All sittings← 2022-09-282022-10-03 →
Thursday, September 29, 2022 · sitting No. 105
Supply motion on taxes dominates as Poilievre presses Freeland on carbon pricing
The House spent the bulk of its sitting on a Conservative supply motion moved by Andrew Scheer that called on the government to commit to no new taxes on gas, groceries, home heating and pay cheques. Scheer told the House the cost of government is driving up inflation and that Liberal policy produces smaller paycheques and higher prices. Kevin Lamoureux replied that Canada is faring better than the United States and Europe and that the government has brought forward measures to support families.
In Question Period Pierre Poilievre pressed Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland on the planned tripling of the carbon tax, arguing it has failed to meet environmental targets while raising living costs. Freeland said the Conservatives have no climate plan and accused them of wanting to take $1,000 cheques from families in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Jagmeet Singh asked Freeland about the government's record on clean drinking water in indigenous communities ahead of the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. Freeland acknowledged the original sin of Canada's treatment of indigenous people and said the government is investing in reconciliation.
Decided that day
- Bill C-29 advanced at second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – September 29, 2022. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2022-09-29
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Public Services and Procurement
Yves-François Blanchet asked the government to table all privately awarded contracts related to Roxham Road as requested by the ethics committee. Chrystia Freeland said immigration is important to Canada and Quebec and that the government will work with partners.
Read the exchangeBorder Security
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe said human trafficking at Roxham Road would end if the government suspended the safe third country agreement instead of expanding facilities. Marco Mendicino said the government is working with the United States and investing resources at the border.
Read the exchangeJustice
Alex Ruff noted 31 homicides and 302 shootings in Toronto this year and said the Liberal solution targets law-abiding owners rather than repeat offenders. David Lametti replied that Bill C-5 removes failed mandatory minimum penalties that have clogged the justice system and over-incarcerated indigenous and Black people.
Read the exchangeChild Care
Hedy Fry asked for an update on the pan-Canadian early learning and child care system in British Columbia. Karina Gould said the government announced a doubling of $10-a-day spaces and savings of up to 50 per cent by December.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the questions on carbon tax and red tape and pivots to criticizing the opposition.
The Conservatives do not have a climate plan.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the tax and affordability questions and attacks the Conservatives instead.
the Conservatives do not have a climate plan.
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the EI tax hike and accuses the opposition of draining pensions and EI.
Now it is time for the Conservatives to drop their utterly reckless scheme to drain our pensions and EI
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the food affordability question and attacks the opposition on pensions and climate.
The people who are out of touch are in a party that believes it is a good idea to slash our pensions and undermine the EI system.
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer evades the tax and food bank question and instead highlights past Liberal achievements while attacking the opposition.
Our government has lifted hundreds of thousands of Canadian children out of poverty with the Canada child benefit.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids tabling contracts and shifts to general support for immigration.
Immigration is important to Canada and Quebec; it is important to our economy.
- deflectedPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the request for unredacted contracts and discusses the border with the US instead.
We are working with our American counterparts on issues related to our common border, including the safe third country agreement.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the importance of reconciliation but does not address the specific record on clean water access.
Our government is working very hard and very sincerely towards reconciliation, and I think all Canadians are.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Acknowledges reconciliation broadly but ignores the specific water crisis and broken promise.
Our government is working wholeheartedly to invest a great deal in reconciliation.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Pivots to accusing Conservatives of U-turns instead of addressing the carbon tax hike.
It is now time for the Conservatives to do another political U-turn and support the other elements of our plan.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Shifts to general climate action without engaging the request to cancel the tax increase.
I believe that we need climate action, and I hope that all members of the House will agree.
- partly answeredTaxationMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.Explains rebates and BC policy but does not address canceling the planned tax increases.
the rebates that are provided to the vast majority of families in this country are more than they actually pay.
- answeredTaxationMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.Directly counters each point on rebates, emissions, and the BC system.
the rebate system that is in place wherever the federal backstop is in place provides more money back to people than they actually pay.
- misdirectedTaxationMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.Dismisses the questioner's statements as untrue rather than addressing the call to cancel the tax.
so what she is saying in the House is simply not true.
- misdirectedTaxationMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). loaded question.Ignores the carbon tax question entirely and attacks Conservatives on unrelated disability policies.
if Conservatives cared about affordability, they would have voted in favour of the unanimous consent motion yesterday that would have seen hundreds of thousands of Canadians with disabilities lifted out of poverty by moving forward with the Canada disability benefit.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe (Bloc) asked Marco Mendicino (Liberal). loaded question.Discusses general cooperation and resources but avoids the expansion timeline or suspension of the agreement.
There are pressures at Roxham Road. That is why we continue to work with the Government of Quebec.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe (Bloc) asked Marco Mendicino (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the listed criticisms and pivots to refugee contributions plus an attack on the opposition.
The Bloc Québécois needs to stop complaining in the House and start coming up with real solutions.
- deflectedBorder SecurityMr. Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe (Bloc) asked Mrs. Marie-France Lalonde (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses the agreement's value and ongoing contacts but never addresses suspension or the timeline.
We are in constant contact with the U.S. government on issues related to our shared border, including the safe third country agreement.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Brad Redekopp (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise about pensions instead of addressing the planned payroll tax increases.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer recounts past COVID support but never answers whether paycheque tax increases will be cancelled.
We have been there for them through COVID.
- deflectedThe EconomyMike Lake (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends fiscal metrics and pivots to pensions without addressing the affordability crisis causes.
Canadians also know that we need to be compassionate and support our neighbours with affordability.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Lori Idlout (NDP) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms $100 million spent and ongoing projects but does not commit to delivering the full promised amount.
91 projects are under way in communities, to a total of about $100 million.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Blake Desjarlais (NDP) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes existing investments but does not confirm full funding of the promised initiative before the next budget.
That is why, in budget 2022, we invested more than $4 billion to close the gap that exists in indigenous communities.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights the child benefit but never addresses scrapping the planned tax increases.
That is why we brought in the Canada child benefit for families, which has lifted 450,000 children across the country out of poverty.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer evades by criticizing opposition rhetoric rather than addressing the carbon tax policy.
What we are hearing throughout this question period and over the last two weeks are games and rhetorical rhetoric that, frankly, are not contributing to the solutions we need.
- partly answeredTaxationMrs. Cheryl Gallant (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The response defends the carbon tax as an efficient market-based approach but does not directly answer about axing taxes.
With respect to the price on pollution, if we asked 100 economists, 99 will tell us that it is the most efficient way to reduce emissions and incent innovation.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Michael Kram (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.Response shifts to the costs of inaction on climate change instead of addressing the carbon tax increase.
Taking action on climate change is about addressing affordability for Canadians, particularly for younger Canadians.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states commitment to reform but provides no specific timeline.
We look forward to launching our long-term plan to improve the EI system.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The response specifies that the long-term plan will be launched before the end of the year.
As I told my colleague, that will happen before the end of the year.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer highlights past actions rather than agreeing to a discussion in the House.
I am so pleased to see the Leader of the Opposition 's ambition in this space, because that is exactly what we have been showing since 2015
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Arnold Viersen (Conservative) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). loaded question.The response attacks the Conservatives for delaying legislation instead of addressing the carbon tax.
What are the Conservatives doing? They are playing procedural games to delay that legislation which will enable Canadians to receive that help now.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to the Canada disability benefit instead of responding to the carbon tax question.
I will take this opportunity to remind everyone in the House that we have a historic moment in front of us right now to come together and support the Canada disability benefit
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alex Ruff (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends Bill C-5 and attacks prior Conservative policies instead of addressing the yes/no request to scrap it.
Failed Conservative policies on tough-on-crime, with minimum mandatory penalties and no possibility of conditional sentence orders, have only clogged the justice system with less serious cases that have resulted in the over-incarceration of indigenous, Black and racialized people in our system.
- deflectedJusticeMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.Answer corrects a quoted remark and defends the bill's intent rather than answering when maximum penalties will be applied to violent offenders.
If he believes an indigenous woman with a problematic addiction, who is trying to keep bread on the table for her three children, sells some prescription drugs on the side and then gets tackled with a minimum mandatory penalty, is the kind of serious offender we need to lock up for that period of time, I would suggest he is absolutely wrong.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.Answer acknowledges local violence and states the bill's goal but does not address what victims' families would think of removing mandatory minimums.
Our goal with Bill C-5 is to increase resources to deal with serious crimes, which will always have serious consequences.
- deflectedWomen and Gender EqualityMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked Ms. Jenna Sudds (Liberal). substantive question.Answer restates general support for abortion access without addressing the specific request to end charitable status for crisis pregnancy centres.
In Canada, universal access to abortion is guaranteed under the Canada Health Act.
- answeredHousingMr. Mike Morrice (Green) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists concrete federal measures already taken or planned on investor taxation and housing as an asset class.
We are introducing a two-year ban on foreign investment in Canadian residential real estate.
- misdirectedBusiness of the HouseAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Question is rhetorical and answer pivots to thanking Conservatives then listing unrelated bills instead of confirming House business.
I want to thank them for helping to move it to committee and for their work to move it through committee.