Commons debates online streaming bill under closure

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   Canadian HeritagePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Greg Fergus (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to web giants paying fair share and Bill C-11 support instead of addressing censorship or freedom of expression.there is a consensus in Quebec that we need to make web giants pay their fair share.
2. deflected
   Canadian HeritagePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Greg Fergus (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats talking points about big tech paying fair share rather than responding to claims about CRTC manipulation or Orwell reference.those are the same old talking points from the Conservative Party and they happen to be the same talking points of big tech.
3. deflected
   Canadian HeritagePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Greg Fergus (Liberal). loaded question.Answer focuses on tech giants not paying fair share and poll numbers instead of addressing government deciding debate sides or shutting down voices.Seventy-one per cent of Canadians agree that they should be doing so.
4. misdirected
   Canadian HeritagePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner personally by implying nonsense and free speech hypocrisy instead of addressing the bill's impact on speech.trying to pretend that there is anybody in the House who believes anything other than free speech, is the very reason that member can go all over the country and say all kinds of nonsense that I disagree with
5. partly answered
   Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer provides rebate figures and a quote from a Conservative premier but does not address the PBO finding or accusation of misleading Atlantic Canadians.The climate rebate will be coming to Atlantic Canada.
6. deflected
   Democratic InstitutionsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Mr. Maninder Sidhu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists funding measures for counter-interference but avoids addressing whether committees failed or need for independent public inquiry.through budget 2023, we are providing $48.9 million to the RCMP to protect Canadians from harassment and intimidation
7. deflected
   Democratic InstitutionsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends rapporteur's independence by citing past roles but does not address control over findings or lack of inquiry.Mr. Johnston's independence is unmistakable.
8. partly answered
   Domestic ViolenceMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Ms. Pam Damoff (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the report and victims but only promises future review without committing to urgent shelter funding.We will be considering and carefully reviewing the recommendations in the report.
9. deflected
   EmploymentMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer focuses on union jobs without addressing new investments in renewables or climate infrastructure.in fact, all the infrastructure that he is talking about will be built by workers with union jobs or workers who are paid prevailing union wages.
10. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Shifts focus to costs of climate change instead of addressing the PBO report on carbon tax net costs.When are the Conservatives going to stop the denial and get serious about climate change?
11. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Defends the rebate and attacks opposition advice rather than explaining why the tax plan will not be ditched.What will not make families better off is investing in cryptocurrency.
12. deflected
    Government AppointmentsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Defends specific appointees and invokes Harper rather than addressing the pattern of appointments.To suggest that David Johnston does not have the best interests of Canada at heart as he looks at the issue of foreign interference is ridiculous.
13. deflected
    Government AppointmentsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Dismisses the question as a comedy routine and defends the appointee without addressing the ethics concerns.there is a place where comedy routines can be tried out; I would suggest that it is not on the floor of the House of Commons.
14. deflected
    Government AppointmentsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Focuses on defending the appointee's past actions without addressing the independence of the appointment process.Over the last 10 years in which the person they are referring to has been in the office, they have taken a lot of difficult positions against the government
15. deflected
    Government AppointmentsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Defends the appointee's independence by referencing prior service without addressing the appointment's optics.Clearly, this person is capable of acting independently.
16. partly answered
    Employment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Mr. Irek Kusmierczyk (Liberal). substantive question.Acknowledges EI reform as a priority and lists related investments but does not explain why it was dropped from the budget.EI reform is a priority. We are on it, and we will get it done.
17. deflected
    Employment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Ms. Rachel Bendayan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids specifying a timeline for EI reform by restating general support for workers.We have promised EI reform and we will deliver.
18. partly answered
    SeniorsMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Kamal Khera (Liberal). substantive question.Mentions some supports like dental care and rebates but does not address the specific concerns about seniors aged 65-74 or penalties for working.budget 2023 continues to grow our government's plan to support seniors
19. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.Ignores the carbon tax question and instead discusses unrelated supports for farmers.there is a lot of good news in budget 2023 for our farmers
20. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Dave Epp (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids the carbon tax question by shifting to other agricultural programs and past Conservative cuts.our government is always there to support our agricultural producers in different ways
21. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.Turns to attacking the Conservatives for voting against the budget instead of addressing the carbon tax increase.For those watching at home, the Conservatives are going to vote against assistance for Canadians. That is what is shameful.
22. answered
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Lori Idlout (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Directly responds by citing specific investments in infrastructure and housing for indigenous communities.our government has made historic investments in infrastructure, with over $7 billion committed in budget 2021
23. partly answered
    HealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.Defends the vaccine factory investment but does not disclose the amount lost or address a public drug manufacturer.The responsible thing we did at the time was to invest in a different family of vaccines.
24. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMr. Jasraj Singh Hallan (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Focuses on rebates and criticizes Conservatives for opposing measures rather than addressing the carbon tax itself.every time we put forward an affordability measure, the Conservatives vote against it
25. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Jasraj Singh Hallan (Conservative) asked Gudie Hutchings (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the call to cancel the carbon tax and instead attacks the opposition's climate views.the Conservatives' lack of recognition of climate change and, frankly, lack of awareness of climate change are pretty frightening for me.
26. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Ms. Rachel Bendayan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to unrelated budget benefits instead of addressing whether the government will listen to business leaders on the carbon tax.it is very interesting to hear my Conservative colleague talk about the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, because the CFIB highlighted just how extraordinary budget 2023 is for small business.
27. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses general economic plans and credits without addressing the request to cancel the carbon tax increase.Canadians are asking us to do three things: help them with the cost of living, invest in health and build an economic future that will foster prosperity and clean jobs for the future.
28. deflected
    Dental CareMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes cooperation with provinces but does not commit to allowing Quebec to opt out with full compensation.Lastly, all of this will be done in co-operation with all of the provinces, including Quebec.
29. deflected
    Dental CareMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats benefits for Quebeckers but again avoids any commitment on opting out with compensation.The Quebeckers I have been talking to for quite some time now are happy to see that between two and three million Quebeckers, families with average and modest incomes, will be able to take advantage of this new Canadian government dental plan over the next few years.
30. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Shelby Kramp-Neuman (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Beech (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses unrelated tax reductions instead of addressing cancellation of the carbon tax increase.That is $3,673 more that one can earn tax-free.
31. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Anna Roberts (Conservative) asked Kamal Khera (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists other supports for seniors without responding to the carbon tax cancellation request.Once again, in this budget, we are providing targeted support for Canadians who need it the most, including seniors, with our new grocery rebate that is going to give seniors additional money to pay for their groceries
32. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Ms. Ya'ara Saks (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights poverty reduction stats instead of addressing the carbon tax or its impact on northern heating costs.my colleagues across the way do not seem to understand or recognize that 2.7 million more Canadians have been lifted out of poverty since this government came into power
33. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Rick Perkins (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Beech (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to tax loopholes on the wealthy instead of addressing the carbon tax question.Ninety-nine per cent of these measures will be affecting people who make over $300,000.
34. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMr. Clifford Small (Conservative) asked Gudie Hutchings (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to past pandemic funding and a hurricane rather than the carbon tax or shelters.When I stood up before and made a comment about the hurricane in my riding, someone on the other side said, "Oh, here she goes again."
35. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Cheryl Gallant (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives' voting record and cryptocurrency instead of responding to the carbon tax increase.What will not make families better off is investing in cryptocurrency.
36. answered
    SportMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Mr. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly agrees and references related sport access initiatives for indigenous youth.That is why I was so glad to get out to Canmore, Alberta a couple of weeks ago to visit Spirit North.
37. partly answered
    The BudgetMr. Kevin Vuong (Independent) asked Ms. Jennifer O'Connell (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses federal transit investments in Toronto but ignores the specific COVID shortfall and service cut questions.I would like to inform the member opposite that on transit alone our government, since 2016, has invested over $8.6 billion in the city of Toronto.
38. deflected
    Maureen BreauMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer raises a point of order on sexism instead of clarifying the budget comments about Quebec seniors organizations.Today, when the member for Calgary Forest Lawn was speaking about budget 2023, he referred to the Minister of Finance as the "minister of inflation".
39. partly answered
    Business of the HouseAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer joins the holiday wishes and notes faith observances but only briefly touches on Bill C-11 debate time.With respect to Bill C-11 , I will simply state that I do not think there is any amount of time that would satisfy Conservatives.