All sittings← 2025-06-122025-06-16 →
Friday, June 13, 2025 · sitting No. 15
Commons advances bill to remove internal trade barriers and speed projects
Dominic LeBlanc moved a motion to fast-track second reading of Bill C-5, the one Canadian economy act, limiting debate to two members per recognized party plus one New Democrat and the Green member, each speaking no more than 10 minutes. The motion, which consumed 46 per cent of the sitting, would send the bill to committee after limited speeches and questions.
Philip Lawrence said the Prime Minister misled Canadians by promising free trade by Canada Day when many barriers remain. LeBlanc replied that only federal barriers fall under Parliament's jurisdiction and that provinces are also removing obstacles. Sébastien Lemire accused the government of giving first nations only five days to comment before projects are designated in the national interest; LeBlanc said the five-day period precedes further extensive consultations.
In question period Ryan Turnbull told Philip Lawrence that GC Strategies has been barred from federal contracts for seven years and that the matter was referred to the RCMP after the Auditor General's report on ArriveCAN spending.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – June 13, 2025. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2025-06-13
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Public Safety
Philip Lawrence asked what extra steps the government would take to protect Jewish communities after Israel's actions against Iran; Robert Oliphant said Israel has the right to defend itself and that the government acts daily against anti-Semitism.
Read the exchangeMarine Transportation
Tamara Kronis said the government is allowing BC Ferries to send jobs to a Chinese shipyard despite receiving federal funds; Mike Kelloway replied that BC Ferries procurement is a provincial matter.
Read the exchangeOil and Gas Industry
Branden Leslie demanded repeal of Bills C-69 and C-48, the emissions cap and the industrial carbon tax before any new pipeline can be built; Julie Dabrusin said projects must be low-risk, low-cost and low-carbon and that the Conservatives failed to build projects when last in office.
Read the exchangeFirearms
William Stevenson said zero firearms have been bought back under the confiscation scheme while gun crime rose 116 per cent; Jacques Ramsay said 12,000 weapons have been purchased and 10,000 destroyed.
Read the exchangeHousing
Tako Van Popta said the housing minister failed to end homelessness in Vancouver and that costs have doubled under the Liberals; Jennifer McKelvie said the government has a credible plan including a GST cut for new homes and the build Canada homes initiative.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredPublic SafetyPhilip Lawrence (Conservative) asked Robert Oliphant (Liberal). substantive question.Affirms commitment to fighting anti-Semitism but provides no specific extra steps.
We will continue to stand up and defend Jews in this community to make sure they are safe.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementPhilip Lawrence (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Lists actions taken but ignores returning funds or supporting a vote.
It is notable that we have terminated all contracts and suspended security clearance for GC Strategies.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementPhilip Lawrence (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Repeats prior points on actions without addressing promotions or firings.
An investigation was undertaken by OSIC.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementJason Groleau (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Repeats actions taken and ignores lifetime ban or returning money.
We have made sure that GC Strategies can no longer receive any government contracts for seven years
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementJason Groleau (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Repeats seven-year suspension and RCMP referral without addressing lifetime ban or rewarding politicians.
They deemed GC Strategies to be ineligible to receive any federal government contracts for seven years
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementJason Groleau (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). rhetorical question.Repeats prior actions and ignores the yes-or-no vote request on lifetime ban.
The investigation of OSIC has deemed it ineligible for any federal government contracts for seven years.
- partly answeredGovernment PrioritiesYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Addresses committee study indirectly by defending the bill's purpose but does not commit to thorough study.
However, to suggest that the government would scale back environmental impact assessments and consultations with indigenous peoples is false.
- misdirectedGovernment PrioritiesYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Disagrees with premise about Conservative agenda instead of addressing committee study request.
it will come as no surprise that I do not agree with my friend from the Bloc Québécois when he says that we have adopted a purely Conservative policy.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesAlexis Deschênes (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the listed grievances and pivots to praising a bill while noting Bloc nostalgia.
I see that our friends in the Bloc Québécois miss our former leader and prime minister, Justin Trudeau.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementLianne Rood (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses the referral and ineligibility but omits any stance on the motion for repayment.
This company has been referred to the RCMP, and legal action is under way.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementLianne Rood (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats prior actions without engaging the claim of promoted ministers or definition of merit.
GC Strategies has been deemed ineligible by the office of supplier integrity and compliance to enter into any contracts with the federal government.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementSteven Bonk (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms actions taken but does not address supporting the Conservative motion for repayment.
The company in question has been deemed ineligible for any federal government contracts for seven years.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementSteven Bonk (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates ineligibility and referral without addressing the pattern of promotions or taxpayer refunds.
The company in question is no longer eligible to enter into contracts with the federal government.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMichael Cooper (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Answer covers ineligibility and RCMP referral but avoids committing to the motion for repayment.
That is exactly why we have deemed this company ineligible to enter into contracts for the next seven years.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementMichael Cooper (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). loaded question.Answer affirms unacceptability and actions but sidesteps the direct fraud accusation and motion support request.
That is exactly why our government has acted on this matter.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Ryan Turnbull (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes repeated responses and seven-year ban but ignores the call for lifetime ban and money recovery.
Obviously, I have done so numerous times in this question period, and I am happy to do so continuously for the remaining time that we have together today.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesXavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The response emphasizes economic benefits and Liberal representation instead of addressing the call to allow parliamentary debate and respect Quebec's consent.
They understand the urgency of the situation with regard to our economy and the importance of prioritizing job-creating projects across Quebec and Canada in order to build one economy, not 13.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsSébastien Lemire (Bloc) asked Rebecca Chartrand (Liberal). substantive question.It mentions consultation efforts but does not address whether they will step back or change the approach to the bill.
That is why we are investing in real consultation, with $40 million to support indigenous engagement, in addition to establishing an indigenous advisory council.
- deflectedMarine TransportationTamara Kronis (Conservative) asked Mike Kelloway (Liberal). substantive question.The answer points out provincial jurisdiction without addressing the federal government's role or strategy regarding Canadian jobs and procurement.
Of note, this particular project was not undertaken by the federal government. BC Ferries is entirely under provincial jurisdiction.
- deflectedMarine TransportationTamara Kronis (Conservative) asked Mike Kelloway (Liberal). loaded question.The response promotes the one Canadian economy act instead of addressing the specific strategy regarding China and the BC Ferries contract.
When it comes to this government, it is Canada first, always.
- deflectedMarine TransportationAaron Gunn (Conservative) asked Mike Kelloway (Liberal). substantive question.It acknowledges the issue but attributes it to provincial jurisdiction without committing to federal action.
The reality is that this particular project is under provincial procurement standards, regulations and oversight, but when it comes to this federal government and to everyone in this chamber, it is going to be Canadian first, always.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesWarren Steinley (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references the agreement among premiers on project criteria but does not address the use of Canadian steel.
If the hon. member across the aisle wants to get people working in Saskatchewan, he should support the one Canadian economy bill.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesWarren Steinley (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.The response ties the bill to getting steelworkers back to work but avoids a direct commitment on using Canadian steel.
That would get steelworkers back to work.
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryEllis Ross (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes the bill and national interest projects without addressing the alleged anti-energy policies or keeping resources in the ground.
Those projects of national interest will include roads, pipelines, transmission lines and renewable resources.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesEllis Ross (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). loaded question.The response promotes domestic permitting reforms instead of addressing the US minerals negotiation claim.
That is why we will speed up permitting of new mines by cutting red tape and approving projects within two years.
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryBranden Leslie (Conservative) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the low-carbon approach and criticizes past Conservative actions without addressing repeal of the listed laws.
To be an energy superpower, we need to make sure that we are low-risk, low-cost and low-carbon.
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryBranden Leslie (Conservative) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). substantive question.The response reframes around national unity and criticizes Conservatives rather than defining consensus or veto power.
we saw an amazing moment of Canadians' coming together, with premiers and our Prime Minister all talking about how we can do what Canadians have asked us to do
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryJonathan Rowe (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes collaboration with premiers and building projects without addressing repeal of the specific bills named.
We are focused on building the economy in Canada, working with premiers in provinces and territories
- misdirectedPublic SafetyTodd Doherty (Conservative) asked Jacques Ramsay (Liberal). substantive question.The response shifts entirely to border security legislation instead of addressing safe supply or repeat offender release.
the strong borders act would combat organized crime, protect the integrity of our immigration system
- partly answeredMental Health and AddictionsTodd Doherty (Conservative) asked Vince Gasparro (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer acknowledges the overdose crisis but pivots to hiring border personnel without new youth-specific measures.
Canada's new government takes the issue incredibly seriously.
- deflectedPublic SafetyAnna Roberts (Conservative) asked Vince Gasparro (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights new hiring and border legislation rather than addressing bail reform or catch-and-release policies.
We are committed to hiring 1,000 new CBSA workers and 1,000 new RCMP personnel.
- answeredFirearmsWilliam Stevenson (Conservative) asked Jacques Ramsay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly defends the buyback program and reports progress on weapons collected.
the firearms buyback program is a serious program to keep our communities safe.
- deflectedHousingTako Van Popta (Conservative) asked Jennifer McKelvie (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes the government's housing plan without acknowledging any failure or addressing the minister's past promise.
I joined the government because we have a credible plan for affordable housing.
- partly answeredInternational TradeClifford Small (Conservative) asked Maninder Sidhu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer describes recent meetings and new mechanisms to address tariffs but offers no timeline for relief.
We agreed to launch the JETC, the joint economic and trade commission, to work through some of these issues
- misdirectedInternational TradeClifford Small (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as slogans and negativity instead of addressing tariff relief.
Rather than slogans, misinformation and negativity, the Liberals are actually doing the work of opening dialogue actively on the ground
- deflectedSportGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked Madeleine Chenette (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes collaboration on prevention but pivots to a personal walking statistic rather than outlining government leadership.
On average, I walk 8.2 kilometres a day.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsJenny Kwan (NDP) asked Robert Oliphant (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms ongoing RCMP investigations and rule of law but does not address rescinding the Modi invitation.
We will continue to have those investigations.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsHeather McPherson (NDP) asked Robert Oliphant (Liberal). loaded question.The answer supports Israel's right to self-defence and calls for de-escalation but neither condemns the strikes nor commits to nuclear disarmament.
Israel has the right, absolutely, to defend itself within the bounds of international law.