All sittings← 2011-10-072011-10-18 →
Monday, October 17, 2011 · sitting No. 30
Commons debates economy bill as labour dispute draws fire
The House devoted most of the sitting to debate on Bill C-13, the Keeping Canada's Economy and Jobs Growing Act. New Democratic MP Megan Leslie said the bill lacked a strategic vision for a green economy and failed to address long-term needs such as continued funding for northern research facilities. Conservative MP Phil McColeman countered that targeted stimulus investments, including a research centre at Wilfred Laurier University, had already supported innovation and local economic activity.
Question period featured repeated exchanges over the Air Canada labour dispute. New Democratic Party leader Nycole Turmel accused the government of siding with management and interfering in bargaining. Labour Minister Lisa Raitt said the parties had twice failed to ratify agreements and that the matter had been referred to the Canada Industrial Relations Board to protect the economy.
Opposition members also pressed the government on income inequality and corporate tax cuts. Finance parliamentary secretary Ted Menzies replied that tax reductions had removed nearly one million low-income Canadians from the tax rolls and supported the creation of 650,000 jobs.
Decided that day
- C-13 passed second reading and referred to Finance Committee
- C-17 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-10-17
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
International Trade
New Democratic MP Robert Chisholm warned that concessions on pharmaceutical patents could raise health costs by up to $2.8 billion. International Trade parliamentary secretary Gerald Keddy said the agreement would boost the economy by $12 billion and increase two-way trade by 20 per cent.
Read the exchangeVeterans Affairs
Liberal MP Sean Casey questioned $3 million spent on backdrops while the department faced $200 million in cuts. Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney said the government had invested $3 billion more than the previous budget over six years.
Read the exchangeCanadian Wheat Board
Liberal MP Frank Valeriote said the government was breaking the law by refusing a plebiscite before ending the single-desk system. Conservative MP David Anderson replied that farmers would gain the same marketing freedoms as others across Canada.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
New Democratic MP Megan Leslie asked why funding for the Canadian Environmental Network had been cut after earlier assurances it would continue. Environment parliamentary secretary Michelle Rempel said the government had chosen web-based consultation instead.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedAir CanadaMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner and demands an apology before giving a partial explanation of the referral.
She should know better and so should the NDP. I expect an apology on the matter.
- deflectedThe EconomyMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids the question on tax cuts and pivots to listing existing social programs.
We have a very progressive tax system that favours the vulnerable in this country.
- deflectedThe EconomyMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the call to cancel corporate tax cuts and instead defends the economic action plan.
That economic action plan is working for Canadians.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer rebuts the inequality claim with job numbers and a counter-quote from the IMF.
It says that relatively, Canada's healthy economic fundamentals create a sounder fiscal financial position than in many other countries in the world.
- deflectedThe EconomyMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer sidesteps cancelling tax cuts and promotes the upcoming vote on the economic action plan.
We hope that hon. members on the other side will support it.
- misdirectedThe EconomyBob Rae (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the Liberal record on EI instead of addressing the $2 billion payroll tax increase.
We heard from businesses that it would not be a good idea and so we made sure that did not happen.
- misdirectedThe EconomyBob Rae (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.Answer again blames the prior Liberal government rather than explaining the payroll tax policy.
the contradiction comes from the questioner because he was part of a party that wanted to create a 45-day work year.
- misdirectedThe EconomyBob Rae (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer evades the payroll tax question by accusing Liberals of raiding the EI fund.
There is no polite way to put it; $57 billion was missing.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes deal benefits without addressing negotiation criticisms or job risks.
A trade agreement with the EU will increase Canada's economy by $12 billion and increase two-way trade by 20%.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats economic benefits and general assurances without addressing health care cost concerns.
I would remind the member opposite that this government always protects and advances Canada's interests during international negotiations and will only enter into an agreement that is in the best interests of Canadians.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as hogwash and attacks the premise rather than engaging the health cost issue.
The claims to this are simply hogwash.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats economic benefits and general assurances without addressing pharmaceutical data or affordability concerns.
The benefits to Canada are clear.
- partly answeredPensionsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Alice Wong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists past actions taken but does not address future pension reform or long-term care needs.
That is why we are providing the largest GIS increase in a quarter century to the lowest-income seniors who need it the most.
- answeredPensionsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses pension reform by explaining the pooled registered pension plan initiative.
That is why we have been working with our partners, the provinces, in developing a new form of a pooled registered pension plan that would provide an opportunity for almost 60% of Canadians, who now do not have a workplace pension plan, to help them save for their retirement.
- misdirectedPost-Secondary EducationMs. Rathika Sitsabaiesan (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists programs and attacks the NDP voting record instead of addressing tuition or debt reduction plans.
Sadly, the NDP has voted against every single one of those efforts to help students.
- misdirectedPost-Secondary EducationMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights past spending and attacks the NDP instead of addressing an education transfer or debt burden.
Unfortunately, the NDP has voted against every single one of these initiatives.
- deflectedAir CanadaMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses bargaining history and outreach but avoids the question on threats as negotiation tactic.
we are very disappointed that the two parties have not been able to attain their own collective agreement.
- misdirectedAir CanadaMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer scolds the asker for interrupting and pivots to protecting the economy instead of addressing mediation efforts.
I which the member for Cape Breton—Canso would be quiet.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansLawrence MacAulay (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer asserts the importance of science without addressing planned cuts or wind-downs.
Science is an important part of fisheries management, and we honour that principle and will continue in the future gaining information from science to better manage our fisheries.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights overall spending increases but does not address the specific photo op versus cutbacks comparison.
In the last six years we have invested $3 billion more than the current budget.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the decision not to renew funding and the shift to web-based methods.
the government has decided not to enter into a contribution agreement with the Canadian Environmental Network this year.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the government's record and compares to the prior government instead of addressing the funding cut or War of 1812 spending.
I am happy to compare our record any day against the previous government, which did nothing but announce intentions.
- answeredFisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the rationale for ending the FRCC and notes replacement approaches.
While the FRCC has historically served an important role, activities have been replaced by other approaches, such as the industry's participation in stock assessments and the development of integrated fisheries management plans
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Ryan Cleary (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer lists past science investments without addressing the new science branch cuts or lack of fisherman input.
our government has made tremendous investments in science since 2006, including $30 million to upgrade 16 laboratories and sites across the country
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer rejects premise and restates approvals without addressing call for investigation.
I categorically reject the premise of the member's question.
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates contribution agreements but ignores demand to explain actions.
Each contribution agreement requires and sets out expectations and these expectations are expected to be followed.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses the office relocation but not the other spending examples raised.
the work that has been done was to relocate a number of new employees within the ministry.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.Answer affirms general concern but does not engage with procurement or renovation critique.
We treat every dollar entrusted to us by taxpayers with the utmost care and respect.
- misdirectedCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Frank Valeriote (Liberal) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to positive farmer quote instead of addressing plebiscite or legality question.
I have never been more optimistic than I am now to be a grain farmer in western Canada.
- answeredCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly reassures that supply management remains protected.
supply management was protected by this government and would continue to be protected by this government.
- partly answeredResearch and DevelopmentMs. Hélène LeBlanc (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges report and promises consideration but offers no timeline or specific action.
I will be considering all the recommendations in that report.
- deflectedResearch and DevelopmentMr. Dan Harris (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends record broadly without addressing shift from corporate subsidies to basic research funding.
this government has some of the most generous programs to encourage businesses to do their own research.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses only the FRCC point while ignoring the rescue sub-centre and broader destruction claims.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada has built into its operations other ways to gather input from fish harvesters, including industry participation, stock assessments, development of an integrated fisheries management plan and through advisory committees.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer promotes free-market benefits instead of addressing the Wheat Board survival question.
We remain committed to providing them with the same opportunities and the same freedoms that other farmers have across the country.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes provincial jurisdiction and limited federal monitoring but does not commit to assistance for removal.
We know that is a provincial jurisdiction, but we will continue to work with the province to determine that there is no polluting of the marine environment and that it is not a hazard to navigation for the moment.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids confirming details about the judge's language skills and pivots to general merit criteria.
The Supreme Court of Canada is the pinnacle of our judicial system and we will continue to make appointments to that body on the basis of legal excellence and merit.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Conservative). substantive question.The response shifts to demanding an apology for an unrelated alleged slur rather than addressing the point-of-order facts.
I am sure he would want to do the right thing, the parliamentary thing, and stand up, withdraw his remarks unreservedly and apologize to the minster.