All sittings← 2011-11-212011-11-23 →
Tuesday, November 22, 2011 · sitting No. 51
Commons debates Senate reform bill as NDP calls for referendum
The House devoted the largest share of the sitting to debate on Bill C-7, the Senate Reform Act. NDP MP François Pilon told the House the bill would cap terms at nine years for senators appointed after October 14 2008 and allow provinces to hold elections at their own expense, yet the prime minister would remain free to appoint anyone. NDP MP François Pilon said the measure would not alter appointments if the prime minister chose otherwise.
In Question Period, NDP MP Nycole Turmel pressed the government on the coming 2014 health accord and asked whether the public would be consulted and whether a new ten-year agreement with 6 per cent indexation would be guaranteed. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that health care is the most important service governments provide and that all governments face rising costs. Liberal MP John McCallum cited the Auditor General's report on delays in drug safety reviews and asked how the prime minister could accept such performance.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-11-22
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Employment
NDP MP Peter Julian said the Auditor General found no reliable data on how many jobs the economic action plan created after $47 billion in spending. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty replied that nearly 600,000 net new jobs have been created since the recession ended.
Read the exchangeHealth Canada
Liberal MP Hedy Fry said Health Canada takes more than two years to inform the public of unsafe drugs on the market. Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq said the department is implementing the Auditor General's recommendations and has invested in the MedEffect network.
Read the exchangeCopyright Modernization Act
NDP MP Peter Julian said Bill C-11 contains retroactive provisions that would allow destruction of course materials. Conservative MP Paul Calandra asked him to identify the section that would criminalize individuals for circumventing digital locks.
Read the exchangeEmployment Insurance Act
Liberal MP Denis Coderre moved second reading of Bill C-291 to eliminate the two-week waiting period for special benefits and said governments must put people first when the economy is uncertain.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredHealthMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions public engagement broadly but does not specify any role in the negotiations.
That is a discussion that I think will engage all Canadians over the next couple of years.
- deflectedHealthMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Restates general cost pressures without addressing the requested commitment or indexation.
All governments are struggling with the increased costs and that is an issue we will discuss when we talk about how to maintain these programs in the future.
- partly answeredHealthMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Notes provincial responsibility and record transfers but offers no plan or immediate results on the current accord.
Of course, under this government, we are giving a record amount of money for health care.
- misdirectedEmploymentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Attacks the opposition's vote instead of addressing the Auditor General's findings on monitoring and job outcomes.
It is regrettable that the NDP chose to vote against it.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Repeats job totals and attacks opposition tax policy rather than explaining the lack of performance monitoring.
They, on the other side, of course, call for higher taxes that would kill jobs and hurt the economy.
- misdirectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Pivots to job numbers and accepts findings without addressing the specific examples of disorganization raised.
The Auditor General has made some good findings and some good recommendations, which we are already working on.
- partly answeredHealth CanadaJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Acknowledges findings and states work is underway but gives no concrete actions or timeline for fixing the delays.
My department is making improvements on how Health Canada responds to concerns about products that are on the market.
- partly answeredHealth CanadaHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Agrees with findings and cites one past investment but does not commit new resources or address the two-year delay.
For example, our government has invested in drug safety and, in fact, the network MedEffect was created by our government a year or two ago and $32 million were invested to support that initiative.
- deflectedAuditor General's ReportMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accepts recommendations but immediately pivots to unrelated job numbers and attacks the opposition instead of addressing the query on job figures for the $47 million.
We have nearly 600,00 net new jobs in this economy as a result of our activities and our actions.
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses reports and pivots to the 600,000 jobs figure without addressing the criteria used for funding projects.
One fact is clear: there are 600,000 net new jobs in Canada since the end of the recession.
- partly answeredHealth CanadaMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the department is implementing advice and agrees on conflict rules but provides no specifics on reducing evaluation delays.
my department is implementing the advice of the Auditor General.
- answeredHealth CanadaMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the query by outlining new procedures, IT systems, and actions already taken to improve monitoring and transparency.
New procedures are being put in place to improve transparency, and to better monitor clinical trials and adverse reaction reports.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer thanks the Auditor General and states a plan is in place but offers no details on addressing the specific issues of missing information and limited suppliers.
The department has accepted his recommendations and is already addressing each concern.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The answer thanks the Auditor General and reiterates commitment to equipment but avoids explaining the maintenance funding gap or mismanagement.
We are working actively on all of these issues and have been for quite some time.
- misdirectedAgricultureMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts blame to provinces rather than addressing the federal role in fixing the AgriStability payment delays.
If he has a problem, he should probably take it up with his counterparts in Ontario.
- deflectedAgricultureMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer welcomes input and corrects a minor point about combining tobacco but does not address the program's loopholes or mismanagement.
The member opposite should know one does not combine tobacco.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly accepts the Auditor General recommendations and confirms implementation work is underway.
We accept all of the Auditor General's recommendations.
- deflectedForeign AffairsIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The response details new sanctions but never addresses the request to list the IRGC as a terrorist entity.
We are taking aggressive action to cover the known leadership of the Iranian Islamic revolutionary guard corps and block virtually all transactions with Iran, including those with the central bank.
- misdirectedNational DefenceJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.The minister attacks the question's tone and pivots to general benefits without addressing ITAR or industrial offsets.
I do not know if sarcasm will advance the legitimacy of what we are doing in this government.
- answeredJusticeMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly rebuts the claim that Bill C-10 compromises Quebec's rehabilitation approach.
there is absolutely nothing in Bill C-10 that would in any way compromise or prohibit the province from reaching out and helping to rehabilitate young people.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the policy change but ignores the legal-violation accusation and instead attacks the registry itself.
we are changing the law in order to get rid of the long gun registry, which is comprised of data that targets law-abiding Canadian citizens
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The minister notes provincial input on some issues but does not engage the proposed rehabilitation amendments.
We have listened to our provincial counterparts with respect to pre-trial detention, adult sentences, and deferred sentencing.
- misdirectedJusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The response counters by attacking the NDP's overall stance rather than addressing Quebec's specific requests or lack of studies.
why is the NDP so bent on opposing everything we do to crack down on crime in this country?
- partly answeredJusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The minister cites one Quebec-suggested wording change but does not address the broader refusal to adopt other amendments or provincial cost concerns.
the most recent amendment we have taken comes straight from the minister of justice of Quebec, with respect to changing the words from "encourager" to "favoriser".
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner personally instead of addressing the environmental record or Durban preparations.
I welcome my colleague back from her treacherous adventure abroad.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer reassures on monitoring but uses sarcasm and sidesteps the muzzling and budget-slashing accusations.
I thank my colleague for those gracious words and I will reassure her again that my department, Environment Canada, will continue to monitor ozone.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes celebrating energy superpower status and quotes progress rather than outlining any sustainable plan.
the opposition, and I have said this many times in the House, should celebrate Canada as an emerging clean energy superpower.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the question about listening to the former minister and instead attacks the NDP while listing union supporters.
the NDP should know that it is always risky to alienate one's political base, but especially when one is in pre-merger discussions.
- deflectedSearch and RescueMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the question was addressed but pivots to criticizing the previous Liberal government's ship policies.
The member may be forgetting, however, that while Liberals were content to tie up ships to rust at the dock, we have done the exact opposite.
- answeredPharmaceutical DrugsMr. Ted Hsu (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's actions and the companies' positive response on drug shortages.
our government is taking a leadership role when it comes to dealing with drug shortages.
- deflectedAffordable HousingMs. Marie-Claude Morin (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer highlights past spending and criticizes NDP votes instead of addressing a long-term affordable housing strategy.
Unfortunately, the NDP voted against all these initiatives.
- misdirectedAffordable HousingMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer turns immediately to attacking the NDP for complaining rather than discussing any housing strategy.
When will the NDP stop complaining and start doing something to actually help those in need?
- deflectedInfrastructureMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past investments without addressing the request for additional funding or timeline extensions.
Our government made, and continues to make, significant investment in waste water infrastructure across Canada.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer invokes privacy rules to avoid commenting on the specific case raised.
first of all, the hon. member must understand that under the Privacy Act, the government and its ministers cannot comment on specific cases.
- partly answeredFisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer counters the criticism by citing a new investment program rather than directly addressing the call to stop budget cuts.
Just last week, for example, I was in Newfoundland to announce the government's investment in an $18 million program to restructure the lobster industry.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to a counter-statistic on public support instead of addressing the question about cooperation with Quebec.
Leger Marketing recently published a survey which showed that 77% of Quebeckers support tougher sentences for criminals.