All sittings← 2022-03-022022-03-04 →
Thursday, March 3, 2022 · sitting No. 40
Commons debates Ukraine sanctions and energy security on opposition day
Conservative MP Michael Chong moved an opposition day motion that condemned President Vladimir Putin and the Russian Federation for their unprovoked illegal attack on Ukraine and called on the government to approve and build new natural gas pipelines to Atlantic tidewater. NDP MP Charlie Angus criticized the motion as a crass attempt to exploit a humanitarian disaster to promote pipelines. Conservative MP Michael Chong replied that the party had long advocated measures against Russian disinformation and for visa-free travel for Ukrainians. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux questioned the Conservative emphasis on energy exports while stressing allied cooperation.
In question period, Conservative MP Luc Berthold pressed the government to expel the Russian ambassador over disinformation. Minister Anita Anand said Canada would defend against propaganda. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called for targeted sanctions on Russian oligarchs and their assets in Canada. Minister Anand said sanctions already covered President Putin, his inner circle and oligarchs close to the regime.
Bloc Québécois MP Christine Normandin asked how long it would take for Ukrainians to reach Canada under the new emergency travel authorization. Minister Anita Anand said a new program would eliminate many formalities and impose no limit on applications.
Decided that day
- C-12 received royal assent
- C-256 introduced
- C-257 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – March 3, 2022. Video from CPAC. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2022-03-03
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
Conservative MP Raquel Dancho noted Russia has 40 nuclear-powered icebreakers and 18 military bases near Canada's Arctic border while Canada has none, and asked what meetings the defence minister had held with cabinet and allies. Minister Anita Anand said the government is prepared for every eventuality and is modernizing NORAD.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Bloc Québécois MP Monique Pauzé asked whether the government would approve the Bay du Nord project given the IPCC report on climate impacts. Parliamentary Secretary Terry Duguid said the decision is under consideration and will follow the legislated process based on the best available scientific evidence.
Read the exchangeSeniors
NDP MP Rachel Blaney said the government is doing the bare minimum to fix problems with GIS payments for seniors who received CERB or CRB. Minister Randy Boissonnault said the economic and fiscal update presented a plan to alleviate financial hardship for those recipients.
Read the exchangeMarine Transportation
Green Party MP Taylor Bachrach said at least four Russian-owned vessels are bound for Canadian ports and dock workers have said they will not unload them. Minister Omar Alghabra said the government has taken decisive action to ban Russian ships from entering Canadian waters.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the expulsion question entirely and pivots to welcoming a Ukrainian official.
Here today is Andrii Bukvych, chargé d'affaires of the Embassy of Ukraine to Canada.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states preparedness and details new lethal aid measures.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Raquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses general preparedness but omits any specific meetings with cabinet or allies.
Our government is prepared for any eventuality.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Raquel Dancho (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims preparedness for nuclear threats but provides no details on meetings held.
we are indeed prepared for every eventuality, including those from the information we have received relating to the nuclear allusions
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to general Arctic sovereignty work without addressing deterrence of Russia or the ambassador.
our government is very serious about protecting our sovereignty in the North and the Arctic.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMs. Christine Normandin (Bloc) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly describes the new fast-track program and states there is no limit on applicants.
today we announced a new program that will eliminate many of the administrative formalities to get Ukrainians here faster
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMs. Christine Normandin (Bloc) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses work permits and family support but does not address organizing an airlift operation.
everyone who arrives under these measures will be eligible for an open work permit.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms sanctions already imposed on oligarchs and states further action is planned.
We have levied sanctions against President Putin directly, key members of his inner circle, his foreign minister, oligarchs close to the Putin regime
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms existing sanctions but does not commit to new ones targeting oligarchs like Abramovich.
we have already imposed sanctions against President Putin himself and on key members of his inner circle, the oligarchs close to his regime and members of the Russian Duma.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.Answer asserts ongoing work with US but provides no timeline or confirmation of fulfilling the 2017 commitment.
alongside our American partners, our government is making the investments necessary to modernize NORAD.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Anita Anand (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites one contract for the North Warning System but does not address full NORAD modernization funding.
We recently awarded a $592‑million contract to Nasittuq Corporation, an Inuit company, to operate and maintain the North Warning System.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Robert Oliphant (Liberal). substantive question.Answer emphasizes existing sovereignty and Arctic Council actions but avoids any timeline or new defense measures against Russian claims.
We work with our partners in the Arctic Council to ensure that we will continue to exercise that sovereignty well.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Greg McLean (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to renewables and IEA talks without addressing Canadian energy exports replacing Russian supplies.
European countries have made it clear, including during this week's International Energy Agency ministerial meeting, of the pressing need for Europe to accelerate the transition to renewables and hydrogen.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Greg McLean (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses banning Russian imports and climate goals but does not address revising regulations for LNG projects.
We are working very, very proactively with the energy sector in this country, including with the Pathways alliance, to ensure we are producing our energy resources in a manner that is consistent with addressing the climate crisis.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.Answer reiterates European commitments and climate context without endorsing an east-west energy corridor.
We are working very actively with our European colleagues and with our American colleagues to ensure we are working to help address both short and long-term energy supply issues in the context that Europe and Canada have committed to do, which is in the context of fighting both the crisis in Europe and the crisis of climate change.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states a decision will come in due course but refuses to give a yes or no on project approval.
I assure the hon. member that decision will be made in due course.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to yes or no by restating that a decision is under consideration.
this is a decision that is under consideration as we speak.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). rhetorical question.The question makes a statement rather than seeking an answer, and the response pivots to general government climate actions.
the IPCC report shows that all countries need to take bold climate mitigation and adaptation action to fight climate change.
- partly answeredAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the crisis and Canada's potential role but does not address domestic agricultural issues raised.
Canada can play a very important role in this.
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Marty Morantz (Conservative) asked Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer details new measures but does not specify a date for lifting the visa requirement.
This will remove many of the barriers that typically result in refusal so we can welcome as many Ukrainians fleeing this war as possible, as quickly as possible.
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMrs. Dominique Vien (Conservative) asked Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes new measures but does not confirm immediate visa-free entry as requested.
Today we announced new measures that will make it easier, faster and safer for Ukrainians fleeing the war to come to Canada.
- partly answeredSeniorsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references a plan in the economic update but does not confirm a timeline for fixing GIS payments.
In the economic and fiscal update, we presented our government's plan to alleviate financial hardship of GIS recipients who received CRB or CERB.
- deflectedMarine TransportationMr. Taylor Bachrach (NDP) asked Omar Alghabra (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates prior actions on flights and ships but does not address implementing the ban before vessels arrive.
That is why our government took decisive and swift action to ban Russian ships from entering Canadian waters.
- misdirectedHousingMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). loaded question.The question assumes the Prime Minister's position is insincere, and the answer attacks the opposition's amendment instead of addressing the commitment.
The member opposite knows very well that the amendment he is referring to was ruled out of order in the committee and would not have been enforceable, even if it passed.
- misdirectedHousingMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's voting record instead of addressing the energy labelling scheme or affordability promises.
Who is not serious about housing affordability? That party is not serious about housing affordability.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Rachael Thomas (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists past Liberal actions and opposition votes but does not address stopping the carbon tax increase.
We lowered taxes for the middle class twice and raised them on the wealthiest 1%, and the Conservatives voted against.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Randy Hoback (Conservative) asked Mary Ng (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes record trade levels and recent meetings but does not detail specific actions against new U.S. tariffs.
I was just there on Monday, just a few days ago, meeting with the USTR and with congressional leaders to continue to defend Canada in this really important market that we have access to.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Louise Chabot (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the independent appeal process and modernization efforts but does not say whether the appeal will be cancelled.
The Canada Employment Insurance Commission, which is also independent, opted to appeal the decision.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again cites the independent appeal and modernization work without addressing cancellation of the appeal.
The Canada Employment Insurance Commission, which is also independent, made the decision.
- misdirectedHealthMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer praises Ontario collaboration and past vaccination efforts instead of addressing ending federal mandates.
Just to give an example, the vaccination operations that took place in Ontario probably saved thousands of lives and avoided billions of dollars in losses to families and businesses over the last few months.
- deflectedHealthMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses individual and collective responsibility plus vaccination rates but provides no timeline or plan to end mandates.
Collectively, we had, at least on this side of the House and I think we worked collaboratively with opposition parties, the responsibility to protect everyone's health and safety.
- deflectedHealthMr. John Williamson (Conservative) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer credits vaccination choices and falling case numbers but does not address testing requirements, fines, or constitutionality.
That is not by chance. That is because Canadians have made the right choice and have been vaccinated and have followed public health measures.
- partly answeredLabourMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Omar Alghabra (Liberal). substantive question.The answer mentions monitoring and meetings but provides no specific steps to prevent a crisis.
Let me assure my colleague that we are monitoring the situation.
- deflectedSmall BusinessMr. Martin Shields (Conservative) asked Randy Boissonnault (Liberal). loaded question.The response ignores the spending question and pivots to unrelated government programs.
As it relates to inflation, there are other structural costs that make life less affordable for Canadian families, and chief among them are housing and child care.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMrs. Anna Roberts (Conservative) asked Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.Provides details on investments and results directly addressing backlog processing.
We have hired more than 500 new staff.
- partly answeredLabourMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mona Fortier (Liberal). substantive question.Explains the process but avoids committing to ministerial intervention.
The Office of the Auditor General of Canada is conducting its own negotiations, and the offer on the table is in line with the increases agreed upon by 99% of the core public administration during the 2018 round of negotiations.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Mike Morrice (Green) asked Mr. Terry Duguid (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids committing to a decision and emphasizes process instead.
we are following a legislated process on this very important decision, and we are reviewing all the evidence
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mark Holland (Liberal). substantive question.Directly lists the planned business for the coming period.
This afternoon, we are going to continue with the debate on the Conservative opposition day motion.