All sittings← 2025-11-182025-11-20 →
Wednesday, November 19, 2025 · sitting No. 56
House debates affordable living act amid spending clashes
The House spent the largest portion of its sitting on the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act. Government members defended the bill's tax reductions and program investments while Conservative members argued the measures would raise costs through the industrial carbon tax. Debate continued without a vote.
In Question Period Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said the government had doubled the deficit and grown the bureaucracy by 80 per cent. Liberal ministers replied that the budget creates jobs and reduces operating expenses while advancing trade deals with Ecuador and Indonesia.
Other exchanges addressed tariffs imposed after the Prime Minister's trips, the industrial carbon tax's effect on food prices and the absence of an emergency debate on extortion.
Decided that day
- Bill C-3 advanced to second chamber
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – November 19, 2025. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2025-11-19
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Export and Import Permits Act
New Democrat MP Jenny Kwan introduced Bill C-233 to close the United States arms-export loophole and bring all shipments under the Arms Trade Treaty standards.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman said tariffs on canola, steel and aluminum rose after the Prime Minister's meetings with China and the United States.
Read the exchangePublic Safety
Conservative MP Sukhman Gill reported a 500 per cent rise in extortion cases in British Columbia and asked why the government blocked an emergency debate.
Read the exchangeFirearms
Conservative MP Carol Anstey said the $742-million program had collected only 22 firearms in its Cape Breton pilot and called for it to be scrapped.
Read the exchangeTaxation
New Democrat MP Don Davies said the government eliminated the luxury-yacht tax while cutting public services, contrary to its claim that the levy cost more to administer than it raised.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner's voting record and motives instead of addressing the deficit or bureaucracy size.
He is against the jobs that we are trying to create across the country, against investments in defence, against investments in health care, and against investments in mining, electricity and energy projects across the country.
- misdirectedInternational TradePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to personal attack on the opposition leader's caucus and strategy rather than providing any tariff reduction example.
the only person hiding under a rock right now is the Leader of the Opposition when he looks at his caucus.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to praising jobs and unions while noting opposition vote, avoiding deficit and bureaucracy questions.
I guess that does not include the Conservatives, who voted against the very Canadians they say they stand up for.
- partly answeredInternational TradePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Maninder Sidhu (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists new trade deals signed but does not address any tariff reductions from the Prime Minister's trips.
We have signed new trade deals with Ecuador and Indonesia.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses ongoing MOU talks without addressing the pipeline cancellation or admitting error.
the Prime Minister and the premier have publicly stated that they are having productive discussions on advancing an MOU between Canada and Alberta.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks past Conservative record on pipelines instead of addressing the ban or northern gateway cancellation.
in those long, barren Harper years when the member was a minister, the only pipeline that was built was the pipeline full of hot air that led to nothing.
- answeredCanadian Identity and CultureYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly corrects the funding amount and details specific investments mentioned in the budget.
We did not announce $500 million in the budget for arts and culture across the country. We announced $770 million, the largest investment in Canadian history.
- misdirectedCanadian Identity and CultureYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists other funded items and criticizes the Bloc's votes rather than addressing private television and radio funding.
The Bloc Québécois's position is outrageous.
- misdirectedCanadian Identity and CultureYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Bloc voting record instead of addressing whether government plans end of private media.
The Bloc Québécois's position is frankly outrageous.
- deflectedFinanceGérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Nathalie Provost (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to personal perspective on women and social programs without addressing deficit management or Fitch warning.
I am surprised to hear my colleague criticizing this budget.
- deflectedFinanceGérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Anna Gainey (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes budget benefits while ignoring the quoted past statement and call for balanced budget advice.
budget 2025 responds to the needs of the time.
- misdirectedFinanceTim Uppal (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). substantive question.Answer insults Conservative leader with snow globe metaphor and attacks party instead of addressing Fitch or spending warnings.
trusting advice from the Conservative leader on this budget is like trusting a forecast by a weatherman who lives inside a snow globe.
- deflectedFinanceTim Uppal (Conservative) asked Wayne Long (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to election coalition and transformational budget without addressing credit card use, food banks or spending impact.
It is time for the members opposite to stop the rhetoric, stop the slogans, stand with us and build a strong economy.
- deflectedFinanceCostas Menegakis (Conservative) asked Leslie Church (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists seniors' benefits and union quote while avoiding fiscal anchors, credit rating risk and spending questions.
Do not take my word for it; SEIU Healthcare union president, Tyler Downey, says, "Putting more money directly into the pockets of PSWs will support retention and help strengthen care for Canada's seniors."
- deflectedFinanceCostas Menegakis (Conservative) asked Leslie Church (Liberal). loaded question.Answer continues listing youth programs and YMCA quote without engaging debt-to-GDP anchor or credit card spending concerns.
this budget is helping young Canadians from their first summer job all the way through the career-starting, lifelong job they are going to have.
- deflectedFinanceRichard Martel (Conservative) asked Mandy Gull-Masty (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to indigenous families and vague credit spending defense without addressing PBO confirmation or mill closure impacts.
Is the process of spending on credit not really a process of defending Canada?
- deflectedThe EconomyYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to criticizing a referendum and currency plan instead of clarifying the original claim about Trump.
Quebeckers are very concerned.
- deflectedThe EconomyYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the Bloc and PQ rather than addressing the hypothetical about adopting the US dollar.
the member is really living in the world of political fiction
- misdirectedInternational TradeMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores trade failures and instead attacks the opposition leader's polling numbers.
Why is it that when the Leader of the Opposition flies out of the city to far-flung places across our vast and grand land, his polling results go down every single time he lands at a great Canadian airport?
- deflectedInternational TradeMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists economic positives and questions Conservative beliefs instead of addressing the Prime Minister's travel or failed deals.
The only question is, why do the Conservatives not believe in Canada?
- deflectedThe EconomyMark Strahl (Conservative) asked Evan Solomon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to listing budget items and inviting agreement rather than explaining results from the Prime Minister's trips.
Can we agree we want to lower taxes for Canadians?
- deflectedThe EconomyMark Strahl (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights stakeholder support for the budget instead of addressing travel or affordability failures.
From Canada's Building Trades Unions to the YMCA to Food Banks Canada, a variety of different stakeholders have advocated for the programs and approach in this budget.
- misdirectedInternational TradeTed Falk (Conservative) asked Rebecca Chartrand (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes northern investments and urges support for the budget instead of responding to tariff or travel criticism.
I encourage the member to get on board and vote for them to ensure we make the national school food program permanent.
- deflectedInternational TradeJacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.Answer contrasts the Prime Minister with the opposition leader rather than addressing specific tariff outcomes from travel.
with all due respect to my colleague, given the choice between a Prime Minister who visits our allies and trade partners to diversify our markets and an opposition leader who spends his time disparaging our institutions on obscure podcasts, the choice is clear and simple.
- deflectedInternational TradeJacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to diversification talking points without addressing tariffs or US agreement.
These individuals are asking us to open international markets and reduce our dependence on the U.S.
- misdirectedThe EconomyLaila Goodridge (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks the member's voting record instead of addressing affordability of baby formula.
The member voted against the Canada child benefit.
- deflectedThe EconomyLaila Goodridge (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer references experts and budget measures but avoids the question on domestic production priority.
In this budget, we have money for innovation in agriculture.
- misdirectedThe EconomyLaila Goodridge (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cuts off by attacking the member for fake outrage rather than responding to the query.
members like that one, with the fake outrage as their colleagues stand up and vote against the very—
- misdirectedThe EconomyRachael Thomas (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks the member's votes on unrelated programs instead of addressing the fuel tax.
she voted against every measure that helps single mothers right now
- deflectedThe EconomyRachael Thomas (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer promotes Liberal values and programs without addressing grocery price increases or the fuel tax.
Liberals believe in helping each other.
- deflectedThe EconomyCorey Tochor (Conservative) asked Buckley Belanger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer blames previous government and promotes budget spending instead of addressing the food packaging tax.
There is $51 billion set aside to help Canada build its communities.
- deflectedCarbon PricingDalwinder Gill (Conservative) asked Rechie Valdez (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights tax cuts and youth programs without addressing the industrial carbon tax impact on food prices.
Again, we have cut taxes for 22 million Canadians.
- deflectedPublic SafetySukhman Gill (Conservative) asked Ruby Sahota (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims the Speaker ruled on debate then pivots to blaming Conservatives on Bill C-2 instead of addressing the extortion crisis or debate request.
Guess who is blocking them? The Conservatives are.
- deflectedPublic SafetyFrank Caputo (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the question on rising extortions and instead attacks the member for opposing Bill C-2.
The Conservatives, and the Conservatives alone, stood in the way of those particular measures, demanding their removal from Bill C-2.
- deflectedPublic SafetyFrank Caputo (Conservative) asked Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the member's points on past votes and again urges support for Bill C-2 without addressing the extortion question.
They have been asking the Conservative Party to step up to ensure that Bill C-2 , with lawful access, is passed.
- misdirectedFirearmsCarol Anstey (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer completely ignores the gun buyback question and instead criticizes the member for voting against the budget.
She voted against 46,000 families who will see an increase in the Canada child benefit, families who rely on the food—
- partly answeredTaxationDon Davies (NDP) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the luxury tax change by citing job creation but does not address the claimed cuts to public services.
following the fact that we changed the tax regime on that particular aspect linked to jets, Bombardier announced 600 new jobs in Montreal and Quebec.