All sittings← 2024-04-302024-05-02 →
Wednesday, May 1, 2024 · sitting No. 306
Budget debate takes most time as Liberals defend spending
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on debate of the 2024 budget under government orders. Liberal MP Julie Dzerowicz said the plan delivers fairness for every generation through investments in housing, child care and dental care. Bloc Québécois MP Maxime Blanchette-Joncas pressed her on whether housing funds should be managed by municipalities that best understand local needs.
In question period Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre repeatedly asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau whether he would reverse the legalization of hard drugs after British Columbia scaled back its pilot project. Trudeau replied that Ottawa would examine any provincial request on its merits and continue working with British Columbia to adjust the program.
Poilievre also challenged the government on housing starts, which he said have fallen since the 2022 promise to double construction, and on the planned increase in the borrowing limit. Trudeau said the federal government is unlocking millions of new homes by cutting red tape and working with other orders of government.
Decided that day
- Budgetary policy passed
- Motion to proceed to Orders of the Day passed
- Bill C-351 second reading failed
- Ninth report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage passed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – May 1, 2024. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2024-05-01
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Grocery Industry
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Loblaw profits rose nearly 10 per cent while thousands of Canadians boycott the chain, and asked why the Prime Minister refuses to confront corporate greed. Trudeau said the government continues to urge grocers to adopt the code of conduct and has strengthened the Competition Bureau.
Read the exchangeFirearms
Poilievre asked how many assault-style weapons the government has seized after spending $40 million on the program. Trudeau replied that the buyback is being established and that the weapons have been illegal to buy, sell or use for four years.
Read the exchangePersons with Disabilities
NDP MP Bonita Zarrillo said the new Canada disability benefit of $200 a month is insufficient and leaves recipients behind while corporations receive large handouts. Trudeau said the benefit represents a monumental step that will deliver hundreds of dollars a month tax-free to the most vulnerable.
Read the exchangeClimate Change
Bloc Québécois MP Kristina Michaud said the commissioning of the pipeline locks Canada into fossil-fuel dependence for decades and asked whether it is good news for the climate. Trudeau said the project is in the national interest, creates jobs and is fully accounted for in the climate plan.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer criticizes the asker for unparliamentary language and restates a general compassionate approach without addressing reversal or Montreal.
You had to censure the Leader of the Opposition for refusing to withdraw the unparliamentary language he used while making political attacks about a crisis, a human tragedy, that is happening in British Columbia.
- partly answeredMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states no other province requested a project and decisions are province-driven, addressing the yes/no on Montreal.
No other requests came from any other province.
- deflectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates the general approach and BC adjustments without confirming or denying reversal of legalization.
We responded to the British Columbia government's ask for a pilot project.
- deflectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer focuses on past collaboration with BC and adjustments without answering the direct reversal question.
We worked with the British Columbia government as it developed this pilot project, and now that it is asking for modifications to that project, we are looking at those modifications.
- deflectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the asker of politics and restates working with BC without committing to reversal.
colleagues will understand if I am a little skeptical when the Leader of the Opposition says this is not about politics, because he has been the one who has been pointing out vulnerable people and trying to pursue ideological aims on this ongoing public health crisis.
- misdirectedDiversity and InclusionMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to infrastructure and general liberties instead of addressing Elghawaby or the budget vote.
our government has chosen to build bridges across the country through our infrastructure investments.
- deflectedDiversity and InclusionMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses listening to communities broadly without addressing the specific concerns about Elghawaby or unequal privileges.
in a pluralist and diverse society like Canada's and Quebec's, it is important to discuss and listen to all the various concerns of the communities and to respond specifically to these concerns.
- partly answeredGrocery IndustryMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the grocery code refusal and Competition Bureau actions but does not directly explain why Loblaw profits rose or the task force inaction.
like many others, we are concerned with the refusal of Loblaw and others to sign on to the grocery code of conduct, which we know will protect consumers and will protect growers across this country as well.
- deflectedGrocery IndustryMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer promotes unrelated programs and competition without addressing the accusation of failing to act against grocery profits.
we will continue to work with the big grocery stores to ensure that there is more competition and that they adopt the code of conduct.
- misdirectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer briefly acknowledges the request then pivots to attacking the asker about Diagolon instead of committing to reverse the policy.
Given the new, more reasonable tone of the Leader of the Opposition, I wonder whether he might take this opportunity to reassure Canadians that he neither supports extremist, white nationalist organizations like Diagolon nor wants their votes.
- misdirectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates working with BC but immediately shifts to demanding condemnation of Diagolon and Alex Jones rather than answering the yes-or-no question.
At the same time, I will point out that the Leader of the Opposition refuses to say a simple thing: that he condemns Diagolon because it is a white nationalist, violent organization, and that he rejects the endorsement of Alex Jones
- partly answeredMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer clarifies the federal approach to provincial requests but does not directly confirm or deny plans for Toronto.
With regard to any other province, whether it be Quebec, Ontario or anywhere else, we will work with the governments in place on proposals they may or may not have
- misdirectedJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims prior questions were answered then redirects entirely to Diagolon and Alex Jones instead of addressing catch-and-release or bail reform.
However, the Leader of the Opposition has not answered Canadians' concerns about why he will not condemn Diagolon, the far right extremist organization and why he will not reject the endorsement of Alex Jones, noted conspiracy theorist.
- deflectedMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer gives a flat no but immediately pivots to accusing the asker of seeking extremist support rather than elaborating on policy.
If the Leader of the Opposition wants to talk about secret plans, he would probably do well to actually clear the air for Canadians about his seeking support among members of extremist right wing organizations like Diagolon.
- answeredMental Health and AddictionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the need for more information from BC and frames the national approach without evasion.
We will continue to be there in a thoughtful, compassionate, rigorous, science-based way to work with jurisdictions on directions that work best for them and adjust those proposals and those responses as necessary.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states the intent to intervene at the Supreme Court but does not address the charge of creating divisions or privileges.
as the Bloc Québécois leader knows full well, when Bill 21 lands in the Supreme Court, we will intervene in our capacity as the federal government, because we are concerned about the consequences this bill could have on Quebeckers.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends right to challenge Bill 21 but ignores request to rein in Elghawaby.
This is exactly what many Quebeckers are doing because they disagree with Bill 21.
- deflectedJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights bail reform and gun control but does not address repealing Bill C-75 or specific bail cases.
We will continue to work on things that are keeping Canadians safe.
- partly answeredFirearmsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer describes the buyback program but provides no seizure numbers.
We are now working on a program to allow those owners to sell them back to the government
- deflectedFirearmsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer avoids giving a number and instead attacks Poilievre's position on the ban.
What the Leader of the Opposition is conveniently refusing to opine on is the fact that he has committed to the gun lobby across this country that he would reverse the 2020 OIC
- deflectedFirearmsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer again attacks Poilievre's stance instead of addressing the zero seizures or crime rise.
I will note, as did everyone in this chamber, that the Leader of the Opposition did not deny that he will be reversing the ban on assault-style weapons.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Lori Idlout (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges delays and mentions investments but offers no timeline for fixing processing delays.
Over the past years, we have made significant historic investments in Nunavut, the Northwest Territories and the Yukon in responding to the health needs
- answeredMental Health and AddictionsMr. Gord Johns (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer commits to evidence-based public health approaches and working with provinces on harm reduction.
Every step of the way, the government will continue to be anchored in compassionate, evidenced-based approaches that look at this as a public health crisis.
- deflectedHousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer describes housing plan but ignores the drop in building and cost question.
We, over the coming years, will be unlocking 3.8 million new homes by cutting red tape, by rezoning, by lowering the costs of homebuilding
- deflectedHousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses partnerships and investments but avoids naming a specific year for rising homebuilding.
There is more to do, but we will be doing it in partnership.
- deflectedHousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts blame to the previous Conservative government instead of addressing the question.
the government that was in place before I became prime minister had a housing minister who is now the Leader of the Opposition in a government that explicitly said that the federal government had no role to play
- deflectedHousingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Responds by reiterating the housing plan without directly addressing the accusation of doubling down on failure.
our housing accelerator program, our comprehensive plan to build more homes to make sure Canadians can see themselves in home ownership once again, is exactly what we are continuing to invest in.
- misdirectedClimate ChangeMs. Kristina Michaud (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots away from the pipeline question to promote the dental care program instead.
Speaking of what is coming into effect today, I thought my hon. colleague was going to mention the dental care program.
- deflectedClimate ChangeMs. Kristina Michaud (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer talks about needing good prices for resources and having a plan, without directly answering if it's good for the planet.
we have a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights Canada's fiscal position and Conservative austerity instead of addressing the impact on interest rates.
we recognize that Canada has one of the best fiscal situations in the G7 and the world.
- misdirectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' position on spending rather than addressing the debt interest question.
the Conservative leader wants nothing but austerity and budget cuts.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer focuses on investments in day care, dental care, etc., rather than addressing the briefing or interest rate impact.
That is why we are here with solutions for them.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer avoids the specific mortgage impact question and pivots to fiscal ratings and Conservative criticism.
Canada has one of the strongest fiscal positions of any country in the world, certainly the lowest deficit in the G7, the best debt-to-GDP ratio in the G7, and it is continuing to decrease
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer sidesteps the repeated request for a mortgage payment figure and instead shares an anecdote about child care.
I talked to a family from Burlington who actually saw their mortgage payments go up because of the rise in global interest rates, while at the same time their child care fees were cut by larger amounts because of investments this government made.
- deflectedFinancePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer does not address the proposed dollar-for-dollar law or $300 billion borrowing and instead defends existing spending.
Our fiscal plan is sustainable and responsible.
- partly answeredPersons with DisabilitiesMs. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains the new benefit but does not address the premise of abandonment or the CEO comparison.
the Canada disability benefit is a monumental step in our strong and unwavering commitment to creating a more inclusive and fairer Canada.
- partly answeredCanada Border Services AgencyMr. Alain Rayes (Independent) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges risks and states diligence but does not confirm postponement or detail specific mitigation steps.
We are working diligently to make sure the project succeeds and to implement better software.