All sittings← 2025-05-272025-05-29 →
Wednesday, May 28, 2025 · sitting No. 3
Commons opens throne speech debate as Carney and Scheer clash over tariffs
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to resuming debate on the Speech from the Throne. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said the address contained slogans but lacked detail on how the government would reverse policies that caused household debt and rising food-bank use. Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney replied that the government would legislate immediately for one Canadian economy and nation-building projects.
Question Period featured repeated exchanges on tariffs and energy policy. Scheer asked why tariff revenues had fallen short of the $20 billion promised during the campaign. Carney said revenues would support affected workers and businesses. Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs pressed for repeal of Bill C-69 while Liberal MP Tim Hodgson said projects would be approved within two years where provincial consensus existed.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – May 28, 2025. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2025-05-28
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Democratic Institutions
Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval said a Léger poll showed 87 per cent of Quebeckers feel no attachment to the monarchy and asked why the first act of the new Parliament was to invite the King. Liberal MP Steven Guilbeault replied that the British Crown has always read the Speech from the Throne.
Read the exchangeHousing
Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman said the new housing minister had overseen a 179 per cent rise in Vancouver home prices and asked whether prices should fall. Liberal MP Gregor Robertson replied that the government would deliver a GST cut for first-time buyers and reduce development costs.
Read the exchangeOpioids
Conservative MP Tamara Kronis said Nanaimo lost 94 people to overdoses in 2024 and called the safe-supply experiment a failure. She urged investment in treatment and recriminalization of hard drugs.
Read the exchangeMental Health
Liberal MP Parm Bains dedicated his statement to a childhood friend who died during the election and said May is Mental Health Awareness Month, citing Canadian Mental Health Association data on suicide rates.
Read the exchangePetitions
Conservative MP Brad Vis presented a petition calling for reduced red tape so veterans can move more easily from military to civilian life.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedFinanceAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer thanks constituents and restates tariff policy without addressing honesty or shortfall funding.
Our tariffs have maximum impact on the United States and minimum impact on Canada, and we are dedicating all the revenues from those tariffs to supporting the workers and businesses affected by the unjustified American actions.
- deflectedFinanceAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer references a prior plan and restates legislative priorities without explaining budget timing.
Our plan includes legislating for one Canadian economy and for nation-building projects immediately, to grow the economy, and we expect the support from all members of the House.
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats economic growth plan without addressing Bill C-69 or pipeline policy.
Canada's new government is acting immediately to grow the economy, one Canadian economy out of 13, with nation-building projects and one project office, working with the provinces to co-operate.
- deflectedFinancePierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states a plan for one economy without disclosing spending details or budget plans.
Canada's new government has a bold, ambitious plan to create one Canadian economy out of 13 and to implement nation-building projects.
- partly answeredFinancePierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists immediate tax measures but does not commit to a summer budget.
the government will take immediate action to cut taxes for the middle class.
- deflectedFinancePierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). loaded question.Answer disputes the $20 billion figure origin and restates tariff targeting without addressing budget timing.
We have put in place tariffs, a tariff response targeting the United States, and they have maximum impact in the U.S. and minimum impact here in Canada.
- partly answeredSpeech from the ThroneYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes the throne speech addressed global trade transformation but does not explain absence of tariff specifics.
for those who were there, the Speech from the Throne talked about the transformation of the global trading system.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). loaded question.Answer calls for unity and mentions premiers meeting without addressing centralization concerns.
we are in the midst of an economic crisis.
- answeredClimate ChangeYves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Mark Carney (Liberal). substantive question.Directly affirms the premise with a clear yes.
yes, the climate crisis is real.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesShannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.Ignores the repeal question and pivots to general project-building promises.
It is time to get many projects built in Canada.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesShannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.Addresses pipelines with a conditional but avoids explicit repeal commitment.
Yes, we will support new pipelines if there is consensus in Canada for them.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesEllis Ross (Conservative) asked Tim Hodgson (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids the production cap question and shifts to general energy superpower rhetoric.
I am interested in getting things built, including pipelines where there is consensus.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesEllis Ross (Conservative) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). substantive question.Ignores the yes-or-no cap question and restates low-carbon goals.
If Canada wants to be an energy superpower, the Prime Minister has stated that energy is going to be low-cost, low-risk and low-carbon.
- deflectedCarbon PricingJonathan Rowe (Conservative) asked Julie Dabrusin (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids repeal and pivots to defending the carbon tax principle.
making sure that polluters pay is a central part of moving forward and being competitive as an energy superpower.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesAndrew Lawton (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Ignores the repeal question entirely and turns to trade war and investment instead.
we know that we are in a trade war that has been launched by the U.S.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesRichard Martel (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids the repeal question and shifts to protecting jobs amid tariffs.
- deflectedDemocratic InstitutionsXavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the poll, costs, and out-of-touch claim by restating throne speech tradition and sovereignty.
I would also like to remind my colleagues in the Bloc Québécois that Canada is a sovereign country.
- deflectedDemocratic InstitutionsXavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the budget and monarchy spending critique to pivot to an unrelated tax cut announcement.
The first thing we announced is a tax cut for 22 million Canadians.
- deflectedHousingMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Gregor Robertson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the question on price increases by thanking voters and listing unrelated tax and housing plans.
I am also looking forward to pursuing the most ambitious affordable housing plan in the history of Canada
- deflectedHousingMelissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Gregor Robertson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer evades the price trajectory question by accusing the asker of wanting seniors to sell homes cheaply.
The member may wish to force seniors to sell their homes for less, but we are going to focus on building more affordable housing
- deflectedHousingScott Aitchison (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the GTA sales collapse and shortage warning to promote the GST cut instead.
We are eliminating the GST for first-time homebuyers in the country for houses up to $1 million.
- misdirectedHousingScott Aitchison (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the Conservatives for questioning the tax cut rather than addressing bureaucracy versus building homes.
it is concerning to hear a member talk down a measure that will help 22 million Canadians in this country; it is shocking.
- deflectedHousingGabriel Hardy (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). loaded question.The answer bypasses the price reality question to highlight the GST cut for first-time buyers.
We are going to eliminate the GST on homes at or under $1 million for first-time homebuyers.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyLeslyn Lewis (Conservative) asked Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses crime concerns by pledging bail tightening but does not engage with repealing Bill C-5.
We will make sure that we tighten up bail reform, and we will ensure that our government will always be there to protect Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
- deflectedPublic SafetyLeslyn Lewis (Conservative) asked Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.The response highlights crime reductions but ignores the call to repeal specific bills.
Since that time, we have been working together with law enforcement to work towards safer communities across Canada.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyTim Uppal (Conservative) asked Ruby Sahota (Liberal). substantive question.It commits to stricter sentences but sidesteps collaboration with the opposition on the specific bill.
We will impose stricter sentences for repeat offenders.
- partly answeredMental Health and AddictionsMichael Ma (Conservative) asked Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.Addresses cracking down on fentanyl but not the specific proposal for life sentences.
Liberals are accelerating our work to crack down and dismantle the fentanyl trade and the organized crime that profits from it.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyAmarjeet Gill (Conservative) asked Ruby Sahota (Liberal). loaded question.Provides commitments on bail but avoids addressing the minister's statement directly.
We will make it tougher for violent criminals to get bail, and we will impose stricter sentences for repeat violent offenders.
- deflectedEthicsMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses opposition of digging dirt instead of confirming the facts about investments.
Opposition members like to distract Canadians with these hypotheticals and conjured scenarios.
- deflectedEthicsMichael Barrett (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Responds by contrasting actions rather than providing the requested assurance on holdings.
What the Prime Minister is busy doing is not what the member is busy doing.
- deflectedEthicsLuc Berthold (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Reiterates compliance and accuses opposition of mudslinging without answering the offshore assets question.
Naturally, the Prime Minister is meeting and exceeding all the requirements in the ethics code
- deflectedEthicsLuc Berthold (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Focuses on ethics code and attacks opposition instead of disclosing information or answering yes or no.
If the Conservative Party wants to keep trying to dig up dirt, I think voters are going to be disgusted.
- deflectedFinanceJasraj Singh Hallan (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer announces a fall budget and pivots to tax cuts without explaining the delay.
we are being very clear that there will be a budget in the early fall of this year.
- deflectedFinanceJasraj Singh Hallan (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Shifts to tax cuts and economic goals instead of addressing spending transparency.
we are cutting taxes. As the Minister of Finance just mentioned, this new government is cutting taxes on the middle class.
- deflectedFinanceSandra Cobena (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.Provides a plan outline but avoids explaining absence of spring budget.
I have one simple answer: We have a plan, and it is a plan in action.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansClifford Small (Conservative) asked Joanne Thompson (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids the policy question by affirming general support for fisheries.
This government continues to understand the cultural and economic importance of the fisheries.
- partly answeredEmploymentDon Davies (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Mentions focus on skills and thriving but lacks concrete steps.
This government is very focused on protecting workers and on making sure that youth and, indeed, workers of all ages have the skills and abilities to thrive as our economy transitions.