All sittings← 2009-03-132009-03-24 →
Monday, March 23, 2009 · sitting No. 31
Commons debates Canada-EFTA trade deal amid shipbuilding concerns
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on second reading of Bill C-2, the Canada-EFTA free trade agreement implementation act. New Democratic members argued the agreement threatens domestic shipbuilding and raw-material supply chains while government members said it opens European markets and has broad industry support.
In Question Period the Leader of the Opposition pressed the Prime Minister on conflicting public and private remarks about the United States stimulus plan and on the fate of a promised 190,000-job target. The Prime Minister replied that fixing the global financial system is the priority and that the economic action plan remains on track.
The Leader of the Bloc Québécois demanded immediate loan guarantees for the forestry sector and accused the government of undermining its own lawyers in ongoing trade litigation; ministers replied that the matter is before arbitration and that Export Development Canada is already assisting most forestry firms.
Decided that day
- Amendment to motion defeated
- Third Report of Foreign Affairs Committee adopted
- S-215 passed second reading
- C-342 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2009-03-23
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Supreme Court Act
Mr. Yvon Godin told the House that Bill C-232 requires future Supreme Court appointees to be bilingual at the time of appointment and is not retroactive.
Read the exchangeForestry Industry
Mr. Gilles Duceppe said the government is contradicting the lawyers it is paying in the London court by refusing loan guarantees that a Quebec legal opinion found permissible.
Read the exchangeCanadian Forces
Mr. Michael Ignatieff asked the Prime Minister to join the House in mourning Master Corporal Scott Vernelli and three other soldiers killed in Afghanistan; the Prime Minister expressed condolences and defended the mission.
Read the exchangeEmployment Insurance
Mr. Yves Lessard asked whether the government would pay interest on overdue employment-insurance benefits after processing times reached 55 days; Minister Diane Finley said additional staff and automation have been added.
Read the exchangeCanadian Forces
Mr. Pierre Poilievre condemned comments on the Fox News program Red Eye that mocked Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and suggested they wanted manicures and pedicures.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredCanadian ForcesMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly expresses condolences matching the request.
we convey all of our heartfelt condolences to the friends, family and comrades of these fallen soldiers.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer corrects the premise and shifts focus to tax policy instead of addressing the alleged contradiction.
First, Mr. Speaker, let me correct the preamble to the question.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats the tax-hike attack on Liberals rather than addressing the public-private inconsistency.
The Liberal Party knows that our party opposes tax hikes for sound economic reasons.
- deflectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the action plan and criticizes opposition without addressing the 190,000-job target omission.
All we hear from the opposition is criticism and talking down the Canadian economy.
- deflectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks Liberals on EI passage instead of confirming or abandoning the job target.
this is rich. This is from the party that did not even understand that if it did not pass the budget promptly, employment insurance would not have been available.
- deflectedForestry IndustryMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states the matter is under arbitration and declines further comment.
We will therefore not comment any further here.
- deflectedForestry IndustryMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to concern for workers and EDC support without addressing the lawyers or sabotage claim.
the leader of the Bloc continues to be concerned about lawyers, but we are concerned about workers.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists expanded programs but does not address timing or specific EI improvements requested.
That is why, in our economic action plan, we expanded our program for older workers.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses hiring and automation but ignores the interest payment proposal entirely.
That is why we have taken steps to hire hundreds of employees to speed up payment of employment insurance benefits and why we have increased automation to provide assistance more quickly, so they can receive the benefits they deserve.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP for voting against measures instead of addressing the job loss statistics or denial claim.
What people are having a hard time understanding is why the New Democratic Party votes against helping the unemployed and Canadian workers.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the NDP leader of denial and opposition rather than addressing the G20 ranking or job loss figures.
the only state of denial around here is the leader of the NDP.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists existing measures but does not address changing EI rules as requested.
this government brought in five additional weeks for unemployed Canadian workers.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly references budget funding for training non-EI eligible workers.
Within that budget is an additional $500 million targeted at helping those very workers who do not qualify to help them get the training they need to qualify for the jobs of tomorrow.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses processing resources but dismisses the 84-day delay example without specifics.
We have hired several hundred people back into EI to get the processing done quickly.
- answeredScience and TechnologyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the infrastructure funding purpose within the total amount.
the $2 billion going into our colleges and universities and for hospital research is actually meant to go toward increasing the functionality of the laboratories.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights new chairs but does not address cuts to the three research councils.
Last month alone this government announced $100 million for 134 research chairs, including Dr. Reinhardt at McGill.
- deflectedDepartment of Foreign AffairsMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims budgets increased without addressing the comparison to National Defence or explaining any imbalance.
In fact, under this government, not only have budgets been stable, but they have increased.
- deflectedDepartment of Foreign AffairsMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise outright and shifts to attacking the questioner's notes rather than engaging the policy comparison.
The member needs to realize, beyond the notes written for her, what the Government of Canada is doing for Canadians.
- deflectedArts and CultureMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights overall arts spending and cultural officers but never addresses the specific PromArt cut or its impact on the ballet tour.
This year, we are doing so to the tune of $22 million.
- deflectedArts and CultureMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists funding totals and ends by attacking the Bloc's voting record instead of addressing restoration of the cut programs.
The Bloc Québécois has voted against every one of these amounts.
- answeredForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms that Canada's policy remains support for two sovereign states living side by side.
we support two sovereign states living side by side in peace and harmony.
- deflectedForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer asserts diplomacy is thriving and budgets exist but supplies no figures or comparison to UK/US increases.
- misdirectedJusticeUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to mocking the Liberals' carbon tax instead of stating a position on the two-for-one credit or wiretap changes.
I assured her that fighting crime in our country and standing up for law-abiding citizens and victims would continue to be a priority of this Conservative government.
- misdirectedJusticeUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's past record and demands support rather than indicating whether the minister will act on the provincial requests.
If they have had a change of heart and become born-again crime fighters, I welcome it.
- partly answeredLe Réveil NewspaperMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the advertising check but sidesteps the Prime Minister's stance and the loaded final question.
I checked and it was not possible to stop the advertising.
- deflectedThe Conservative GovernmentMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). rhetorical question.The question mocks ministers rather than seeking information and the answer pivots to a general NDP critique without addressing the claims.
From its perspective, the problem is always give, give, give.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer offers general praise for government measures instead of addressing the specific $6 billion transfer demand.
Once again last week, I had the honour to visit many areas of Quebec.
- answeredFinanceMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that transfers will not be reduced and provides the percentage increase in federal funding to Quebec.
Transfers to Quebec will not be reduced.
- answeredOil and Gas IndustryDan McTeague (Liberal) asked Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). substantive question.The answer points to the Competition Bureau's role in reviewing the merger for consumer protection.
In transactions like these, he will also know that the Competition Bureau will take the appropriate steps to scrutinize the transaction under the Competition Act.
- answeredOil and Gas IndustryDan McTeague (Liberal) asked Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). substantive question.The answer again cites the Competition Bureau's examination of refinery capacity and consumer impacts.
first, those are precisely the issues that the Competition Bureau will be examining under law.
- deflectedCampaign AdvertisingMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer asserts rule-following and dismisses the allegations without addressing the specific organizational ties raised.
Any allegations by the NDP are, of course, made up.
- deflectedCampaign AdvertisingMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer offers a general assurance about past compliance rather than addressing the spending-limit circumvention claim.
the member involved has always respected the campaign finance laws of this country in the past and always will in the future.
- partly answeredMulticulturalismMs. Ruby Dhalla (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise of abandonment and details program changes instead of directly addressing the accusation.
no one is forcing such a false choice.
- answeredScience and technologyMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly affirms belief in evolution before pivoting to government spending.
I do in fact believe in evolution, full stop
- partly answeredSearch and RescueMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains current asset placement and coverage but does not commit to the specific recommendation.
Gander is centrally located in Newfoundland and Labrador, and as such, allows the CF an even search and rescue coverage throughout the region.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer briefly explains the decision then attacks the asker by referencing his brother instead of addressing the funding or sewage issue.
Perhaps at Sunday dinner, before he wastes his time here in the House of Commons, he could inquire as to his brother's excuse as well.