All sittings← 2024-04-172024-04-19 →
Thursday, April 18, 2024 · sitting No. 302
Commons devotes nearly half its sitting to budget debate
The House spent the largest share of its time on government orders for the budget. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said the government had doubled the national debt and housing costs while adding $50 billion in new spending, and he stated that Conservatives would vote against the budget. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux accused Poilievre of manipulating information and noted that only six affordable housing units were built during Poilievre's time as housing minister.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on bail reform and carbon pricing. Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman asked why suspects in a major gold theft were released on bail and called for reversal of provisions in Bill C-75. Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Justice Minister Arif Virani defended recent bail changes and said the budget would increase sentences for auto theft and address money laundering.
Other exchanges covered auto theft and small-business supports. Conservative MP Tim Uppal described rising carjackings and urged action on the issue. Liberal MP Rechie Valdez highlighted a $2.5-billion carbon rebate for small businesses.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – April 18, 2024. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2024-04-18
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Justice
Conservative MP Doug Shipley said thieves in the largest gold heist were released because of Bill C-75 and asked when the prime minister would reverse bail policies.
Read the exchangeCarbon Pricing
Conservative MP John Barlow said food-bank demand had risen sharply and asked the government to reverse the carbon-tax increase and pass Bill C-234 in its original form.
Read the exchangeThe Budget
Bloc Québécois MP Alain Therrien said the budget threatened provinces and cities with funding cuts unless they accepted federal zoning rules and called the approach a Liberal-Conservative coalition.
Read the exchangePublic Services and Procurement
NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice asked why the government was cutting 5,000 public-service positions while continuing to award large contracts to private firms such as those involved with ArriveCAN.
Read the exchangeOil and Gas Industry
NDP MP Matthew Green said the government had backed away from taxing oil-and-gas windfall profits and asked when it would stand up to industry lobbyists.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeMs. Melissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to general bail reform and budget measures without addressing the specific bail release in the gold heist case.
I would point out to the member opposite and other members in the chamber that we passed significant bail reform legislation in this chamber with the co-operation of premiers around the country and law enforcement officials around the country.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Melissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates government actions on bail and accuses the opposition of non-support rather than addressing the specific policies or Bill C-75.
The previous times legislation has been in this chamber, they voted against such legislative initiatives.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMs. Melissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explains the rebate mechanism but ignores the request for a pause on hikes or an election call.
eight out of 10 families receive more from the carbon rebate than they pay on the carbon price.
- misdirectedThe EconomyMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservative leader's past housing record instead of addressing the current cost-of-living and housing issues raised.
six is the number of affordable housing units that the Conservative leader created across all of Canada over his entire term as minister responsible for housing.
- misdirectedThe EconomyMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again attacks the Conservative leader's record and insults him rather than responding to the budget or affordability critique.
However, her leader, who built only six housing units, continues to insult Quebec municipalities by calling them incompetent.
- deflectedThe BudgetMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer notes the budget contents and accuses the Bloc of voting against it without engaging the coalition or threat premise.
- answeredThe BudgetMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly counters the timing claim by stating current housing construction in Quebec with specific numbers.
In Quebec, 8,000 housing units are being built through the exceptional partnership between the Canadian and the Quebec governments.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses public service management via attrition and consultation but does not address eliminating subcontractors.
For example, budget 2024 talks about natural attrition in the public service.
- deflectedInnovation, Science and IndustryMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes foreign investments and job creation without addressing tracking of subsidies or accountability.
I am very glad that, the day after the budget, my colleagues give me the opportunity to talk about the great investments we have been attracting to this country.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights unrelated budget programs for farmers instead of addressing the carbon tax hike or Bill C-234.
For example, we are enhancing the livestock tax deferral program, which is a big asset when ranchers have a downturn with the climate, and also the advance payments program, with $250,000.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition's past record on agriculture funding rather than responding to the carbon tax impact on food costs.
Quite simply, when they were in power, they slashed half a billion dollars from agriculture and agri-food.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses Conservatives of serving corporate interests and attacks their plan instead of addressing the carbon tax on gas prices.
when the Conservatives blame the cost of living crisis on carbon pricing and proven emissions reduction strategies, they are only serving the greedy corporate interests of billionaire grocery and oil and gas executives.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal). loaded question.The answer recounts past election results and Conservative positions on carbon pricing without addressing the current tax increase or affordability concerns.
there was an election on the carbon tax. In fact, there were three of them.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Shelby Kramp-Neuman (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attributes price increases to seasonal fuel changes and cites an expert while denying any link to the carbon tax.
According to Dan McTeague, who is the president of the advocacy group Canadians for Affordable Energy, "In past years the switchover to summer fuel typically results in an increase of about six to 10 cents per litre."
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Shelby Kramp-Neuman (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again blames seasonal fuel blends and calls the question theatrics without engaging the request to cancel the carbon tax.
we go through this every year. We change from the winter blend to the summer blend.
- partly answeredThe BudgetMr. Martin Champoux (Bloc) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the measure exists and states the government will review it but provides no details on its purpose or target audience.
What we have said is that we are going to look at this to make sure it is done properly.
- deflectedThe BudgetMr. Martin Champoux (Bloc) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer denies government intent but sidesteps the election date change and sharia law accusations entirely.
We are simply going to look at the issue, but our government has no intention of supporting it.
- deflectedThe BudgetMr. Martin Champoux (Bloc) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats that it is a market product without addressing the secularism clash or budget inclusion.
This is in no way a product offered by our government.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses recovery of funds and audits but does not explain why the House order has not been enforced yet.
anybody who abused taxpayers' money will face the consequences, and the government will always seek to recover taxpayers' money that was spent inappropriately.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer covers ongoing investigations but avoids stating when or if the ordered repayment will occur.
if taxpayers' money has been misplaced or mishandled, of course, the government will seek to recover those funds.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references investigations and rule changes but does not address the specific claim that no refund steps were taken.
we have always said that anyone who abuses taxpayer money will have to face the consequences.
- misdirectedOil and Gas IndustryMr. Matthew Green (NDP) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking the NDP and competition reform instead of addressing the decision not to tax oil and gas profits.
I usually say that we will take no lessons from the Conservatives, but I will say that of the NDP this time.
- misdirectedOil and Gas IndustryMs. Lisa Marie Barron (NDP) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to defending the carbon tax and criticizing NDP support rather than explaining the emissions cap delay.
I would invite the New Democrats and their leader to find the courage of their own convictions and come back to supporting us on a price on pollution.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer cites the investigation to avoid confirming or denying any communication by the Deputy Prime Minister.
It would be totally inappropriate for politicians anywhere in the House to try to pretend they would be better than others and the RCMP to do that type of work.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids any commitment on cooperation and instead deems political involvement inappropriate.
it would be completely inappropriate for politicians in the House to claim they could do a better job or know more about the work of these organizations, especially the RCMP.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms steps to recover funds but sidesteps the specific parliamentary order to request repayment.
I can assure colleagues that the government will always take steps to recuperate taxpayers' money that was inappropriately expended
- answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the government will request return of misused funds.
if taxpayers' money has been misplaced or mishandled, of course, the government will ask for that money to be returned
- misdirectedThe BudgetMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the jurisdictional question and instead attacks the Bloc for lacking courage.
the Bloc Québécois should show a bit of courage and tell us which aspect of the budget they are opposed to.
- partly answeredThe BudgetMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights one investment area but does not address the multiple specific demands listed.
That is why I am sure he will be pleased with the $6 billion invested in Quebec over four years.
- deflectedPublic SafetyTim Uppal (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses ongoing collaboration but evades the demand that Liberals step aside.
We will continue to do everything possible in collaboration with our partners to bring this worrisome trend down.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). substantive question.The answer turns to criticizing the Conservatives' past vote instead of addressing future action on sentences.
as soon as Bill C‑75 was introduced in the House two Parliaments ago, the member opposite voted against it, even though it included longer sentences for auto theft.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again focuses on the Conservatives' voting record rather than committing to harsher penalties.
The member and all of his colleagues voted against that.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Doug Shipley (Conservative) asked Arif Virani (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to auto theft penalties and past votes instead of addressing bail policies in Bill C-75.
It is an issue we all need to address.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Frank Caputo (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer focuses on officer safety and meetings but ignores luxuries for offenders and who runs corrections.
I have met with representatives of the union.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMrs. Laila Goodridge (Conservative) asked Ya'ara Saks (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses fentanyl and meetings but avoids yes/no on ending decriminalization.
Fentanyl is driving the crisis, and too many Canadians are dying as a result of it.
- deflectedWomen and Gender EqualityMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked Ms. Lisa Hepfner (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists budget investments but does not address restoring funding for the specific crisis centre.
I will point to the fact that this budget does cover contraceptives for women
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Alain Rayes (Independent) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains the visa rule and offers to discuss exceptions personally without committing to an immediate fix.
If exceptions need to be made, he can come and see me and we can discuss them together.
- answeredPoints of OrderMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Mr. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly withdraws the disputed comment as requested in the point of order.
Mr. Speaker, I withdraw the comment.
- deflectedPoints of OrderAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses general rulings on ideology but does not resolve the specific point of order on titles or substitutions.
It is extremely appropriate and, indeed, our right to be able to express how we feel.
- misdirectedBusiness of the HouseAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). rhetorical question.Question rambles on past budgets rather than asking a clear question; answer attacks Conservatives' voting record instead of outlining upcoming business.
the different results we hope for are for Conservatives to stop voting against the series of measures we put in place