or the bidding process.
that is just absolutely idle rhetoric.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates talking points about competition and safety without addressing tender or communication failure.
The issue is that the F-35 won out over other aircraft.
- partly answeredJusticeDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Mr. Robert Goguen (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes one amendment accepted and ongoing work but ends by attacking Liberals.
Judging by the number of Liberals here, perhaps they need to focus on rehabilitating their party.
- misdirectedJusticeDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Mr. Robert Goguen (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberals and ignores the question on long-term safety and amendments.
The word safety is not part of the Liberals' vocabulary.
- deflectedJusticeStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Mr. Robert Goguen (Conservative). substantive question.Answer begins to cite a report but cuts off without addressing co-operative federalism or costs.
Bill C-10 was based on Justice Nunn's report and—
- deflectedPovertyMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists past measures but pivots to criticizing NDP voting record instead of new actions.
It is too bad that the NDP members did not actually support any of our efforts to help struggling Canadian families.
- deflectedPovertyMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats existing child care benefit but does not address national plan or poverty reduction.
We introduced the universal child care benefit which is $100 a month to parents of each child under the age of six
- answeredPersons with DisabilitiesMs. Manon Perreault (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states ratification and lists specific programs for persons with disabilities.
I am very proud that our government ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
- deflectedAffordable HousingMs. Marie-Claude Morin (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer blames NDP voting record and cites past funding without addressing national strategy.
it is the NDP that has done nothing to help people who need affordable housing.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to biometrics and NDP opposition instead of addressing the specific Auditor General findings on training and quality systems.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The response reiterates acceptance of recommendations but immediately shifts to attacking the NDP on unrelated initiatives.
Unfortunately, the NDP is opposed to this initiative that would protect Canada.
- answeredTelecommunications IndustryMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly states that no decisions have been made yet and explains the ongoing examination of foreign investment rules.
I would like to remind my colleagues that no decisions with regard to the upcoming spectrum auctions and foreign investment have been made yet.
- deflectedTelecommunications IndustryMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the budget commitment then pivots to attacking the opposition on an unrelated tax proposal.
Allow me to say that, unlike the members opposite, we will not propose a tax hike of $10 billion.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Frank Valeriote (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). loaded question.The minister justifies cutting debate by insulting the quality of opposition debate rather than addressing the Wheat Board impacts.
there is a reason why we cut off debate when that is all we get.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The response rejects the question's assumptions and attacks the member's research instead of clarifying the ozone program status.
I would also, again, suggest that she use more reliable research than that to which she has made a practice of using.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights oil sands regulations and monitoring but does not address the question on clean energy investment rankings.
I would remind her that Environment Canada administers and enforces any number of acts and regulations which impose requirements on the oil sands.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). loaded question.The answer begins by attacking the NDP's focus rather than addressing concerns about international reactions to oil sands policy.
the NDP members keep talking about the environment.
- partly answeredHealthHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states work is underway on recommendations but ignores the five-year delay highlighted in the question.
Work is already under way to address the recommendations outlined.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Sylvain Chicoine (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the specific Couillard case but does not explain general mechanisms for ensuring SIRC independence.
This involvement predates his appointment to SIRC, and was fully disclosed.
- deflectedAsbestosMr. François Lapointe (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the government's position on safe use of asbestos and ignores the questions on jobs and diversification.
for more than 30 years, the Government of Canada has been supporting the safe use of chrysotile asbestos and recent scientific studies show that chrysotile fibre can be used safely in a controlled environment at the national or international level.
- answeredJusticeMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Mr. Robert Goguen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly rejects the need for a separate Quebec criminal code and points to the bill's purpose.
it will absolutely not be necessary for Quebec to create its own criminal code.