All sittings← 2006-05-052006-05-09 →
Monday, May 8, 2006 · sitting No. 18
Commons spends majority of day on budget debate amid opposition attacks
The House devoted 52 per cent of its time to Government Orders on the budget. Members from all parties exchanged views on spending priorities, environmental measures and crime policy during the extended debate.
In Question Period the main clashes centred on judicial independence after remarks by the member for Saskatoon—Wanuskewin drew criticism from Liberal MP Bill Graham. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that the comments were personal and did not represent government policy.
Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe pressed the Prime Minister on Quebec’s role at UNESCO while NDP Leader Jack Layton questioned the government’s court position on access to information.
Decided that day
- Bill sent to Health committee for second reading
- House backed ratification of North American Aerospace Defense agreement
- Motion for Canada-wide child care system defeated
- Proposed amendment to motion defeated
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-05-08
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Aboriginal Affairs
Liberal MP Gary Merasty accused the government of killing the Kelowna accord and questioned the suitability of the member for Saskatoon—Wanuskewin as aboriginal affairs committee chair.
Read the exchangeAgriculture
Conservative MP Bill Casey asked the agriculture minister to resolve collection letters sent to 272 Nova Scotia farmers under the CAIS program.
Read the exchangeAdjournment Proceedings
NDP MP Olivia Chow raised the government’s decision to end the previous child-care agreements during adjournment proceedings.
Read the exchangeNational Mining Week
Conservative MP Christian Paradis marked National Mining Week and highlighted the sector’s $60-billion production value.
Read the exchangeWorld Red Cross Red Crescent Day
Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc and Bloc Québécois MP Christiane Gagnon both recognized World Red Cross and Red Crescent Day.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids any action or intent by PM and merely restates the member's disclaimer.
the member for Saskatoon—Wanuskewin has already said that these are his own personal views and that they do not represent the position of the government.
- misdirectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the question on rein-in or apology and instead attacks the Liberal Party with quotes.
The member for Mississauga East—Cooksville said the following, "One man one vote has been replaced by one judge one vote.
- misdirectedJusticeBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer evades the demand for resignation and pivots to questioning Liberal positions with quotes.
But what is the Liberal Party's stance on this issue?
- deflectedJusticeMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer states respect for judiciary but does not address disciplinary action or intimidation claim.
The government has the greatest respect for all those who serve in the judiciary, including all those who serve their country by sitting on the Supreme Court of Canada.
- misdirectedJusticeMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer deflects to past Liberal conduct on Gomery and avoids confirming confidence in the member.
the hon. member should be embarrassed about the conduct of her party in the last Parliament with respect to the Gomery commission.
- partly answeredUNESCOMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends the agreement as historic but does not directly confirm equivalence to Francophonie voting rights.
On Friday, we signed an historic agreement on Quebec's participation in UNESCO.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer corrects a factual premise but pivots to accusing Bloc of preferring independence rather than addressing the promise.
Perhaps the Bloc Québécois prefers an independent Quebec in UNESCO.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer avoids the comparison to independent status and instead lists endorsements from others.
Even Louise Beaudoin, the former colleague of the member who has just asked the question, found that it was an excellent agreement.
- deflectedUNESCOMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer invites rereading but never addresses whether Ottawa retains final say.
I invite my honourable colleague to reread the agreement carefully.
- deflectedAccess to InformationJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer highlights new agencies but ignores the court case on the PM's agenda.
with Bill C-2, it is this government that has given greater access to information.
- deflectedAccess to InformationJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats legislative achievements without addressing the ongoing court case or releasing documents.
we also put forward both the access to information commissioner's report and a white paper
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gary Merasty (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to budget spending and attacks the questioner's knowledge instead of addressing the chair appointment.
this budget does more for aboriginal Canadians than any previous Liberal budget.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gary Merasty (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists spending figures and refuses to discuss the chair's resignation.
I do not intend to take lessons or lectures from that hon. member with respect to this budget.
- partly answeredGovernment of CanadaMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer acknowledges the meeting with Luntz and notes McGuinty's support on softwood but does not explain priority given to the pollster.
I have known Mr. Luntz for some years, but he does not work for the government or the Conservative Party.
- misdirectedGovernment of CanadaMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer mocks the questioner and shifts to softwood lumber instead of addressing the Civitas agenda.
the member seems to be amazed that the leader of the Conservative Party would attend a cocktail party
- deflectedUNESCOMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer praises the bilateral agreement but never addresses the Belgian model or voting rights at UNESCO.
We believe--and this is also the Quebec government's position--that the agreement is excellent for everyone.
- answeredUNESCOMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly denies the claim in the question.
- partly answeredHumanitarian Aid to PalestineMs. Caroline St-Hilaire (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses ongoing aid but not the specific bank refusal issue raised.
CIDA is continuing to fund aid for the Palestinian population, but it is reviewing the situation and has suspended funding that was intended for the Palestinian authority, for Hamas.
- partly answeredHumanitarian Aid to PalestineMs. Caroline St-Hilaire (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains aid continuation via partners but does not address the bank decision reconciliation.
Canada is continuing to respond to the Palestinians' humanitarian needs through multilateral organizations and other partners not associated with Hamas.
- deflectedFederal-Provincial RelationsMr. Anthony Rota (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids apology by shifting to friendship with John Tory and opposition behavior.
I do not think the House will be surprised to learn that John Tory is a very good friend of mine.
- misdirectedFederal-Provincial RelationsMr. Anthony Rota (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition with quotes instead of addressing the meeting request.
Let me quote the member for Etobicoke North, who said in talking about Premier McGuinty: I just resent...I expect that from the Bloc Québécois, I don't expect that from the premier of Ontario.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to criticizing past Liberal actions rather than committing to Kelowna funding.
We are not making empty promises the way the Liberals had been doing for the past 13 years.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer again emphasizes budget funds while dismissing the accord without addressing implementation demand.
The funds that are contained in this budget exceed any money that was put forward by the former Liberal government in the 2004 budget, the 2005 budget, and the economic statement.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the made-in-Canada plan but ignores the specific program abolition and oil company funding question.
Under our made in Canada plan, we will see all Canadian taxpayer money invested right here at home in Canadian solutions for the environment.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer criticizes the prior program and old government instead of addressing why Conservatives adopted the approach.
This program specifically was sold to Canadians as an energy efficient program, yet only 50¢ of every program dollar actually went to homeowners.
- misdirectedHomelessnessJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal record on homelessness rather than confirming no cuts to funding.
If we look on the streets of Toronto after 13 years of the Liberals being in government what progress was made?
- deflectedHomelessnessJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer dismisses the question as rhetoric and restates the new funding commitment without addressing cuts to the truly homeless.
more rhetoric, no results, no accomplishments, not getting anywhere; this is what promises are like from Liberals.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Borys Wrzesnewskyj (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes a process exists for exemptions but avoids specifics on the Lizano-Sossa case or ministerial permit.
there is a process to determine the whole aspect of deportation and whether there should be exemptions.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationAndrew Telegdi (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks prior Liberal record and lists new spending instead of addressing the claimed broken promise on funding levels.
the previous government made lots of promises but it never delivered.
- answeredManufacturing IndustryMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly cites budget measures and external endorsement addressing manufacturing competitiveness.
That is why we brought down a budget that responds to the concerns of the manufacturing industry, that cuts income taxes for small businesses, that eliminates the capital gains tax and responds to the industry's concerns.
- deflectedManufacturing IndustryMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer disputes the premise by claiming tax cuts help businesses but does not address non-profitable firms facing closure.
If we asked all the businesspeople in Beauce, in Quebec and in Canada whether a tax cut would help them and their business, I think they would not hesitate to say yes.
- answeredPolitical DonationsMr. Sukh Dhaliwal (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states that neither the PM nor ministers direct RCMP investigations, directly addressing the accountability concern.
neither the Prime Minister nor individual members of Parliament nor cabinet ministers direct the RCMP when it comes to investigations.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promotes their Accountability Act and attacks Liberals instead of confirming or denying intent to ignore Gomery.
We will take no lessons from any Liberals on this issue.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer dismisses the preamble as wrong and restates a general commitment without addressing the specific policy change or broken promise claim.
The government is going to do everything in its power to ensure taxpayer dollars are well spent and spent in the best interests of all Canadians.
- misdirectedAtlantic AccordMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner's past inaction rather than addressing whether the Atlantic accord is fair or if the minister will confront the Finance Minister.
When we were fighting to get the benefits for our province from the Atlantic accord and when our Prime Minister forced the government to deliver, that member and others sat there and would not lift a finger to help Newfoundland and Labrador.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Answer reports on checks for legality and flight plans but does not state whether the minister approves of the practice.
Up to now, we have found nothing illegal.
- deflectedPensionsMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer calls the facts inaccurate then shifts to an unrelated pension credit increase instead of addressing the proposed use of surplus funds.
It took 30 years and this government to double that from $1,000 to $2,000.