All sittings← 2006-05-082006-05-10 →
Tuesday, May 9, 2006 · sitting No. 19
Commons devotes day to budget debate as opposition attacks tax and spending plans
The House spent most of the day on the budget presented May 2. Liberal MP Navdeep Bains said the budget lacks vision and leadership and is not in the best interests of his constituents in Mississauga--Brampton South. Conservative MP Barry Devolin said there is no national child care program and never was one under previous Liberal governments.
Question period featured repeated clashes over judicial remarks by the member for Saskatoon--Wanuskewin. Liberal MP Bill Graham pressed Prime Minister Stephen Harper to demand the member's resignation from a committee chair. Harper replied that the member had withdrawn some remarks and that Liberals should first withdraw their own comments about the courts.
Decided that day
- The amendment to the motion failed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-05-09
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
UNESCO
Bloc Québécois MP Gilles Duceppe asked whether Quebec could publicly disagree with Canada at UNESCO under the new agreement. Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the two governments had agreed to work in harmony and full cooperation.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Jack Layton asked the Prime Minister to hold a debate and vote before any further troop deployment in Afghanistan beyond February 7. Stephen Harper said Canada stands ready to assist in Darfur but is already committed to a UN mission in Afghanistan.
Read the exchangeOfficial Languages
Liberal MP Jean Lapierre asked Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon to table amendments to the Air Canada Public Participation Act to protect linguistic rights. Cannon said the government would announce its position after reviewing the Commissioner of Official Languages report.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Liberal MP Scott Brison asked why the government cancelled the EnerGuide program for low-income households. Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn said almost 50 cents of every dollar had gone to administration and the government intends to deliver results differently.
Read the exchangeForestry Industry
Conservative MP Richard Harris asked what benefits British Columbia would see from the $400 million in the budget for forestry and pine beetle issues. Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn said the government is mitigating damage and has solved the softwood lumber dispute.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise then pivots to attacking Liberal remarks instead of addressing condemnation of the member.
If that is not a description of a religion, I do not know what is. I would like to know if that is really the position of the Liberal Party.
- misdirectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the opposition of inconsistency and demands they withdraw their own comments rather than addressing the resignation request.
The fact of the matter is that if that party and that member oppose these kinds of comments, then they should withdraw the comments they have made, which are far worse than anything the member Saskatoon—Wanuskewin said.
- misdirectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise as false and again demands the Liberals withdraw remarks instead of addressing the resignation demand.
It is now up to the Liberal Party to withdraw its remarks which are far worse than those of the member for Saskatoon—Wanuskewin.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains prior history and a past bill but does not state why no action has been taken now.
In fact, in the end my predecessor hastily tabled a bill that died on the Order Paper.
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the questioner's past record and defers any decision rather than committing to immediate action.
Nonetheless, it is a shame he did not have that same conviction for defending this issue in the past.
- answeredUNESCOMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states it is impossible to prevent a province from expressing its position while noting the agreement.
it is impossible for a federal government to prevent a province from expressing its position in a matter of public policy.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids a direct yes or no on public disagreement and instead praises the agreement and criticizes Liberals.
For the first time, the Government of Quebec and the Government of Canada have concluded an agreement to give Quebec a voice and full participation in UNESCO.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refers the member to the agreement text without clarifying whether disagreement can be publicly expressed.
I invite my hon. colleague to reread the agreement that the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec signed last week.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the question by pointing to a supposed problem with the Prime Minister.
The problem is that the Government of Canada, this Prime Minister—
- deflectedNational DefenceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response discusses Darfur instead of addressing the request for debate and vote on Afghanistan.
we welcome the peace initiatives in Darfur and we are optimistic that they will lead to a lasting settlement.
- misdirectedNational DefenceJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Turns to criticizing the NDP's position on Afghanistan instead of answering about Darfur.
the NDP cannot use its support for action in Darfur to excuse itself for not standing behind our troops in Afghanistan.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Responds by questioning the opposition's actions rather than addressing the query.
What the member of the official opposition has not done is explain the actions and the comments of the member for Scarborough—Guildwood or the member from Mississauga East.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Uses sarcasm to dismiss the question about a right-wing conspiracy.
I cannot resist answering a question about the vast right wing conspiracy.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids the question by directing it back to committee procedure.
if the hon. member is a member of that committee, why does he not raise these issues at the committee himself.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Shifts to praising the budget instead of addressing the chair's comments or resignation.
The budget, which has been put forward, is a wonderful budget with more for aboriginal Canadians than ever emerged from that side of the House
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Explains the government's approach but does not address the call for the minister to step down.
I continue to engage international counterparts on the issue of climate change.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to international Kyoto commitments without addressing the credibility claim.
That is the approach we are going to take.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer notes clearer regulations but does not address the figures or scandal claim.
The regulatory requirements are now clear.
- deflectedHealthMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats that the situation is regulated without addressing lobbyists or an investigation.
It is important for Health Canada to protect women at all times.
- misdirectedAtlantic AccordMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer attacks the asker's party and knowledge instead of clarifying the conflicting messages.
Maybe he should ask why we had to wait so long to deliver to a province what was rightfully a province's own justification for getting good benefit from the offshore that his party should have delivered years ago.
- misdirectedAtlantic AccordMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer mocks the asker about television and a parrot before pivoting to assurances.
I just cannot think of the name of the parrot but I am sure it will come to me.
- deflectedHomelessnessJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights new funding and blames the prior government rather than addressing the jailing or cuts.
This is a great opportunity for constructive progress with respect to a social issue that was neglected for 13 years by the previous federal government.
- deflectedHomelessnessJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer gives a general assurance on priorities without addressing the specific cuts or jailing claim.
The member opposite would be pleased to know that the important services that are provided to Canadians, that meet the priority of Canadians and that are run effectively will certainly be something this government will protect.
- answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that no determination has been made on the project.
no determination has yet been made on this project.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer blames prior government without addressing the cost or future deals raised.
Once a deal has been signed the details will be known and we will have a full debate on the issue.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesScott Brison (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal record and efficiency stats instead of explaining the cut's priority.
The facts on this file are that almost 50¢ of every $1 is spent on administration or inspections.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesScott Brison (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to new programs and mandate while ignoring efficiency comparison and deputy minister firing.
We are working on a new ethanol program.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates Kyoto difficulties and false choices rather than addressing program cancellations or credibility.
The only way we can reach our Kyoto target is to, first, shut down the Canadian economy or, second, ship billions of dollars overseas.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges international challenges and ongoing talks but does not commit to restoring EnerGuide.
One of the reasons that we are engaging in the discussions in Bonn on the open dialogue on Kyoto targets and future participation by Canada is to see where we can go from here
- partly answeredHumanitarian Aid to PalestineMs. Caroline St-Hilaire (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states policy on non-Hamas partners but does not address the specific YWCA daycare transfer issue.
Canada continues to respond to the humanitarian needs of the Palestinians through multilateral organizations and other partners that are not associated with Hamas.
- answeredHumanitarian Aid to PalestineMs. Caroline St-Hilaire (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains suspension and restructuring of projects to avoid PA benefit.
Canada has suspended four projects involving direct aid to the Palestinian Authority and is in the process of restructuring eight projects to ensure that they will not benefit the Palestinian Authority.
- partly answeredResearch and DevelopmentMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms the $100 million increase but does not compare to G-7 leadership or address future prosperity concerns.
I would point out that the Canadian government has invested $100 million more in research this year.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to Kyoto protocol costs instead of addressing northern financial support.
we have two options if we would like to try and meet that target: one is to shut down the entire economy, and that includes the economy in the north; or two, send billions of dollars in taxpayer money overseas, money we could invest in the north.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer acknowledges emissions sectors but ignores the direct question on elders and lack of plan.
I will acknowledge that the oil and gas sector along with the transportation sector are two industry sectors that will be a big part of reducing emissions here in Canada.
- deflectedResearch and DevelopmentJoe Fontana (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer offers only a generic thank you without engaging the question on astronomy funding.
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for the question--
- partly answeredImmigrationMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses humanitarian options and openness but does not commit to any announcement or process for residency.
I talked to them about the need to use humanitarian and compassionate avenues to permit them to stay, where it is warranted.