All sittings← 2010-10-082010-10-19 →
Monday, October 18, 2010 · sitting No. 81
House advances anti-spam bill amid foreign affairs clashes
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on debate of Bill C-28, the Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam Act, at second reading. Bloc Québécois MP André Bellavance said the legislation is needed to protect the viability of the Internet as a means of communication and noted that Canada remains the only G8 country without anti-spam rules. Liberal MP Paul Szabo said the government's failure to send the bill to committee immediately after tabling showed it has no intention of advancing its legislation.
In question period, Liberal MP Bob Rae pressed the government on Canada's loss of a UN Security Council seat and on its handling of relations with China, African aid recipients and the United Arab Emirates. Conservative MP John Baird replied that the government makes foreign policy decisions on principle rather than popularity and expressed pride in the Prime Minister's leadership during the G8 and G20 summits.
Conservative MP Dave MacKenzie introduced debate on Bill C-39, which would amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to end early release for certain offenders and increase offender accountability.
Decided that day
- C-28 advanced to second reading
- C-581 and C-582 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-10-18
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Employment Insurance Act
Bloc Québécois MP Guy André said Bill C-395 would extend the qualifying period for employment insurance when a strike or lockout lasts more than 52 weeks so that workers who have paid into the system remain eligible.
Read the exchangePublic Works and Government Services
NDP MP Thomas Mulcair asked why a contract was awarded to Broccolini after the minister met the company's representative at a fundraiser and later appointed his campaign organizer to the trade tribunal that oversees such contracts.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc said the government has provided only a table of contents rather than the full needs document for the F-35 purchase and asked when a transparent competition would be held.
Read the exchangeSmall Business Entrepreneur
Conservative MP Ed Fast recognized Abbotsford entrepreneur Barb Mowat for her work supporting women entrepreneurs across Canada and in Afghanistan.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the government's foreign policy principles without addressing responsibility for the UN Security Council loss.
Our government makes foreign policy decisions based on what is right and not on what is popular, and we have nothing to be apologetic about.
- deflectedForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats praise for principled decisions and G8/G20 hosting but ignores the listed diplomatic failures.
We have nothing to apologize for.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refuses to address the UAE negotiations or incompetence claim and instead attacks the prior Liberal government.
I can say, for my friend from Toronto Centre , that thank goodness the dark decade, the 10 lost years of the previous Liberal government, is over, thanks to the leadership of this Prime Minister.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer corrects a factual claim and promotes the economic action plan but does not address why priorities favor prisons and jets over families.
Our deficit this year is lower than anticipated in this fiscal year.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites external praise for the economy and attacks opposition tax plans without engaging the borrowing priorities question.
Here is another opinion: Everybody looks on [Canada] with envy in terms of our economy...our stability, the fact that we have…the room to spend because we paid down debt.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer restates the principle-over-popularity line without addressing the UN defeat or policy contradictions.
When it comes to foreign affairs, our government will do what is good for Canada, what is good in general when it comes to foreign affairs, not just what is popular.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer claims leadership at Copenhagen but does not admit or address blame for the UN seat loss.
Our government showed leadership in making sure that all the major emitters were involved in that discussion.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to Khadr's charges in the US and avoids any link to the UN bid or human-rights criticism.
I do not know how many times this House has been told that Omar Khadr faces serious charges in the United States.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the Convention, court rulings and repatriation request by pivoting to U.S. jurisdiction.
Omar Khadr faces charges in the United States and these charges will be resolved in the United States.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer asserts fairness without addressing the timeline or minister's meeting with the eventual winner.
they were overseen by a fairness monitor who deemed them to be managed openly, transparently and fairly.
- misdirectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer denies irregularities instead of addressing the appointment of the minister's campaign organizer to the tribunal.
if the opposition is trying to suggest that irregularities arose in the context of that particular government contract, my answer is no, absolutely not.
- misdirectedMinister of Natural ResourcesMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the premise and pivots to general ethics record rather than addressing the three specific allegations.
it will not come as any surprise to my friend from Winnipeg Centre that I do not share his views on this matter.
- deflectedMinister of Natural ResourcesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats a denial without reconciling the three differing accounts given by the minister.
there was no discussion of any contracts at that event.
- deflectedMinister of Natural ResourcesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer claims no government involvement and shifts focus to a private dispute, avoiding the minister's credibility and Varin link.
no members of this government are part of this inquiry.
- partly answeredHealthUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Answer affirms commitment to public health care and notes increased transfers but does not address elimination of federal spending power.
our government is committed to the universal public health care system and we will continue to work with the provinces and territories
- deflectedHealthUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer states support for the Canada Health Act without addressing the Prime Minister's stance on the member for Beauce.
This government strongly supports the Canada Health Act, and we have always held that position.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMrs. Carole Freeman (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends actions and denies impropriety without addressing whether business was discussed at the fundraiser.
If the member opposite wants to insinuate that there is anything improper here, the answer would of course be no, nothing is.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMrs. Carole Freeman (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites a fairness monitor report on procurement but ignores the allegation of contractors funding the party.
decisions were made "objectively, free from personal favouritism and political influence, and encompasses the elements of openness, competitiveness, transparency and compliance".
- misdirectedJusticeMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to an unrelated religious event and provincial jurisdiction instead of addressing the veil testimony request.
there certainly was a great religious moment in the province of Quebec and across Canada and that was the canonization by the Catholic Church of Brother André.
- misdirectedJusticeMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Bloc Québécois position on jurisdiction rather than addressing the veil and voting identification issue.
this is very interesting coming from the Bloc Québécois, in as much as the administration of justice is within provincial jurisdiction.
- deflectedNational DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to historical Liberal origins and industry benefits without addressing transparency or competition.
this entire process goes back to 1997, when the previous Liberal government entered into a process to replace what will be a 40-year-old aircraft by the time we get to the year 2020.
- misdirectedNational DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the questioner of changing position and labels the query fact-free instead of providing cost or competition evidence.
that was a fact-free question. This process goes back many years. It goes back to a time when the member opposite was, wait for it, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence.
- partly answeredNational DefenceGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer asserts best price and value but does not engage the expert testimony or sole-source concerns raised.
We are getting the best aircraft at the best price.
- misdirectedNational DefenceGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's past record on helicopters and quotes a different official rather than addressing the expert or smearing claim.
we have been listening to the lecturing and the harping of the member opposite who was part of a government that cancelled the maritime helicopter program
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific listed failures and instead repeats general praise for policy.
this government is proud of our principled foreign policy positions.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the member as misinformed and avoids answering whether meetings occurred or what actions are planned.
the hon. member is either deliberately or naively misinformed on our campaign for the Security Council seat.
- partly answeredQuebec City ArenaMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes a meeting and private-sector needs but does not resolve the inconsistencies or commit to participation.
we will study this project in the entire context of the various requests from all over the country.
- partly answeredQuebec City ArenaMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer outlines evaluation criteria and fiscal limits but does not confirm a pledge or equal treatment with Toronto.
This one must be evaluated in view of the big picture and the similar projects elsewhere in Canada.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The minister declines to answer the cost question by citing operational matters.
the government does not comment on operational matters concerning the deployment of Canadian Forces personnel abroad.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats a stock phrase about best interests without addressing negotiation failures or costs.
the Government of Canada always chooses arrangements that are in the best interests of Canada and Canadian taxpayers.
- answeredThe EconomyMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The response directly counters the premise with recent full-time job numbers and references to the action plan.
there were 37,000 net new full-time jobs in Canada last month.
- misdirectedThe EconomyMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to an unrelated university announcement instead of addressing the takeover or apology request.
I was in Hamilton on Friday announcing a wonderful new initiative for McMaster University, local researchers, and local workers.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's voting record instead of addressing the rejection of projects or signage spending.
What is interesting is that the member opposite, together with the members opposite, voted against any money for any arena in any part of Canada.
- deflectedSecurities industryMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the project as voluntary without addressing the call to abandon it or provincial opposition.
it is an initiative with voluntary membership that respects the jurisdictions of Quebec and the other provinces.
- misdirectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. Alex Atamanenko (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP as disconnected from rural Canada rather than addressing the bill or farmers' markets.
the NDP has continually shown how disconnected it is from rural Canada, and this piece of legislation that it is bringing in does this one more time.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Lynne Yelich (Conservative). loaded question.The answer provides numbers of funded projects in BC but does not address the specific criticism of spending on signage versus rejected facilities.
Our economic action plan has funded 224 RInC projects and 174 CAF projects in British Columbia.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Thierry St-Cyr (Bloc) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains that applicants can choose the hearing language and that French hearings are available.
any applicant can tell the IRB in which official language he or she wants the hearing to be held.
- answeredStatus of WomenMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the request for real solutions by detailing increased funding and supported projects for women.
our government has now increased the funding for women to its highest level ever in the history of Canada.