All sittings← 2026-11-032026-11-05 →
Wednesday, November 4, 2026 · sitting No. 162
Commons debates medical assistance in dying safeguards bill
The House spent nearly half the sitting on second reading of Bill C-41, the medical assistance in dying safeguards act. Liberal MP Emmanuella Lambropoulos said the bill would prevent expansion of MAID for mental illness while allowing advance requests under strict conditions. Conservative MP Arpan Khanna asked why advance requests had not been studied in committee before the bill reached the House.
Question period focused on affordability and government contracts. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pressed the government to remove all taxes on gas and diesel. Liberal MP Steven MacKinnon said external factors including foreign wars had raised prices and noted Conservative opposition to measures that support Canadians in need.
Decided that day
- Ninth report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights passed
- Bill C-269 failed second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – November 4, 2026. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2026-11-04
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Provisional score. Question Period for this sitting has not been rated yet, so the score rests only on what was decided and how much time went to the business at hand. It will change when the exchanges are read.
Other moments
Remembrance Day
Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal recognized retired master corporal Matthew Logan for organizing annual Remembrance Day gatherings in Newton that share stories of fallen service members from the Korean War.
Read the exchangeThe Economy
Conservative MP Ted Falk said half of surveyed Canadians are using savings for necessities and nearly one in three are skipping meals because they cannot afford groceries.
Read the exchangeSyria
Liberal MP Salma Zahid said she had joined a parliamentary delegation that saw rubble and ongoing suffering during a recent visit to Syria.
Read the exchangeFinance
Bloc Québécois MP Christine Normandin asked why the federal government had caved to U.S. demands on culture, pipelines and dairy while Quebec still awaited repayment for asylum-seeker costs and higher health transfers.
Read the exchangePublic Services and Procurement
Conservative MP Jamil Jivani asked why the Prime Minister had not placed CEO Dan Goldberg under an ethics screen when the AI minister had done so for the same individual.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer avoids the specific call to eliminate gas taxes and pivots to general support measures.
of course, we have repeatedly taken action to support Canadians who have—
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses Telesat's importance but ignores the ethics and contract discussion question entirely.
Successive governments have supported this company because we believe it is important for Canada not to rely on foreign companies
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer blames external factors and opposition instead of addressing removal of gas taxes.
I have to also note the systematic opposition of the Conservative leader and party to every single possible initiative
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to heat pumps and a company outside the riding rather than addressing the gas tax question.
If the Leader of the Opposition wants to talk about clean fuel regulations, I am sure he might like to have a conversation with Imperial in Strathcona.
- deflectedPublics Services and ProcurementPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer reframes around American tariffs and sovereignty instead of addressing the ethics act or contract discussion.
First, the Conservatives are never talking about the American tariffs.
- deflectedPublics Services and ProcurementPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends industrial policy and questions opposition stance rather than addressing the ethics violation claim.
I would like to know what the Leader of the Opposition suggests. Is it more Telesat, or more of an American company?
- misdirectedFinanceChristine Normandin (Bloc) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to a hydro project and attacks Bloc instead of addressing US influence or cultural concessions.
For once, will the Bloc Québécois show it is capable of supporting a project that is building Quebec?
- deflectedFinanceChristine Normandin (Bloc) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists existing benefits but does not engage with the specific policy reversals requested.
we can talk about the Canada child benefit, which has reduced child poverty by nearly 40% in Quebec.
- deflectedFinanceJean-Denis Garon (Bloc) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights past actions instead of addressing the specific demands for repayment and health transfers.
Take, for example, what we have done in the past 11 months: $11 billion for the Davie shipyard, 5,000 jobs, the biggest contract—
- deflectedFinanceMichael Chong (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). substantive question.The response promotes economic plans without confirming if fiscal targets will be met.
On this side of the House, we are serious about building a strong economy and the most resilient and diversified economy in the G7.
- deflectedFinanceMichael Chong (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). substantive question.Again, focuses on building economy rather than addressing debt reduction targets.
we are going to continue the work of building a strong economy, the most resilient economy in the G7, for all Canadians.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Leslie Church (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists existing programs but does not confirm whether the budget will address the affordability crisis.
It is why this government made the national school food program permanent.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Leslie Church (Liberal). substantive question.Provides examples of support services but avoids a direct commitment on new budget measures for affordability.
These are the ways we bring about affordability for Canadians.
- misdirectedFinancePhilip Lawrence (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.The response attacks the opposition instead of addressing fiscal restraint or targets.
If the Conservatives wrote the budget, it would be called "Servants of Surrender".
- deflectedFinanceEric Lefebvre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pays tribute to the MP but sidesteps whether the Prime Minister agrees on balancing the budget.
He did a great job when he served as Quebec's finance minister, and he is also doing a great job as parliamentary secretary.
- deflectedFinanceEric Lefebvre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The response references historical debt but does not outline measures for the current promise.
I would like to remind members that we will have the documents and budget numbers here in the House tomorrow.
- misdirectedThe EconomyGabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer addresses environmental regulations and projects instead of Bill C-39 powers or criticism.
We will work to improve the effectiveness of our regulations, but we will not change the environmental standards under those regulations.
- partly answeredThe EconomyGabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer addresses labour dispute prevention but ignores calls to withdraw Bill C-39 or constitutional concerns.
That is why Bill C-39 proposes introducing special measures, special mediation, new techniques and new approaches.
- misdirectedInternational TradeShuvaloy Majumdar (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives on by-elections rather than addressing the Prime Minister's shifting positions on trade.
I am surprised the Conservatives continually talk about by-elections.
- misdirectedInternational TradeShuvaloy Majumdar (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends countertariffs by attacking opposition instead of addressing evidence on their ineffectiveness or impact on low-income Canadians.
Canadians expected our government to take a strong position, something the opposition would never have done
- misdirectedInternational TradeJacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer accuses asker of irony and defends by-elections instead of explaining the timeline for a trade deal.
hearing the member talk about theatrics seems a bit ironic, considering his behaviour in this place.
- answeredMajor Projects OfficeShannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly names the sectors of interchange staff as requested.
Last night I said, and I am happy to repeat it again, the transportation sector, financial services sectors and agriculture sectors.
- deflectedMajor Projects OfficeShannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes job creation and attacks the question as conspiracy instead of addressing secrecy or recusal rules.
Instead of talking down the MPO, why do they not help us build jobs?
- misdirectedMajor Projects OfficeCarol Anstey (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to announcing tariff removal instead of disclosing corporate-paid staff numbers or companies in the MPO.
Today we were proud to announce the removal of China's tariffs for two years—
- deflectedMajor Projects OfficeCarol Anstey (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the request for employee numbers and pivots to unrelated projects while attacking the question.
rather than come up with conspiracy theories, why does the member not talk about what the MPO did at Churchill Falls?
- deflectedMajor Projects OfficeConnie Cody (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.Answer refuses the yes-or-no transparency demand and instead promotes projects while insulting the opposition.
just as with the last member, I would invite the member, rather than focusing on conspiracy theories about the MPO, to focus on the 18,000 jobs at the Darlington nuclear reactor.
- misdirectedMajor Projects OfficeConnie Cody (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts entirely to announcing a BC project and never addresses the hiding or conflict-of-interest claims.
we have talked about Atlantic Canada, we have talked about Quebec, and we have talked about Ontario. Now it is time to talk about British Columbia, where I was last Friday to announce, with the help of the MPO, it must be said, the listing of Roberts Bank Terminal 2.
- misdirectedMajor Projects OfficeGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the member's voting record on unrelated benefits instead of addressing loaned employees or conflicts.
what I do not understand about the Conservatives is the way they talk about helping ordinary people and then systematically vote against those people's interests.
- deflectedMajor Projects OfficeGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes a Quebec project and avoids any response on independent oversight or releasing company names.
the Major Projects Office has selected Quebec winners as well. I implore the member to support this side of the House, because we revealed the investment and the start of construction on the Contrecoeur project
- answeredArtificial IntelligenceAaron Gunn (Conservative) asked Evan Solomon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly explains the equity stake, job creation and rationale for the investment rather than deflecting.
With this company, we are taking an equity position so all Canadians can benefit. This company will create 1,000 jobs and invest $1.7 billion in computing here.
- deflectedArtificial IntelligenceBlaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Evan Solomon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the insider-benefit allegation and repeats the general pro-investment message.
we are not going to wait for others to build AI. We are going to build safe Canadian AI. We are going to invest in Canadian companies.
- deflectedArtificial IntelligenceBlaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Evan Solomon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the Conservatives' record instead of addressing the specific insider or picking-winners claims.
this is not about what the Conservatives say, picking winners or losers. This is about investing in Canadians. They should try it for a while.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementJamil Jivani (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses general ethics rules without addressing the specific contract or ethics screen differences.
the Prime Minister , like all ministers, all members of the House and all senior officials throughout the government, must live under some of the most stringent ethics rules in the world.
- deflectedSteel and Aluminum IndustryMichael Guglielmin (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states the government's position on Stelco but does not address tabling the demand letter or answer yes or no.
There are three days left. If not, we are suing.
- deflectedSteel and Aluminum IndustryMichael Guglielmin (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses willingness to work together but pivots to tariffs and the upcoming budget instead of committing to the proposals.
I am convinced that he will be convinced by our plan to build Canada strong.
- partly answeredNational DefenceJames Bezan (Conservative) asked David McGuinty (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the incident and support provided but only notes the question without confirming equal benefits.
I take due note of the member's question. We will look at it and come back with an answer.
- deflectedHousingJenny Kwan (NDP) asked Jennifer McKelvie (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists past housing actions and results but does not address declaring community housing a national interest or increasing the budget for non-market units.
Over the last year, we have worked with provinces to reduce red tape and fees.