All sittings← 2010-10-072010-10-18 →
Friday, October 8, 2010 · sitting No. 80
Commons debates economic recovery act as ndp assails spending
The House devoted the largest share of its time to government orders on the Sustaining Canada's Economic Recovery Act. NDP MP Charlie Angus accused the Conservative government of reckless spending and of enabling claims such as Vito Gallo's $355-million suit against taxpayers. Conservative MP Richard Harris rose on a point of order to say the remarks had little relevance and later described them as rhetorical rantings.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on family caregiving, employment insurance and government contracts. Liberal MP Judy Foote pressed the government on its refusal to adopt the Liberal family care plan while it spent billions on prisons and fighter jets. Conservative MP John Baird replied that the economy remained fragile and that tax increases proposed by the opposition would kill jobs.
Further clashes arose over employment insurance pilot projects and the awarding of federal contracts. Liberal MP Jean-Claude D'Amours and Bloc Québécois MP Pierre Paquette questioned the timing and propriety of decisions, while Conservative ministers Ed Komarnicki and John Baird defended the government's record on jobs and accountability.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-10-08
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Veterans Affairs
NDP MP Peter Stoffer said the government and the Department of Veterans Affairs owed Sean Bruyea an apology for the handling of his medical records.
Read the exchangePotash Industry
Liberal MP Ralph Goodale asked what the government would consider a net benefit to Canada in any sale of PotashCorp of Saskatchewan.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Jack Harris said the government had placed a $16-billion untendered contract without debate and was misleading Canadians on costs and industrial benefits.
Read the exchangeCriminal Code
NDP MP Charlie Angus introduced Bill C-580 to amend the Criminal Code, Firearms Act and Contraventions Act concerning long guns.
Read the exchangePoints of Order
Liberal MP Mark Holland retracted earlier statements about Chris Froggatt and apologized for any distress caused.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to general health transfers instead of addressing the family care plan or specific caregiver help requested.
That is why this government has increased transfers to the provinces by some 30%, recognizing that health care is an important priority.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts to criticizing Liberal tax plans and economy rather than addressing the spending contrasts or 'reckless' label.
The last thing this fragile economy needs is the Liberal plan to raise taxes on job creators.
- misdirectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks past Liberal cuts instead of explaining the choice against the family care plan.
At another time, it was the Liberal Party that cut health care transfers by $25 billion.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges reviewing pilot projects and promises a future response but does not commit to permanent implementation.
We will look at the pilot projects and make sure that we get the best results from them.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends record and attacks Liberal policies instead of announcing continuation of the programs.
We will make that announcement in due course.
- answeredGovernment ContractsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly addresses the timeline and denies discussing contracts at the event.
the contract in question was signed on May 30, 2008.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer highlights the Accountability Act and past Liberal scandals rather than addressing the specific contractors at the fundraiser.
our Conservative government is the one that brought the Federal Accountability Act—some very strong legislation—to the House of Commons.
- misdirectedGovernment ContractsMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer praises the minister's ethics and references Liberal scandals instead of addressing the new contractors mentioned.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer clarifies the investigation referenced but avoids addressing the report's release or any hiding.
The mention of an investigation made by the then minister of public works in the House on December 8 was not in reference to the RCMP inquiring into the work on the West Block.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Joe Comartin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights job gains and contrasts visions but does not address continuing the stimulus program.
That is why we remain focused on jobs and the economy.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Joe Comartin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the F-35 purchase but ignores the call to stop insults and intimidation.
We cannot ask these men and women who serve Canada so bravely to get into planes that were designed in the 1970s.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the F-35 program benefits but does not address releasing requirements or total costs.
It was initiated to provide thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in work for Canadian industry.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Brian Murphy (Liberal) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the source of the numbers and references the prior government instead of addressing open competition.
It was the former Liberal government that signed the memorandum of understanding for the joint strike fighter.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Brian Murphy (Liberal) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists partner nations and defends the deal but ignores the question about the Prime Minister's conduct.
There is only one fifth generation fighter out there today which will meet our challenges for the air forces of the free world for the next 40 years or more.
- deflectedMember for Nepean—CarletonMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the premises and pivots to priorities instead of addressing the security breach.
I do not share the premises of the question of the member opposite.
- deflectedMember for Nepean—CarletonMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer calls the matter trivial and redirects to economy and crime instead of addressing firing the member.
Let us focus on the priorities of the people of Canada and not these trivial matters.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Guy André (Bloc) asked Mr. Greg Kerr (Conservative). substantive question.The answer expresses outrage but does not explain the delay in action.
we will do everything in our power to ensure that this terrible incident is not repeated
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Guy André (Bloc) asked Mr. Greg Kerr (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids the loaded comparison by focusing on procedures.
we have to follow the absolute proper procedures to ensure we deal with this within the fullness of the law
- answeredCensusMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the rationale for making the census voluntary.
we do not believe Canadians should be threatened with jail time, fines, or both should they choose not to answer private and personal and intrusive questions
- misdirectedCensusMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The response attacks the opposition instead of addressing the reinstatement request.
the inconsistencies and the hypocrisy of the opposition is absolutely alarming
- partly answeredGovernment ContractsMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answers the claim about discussion but ignores the inquiry findings.
The minister did not discuss the awarding of the contract with the individual in question.
- misdirectedGovernment ContractsMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Deflects by denying the label and countering with opposition info.
The member calls this Varin fellow a Conservative organizer. She is wrong.
- answeredPotash IndustryRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Directly states the criterion used.
we will be looking at the net benefit to Canada for any prospective sales
- deflectedPotash IndustryRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Gives general assurance without addressing specific inquiries.
Our government will review any case that falls under the purview of the Investment Canada Act.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Mr. Greg Kerr (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the four-year delay by claiming the issue only recently came to a head.
the fact is this matter came to a head yesterday and made clear to all of us that it had to be dealt with
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Mr. Greg Kerr (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the asker's inconsistency and questions his courage instead of addressing the call for an apology or inquiry.
I can only hope the member for Sackville—Eastern Shore has the courage and audacity to support the government when we clear this issue up
- deflectedAerospace IndustryMr. Luc Desnoyers (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the competitive process and quotes industry support without addressing demands for required spinoffs.
a competitive process took place between 1997 and 2001 under the previous government
- deflectedAerospace IndustryMr. Luc Desnoyers (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites industry quotes urging a decision but does not address the lack of guaranteed spinoffs or refusal to defend Quebec jobs.
The Canadian industry is ready to step up, but a decision needs to be made now
- partly answeredPovertyMr. Mario Silva (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses helping those in need via tax measures but does not explain difficulty prioritizing poverty over other issues.
by reducing taxes, the average Canadian family will have an additional $3,000 in its pocket
- partly answeredPovertyMr. Mario Silva (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses job creation but ignores Senate recommendations and spending priorities raised in the question.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references prior answers and the Accountability Act without addressing the minister's specific actions or resignation.
this government's first order of business was to pass the Federal Accountability Act
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the claims as unfactual and restates the Accountability Act without addressing the minister's responsibility.
the fury and bluster of the member opposite, while entertaining, is not factual
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Randy Kamp (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the current decision without committing to honouring the original agreement.
The majority of participants support this decision, and this is the decision that we are staying with.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Monique Guay (Bloc) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The response avoids addressing the royal recommendation request by stating a general policy.
The government does not interfere in specifics like strike action and capping those days.
- misdirectedMember for Nepean--CarletonMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the member rather than addressing the call for responsibility.
The member in question has spoken to this. I should point out that the member is a hard-working member.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Randy Kamp (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids agreeing to reconvene by reiterating the decision's fairness.
This was a decision made in equity, and in our opinion and as the minister has reviewed this decision, it is our conclusion that reconvening a panel would accomplish nothing and would destabilize the industry.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Bruce Hyer (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses the program status but does not commit to reinstatement.
$300 million is still flowing until the end of the calendar year for the home retrofit program.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Mr. Dave MacKenzie (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's crime policy without engaging with prevention alternatives.
Our Conservative government is proud to be on the right side of the issue, the side of law-abiding Canadians and the side of victims who want justice.