Commons debates budget bill amid clashes over trade and pipelines

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   Canada-U.S. RelationsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks Poilievre's judgment rather than addressing the Brookfield contract or concessions listed.the Leader of the Opposition knows full well that Canadians did not trust his judgment
2. deflected
   Natural ResourcesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer invites travel to Calgary instead of confirming federal authority or approving a pipeline.I would invite the member opposite to buy a ticket to Calgary tomorrow to see how a federal government works with a provincial government
3. misdirected
   Natural ResourcesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to Alberta's premier and avoids the veto or pipeline approval question.maybe the member opposite should explain to his constituents why the Premier of Alberta wants to stand beside our Prime Minister
4. deflected
   Natural ResourcesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists general leadership points without confirming authority or approving the pipeline.what the Prime Minister is doing is leading.
5. deflected
   International TradePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer repeats the Calgary invitation and does not address attendance or the deal.I would invite the member opposite to buy a ticket and come to Calgary tomorrow to see who cares.
6. deflected
   International TradePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims the best deal exists but pivots to criticizing Poilievre without addressing concessions or Brookfield.Unlike the Leader of the Opposition, who would have signed any bad deal put in front of him, the Prime Minister did not do that.
7. misdirected
   Natural ResourcesYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Lena Metlege Diab (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses immigration and the Canada-Quebec Accord instead of tariffs or the oil agenda.I am fully focused on ensuring that our immigration system remains strong and attracts the best talent in the world for Quebec and Canada.
8. misdirected
   Natural ResourcesYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Bloc leader's past votes on drilling and pipelines rather than addressing the oil agenda or laws.the Bloc Québécois leader's question might be more relevant if he had not authorized drilling on Anticosti Island
9. answered
   Natural ResourcesYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The minister directly affirms the assurance requested without evasion.Mr. Speaker, the answer is yes.
10. misdirected
    International TradeJohn Brassard (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the Brookfield conflict and instead attacks the Conservatives.Why do the Conservatives not get on board and fight for Canadian families instead of for themselves?
11. misdirected
    EthicsJohn Brassard (Conservative) asked John Zerucelli (Liberal). loaded question.The response pivots to steelworkers and attacks the opposition rather than addressing the ethics screen meeting.The Conservatives are investing in division.
12. misdirected
    EthicsMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Gregor Robertson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to housing and steel support without addressing the nuclear deal or personal interests.The Prime Minister is standing up for Canadians today and we stand with him.
13. deflected
    EthicsMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The reply dismisses the question as conspiracy theories and pivots to unrelated trade supports.While the members opposite engage in conspiracy theories, our Prime Minister will stand up later today and announce major new supports for the forest products industry
14. misdirected
    EthicsRaquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the Brookfield investment claim and promotes steel measures while urging the leader to tune in.I urge the Conservative leader to tune in, get behind these measures and support the—
15. deflected
    Natural ResourcesPatrick Bonin (Bloc) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). substantive question.The minister avoids the pipeline question entirely and discusses a Quebec graphite project instead.Here is an example from Quebec. The Nouveau Monde Graphite project in Saint‑Michel‑des‑Saints will supply essential components for electric vehicle batteries and energy storage systems.
16. deflected
    Natural ResourcesPatrick Bonin (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer rejects the shame premise and contrasts parties without addressing the pipeline or environmental concerns.Between the Bloc Québécois, which wants to destroy our economy, and the Conservative Party, which wants to open the floodgates and destroy everyone in its path, the Liberal Party and the Liberal government, as always, find the proper balance.
17. deflected
    International TradeGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Carlos Leitão (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes government actions without addressing the conflict of interest claim.That is why we have made several trips abroad, which the Conservatives are not big fans of, to secure investments.
18. deflected
    EthicsGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Carlos Leitão (Liberal). loaded question.Responds by criticizing Conservatives instead of addressing the ethics question.I am very sad to see the petty games they are playing.
19. misdirected
    International TradePat Kelly (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Begins by insulting the opposition rather than answering the trade deal question."Conservatives care" is like an oxymoron or some pathetic joke, because we know those two terms are like oil and water; they just do not mix.
20. deflected
    Intergovernmental AffairsMichael Cooper (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Dismisses as conspiracy without fully assuring no benefit to Brookfield.I hate to break up the Conservatives' conspiracy theory, but Pathways is actually owned by six large oil companies, not Entropy.
21. deflected
    Intergovernmental AffairsMichael Cooper (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids specific assurance by labeling the question a conspiracy theory.here we go again with conspiracy theories.
22. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). rhetorical question.Suggests attending an event instead of clarifying the pipeline announcement.I would invite that member to get a ticket to Calgary tomorrow as well, and they can see why the Premier of Alberta thinks that things have never been so good in Canada.
23. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Explains process but does not commit to building the pipeline as asked.We also understand that if a proponent wants to take it to the Major Projects Office, we expect them to work in conjunction with the affected jurisdiction and to consult first nations.
24. misdirected
    Natural ResourcesJasraj Hallan (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Diverts to advising the opposition leader to contact the premier instead of addressing the policy commitments.The Leader of the Opposition should please call Danielle Smith.
25. deflected
    Natural ResourcesJasraj Hallan (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer invites the member to an event rather than addressing whether Brookfield sponsorship is required for pipeline approval.I invite the member across to buy a ticket and come to Calgary to see how the federal government can work with a provincial government to build Canada strong.
26. misdirected
    Intergovernmental AffairsAaron Gunn (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to steel and lumber support while attacking the Conservatives instead of answering the pipeline jurisdiction question.These guys cannot get their heads out of the sand for the sake of the companies right now who need our support.
27. deflected
    Natural ResourcesAaron Gunn (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to the trade war and government support without addressing leadership on the pipeline.Tariff-impacted industries across Canada know that this government is standing up to protect their interests at every step along the way.
28. deflected
    Natural ResourcesDan Albas (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer questions the member's intent and suggests he has not thought it through rather than stating a position on federal jurisdiction.I think he does not really mean that.
29. deflected
    Natural ResourcesDan Albas (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as manufactured indignation and restates election commitments instead of addressing the pipeline decision.we want to thank our colleague in the Conservative Party for that manufactured indignation.
30. deflected
    Natural ResourcesDavid McKenzie (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes an event and project referrals without confirming whether the Prime Minister will approve the pipeline.Maybe the member can join us tomorrow in Calgary and see how this government, with the provinces, is building Canada strong.
31. misdirected
    Automotive IndustryRhonda Kirkland (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservative leader personally while announcing unrelated steel measures instead of addressing the Prime Minister's comments on trade.The Conservative leader only cares about himself and squashing a caucus revolt.
32. deflected
    Automotive IndustryRhonda Kirkland (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims worker satisfaction and upcoming announcements but does not address why the Prime Minister has not negotiated on auto jobs.They have acknowledged our remissions framework and how we have adjusted it, and they are looking to us for leadership and more support.
33. deflected
    Automotive IndustryTony Baldinelli (Conservative) asked John Zerucelli (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes government plans and asks Conservatives to support them instead of addressing the GM plant or PM's comments.In a few minutes, the Prime Minister will be announcing more supports for the auto sector and more supports for the steel industry because we have their backs.
34. deflected
    EmploymentGérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Carlos Leitão (Liberal). loaded question.The answer expresses surprise at the question phrasing and notes a trade war without addressing Paccar workers or the PM's comment.Mr. Speaker, I am rather surprised that the member would phrase his question that way.
35. partly answered
    The EnvironmentDon Davies (NDP) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses consultation with provinces and indigenous groups but does not explain the policy reversal or why the coast is being risked.our Prime Minister was very clear yesterday, and it is important to highlight that we will make sure, with any of the major projects that move forward, that we work with affected jurisdictions.
36. answered
    The Member for Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel—AlnôbakYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked L’hon. Marc Miller (Liberal). rhetorical question.The exchange is a tribute to a member's record with no substantive question asked or evaded.I want to congratulate the member for Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel—Alnôbak.
37. answered
    The Member for Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel—AlnôbakLouis Plamondon (Bloc) asked The Speaker (Liberal). rhetorical question.The exchange consists of thanks and tributes with no question posed that requires an answer.Dear colleagues, Thank you for your words, your kind thoughts and the deep respect you have shown our dear colleague