All sittings← 2022-09-202022-09-22 →
Wednesday, September 21, 2022 · sitting No. 99
House begins debate on national council for reconciliation bill
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to second reading of Bill C-29, which would create a national council for reconciliation to monitor progress on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's calls to action. Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller moved the bill and noted that it addresses calls 53 to 55, with call 56 to follow once the council is established. Conservative MP Gary Vidal and NDP MP Blake Desjarlais questioned the scope of consultation and the bill's assignment of reporting duties to the minister rather than the prime minister.
In Question Period the main exchanges concerned taxation and housing affordability. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pressed Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland on rising payroll taxes and their effect on home ownership, while Freeland defended EI and CPP contributions as essential supports and noted lower future premium rates compared with 2015.
Other Question Period clashes covered immigration at Roxham Road, corporate profits and food prices, illegal firearms in Montreal and indigenous housing needs in Nunavut.
Decided that day
- Private Members' Business M-47 on long-term care improvements passed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – September 21, 2022. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2022-09-21
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Employment Insurance
Bloc Québécois MP Louise Chabot told the House that Employment Minister Carla Qualtrough had failed to overhaul the EI system over the summer and urged extension of temporary measures that end Sunday, leaving 60 per cent of workers without coverage.
Read the exchangePublic Safety
Bloc Québécois MP Kristina Michaud asked why federal border measures have not reduced illegal firearms after another fatal shooting, while Parliamentary Secretary Pam Damoff cited record CBSA seizures and new scanner investments.
Read the exchangeThe Economy
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh highlighted rising grocery prices and increased profits at chains such as Sobeys and Loblaws, urging action on greedflation; Freeland pointed to the new 1.5 per cent corporate tax surcharge on banks and insurers and the luxury tax.
Read the exchangeAgriculture and Agri-Food
Conservative MP John Barlow accused the government of worsening food inflation through its fertilizer policy and carbon tax; Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau replied that the largest-ever agriculture budget supports farmers facing climate threats.
Read the exchangeCriminal Code
Conservative MP Michael Cooper spoke for the final time on Bill S-206, which creates a narrow exception allowing jurors suffering post-traumatic stress to seek mental-health support, crediting the justice committee study initiated by NDP MP Alistair MacGregor.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer opens with congratulations and reflections on democracy but never addresses taxes or housing.
It is clear that we disagree on many points, but I hope that we can all—
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to past EI rates and accuses the asker of inconsistency instead of addressing current tax-hike cancellation.
The leader of the official opposition needs to tell Canadians if he was misguided then or he is misguided now.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the principle of contributions and labels the proposal irresponsible without engaging the specific request to cancel hikes.
At a time of global economic uncertainty, it is the height of irresponsibility for the Conservatives to suggest that we, as a country, stop putting money away for our retirement and a rainy day.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to positive economic indicators and accuses the opposition of talking down the economy rather than addressing planned tax increases.
it is so irresponsible for the Conservatives to talk down the Canadian economy.
- misdirectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the asker’s crypto comments instead of responding to the tax-hike question and uses loaded premises about housing and food.
A Canadian who invested in Bitcoin according to the reckless advice of this new leader would have seen her life savings destroyed.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states general support for the system and cooperation without addressing the request to reinstate the rule of law at Roxham Road.
We always work closely with all of our partners to meet our national and international obligations.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer praises immigration’s economic value and Quebec’s targets but does not address suspending the safe third country agreement or devolving powers.
I hope that all members in the House will work together to welcome immigrants to Canada and Quebec.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly lists recent tax measures on banks, excess profits and luxury items that partially respond to corporate-profit concerns.
We are permanently raising the corporate income tax by 1.5% on Canada's largest, most profitable banks and insurance companies, and we have introduced a recovery dividend of 15% on the excess profits of these institutions during the COVID pandemic.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses bank taxes instead of grocery chain profits.
We are permanently increasing the corporate tax rate by 1.5% for the largest banks and insurance companies.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to spending plans without pledging on taxes.
That is why we are going to double the GST tax credit, create a $500 housing benefit and launch a dental program for children under 12.
- misdirectedTaxationMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives and reframes to their benefits instead of addressing tax pledge.
if the Conservatives really want to help Canadians, they should support our plan.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives and reframes to their benefits instead of addressing tax hikes.
if the Conservatives really cared about hard-working Canadians who are struggling to make ends meet, they would support our plan.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives' past record instead of addressing current tax hikes.
the Conservatives used to be a party that had a few core economic principles.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to attacking Conservatives on carbon pricing instead of tax increases.
I spent some time in Alberta this summer, and I have some very clear views on who is trying to divide Canadians.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer defends carbon rebates and attacks the member instead of addressing tax increases.
it is a little shocking to me that an MP from Alberta would be wanting to spare Alberta families a cheque for $1,079
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMs. Kristina Michaud (Bloc) asked Ms. Pam Damoff (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists specific actions taken but does not directly address whether measures are working or when real action will occur.
we are taking the strongest action in a generation to keep communities safe from gun violence.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Kristina Michaud (Bloc) asked Ms. Pam Damoff (Liberal). substantive question.Answer boasts about seizures and investments without addressing the demand for visible results or timeline.
Last year, CBSA seized a record number of illegal firearms at the border, more than double the seizures in 2020.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to compassion and support for their own $500 payment instead of addressing the tax increase question.
That is why I just do not understand why the Conservatives will not support us in giving about $500 to families struggling to buy groceries, $500 to Canadians struggling to pay their rent.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.Answer denies tax increases by redefining them as EI/CPP and shifts to child care benefits unrelated to paycheque taxes.
There are no tax increases. We are talking about EI and CPP, and we are helping families.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lectures on the difference between taxes and premiums while avoiding any commitment on cancelling increases.
We know that Canadians understand the difference between taxes and paying their EI premiums and paying into the Canada pension plan.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives as fiscally irresponsible and pivots to unrelated supports instead of addressing the tax question.
the sad reality is that, in pursuit of populist partisan talking points, the Conservatives have become the party of fiscal irresponsibility.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Lori Idlout (NDP) asked Dan Vandal (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites recent investments but does not commit to a by-indigenous-for-indigenous national strategy before the next budget.
Budget 2022, as an example, invested $4 billion in indigenous housing, including $845 million alone in Inuit Nunangat.
- deflectedHousingMs. Jenny Kwan (NDP) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists existing programs without addressing the request to stop financialization of housing or corporate landlord financing.
I want to remind the hon. member that we have been very much focused on putting in place cutting-edge programs, such as the Canada housing benefit
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights agri-environmental spending without addressing fertilizer policy, fuel tax hikes or food inflation directly.
Recently, we have invested $1.5 billion in agri-environmental programming because our farmers know that the biggest threat to their production is climate change.
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores carbon tax rebate question and pivots to unrelated investments and climate change as the threat.
I will talk about the clean technology program, as one example, because we know that farmers need equipment, and they need new technologies to be more energy efficient to be able to do precision agriculture to fight against climate change, which is the real threat to food security.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Michelle Ferreri (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates rebate talking points instead of addressing cancellation of tax increases.
That is why it is important that the price on pollution and the climate action rebate will put more money in people's pockets.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Michelle Ferreri (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservative claims and lists unrelated programs rather than addressing tax increase cancellation.
just because the Conservatives repeat something does not make it true.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains why temporary measures are ending and affirms ongoing EI access but does not address extending them.
We are winding down our temporary measures, but there is good reason for that.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights one upcoming change and promises future vision but does not address the delay in full reform.
By the end of this December, workers will have access to 26 weeks of sickness benefits instead of 15.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Richard Lehoux (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives on climate instead of addressing carbon tax impact on farmers and food prices.
after listening to the Conservative leadership race over the last number of weeks, the party is still debating whether climate change is real.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Stephen Ellis (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends the rebate structure and quarterly payments without addressing cancellation of tax increases on heating fuel.
One party on this side of the House is doing something about it, and that is why our climate plan is designed so that the majority of Canadians receive more in climate action incentive payments than they pay at the pump.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Stephen Ellis (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to a new funding announcement and attacks Conservatives rather than addressing energy poverty or canceling taxes.
That is why the Minister of Environment , just last week, announced $120 million from the low carbon economy fund to help Atlantic Canadians transition away from heating oil to cleaner energy.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Scot Davidson (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes the emissions plan and attacks Conservatives instead of addressing the business impact or scrapping the tax.
They have no plan for the environment. They have no plan for the economy.
- deflectedTaxationMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.The answer cites a Conservative colleague's support for rebates rather than addressing cancellation of the taxes.
I wonder if they could talk to their colleague from New Brunswick Southwest, who says his province should go back to using the federal carbon price because at least it comes with rebates.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to urging support for Liberal measures like the GST credit instead of addressing tax increases.
if the Conservatives really want to help Canadians, I have an idea. They can vote in favour of our plan
- partly answeredHealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the health care crisis by detailing specific federal investments in surgeries and long-term care.
including the $2-billion investment we are making now to support a reduction in surgeries and the additional $1-billion investment to reduce the pressure on long-term care
- deflectedClimate ChangeMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.The answer outlines general emissions reduction measures without addressing cancellation of TMX or Bay du Nord.
incentives in infrastructure for electric vehicles, energy retrofits for greener homes and buildings, reducing oil and gas emissions, and supporting our farmers.