Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2007-12-042007-12-06 →

Wednesday, December 5, 2007 · sitting No. 31

Commons debates elections financing changes as Liberals object to debt rules

Government orders on Bill C-29, an act to amend the Canada Elections Act, consumed the largest share of the sitting as the House considered amendments on candidate loans and contribution rules. Peter Van Loan moved three amendments that would treat unpaid candidate debts as contributions and impose new deadlines for repayment. Keith Martin and Marcel Proulx argued the changes blurred conduct with accountability and that the Liberal Party had already advanced stricter financing limits in prior parliaments.

Question period opened with exchanges on the status of women in which Stéphane Dion pressed the government on the removal of equality language from Status of Women Canada mandates while Stephen Harper defended direct payments to families and new violence legislation. Further clashes arose over assistance for manufacturing and forestry sectors, with Gilles Duceppe and Paul Crête calling for immediate short-term funds and Stephen Harper and Jim Flaherty pointing to tax reductions already enacted.

Later exchanges covered official languages, immigrant women, housing and older workers, with Jack Layton, Diane Marleau, Maria Minna and Yves Lessard raising concerns and ministers responding on existing programs and spending levels.

Decided that day

  • Motion to amend Section 7 of the Canadian C failed
  • S-213 advanced to second reading
  • S-215 advanced to second reading
  • C-490 introduced

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2007-12-05

Government (Conservative)OppositionOver the day: government 45%, opposition 55% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0515:0016:0017:00Last speech 18:20Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 4 h 15 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
68Bills creep forward, answers mostly dodgeThree bills advanced through initial stages and a motion on elections was defeated after limited debate. Question period produced mostly deflected or incomplete replies despite high time on substantive topics.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Points of Order

Irene Mathyssen raised a point of order alleging that James Moore had displayed an image of a scantily clad woman on an open laptop in the chamber, calling it disrespectful to women and the House. Moore denied the allegation and stated he treats the chamber with respect.

Read the exchange

Committees of the House

Mervin Tweed presented the first report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities on Bill C-8 with an amendment, while Rob Merrifield presented the second report of the finance committee on Bill C-28 without amendment.

Read the exchange

Ways and Means

Peter Van Loan moved concurrence in a ways and means motion to introduce legislation giving effect to the Tsawwassen First Nation Final Agreement. John Cummins rose on a point of order to record his opposition.

Read the exchange

Aboriginal Affairs

Steven Blaney, Larry Bagnell, Mario Laframboise and Judy Wasylycia-Leis spoke in support of a motion calling for immediate adoption of Jordan's Principle to resolve jurisdictional disputes over care for First Nations children, with Jean Crowder acknowledging the contributions of all parties.

Read the exchange

Adjournment Proceedings

Luc Malo pressed the government on the lack of long-term assistance for Saint-Amable producers affected by golden nematode contamination one year after quarantine, while Guy Lauzon outlined the suite of business risk management programs now in place.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. misdirected
    Status of WomenStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal leader's positions rather than addressing the mandate change.I guess, having read that the leader of the Liberal Party has adopted the strategy of General Kutuzov, I wonder if this is just another example of him retreating from his own positions.
  2. deflected
    Status of WomenStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates government actions and criticizes Liberals without addressing the specific program abolitions.This government has replaced funding for bureaucracies with funding that goes directly to women's programs.
  3. deflected
    Status of WomenStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes government record and attacks Liberal plans instead of explaining the track record on equality.this government has brought in new laws to protect women from violence.
  4. partly answered
    Status of WomenBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses legal aid history and current initiatives but does not commit to a new provincial agreement.I continue to work with federal-provincial counterparts.
  5. deflected
    Status of WomenBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). loaded question.The answer corrects the questioner and shifts to listing government spending instead of addressing the threat allegation.Perhaps since her French is not very good, she misinterpreted what she read in the newspaper.
  6. partly answered
    Manufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references past budget incentives but does not introduce a new immediate plan for manufacturing.in the 2007 budget, this government introduced incentives for the manufacturing sector.
  7. deflected
    Manufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends tax cuts and criticizes the Bloc instead of explaining why manufacturing aid was not prioritized.The manufacturing sector in Quebec welcomed that statement and those measures, even though the Bloc voted against the tax reductions for that sector.
  8. partly answered
    Manufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer details tax reductions already provided but does not address the proposed short-term funds or immediate action.These were welcomed by the manufacturers in Quebec.
  9. partly answered
    Manufacturing and Forestry IndustriesMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses tax cut reception but ignores job loss and indifference accusations.We're pleased the Minister of Finance acknowledged the competitive challenges facing manufacturers.
  10. deflected
    Official LanguagesJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates throne speech commitment and attacks NDP voting record instead of outlining concrete actions.I am very disappointed that the NDP voted against these measures and these commitments in the Speech from the Throne.
  11. partly answered
    Official LanguagesJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer states federal limits on language use but does not address the call for action on French language decline.the federal government has no control over the languages spoken by Canadians, but it can ensure that services and benefits are available for all communities
  12. partly answered
    Immigrant WomenDiane Marleau (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer mentions settlement funding but does not address pay equity or specific integration for immigrant women.have worked with the provinces and our local service providers to provide services for new Canadians
  13. partly answered
    Immigrant WomenDiane Marleau (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer covers credential referral office and funding but omits language training and skills programs for immigrant women.we launched the Foreign Credentials Referral Office, which will help these new Canadians find out how to get their credentials evaluated
  14. deflected
    HousingMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.Answer claims record spending and attacks Liberal record rather than addressing specific funding cuts.This government is spending more on affordable housing than any government in history.
  15. misdirected
    HousingMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal history and sponsorship scandal instead of responding to housing barriers for women.Shame on them for their history.
  16. deflected
    Manufacturing SectorMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes innovation and shared responsibility but offers no new manufacturing plan.the industry has to innovate and make investments. Each level of government has to do its part.
  17. deflected
    Manufacturing SectorMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the specific 22 recommendations and pivots to general economic claims.The Canadian economy continues to be strong.
  18. misdirected
    Older WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member's faith in Quebecers rather than addressing the requested income support program.I reassert my claim that he really does need to have faith in the people of Quebec.
  19. partly answered
    Older WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists existing supports but does not address the specific POWA funding request or Alberta relocation claim.There is the targeted initiative for older workers.
  20. answered
    EthicsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the appointment of Dr. Johnston to investigate the matter raised.we have appointed an individual in the person of Dr. Johnston to investigate all issues with respect to this issue.
  21. deflected
    EthicsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids confirming the legal interpretation and redirects to the ongoing process.if she has any allegations, she should bring them forward in the appropriate manner.
  22. deflected
    EthicsMs. Bonnie Brown (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer references existing processes without addressing whether the code applies to the described conduct.There are hearings going on before the ethics committee.
  23. answered
    EthicsMs. Bonnie Brown (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms that Dr. Johnston has wide latitude to examine all issues including the code.We have given wide latitude to Dr. Johnston and I think all members of the House will look forward to his recommendations.
  24. partly answered
    HealthMs. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the chemicals management plan review but does not commit to an immediate ban.bisphenol A has been one of the first chemicals that we put to review.
  25. deflected
    HealthMs. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates standards and science basis without addressing responsibility for importers or recall tools.I hope the hon. member would agree with me that we have to take these situations with science as the basis for making our decisions, and that is exactly what we are doing in this case.
  26. misdirected
    Aboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Mr. Rod Bruinooge (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking the asker and her party over human rights delays instead of addressing reinstatement of the program.I have to marvel at the member's raising this issue.
  27. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Mr. Rod Bruinooge (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member's truthfulness and repeats the human rights talking point without addressing recourse for aboriginal women.on the member's reference to the economics of the truth, I must say that she is truly bankrupt in that area.
  28. partly answered
    JusticeMrs. Susan Kadis (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states cases will be handled case by case but does not specify criteria for life-or-death decisions.it has already been indicated by the government and most recently by my colleague, the Minister of Foreign Affairs , that we will look at cases on a case by case basis.
  29. deflected
    JusticeMrs. Susan Kadis (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes abolition of the death penalty abroad without clarifying who makes the final commutation decision.as we all know, Canada has abolished the death penalty, and we will certainly not be reopening that file.
  30. answered
    Agriculture and Agri-FoodMrs. Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly references the $600 million allocation for the livestock sector in response to the aid requests.I want to remind the hon. member that an announcement was made almost two weeks ago, whereby $600 million would be allocated to help the livestock sector, both hog and beef production.
  31. misdirected
    Agriculture and Agri-FoodMrs. Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Bloc for voting against supply management instead of addressing equal standards for imports.it is fascinating to see how the Bloc Québécois can twist the questions.
  32. partly answered
    HealthHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes contingency plans and emergency supplies but does not detail a specific plan for radioisotopes.We are working with industry right now. We are getting emergency supplies for emergency procedures and that will continue.
  33. partly answered
    LobbyistsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer provides a timeline for implementation but avoids addressing the specific claim about lobbyist influence delaying regulations.The pre-publication under the lobbyist regulation will take place in January.
  34. deflected
    AirbusM. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts focus to past Liberal governments and general claims of reform without addressing the specific non-registration or enforcement issue raised.this happened at another time under another government.
  35. deflected
    PovertyMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists existing programs but pivots to attacking the Liberal leader instead of outlining new poverty reduction actions for women.What is shameful is the fact that the Liberal leader wants to take away support for Canadian families, the universal child care benefit, and that will hurt--