All sittings← 2006-09-182006-09-20 →
Tuesday, September 19, 2006 · sitting No. 48
House advances transport act changes after 28 per cent of sitting
Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon moved second reading of Bill C-11, an act to amend the Canada Transportation Act and the Railway Safety Act. The bill addresses railway noise complaints, final-offer arbitration and security at ports and airports. Cannon said the measures select high-priority items from earlier omnibus bills that failed to pass.
Liberal MP David McGuinty questioned the minister on airport security and the rail provisions. Bloc Québécois MP Mario Laframboise raised concerns that clause 29 limits the Transportation Agency when assessing excessive noise from marshalling yards. NDP MP Denise Savoie asked how the bill would improve dialogue between communities and transport operators.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the firearms registry, the Maher Arar inquiry and the Afghanistan mission. Prime Minister Stephen Harper defended the government's approach to public safety and said the government would act on the O'Connor report recommendations.
Decided that day
- Ways and Means motion on softwood lumber export charge passed
- Bill C-16 advanced to second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-09-19
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canada Elections Act
Liberal MP Mario Silva said he supports the principle of fixed election dates in Bill C-16 but believes the bill falls short because it does not sufficiently limit the prime minister's ability to declare confidence votes.
Read the exchangeFirearms Registry
Liberal MP Lucienne Robillard asked the prime minister to keep the registry after a teenager in Hudson was arrested using registry information; Harper replied that the registry did not prevent the Dawson College tragedy.
Read the exchangeMaher Arar Inquiry
Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe called on the government to compensate Maher Arar and to lodge formal complaints with American and Syrian authorities; Harper said the government would act on the O'Connor recommendations.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
Bloc Québécois MP Paul Crête pressed the government for measures to help workers and companies affected by the softwood lumber crisis; International Trade Minister David Emerson said the agreement would flow more than $5 billion to Canadian companies.
Read the exchangeLobbying
Liberal MP Ralph Goodale asked whether Conservative lobbyists who worked on the accountability file were violating the government's promise to end the revolving door to private lobbying; Treasury Board President John Baird pointed to the Liberals' own record.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedFirearms RegistryLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to keeping the registry and instead highlights its past failure.
Unfortunately, the record clearly shows that the registry did not prevent the tragedy at Dawson College.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the request for real reasons and pivots to a general call for facts from the RCMP.
We have to look at the facts of the matter.
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the premise then attacks the previous Liberal government instead of explaining the policy.
What I did say is the last government, instead of worrying about insane people or criminals, simply went after farmers.
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer turns to criticizing Liberal MPs rather than addressing the registry's role in the recent arrest.
The Liberal leadership candidate, the Liberal from Kings—Hants , voted against the gun registry and voted against funding for it.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the registry's role in the arrest and avoids any commitment to maintaining it.
It was not because of the firearms registry, but because of something they discovered.
- answeredMaher Arar InquiryMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the intent to act on the commissioner's recommendations including compensation.
we intend to act on his recommendations.
- partly answeredMaher Arar InquiryMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms acting on recommendations but deflects responsibility to the prior government.
I would emphasize that these events happened under the former government.
- deflectedMaher Arar InquiryMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives a vague commitment to action without addressing a report to the House.
- partly answeredMaher Arar InquiryMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer commits to acting on recommendations but does not provide specific guarantees against future abuses.
We agree with them and we will take action.
- deflectedMaher Arar InquiryJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response acknowledges the injustice but shifts focus to the previous government instead of addressing the apology request.
We all know this took place during the period of the previous government.
- deflectedMaher Arar InquiryJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references ongoing legal proceedings to avoid directly addressing the demand for an apology.
I also understand that Mr. Arar has launched legal proceedings against the federal government.
- deflectedNational DefenceUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to NATO specifics without addressing the request for an apology to veterans.
I was speaking specifically of Canada's role in NATO, which we know that under successful Liberal governments--
- misdirectedNational DefenceUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the questioner's voting record instead of explaining the Prime Minister's statement.
I find it reprehensible that the member over there, who voted against our troops in Afghanistan and who weasels all his words all the time about support for the military, is talking about our military.
- deflectedNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.The answer criticizes the previous government's record rather than responding to the call for an apology.
the record of the previous government over the last 12 or 13 years was to drain the military of all its resources, to run its strength down, to ask our military to do things well beyond its ability and it kept straining the military.
- misdirectedAfghanistanDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.The response blames the previous government for the mission instead of addressing the exit strategy or image campaign questions.
the previous government put us in Kandahar and committed us to the Kandahar area.
- answeredAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the conditions under which Canada and NATO would exit Afghanistan.
Canada and NATO will exit Afghanistan when we are confident that governance, development and security are satisfactory and irreversible.
- deflectedAfghanistanMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates past authorization without addressing the presumption for future extension.
We are confident that the House will support the military in whatever it has to do in the future.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts to criticizing the Bloc rather than addressing the policy question.
Maybe the Bloc Québécois' own uselessness in this House will be revealed.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberMr. Serge Cardin (Bloc) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses the agreement's benefits but ignores the exchange rate loss and specific measures requested.
the softwood lumber agreement actually puts over $5 billion Canadian cash into the pockets of Canadian companies.
- misdirectedLobbyingRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores the question to attack the Liberal record and demand an apology.
The member for Wascana should stand in his place and apologize to the people of Canada for those ethical lapses under his regime.
- misdirectedLobbyingRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Responds with personal attacks on the asker instead of addressing the lobbying issue.
Maybe the member for Wascana could stand in this place and let us know how the income trust leak RCMP investigation is going.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Restates termination of contract but pivots to unrelated Senate and accountability act points.
The member opposite should not hide behind his colleagues in the Liberal Senate and tell them to get on and pass the bill.
- misdirectedGovernment ContractsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores repayment demand to attack Liberal Party scandals instead.
When will he return all the cash that the Liberal Party and the Liberal government stole from Canadians?
- partly answeredMaher Arar InquiryMs. Alexa McDonough (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Acknowledges the report and ongoing talks but does not address the call for immediate apology.
There are government lawyers who are talking with those lawyers.
- deflectedMaher Arar InquiryMs. Alexa McDonough (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps calls for apology and compensation by reiterating 'regrettable' without committing.
Those were his words. Those are our heartfelt words and we think those are appropriate.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains revenue flow to provinces but avoids quantifying the expected size of the impact.
any export tax revenue will be flowed back, net of administrative expenses related to the agreement, to the provinces.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's past position instead of addressing the duty revenue or minister's role.
That party was prepared to settle for far less than this government has achieved in negotiations with the United States.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites Quebec support but does not address the punitive surtax or companies opposing the deal.
this agreement is supported by the softwood lumber industry in Quebec, by the unions in Quebec and by the Liberal government of Quebec.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of voting for lawyers and ignores the specific question about Domtar and the Competition Bureau.
By voting against this agreement, the hon. member is voting only for lawyers and lobbyists.
- answeredOlder WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms a feasibility study on older worker assistance will be announced soon.
the government is proceeding with that and it will be making an announcement soon.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mentions a general plan for biomass but does not commit to following the Bloc's specific proposal.
The government believes very much in energy efficiency and alternate fuels, including biomass.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Blair Wilson (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the member personally and cites industry support rather than addressing the 19% tax threat.
The member should be ashamed of himself, playing partisan political games with the lives of workers in the softwood lumber industry.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids any clarification of the quoted remarks on casualties and pivots to unrelated statements about general military support.
We also mourn our losses and we regret any losses.