All sittings← 2009-03-232009-03-25 →
Tuesday, March 24, 2009 · sitting No. 32
Liberals press for list of projects to draw on $3 billion fund
The House spent most of the sitting on an opposition day motion moved by Liberal MP John McCallum that calls on the government to table by April 3 a list of departments likely to use Treasury Board Vote 35 and to report each use of the $3 billion authority within one sitting day. McCallum said the request seeks only basic accountability at no cost. Bloc Québécois MP Guy André and NDP MP Charlie Angus supported the motion and warned of partisan spending.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on employment insurance. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff asked the government to adjust eligibility rules so more laid-off workers can access benefits; Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the government has already lengthened benefit periods and added training funds. In other exchanges, Liberal MP Alexandra Mendes pressed for forestry aid while Minister of State Denis Lebel listed existing programs.
Decided that day
- Interim Supply of $26.7 billion passed
- Supplementary Estimates (C) 2008-09 concurred in
- Bill C-21 passed second and third reading
- Bill C-22 passed second reading
- Bill C-20 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2009-03-24
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Afghanistan
Liberal MP Bob Rae asked what new initiatives Canada would propose at next week's Afghanistan conference; Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Canada would confirm its existing six priorities and await the U.S. revised strategy.
Read the exchangeCanadian Broadcasting Corporation
NDP MP John Rafferty said the minister had refused bridge financing for the CBC; Heritage Minister James Moore replied that the government has increased CBC funding every year since 2006 while the NDP voted against each increase.
Read the exchangeHealth
Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett said the government had cut funding for fetal alcohol syndrome programs; Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq said the government remains committed to prevention and screening.
Read the exchangeOmar Khadr
Bloc Québécois MP Francine Lalonde asked whether the government would follow the House report and seek Omar Khadr's transfer from Guantanamo; Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Canada would follow the new U.S. review process.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Explains EI formula and lists actions taken but does not address adjusting eligibility requirements.
eligibility for EI is determined by the region in which one lives, according to a formula.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts to criticizing the opposition's lack of proposals instead of addressing a review of eligibility.
the Leader of the Opposition should know that those who are not eligible for EI it is often because they did not pay into EI in most cases because they are not participants
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Denies premise then attacks the opposition for playing politics rather than answering.
What we are saying is that whether somebody is prime minister or not, when they are elected to have responsibility in this House during a recession, they are here to help Canadians, not just to try and play on bad news for their own strategic advantage.
- answeredForestry IndustryMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Lists multiple specific measures already announced for the forestry sector.
I would like to take the precious time the opposition member has given me to remind her of all the positive measures we have announced for the forestry sector: $1 billion over two years to help communities;
- deflectedForestry IndustryMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.Blames markets and accuses asker of playing politics instead of addressing new help.
Everyone know that, except the people who want to play politics.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Highlights past actions and attacks Bloc voting record instead of considering the waiting period proposal.
The Bloc Québécois is a party with no serious economic policy. It is against everything, and for nothing.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Details work-sharing and other enhancements but does not address abolishing the waiting period.
once again this morning there was an announcement of increased access to employment insurance through our economic action plan.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Describes automatic regional adjustments without addressing uniform criteria or the proposed bills.
we have an employment insurance system that adjusts automatically every month to changing conditions in each of Canada's 58 regions.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's view on older workers rather than addressing the timeline for a program.
it makes me sad to hear the gentleman say such a thing, to say that older workers cannot learn.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Responds with general info then pivots to criticizing the NDP's vote.
What those people will be wondering is why the New Democratic Party voted against all of those benefits for them.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on criticizing NDP and Liberals instead of addressing the fixes proposed.
I do not know which is worse, the Liberal Party that votes for something then criticizes it or the NDP that asks for something and then votes against it.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids direct yes/no by attacking NDP's voting record.
The problem with members of the NDP is that they are anxious to be against everything and never have any responsibility for anything but they vote against everything.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Provides information on eligibility and new funding but does not directly respond to the personal impact on those excluded.
over 80% of those who pay into EI are able to collect the benefits.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Describes measures but deflects with criticism of the opposition.
Why have those members not even proposed any solutions? All they do is whine.
- partly answeredAfghanistanBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.States intentions to confirm position but does not outline specific new initiatives.
We are expecting the United States to unveil part of their revised strategy at that conference.
- deflectedAfghanistanBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Reiterates past actions and priorities rather than proposing new initiatives for the conference.
our Canadian troops as well as our Canadian civil workers are getting the job done.
- answeredForestry IndustryMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly clarifies the meaning of the 90% figure with specifics on assistance.
more than 90% of forestry companies are working with Export Development Canada to obtain tax assistance in order to improve their position and be competitive in different situations
- deflectedForestry IndustryMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the legality question and restates general support instead.
Export Development Canada is working with forestry companies and will continue to do so.
- deflectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Jean-Yves Roy (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the prior decision and calls the premise false rather than addressing ongoing harm.
What my colleague opposite has just said is totally false.
- misdirectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Jean-Yves Roy (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Bloc's attitude instead of addressing the two-year limit or election timing.
what amounts to the same thing is the attitude of the Bloc—whine, whine some more, find the angles, move nothing forward.
- deflectedInternational TradeScott Brison (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer disputes the premise with EDC stats but does not address the US incorporation claim.
EDC alone in this last year has done business with over 8,600 customers.
- deflectedInternational TradeScott Brison (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the boot camp claim and pivots to general EDC success without addressing the advice given.
if the member wants to raise his voice and look excited because he has lost the point, he can surely try and do that.
- partly answeredArts and CultureMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses funding levels but not the specific delay or knowledge of Guy Laliberté.
We are investing $2.3 billion in Canadian artists this year.
- deflectedArts and CultureMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats record spending and due diligence but ignores the specific groups and deadline issue.
he is entirely wrong. What we are doing is our due diligence on behalf of taxpayers.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationMr. John Rafferty (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists past NDP votes instead of addressing the bridge financing request or denial claim.
In 2004-05, Parliament increased funding for the CBC and those members voted against it.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats record investments and NDP votes rather than addressing the long-term plan or $60 million claim.
We made a very specific promise in the campaign to maintain or increase support for the CBC.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats Bloc votes against funding instead of addressing asset sales, layoffs or the request for help.
In 2005-06, we increased the CBC's budget and the Bloc voted against it.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites the election promise and total funding but ignores the specific request for budget flexibility or an advance.
This year it will get more than $1 billion.
- partly answeredHealthCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer affirms commitment to FASD but does not explain the reported reduction from the allocated $3.3 million.
Our government is committed to making a strategic investment when it comes to FASD prevention, counselling and improved screening.
- deflectedHealthMr. Paul Szabo (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer calls the premise inaccurate and restates general commitment without addressing the one-third cut claim.
In fact, the government is committed to FASD prevention.
- misdirectedCampaign AdvertisingMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked Mr. Kevin Sorenson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer switches entirely to Canada's position on Kashmir, ignoring the campaign spending and third-party link questions.
recent reports have stated that Canada has changed its position regarding the disputed Kashmir region.
- answeredTransportMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the port authority is arm's length and the government had no involvement in the board's decision.
the Montreal Port Authority operates at arm's length from the government.
- deflectedGun RegistryMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the government's opposition to the registry and shifts focus to criminals instead of addressing the request to transfer powers to Quebec.
Our belief is that in terms of combatting crime, our focus should not be on those who are lawful, law-abiding hunters and farmers in possession of long guns.
- partly answeredForestry IndustryMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the economic action plan addresses financing needs but ends by attacking the NDP rather than confirming specific action on credit access.
Furthermore, the government is about action, whereas the NDP is all about talk.
- answeredScience and TechnologyMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly counters the premise of cuts by detailing increased funding and infrastructure support for research.
The fact is, Mr. Speaker, the government has recently surpassed the $10 billion a year number for our science and tech communities.
- deflectedOmar KhadrMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains following the US process and waiting for outcomes without stating whether the government will request Khadr's transfer as recommended.
The new American administration has put a process in place. The Government of Canada intends to follow that process, which basically consists in reviewing all the cases.