Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2023-03-102023-03-21 →

Monday, March 20, 2023 · sitting No. 169

Conservatives move to summon Telford over Beijing election interference

Conservative MP Michael Cooper moved a supply motion that would empower the access to information committee to study foreign interference in the 2019 and 2021 elections and order Prime Minister's chief of staff Katie Telford to testify alone for three hours under oath. The motion remains before the House after limited debate.

In Question Period, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pressed the NDP to support the call for Telford's testimony and accused the Liberals of seeking a cover-up. Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc said the government takes the issue seriously and has appointed former governor general David Johnston as special rapporteur.

New Democrat MP Heather McPherson asked whether the study should also examine interference by other countries. Conservative MP Michael Cooper said the motion would end the Liberal cover-up.

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

Question Period – March 20, 2023. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube

Who held the floor · 2023-03-20

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 40%, opposition 60% of the words spokenPrivate membersGovernment businessQuestion PeriodGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 11:0512:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:00Last speech 18:10Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 7 h 5 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
40One Bill Introduced Amid Mostly Deflected AnswersThe sitting devoted the bulk of its time to business of supply and related topics, yet recorded no votes and advanced only a single bill at introduction. Question period produced far more deflections than clear answers.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Federal Framework on Housing for Individuals with Non-Visible Disabilities

Bloc Québécois MP Marie-Hélène Gaudreau supported Motion No. 59 on a federal framework for housing for people with non-visible disabilities, calling it fair and important for Quebec.

Read the exchange

Nowruz

Liberal MP Chandra Arya hosted a Nowruz celebration on Parliament Hill with about 700 participants and recognized the contributions of communities that mark the Persian new year.

Read the exchange

Health

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said waiting lists have doubled to 26 weeks and called for a national test to license foreign-trained doctors. Liberal MP Jean-Yves Duclos pointed to a $198-billion federal investment and provincial commitments on credential recognition.

Read the exchange

The Environment

New Democrat MP Heather McPherson condemned the failure to inform communities of a nine-month tailings-pond leak in Alberta. Liberal MP Steven Guilbeault said enforcement officers have since been sent and water testing continues.

Read the exchange

Child Care

New Democrat MP Leah Gazan said inadequate wages are driving workers from the sector and asked the government to guarantee at least $25 an hour. Liberal MP Karina Gould said the Canada-wide agreements already require provinces to recruit and retain early-childhood educators.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses general measures on interference instead of addressing testimony request.We further strengthened the measures to address foreign interference.
  2. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats transparency claims and avoids the specific cover-up or testimony question.our government has always been very transparent with Canadians in the efforts we have made to counter foreign interference
  3. misdirected
    Democratic InstitutionsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Ms. Pam Damoff (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks the opposition leader's past record rather than addressing the NDP leader's position.Unlike the members opposite, when the Leader of the Opposition was in charge of democratic institutions, he stood idly by and did nothing.
  4. partly answered
    HealthPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer references an agreement on credential recognition but does not commit to a national test or licensing process.everyone agreed to boost and facilitate the recognition of skills acquired here at home or abroad.
  5. answered
    HealthPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states that provinces have committed to national credential recognition.All provinces have now sent a letter, in principle committing to implementing a national credential recognition.
  6. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Answer defends the rapporteur appointment instead of addressing the call for a public inquiry.we asked the Right Hon. David Johnston to act as an independent special rapporteur
  7. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Alain Therrien (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer praises Johnston's credentials without engaging the independence or inquiry request.I think that all Canadians recognize Mr. Johnston's important contributions in a number of areas.
  8. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights existing measures and the rapporteur without committing to a public inquiry mandate.The Right Hon. David Johnston will go even further.
  9. partly answered
    Child CareMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses wage supports via provincial agreements but does not address the specific $25/hour commitment requested.Within those agreements, they can use some of that money to help with wage increases.
  10. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMs. Melissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to foreign leaders meeting and offered briefings instead of addressing whether the chief of staff will testify.What has been offered is for the people who received the briefings, the national campaign directors in 2019 and 2021, to appear.
  11. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMs. Melissa Lantsman (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to declined briefings and NSICOP while implying partisan motives rather than confirming testimony.It would appear to me that their interest is partisan in nature and that they are using this opportunity to grind a partisan axe rather—
  12. misdirected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition leader's past record on oversight instead of addressing the request for the chief of staff to testify.What did the opposition leader do when he was minister of democratic reforms? He did nothing.
  13. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer emphasizes offered mechanisms and an independent review while labeling the interest as partisan rather than confirming testimony.Their interest continues to be a partisan interest, not a factual interest.
  14. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights new measures and the special rapporteur instead of addressing whether the chief of staff will appear at committee.We also asked the Right Hon. David Johnston to look at all the measures currently in place and to make recommendations that will be made public
  15. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer points to ministers testifying and past actions on democracy instead of confirming the chief of staff will testify.ministers are always available to give proper testimony before parliamentary committees.
  16. partly answered
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. René Villemure (Bloc) asked Ms. Pam Damoff (Liberal). substantive question.The answer endorses the independent review and states it may include a public inquiry but does not commit to launching one now.Whatever the recommendations are, we will accept them.
  17. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. René Villemure (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Bloc voting record instead of addressing the call for an inquiry.When measures were put in place to protect our elections, the Bloc voted against them.
  18. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMs. Marie-Hélène Gaudreau (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates government actions without addressing the demand to remove the Prime Minister as obstacle.our government has brought in important measures to counter foreign interference.
  19. misdirected
    Democratic InstitutionsMichael Chong (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives for questioning Johnston and references past votes instead of clarifying NDP position on the motion.The Conservatives are now calling that individual into question.
  20. deflected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer accuses Conservatives of partisanship rather than explaining why Telford is shielded from testifying.It is a partisan interest, and it is deeply disturbing.
  21. misdirected
    Democratic InstitutionsMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer focuses on objecting to the word corrupt instead of addressing whether the motion will be respected.Calling a member of this House "corrupt" is despicable.
  22. partly answered
    The EnvironmentMs. Heather McPherson (NDP) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains federal actions after notification but does not address the blocked oversight or future prevention.We have since sent out enforcement officers to do monitoring.
  23. answered
    The EnvironmentMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Steven Guilbeault (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states the amount of current Canadian investment in clean energy.we are already investing in Canada, $120 billion, not coming but happening now
  24. partly answered
    TaxationMr. Adam Chambers (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses the tax increase amount but does not commit to stopping the escalator.The increase this year will be one cent per can of beer.
  25. deflected
    TaxationMrs. Tracy Gray (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks Conservatives as hypocritical rather than addressing cancellation of the tax increase.
  26. deflected
    TaxationMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses the one-cent cost and equity but does not address cutting the excise tax increase.With inflation and the excise tax, a can of beer will cost one cent more.
  27. misdirected
    TaxationMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Pascale St-Onge (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to poverty reduction stats and attacks Conservative voting record instead of addressing tax hikes or food banks.What the Conservatives need to explain to Canadians is why they always vote against helping those who need it most.
  28. partly answered
    InfrastructureMr. Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses working with Quebec on projects and expects an agreement by March 31 but does not confirm extending the deadline.I am sure that, by March 31, we will come to an agreement with the Government of Quebec on an important list of infrastructure projects like the ones my colleague talked about.
  29. answered
    InfrastructureMr. Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly assures that funding will not be denied and lists specific projects being supported.on the contrary, we will not deny the municipalities of Quebec or the Government of Quebec federal funding for projects as important as the public transit projects my colleague talked about.
  30. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the carbon tax as an affordability measure and pivots to climate change without addressing axing the tax.This government has put in place a range of measures to address affordability concerns, including the fact that the price on pollution actually results in eight out of 10 families getting more money back than they pay.
  31. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Anna Roberts (Conservative) asked Kamal Khera (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights poverty reduction and attacks Conservatives instead of addressing the carbon tax increase or seniors' costs.It is because, unlike them, we decided to invest in them by ensuring we are investing and increasing their guaranteed income supplement and by increasing their old security pension for them.
  32. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends government support for farmers and attacks prior Conservative cuts without addressing the carbon tax on farms.When the Conservatives were in power, they made cuts to risk management programs and slashed investment in research and innovation.
  33. deflected
    JusticeMs. Raquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Mr. Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.The answer references meetings and general bail principles without addressing the demand for the Prime Minister to take responsibility.Federal, provincial and territorial leaders met last week, including with the Minister of Justice , on the issue of bail and have come forward with a communiqué.
  34. deflected
    JusticeMs. Raquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Mr. Gary Anandasangaree (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights meetings and constitutional rights but avoids committing to specific fixes for the bail system.The ministers of justice came together with a program that will allow us to ensure that our communities remain safe, while at the same time ensuring the right to bail.
  35. misdirected
    JusticeMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Ms. Rachel Bendayan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to attacking the Conservatives on gun control instead of addressing rising crime or sentencing policies.it is the Conservative Party that is getting in our way when it comes to our country's national security.
  36. partly answered
    HealthMs. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses health care investments but does not address making the Canada caregiver credit refundable.That is why, just six weeks ago, the Prime Minister announced a historic investment of almost $200 billion in addition to the current level of the CHT
  37. partly answered
    TransportationMr. Mike Morrice (Green) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes past capital investments but does not commit to new operating support for transit in budget 2023.I think the hon. member will acknowledge that our government has made multi-billion dollar investments in improving Canada's public transit infrastructure
  38. answered
    Tragedy in AmquiMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly responds by reading from Hansard and standing by the principle without withdrawing or apologizing.I stand by my comment that no member of Parliament should call any other member of Parliament corrupt.