House debates housing report concurrence as Poilievre presses GST cut

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks opponent's plan instead of addressing the GST proposal.His idea of a housing solution is to cut billions of dollars from the investments we are making to build more housing faster.
2. deflected
   HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats criticism of cuts without engaging the GST or reimbursement question.the Conservative Party's plan is to cut hundreds of millions of dollars from Quebec and cut investments in housing across the country.
3. deflected
   HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer focuses solely on accusing opponent of cuts rather than responding to the GST plan.He is offering cuts. He is offering austerity.
4. misdirected
   HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts entirely to national security and security clearance instead of housing policy.Unfortunately, the Leader of the Opposition has failed at his responsibility to keep his own MPs safe from foreign interference.
5. misdirected
   HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to security briefings and ignores the GST housing question entirely.it is extraordinarily difficult to have a leader of the Conservative Party refuse to get the necessary security briefings
6. partly answered
   SeniorsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends seniors investments but does not address the specific OAS increase for 65-74 group.our government invested in seniors by enhancing the guaranteed income supplement by 10%, by increasing old age security for seniors aged 75 and up
7. deflected
   SeniorsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists past votes against programs instead of addressing the OAS fairness or election risk question.the Bloc Québécois and the Conservative Party voted against it.
8. answered
   HealthMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states agreement with Canada Health Act violation and outlines government actions.we are the government that has stood up for women's rights unequivocally across this country, including pulling back transfers to provinces where abortion services and reproductive health were not being delivered.
9. misdirected
   HousingMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the housing question entirely and pivots to attacking Conservatives on abortion rights.I want to follow up on the first part of my hon. colleague's question about the fact that the Conservative Party continues to attack women's rights.
10. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to national security clearance instead of addressing the election call or GST housing plan.having inexplicably decided not to get his security clearance, the Conservative leader is putting Canadians at risk
11. misdirected
    Government PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer avoids the carbon tax election question and criticizes the Conservative leader on security clearance.Why has the Leader of the Opposition chosen to not get a security clearance when the safety of his own MPs is in the balance?
12. misdirected
    Government PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the call for an election and repeats the security clearance attack instead.It is inexplicable to our security services that they cannot let the leader of the Conservative Party know about the threats facing him
13. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer refuses to release names and lectures on security risks rather than answering directly.There is a reason we do not disclose classified information in places where our adversaries are watching and paying attention
14. misdirected
    Liberal Party of CanadaPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer sidesteps the carbon tax election demand and focuses on the opposition leader's refusal of security clearance.The leader of the Conservative Party chooses to play the pettiest form of politics instead of stepping up on his responsibilities
15. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the GST housing proposal and pivots to criticizing the Conservative stance on security.when there is a real threat to Canadians' security and even the security of his own members, the Conservative leader refuses to get his security clearance
16. answered
    International TradeMr. Yves Perron (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly affirms support for supply management and calls on the Senate to pass the bill.We are defending supply management and we expect the Senate to pass this bill to ensure that supply management will always be protected in Canada in the future.
17. deflected
    International TradeMr. Yves Perron (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms Senate independence without addressing the request to call the senator.we recognize the Senate's independence and the important work it does in considering bills and making recommendations.
18. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to attacking the asker on security clearance instead of addressing the GST plan or homelessness.That being said, it is interesting to see the Conservative leader absolutely refuse to answer such a simple question.
19. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts entirely to national security and security clearance rather than the GST housing proposal.the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada refuses to get his security clearance so that he can keep Canadians safe
20. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer criticizes the plan as cuts and attacks on security clearance instead of engaging the housing tax proposal.the fine print on this one is that it would be cutting billions of dollars of investments in housing
21. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer redirects to premiers accepting funds and again attacks on security clearance, avoiding the GST plan.maybe he could give a call to his fellow Conservatives, the premiers of Saskatchewan and Ontario
22. deflected
    Public Service of CanadaMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights general anti-Black initiatives without addressing the specific lawsuit or court fight.this government has done more to recognize systemic bias, systemic discrimination, unconscious bias and anti-Black racism than any other.
23. partly answered
    HealthMs. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer affirms pro-choice stance and enforcement but pivots to attacking Conservatives rather than fully detailing Canada Health Act actions.This government is unequivocally pro-choice. We will always defend a woman's right to choose, full stop.
24. misdirected
    HousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer ignores the GST election proposal and instead attacks the asker on women's rights and security clearance.Canadians watching today will see that the Leader of the Opposition is refusing to stand up to take a strong position in protecting women's rights unequivocally in the House.
25. misdirected
    Government PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question embeds attacks on PM's motives and housing record before asking about an election; answer ignores the ask and attacks Conservatives on women's rights instead.Conservative Party members do not stand up for women's rights, so nor does the Conservative leader.
26. deflected
    Government PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question mixes personal attack with call for election; answer begins by commenting on the spectacle rather than addressing any point raised.what is fascinating is the spectacle of watching—
27. misdirected
    Government PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question accuses PM of various failures and asks about a free vote on non-confidence; answer pivots to criticizing Conservative positions on defence and security briefings.Why will he not trust our national security agencies?
28. partly answered
    JusticeMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Question asks for Criminal Code amendment on advance MAID requests; answer addresses the request by stating a national conversation will occur and no legal action against Quebec.We are therefore launching a national conversation and will not initiate legal proceedings against Quebec's Bill 11.
29. deflected
    JusticeMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question presses for immediate action and warns of Conservative risk; answer agrees on the risk but restates need for time without committing to amendment.we must not hurry through an issue as fundamental as medical assistance in dying.
30. misdirected
    FirearmsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question asks why PM rejects Conservative gun plan; answer attacks that plan and pivots to security clearance demand.why will the leader of the Conservative Party not get the necessary security clearance
31. deflected
    FirearmsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question challenges gun policy outcomes and asks for border and criminal focus; answer dismisses slogans and again demands security clearance.why it is that the leader of the Conservative Party continues to refuse to get the appropriate clearances
32. deflected
    Mental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Question asks for specific action to close a consumption site under existing law; answer restates general public-health approach without addressing the request.Our approach is rooted in science, facts and research, as well as compassion and the work we can do on the ground
33. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the carbon tax and food price claims entirely and pivots to security clearance.The Leader of the Opposition is also refusing to get the security clearance necessary to keep Canadians safe by getting the briefings from our security agencies that talk about foreign interference.
34. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats rebate claim but shifts to security clearance attack instead of addressing food bank or price data.At the same time, we know the Leader of the Opposition will not listen to experts.
35. misdirected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer accuses the asker of politicizing the issue and pivots to school food program and security clearance rather than responding to the election call.if the Conservative leader actually cared about food insecurity, instead of just wanting to politicize and instrumentalize it, he would have supported our national school food program.
36. partly answered
    Veterans AffairsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states an investigation was requested but does not address identifying who overcharged or immediately ending the practice.the Minister of Veterans Affairs has asked her officials to investigate this matter further.
37. misdirected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Kevin Vuong (Independent) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the question as disgraceful and redirects to the Conservative leader's clearance instead of addressing ministers and foreign interference.that was an absolutely disgraceful display of irreverence and unseriousness in a place that deserves a serious contemplation of issues of national security