All sittings← 2024-12-022024-12-04 →
Tuesday, December 3, 2024 · sitting No. 381
Commons debates environment committee report amid privilege and border clashes
The House spent the largest share of its time on routine proceedings for committees, where Conservative MP Branden Leslie moved concurrence in the 10th report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. Liberal MP Julie Dabrusin said emissions are at their lowest in almost three decades and defended the carbon price as the most efficient tool, while Leslie replied that the government is failing to meet its targets and ranks last in the G7. Bloc Québécois MP Yves Perron questioned the effectiveness of carbon storage technology.
Question period featured repeated Conservative attacks on border security and spending, with Leader of the Opposition Pierre Poilievre asking the Prime Minister to reverse policies on immigration, deficits and taxes. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau replied that Canada is working with the incoming U.S. administration and defended the carbon rebate and new social programs. Other exchanges addressed foreign interference allegations and the Canada Emergency Business Account.
Decided that day
- 10th report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development passed
- 18th report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs passed with amendment
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – December 3, 2024. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2024-12-03
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Privilege
Conservative MP Andrew Scheer said the NDP had raised baseless accusations about Conservative conduct during a vote and that the actual contempt was the behaviour of the NDP deputy House leader.
Read the exchangePetitions
Conservative MP Ted Falk presented a petition calling on the government to block any attempt to legalize the killing of infants under one year of age.
Read the exchangeForeign Interference
Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said a Conservative MP had been in touch with agents linked to foreign interference in the Conservative leadership race.
Read the exchangeTaxation
Liberal MP Julie Dzerowicz asked why the Conservative leader voted against the temporary GST tax break for the holiday season.
Read the exchangeSeniors
Conservative MP Anna Roberts said the Auditor General found value-for-money concerns with nearly half the projects under the new horizons program for seniors.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the call to reverse specific policies and instead pivots to border cooperation and a tax break the Conservatives opposed.
As for us, here, we are going to continue to invest in Canadians, to be there to support people in difficult times, with measures like the tax break we are offering for the next few weeks, a tax break that the Conservatives voted against.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer sidesteps reversing tax hikes, debt, and investment losses by listing programs the Conservatives opposed.
if the Leader of the Opposition were truly concerned about Canadians' well-being, he would not have voted against the tax break that we are offering to Canadians for the next couple of months.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing loss of control or policy reversal and instead criticizes the questioner for amplifying U.S. narratives.
I think the Leader of the Opposition needs to reflect carefully on whether he really wants to amplify the erroneous narratives that the Americans are putting forward around, for example, our border
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer evades the question on tax and investment policies by again listing opposed programs and accusing the asker of exploitation.
The Conservative leader just wants to exploit the challenges Canadians are facing, while we will solve them.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the carbon-tax and job-loss question and instead defends the carbon rebate without engaging the premise.
The price on pollution puts more money back in the pockets of the middle class across this country than it costs it.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states that the immigration plan was shared weeks ago and details investments already made.
we shared our immigration plan weeks ago.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms discussions on trade issues but does not address Quebec representation on negotiating teams.
on Friday evening, we spoke with the president-elect not only about our borders, but also about trade, steel, aluminum, energy and softwood lumber.
- misdirectedCanada Border Services AgencyMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer turns the question about rehiring border officers into an attack on Conservative cuts to unrelated programs.
That is why it is so bewildering that the Conservative leader continues to stand up on cuts for dental care and cuts on housing investments
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer focuses on border investments instead of addressing the Mar-a-Lago dinner outcome.
We have already introduced many measures in recent years to reduce the number of immigrants and irregular arrivals and to stop U.S. guns and drugs from crossing the border into Canada.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Eric Duncan (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Responds by referencing past Conservative cuts rather than outlining a current plan.
We think it is unfortunate the previous Conservative government cut the money available for this important work.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Eric Duncan (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The response mocks the question with rhymes instead of providing details on border plans.
it would appear that the only plan the Conservatives have is to think up silly new rhymes in question period.
- misdirectedBorder SecurityMr. Tom Kmiec (Conservative) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the Conservative member's record instead of addressing the border plan.
or do we trust the guy who spent 20 years making up interesting rhymes and spent 20 years securing one and only one thing, his own paycheque and a bloated pension?
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Tom Kmiec (Conservative) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.Deflects by criticizing Conservative voting record rather than presenting a plan.
What did the Conservatives do? They voted against it.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.Blames opposition for inaction instead of detailing the government's plan.
What did the Conservatives do? They did absolutely nothing.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Accuses the questioner of repeating forced slogans without providing concrete solutions.
I would ask our colleague to be more responsible before repeating slogans that I am sure his head office has forced on him.
- answeredInnovation, Science and IndustryMr. Rhéal Éloi Fortin (Bloc) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The response affirms ongoing support and collaboration without evasion.
We will always be there for Lion Electric workers.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Martin Champoux (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Thanks colleague but pivots to general inclusivity without addressing the bill.
We are working with the Quebec government at all levels and at all times.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Martin Champoux (Bloc) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). substantive question.Agrees on issue and cites Bill C-63 but avoids committing to C-373.
I also want to point out that Bill C‑63 already addresses the aspects and sections of the Criminal Code targeted by this bill.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Adam Chambers (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Ignores tax reversal request and attacks Conservatives' attitude toward US.
the Conservatives seem to have an inferiority complex vis-à-vis the United States, but on this side of the house, we are proud to be Canadian.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Adam Chambers (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids deficit question by proposing a joint GST break instead.
if the Conservatives are so keen on supporting Canadians, as they like to claim every single day in the House, I have a great idea for them.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Highlights inflation success and GST break without addressing election timing.
inflation has been within the Bank of Canada's target range for the past 10 months.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Ignores rhetorical question and promotes GST holiday on inflation.
we have good news for Canadians. For the past 10 months, inflation in Canada has been within the Bank of Canada's target range.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked Mr. Jaime Battiste (Liberal). substantive question.Focuses on healing and National Day but sidesteps the bill on denialism.
we continue to focus on support and healing.
- partly answeredYouthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Marci Ien (Liberal). substantive question.Mentions Canada summer jobs but does not address youth climate corps.
There are 70,000 young people who have benefited from the Canada summer jobs program.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Scot Davidson (Conservative) asked Rechie Valdez (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the Auditor General finding and pivots to promoting a GST break while referencing past Conservative positions.
Our government is giving Canadians a GST tax break starting December 14 that will benefit retailers across Canada.
- misdirectedSmall BusinessMr. Marty Morantz (Conservative) asked Rechie Valdez (Liberal). loaded question.Answer refuses the CEBA question and instead attacks the Conservative leader over security clearance.
What Canadians really want to know is why the leader of the Conservative Party refuses to get his security clearance.
- misdirectedSeniorsMrs. Anna Roberts (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the Conservatives on past Harper policy rather than addressing the new horizons program waste.
I will remind the member that her former leader, Stephen Harper, went to Davos for the World Economic Forum, instead of going to King—Vaughan, to announce to Canadians that henceforth, the retirement age would be moving to 67 from 65.
- partly answeredSmall BusinessMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Rechie Valdez (Liberal). substantive question.Answer provides some data on CEBA repayment rates but does not address the ineligible payments or foreign management concerns.
our government helped nearly 900,000 small businesses through its CEBA loans, and more than 80% of them have paid back their loan and took advantage of the loan forgiveness program.
- misdirectedSeniorsMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to criticizing Bloc voting record instead of responding to the Auditor General findings on seniors programs.
Was it a political decision for the Bloc Québécois to vote against every increase to the guaranteed income supplement?
- misdirectedSeniorsMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again attacks Bloc positions on past votes rather than addressing data gaps or the royal recommendation request.
It has made several political choices that are bad for the future of Quebec and for the future of seniors in Quebec.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.Answer is cut off but begins by avoiding the coalition question entirely.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses past farm aid instead of addressing the coalition deal or NDP pension question.
I consulted with the Conservative Party, which was urging me, as we did at the time, to come to the aid of farmers in Saskatchewan and throughout western Canada who were trying to get what was a bumper crop to the ports and international markets
- misdirectedGovernment AccountabilityMr. Dan Muys (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the question about NDP-Liberal deals and instead attacks Conservatives for their voting record.
They are too scared to actually act on their issues.
- misdirectedNew Democratic Party of CanadaMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the question on NDP support for the government and instead accuses Conservatives of petty politics.
They have an opportunity to ask real questions of the government, but instead they choose to play petty politics.
- misdirectedNew Democratic Party of CanadaMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the question about NDP pensions and instead attacks the Conservative leader's pension.
it kind of boggles the mind that the Conservatives are talking about pensions for their members when the Leader of the Opposition has a $2-million pension from the House of Commons.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Frank Caputo (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the mother-child program eligibility and protocols but warns against politicizing the issue.
There are eligibility criteria and protocols to participate in this program.
- deflectedSeniorsMs. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights Liberal support for seniors and Conservative opposition but does not address tracking program impacts or the rebate exclusion.
We have managed to accomplish this in this Parliament and it is a great tribute to those members who have voted for those things.
- answeredVeterans AffairsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses investments, office openings, and immediate access to mental health benefits for veterans.
When it comes to mental health benefits, we have made improvements to ensure that when veterans apply for benefits, they have access to them immediately.
- answeredPoints of OrderMr. Damien Kurek (Conservative) asked Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the point of order regarding question relevance and member rights under Standing Orders.
There seems to be a precedent developing that if a member is of the side of the government, they belong to the political party of the government, and their question will not be answered if you deem it not to be in line with government business.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMr. Larry Brock (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.The answer deflects the request for an apology by attacking the questioner and withdrawing the insult conditionally.
I withdraw that insult if those snowflakes cannot take it.
- deflectedPoints of OrderMr. Frank Caputo (Conservative) asked The Speaker (Liberal). rhetorical question.The statement poses no actual question and is ruled out of order as debate rather than being addressed on substance.