All sittings← 2008-04-022008-04-04 →
Thursday, April 3, 2008 · sitting No. 71
Commons opens debate on budget implementation bill
The House spent the largest portion of its sitting on second reading of Bill C-50, the Budget Implementation Act, 2008. Conservative MP Ted Menzies opened the debate by highlighting the government's fiscal position and tax reductions. Liberal MP Paul Szabo questioned the absence of a broader vision, while Bloc Québécois MP Paul Crête warned that the bill ignored the U.S. recession and its effects on Canadian exports.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on immigration policy. Liberal MP Michael Ignatieff pressed Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan on changes that would replace mandatory language with discretionary authority for the minister. Van Loan defended the record on settlement funding and family reunification wait times.
Other exchanges touched on language of work in Quebec and federal spending power. Bloc Québécois MP Gilles Duceppe pressed Labour Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn on extending Bill 101 protections to federal workplaces.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2008-04-03
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Points of Order
Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan corrected the record, stating that the head tax was introduced in 1885, not under a Liberal government.
Read the exchangePetitions
NDP MP Chris Charlton tabled petitions opposing further implementation of the security and prosperity partnership until a democratic mandate is secured.
Read the exchangePetitions
Conservative MP Ken Epp presented petitions supporting Bill C-484, which would create a separate offence for injury or death of an unborn child.
Read the exchangeHuman Rights
NDP MP Bill Siksay called on the government to require an apology from Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski after a video showed remarks describing homosexuals as transmitting diseases.
Read the exchangeScience and Technology
Liberal MP Scott Brison asked Industry Minister Jim Prentice why the government allowed MDA to negotiate the sale of the satellite to an American firm the day after launch.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the regulation change and instead attacks the Liberal leader's court injunction.
although I do see today that the Liberal leader is again in full retreat.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists past Conservative actions without addressing the 27-month inaction or arbitrary ministerial power.
The Conservative government has an impressive track record.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises the minister's record and quotes a Liberal instead of addressing arbitrary discretion or appeal rights.
The minister has actually performed quite impressively since she became minister.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer clarifies the minister's power scope and cites the Canadian Bar Association but does not address limits on discretion.
In reality, the minister would have the power to determine how many people in a class may apply to enter Canada in a year.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly assures no impact on the Canada-Quebec accord and ongoing discussions with Quebec.
I already assured this House last week that we were in discussions with the representatives of Quebec.
- answeredThe Quebec NationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that the Canada Labour Code does not cover language of work.
the Canada Labour Code does not cover language of work any more than the Quebec Labour Code or any other province's labour code.
- partly answeredThe Quebec NationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains federal jurisdiction needs but does not address making an exception for Quebec language of work.
In Quebec, some people speak English and need services in English, while others speak French and need services in French.
- answeredFiscal ImbalanceMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the fiscal imbalance was resolved in 2006-07 with increased transfers.
The fiscal imbalance issue was dealt with in 2006-07.
- deflectedFiscal ImbalanceMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The minister talks about existing compensation instead of the promised bill.
there are lots of instances where the Government of Quebec receives compensation.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationJack Layton (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP and previous parties rather than fully addressing the concerns.
We are solving a problem created by that party over there and that party will never get a chance to do it.
- partly answeredHuman RightsMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The response notes the comments are inappropriate but does not confirm any specific action.
The comments do sound distressing and inappropriate and they will have due attention.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the opposition of misrepresenting and delaying instead of addressing the quote.
I really do not understand how the hon. member opposite can think that we are trying to sneak anything through when all day this issue is being debated in the House.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Responds by questioning the Liberals' motives rather than the policy.
Why are they the ones who are fearing and smearing when they cannot deal with policies?
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationGurbax Malhi (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer counters with past actions of the opposing party instead of addressing the current claim.
I find very curious these questions coming from members of a party whose predecessors introduced the Asian Exclusion Act
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationGurbax Malhi (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.Attacks the member's voting record instead of answering about the reforms.
That member should tell us why he voted to impose a $1,000 head tax on all newcomers to our country.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Denies the premise but provides no specific confirmation or denial details on the design.
that is not the case at all. Everything my colleague from Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie has said is false.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Bloc's record instead of addressing whether the plan penalizes early reducers.
In the 18 years since the Bloc first came here to the House of Commons, absolutely nothing has been done.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer describes consular work but does not address calling in the ambassador or demanding return to Canada.
We are working with his family and the lawyers to ensure that his rights are protected over there.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes consular assistance but avoids any mention of demanding ambassador intervention.
Consular officials in Riyadh are currently working closely with relevant Saudi authorities to attempt to find a resolution to Ms. Morin's case.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites the legal review process and confidentiality without addressing trust in MDA.
This analysis is currently under review. I cannot speak further about it, and my friend knows that.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sticks to the review timeline and avoids the sovereignty or sale question.
I have extended the 30 day period for the review as of March 20.
- partly answeredScience and TechnologyNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mentions ongoing discussions with the US but does not address securing waivers or standing up for jobs.
We continue to work with our American neighbours to ensure we have a vibrant space industry and a vibrant aeronautics industry and that we are able to make these arrangements workable.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refuses to comment and delivers a sarcastic jab at Liberals instead of addressing the sale.
If my friend really believes that is the effect of the contracts between the Canadian Space Agency and MDA, I would invite him to boldly go where no Liberal has gone before, talk to the people who negotiated that contract, whom he sits with on that side of the House.
- misdirectedScience and TechnologyMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer opens with an insult to the NDP before providing procedural information.
I think it is clear to members of the House that when we are dealing with members of the NDP, not only is their remote sensing defective, their up close sensing does not work either.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses procedural responsibilities without addressing sovereignty or monitoring concerns.
I will deal with that application. I will deal with it in due course, and I will deal with it according to the full responsibility under the Investment Canada Act.
- answeredCanadian HeritageDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly denies censorship intentions and explains the legislative gap referenced in the question.
Our government does not intend to engage in censorship.
- deflectedCanadian HeritageDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's consistency rather than addressing the request to drop the clause or work with industry.
the member for Bourassa can grandstand all he likes, but he knows that the wording of the clause in Bill C-10 is exactly the same as what his former colleagues, ministers Manley and Copps, included in a press release in 2003.
- misdirectedEthicsMrs. Susan Kadis (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question by attacking the Liberals instead of addressing the Prime Minister's appearance before committee.
- partly answeredHuman RightsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the tape but does not address requiring the member to step aside pending investigation.
It will, however, receive due attention.
- answeredJusticeMrs. Carole Freeman (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer clarifies that the bill is private member's legislation before committee and states the government's position.
I urge the committee to have a look at that bill and make its recommendations to Parliament.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directs the member to the committee but does not address approaching the Minister of Justice.
the hon. member is welcome to make any representations before the committee that is having a look at that private member's bill
- answeredTobacco IndustryMr. Lloyd St. Amand (Liberal) asked Mr. Guy Lauzon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer details meetings and ongoing work with stakeholders to address the tobacco farmers' concerns.
This week, as a matter of fact, he met with the Ontario agriculture minister, Ms. Leona Dombrowsky.
- deflectedGasoline PricesMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). substantive question.The response promotes tax cuts instead of addressing the proposed monitoring system or Competition Bureau.
We have taken direct steps to help to reduce those gas prices and the cost of living with significant changes, particularly tax reductions, including cuts to the GST.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Directly states no plan to close the station and offers to work on funding.
I would like to tell the House that the government does not intend to close the Bas-Caraquet weather station, and that I would be pleased to work with my colleague to find the funds needed for this important file.
- deflectedTourism IndustryMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). rhetorical question.Blames the previous government rather than addressing the listed ministerial failures.
If we want to find a former Canadian government that did not care about the tourism industry, it sits on that side of the House.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Bill Casey (Independent) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Cites court proceedings to avoid confirming the bid details or tabling the chart.
This issue is in fact before the courts. No final decision has been made.
- deflectedBusiness of the HouseRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Discusses the budget bill and accuses opposition of obstruction instead of providing timelines for the requested bills.
We have missed it once or twice.
- partly answeredBusiness of the HouseRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Explains committee challenges but stops short of committing to a timeline.
at this point in time I am not sure I can give him that commitment.
- misdirectedBusiness of the HouseRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Jay Hill (Conservative). substantive question.Responds with an attack on the opposition instead of addressing how to establish the committee.
What's the point of having another committee where you guys are operating?
- answeredPrivilegeMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Explains that the minister's prior statements and letter clarified the matter.
I believe that with the letter that was tabled with this House some weeks ago and with her comments here on Tuesday, she certainly clarified that.
- misdirectedPrivilegeMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Mr. Luc Harvey (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the request for a Speaker's ruling on privilege and instead raises an unrelated complaint about unparliamentary language.
the hon. member for Montcalm , used unparliamentary language, as usual.
- misdirectedPoint of OrderMs. Pauline Picard (Bloc) asked Mr. Dean Del Mastro (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses a separate alleged unparliamentary remark by another member rather than the behaviour rectification noted in the question.
I would like to ask the member for Don Valley East to withdraw the comment and apologize for making it.