All sittings← 2010-03-162010-03-18 →
Wednesday, March 17, 2010 · sitting No. 11
NDP motion to limit prorogation debated as longest item
The House spent the largest share of its time on an NDP motion moved by Jack Layton that would bar the prime minister from advising the Governor General to prorogue Parliament for more than seven days without a House resolution. Layton said the motion targets abuse of prorogation to avoid accountability. Conservative House leader Jay Hill said prorogation is a standard tool used by governments of all parties and asked whether the motion would apply to past NDP provincial governments.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on employment insurance premiums. Liberal MP John McCallum said the government would raise payroll taxes four years in a row and asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to admit it. Harper replied that premiums are set by an independent commission and that Liberal proposals for a 45-day work year would drive costs higher.
Other exchanges centred on tax harmonization with Quebec. Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe asked whether Ottawa would insist on collecting the tax itself. Harper said the existing 1992 agreement under which Quebec collects the GST remains in force and that any new harmonization deal must respect obligations to other provinces.
Decided that day
- Motion that the Prime Minister shall not advise the Governor General passed
- Bill S-210 advanced to second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-03-17
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Afghanistan
Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc said ministers had privately told Afghan officials they would build detention centres while telling Canadians the opposite. Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said a 2007 transfer agreement negotiated by the government gives Canada unrestricted access and that more than 210 inspections have occurred without notice.
Read the exchangeInternational Cooperation
NDP leader Jack Layton asked why contraception is excluded from the G8 maternal-health initiative. International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda replied that the plan focuses on saving lives during the 48 hours after delivery when most maternal deaths occur.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
Liberal MP Anita Neville said the minister's three pillars do not constitute an action plan. Status of Women Minister Helena Guergis said the government restructured the department around economic security, ending violence and women in leadership and created a partnership fund to support grassroots groups.
Read the exchangeChild Care
NDP MP Olivia Chow said the government created no new spaces and cited OECD rankings. Human Resources Minister Diane Finley said the universal child care benefit lifted 22,000 families above the poverty line and that provinces have announced more than 85,000 new spaces with federal funding.
Read the exchangeAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Liberal MP Jean-Claude D'Amours said ACOA funding for innovation and communities funds fell from $113 million to $19 million. ACOA Minister Keith Ashfield said the $19 million is now an ongoing base budget plus $11 million for community futures and is not a cut.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTen PercentersJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids committing to House vote and instead attacks Liberals.
having viewed a few of these Liberal ten percenters, I think the cancellation of the program was a good idea.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains premium process but pivots to attacking Liberal EI proposal instead of addressing tax hike claim.
That is why this government is opposed to these changes to the employment insurance program.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats independent commission line and again attacks Liberal plan rather than confirming or denying tax increase.
Those premiums are determined by an independent commission in line with the cost of the program.
- deflectedThe BudgetMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores tax and research questions and shifts to listing youth job programs.
This summer, young people will be able to take advantage of the Canada summer jobs program.
- deflectedThe BudgetMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids explaining the specific tax increase for the named student and lists general student supports instead.
We have done a lot for students: there are many more scholarships and funding opportunities available.
- partly answeredTax HarmonizationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses the management question by referencing existing agreements but does not clarify the Quebec-specific point.
We have signed agreements in this regard, agreements that create mutual obligations between the federal and provincial governments.
- answeredTax HarmonizationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states Quebec collects GST under the 1992 agreement and remains open to other arrangements.
This agreement states that Quebec will collect the GST on behalf of the federal government.
- misdirectedEnvironment CanadaMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.Answer denies allegations and pivots to defending government science support without addressing censorship claims.
Climate change science is valuable and important work that this government supports.
- misdirectedScience and TechnologyMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the science policy question entirely and pivots to attacking the asker on environmental legislation.
Why will that member not support good environmental legislation?
- deflectedProrogation of the HouseJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing limits on prorogation by claiming a constitutional barrier and then attacking the asker about coalitions.
if the leader of the Bloc—excuse me, I meant to say the leader of the New Democratic Party, but sometimes it amounts to the same thing—wants to form his coalition with the Bloc and the Liberal Party instead of changing the Constitution, he should seek a mandate from the people of Canada.
- partly answeredInternational CooperationJack Layton (NDP) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the maternal health focus but sidesteps the specific question on excluding contraception.
This initiative is about saving the lives of mothers and children.
- deflectedInternational CooperationJack Layton (NDP) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats maternal death statistics without addressing the contraception exclusion or the provocative framing.
Far too many lives are being sacrificed when we can do something about it.
- partly answeredAfghanistanDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer clarifies the UK-led proposal and current facilities but does not fully explain the public-private discrepancy.
the proposal to build a Kabul-based NDS detention centre in 2007 was a U.K.-led initiative, which ultimately did not come to pass.
- answeredAfghanistanDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly refutes the advance-notice claim with specifics from the agreement and inspection counts.
had my honourable colleague made just the slightest effort to read the agreement, he would have quickly discovered that we do not give advance notice.
- deflectedAfghanistanBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies knowledge of the secret deal and restates the existing agreement without addressing the broken promise or torture risks.
to my knowledge, we have never been briefed on that.
- deflectedAfghanistanBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates Canada's role in mentoring prisons but avoids the call for a public inquiry or the contradiction with prior statements.
Canada is not in the business of building or running Afghan prisons.
- deflectedRights & DemocracyMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refers only to legislation and avoids the question on Omar Khadr and international commitments.
I invite my colleague to carefully read the legislation governing Rights & Democracy, particularly subsection 13(3).
- deflectedRights & DemocracyMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer points to prior committee appearances without addressing the accusation of government control.
On October 29, 2009, the people of Rights & Democracy had the opportunity to appear before the committee, which was satisfied with the responses it heard.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Claude Guimond (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the issue is under examination but provides no decision or commitment on extension.
We are examining the situation. The decision has not yet been made.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Claude Guimond (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing the Bloc's voting record instead of explaining the elimination of measures.
Each time, the Bloc voted against those measures.
- answeredInternational DevelopmentCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly counters the premise by affirming care for women's health and outlining focus areas.
we should be clear that this government does care about women and does care about the health of women.
- deflectedInternational DevelopmentCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights international support without addressing contraception or the failure claim.
Every one of these enlightened countries, the donor countries which are making a difference in developing countries, knows that there are actions we can take that will actually make a significant difference in the number of mothers who are dying in childbirth and in their postpartum terms.
- answeredStatus of WomenAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the three pillars and related actions as the plan.
We introduced three pillars of focus: economic security, ending violence against women, and women in leadership and democracy.
- misdirectedStatus of WomenAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government rather than addressing the minister's responsibilities.
we Conservative women, were not relegated to the pink back room with a pink pad of paper and asked to write down for the third time a list of pink broken promises made by the previous Liberal government.
- partly answeredChild CareMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer counters the report's relevance and lists actions taken but does not address timing for new services.
That report was actually written not about this government, but the study period ended in 2005 under the previous government.
- partly answeredChild CareMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer explains federal limits and reiterates funding and benefits but avoids admitting policy failure.
in fact it is not the federal government's responsibility to create child care spaces.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains that public servants handle visa decisions and notes issues with the application.
public servants, not the minister, make decisions about visa applications.
- deflectedHaitiMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses general Haiti initiatives and the upcoming meeting but does not address promoting the wood houses proposal.
Another meeting will take place at the end of the month in New York to help us align the needs identified by the Haitian government
- misdirectedAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts to defending the economic action plan and criticizes passage issues instead of addressing ACOA cuts.
We had a little trouble getting it passed through this House but we managed.
- answeredAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.Answer clarifies the ongoing base budget and additional funding, directly countering the cut claim.
It is an improvement over what was there before and certainly not part of the five year programming.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer discusses past NATO decisions and capacity building but avoids addressing the call for a public inquiry.
We are there not to build prisons for Afghans; we are there to help them build capacity to do these things for themselves.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.Answer provides visit statistics under the agreement but does not address limiting inspections or the inquiry request.
there have been over 210 visits by Canadian officials to Afghan detention facilities since the transfer agreement was signed.
- deflectedTelecommunicationsLawrence MacAulay (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses 2010 funding but deflects on future years and CAP sites by attacking the prior government instead of promising continued support.
After 13 years of neglect from the other side, we are actually funding access for broadband for rural and remote Canadians, and we are proud of that.
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesMs. Monique Guay (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates general support for official languages without addressing the specific hiring statistics or the claim of hostility.
the government supports the guidelines, the laws and the rights of people across the country when it comes to the official languages, and it will continue to do so.