All sittings← 2020-02-192020-02-21 →
Thursday, February 20, 2020 · sitting No. 20
Conservatives move motion backing Coastal GasLink amid pipeline protests
The House spent the bulk of its sitting on a Conservative motion moved by MP Todd Doherty that expressed solidarity with elected band councils along the Coastal GasLink route, a majority of hereditary chiefs and the majority of the Wet'suwet'en people who support the project, while condemning radical activists for exploiting divisions. The motion remained before the House at adjournment.
In Question Period, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer pressed Public Safety Minister Bill Blair on when the illegal blockades would end, citing economic harm and Wet'suwet'en support for the project. Bloc Québécois MP Yves-François Blanchet asked whether the government would meet hereditary chiefs now in eastern Canada and whether it would propose suspending construction work.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
Question Period – February 20, 2020 (with English interpretation) #QP #cdnpoli. Video from CPAC, with interpretation. Watch on YouTube
Who held the floor · 2020-02-20
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Employment Insurance Act
NDP MP Daniel Blaikie introduced Bill C-212 to extend employment-insurance sickness benefits from 15 weeks to 50 weeks for Canadians with serious illnesses such as cancer.
Read the exchangePrivilege
Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux responded to a privilege question from Conservative MP Earl Dreeshen, maintaining that the government's answer to Question No. 50 on contracts with the Pembina Institute did not deliberately mislead the House.
Read the exchangePetitions
Green MP Elizabeth May presented a petition calling for implementation of the 75 recommendations from the Cohen commission on the decline of Fraser River sockeye salmon.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
NDP MP Daniel Blaikie welcomed government acceptance of his proposals requiring 90 days' notice of intent to negotiate trade deals and tabling of objectives 30 days before talks begin.
Read the exchangeInfrastructure
Conservative MP Luc Berthold pressed the government on why it voted against sending the infrastructure program to the Auditor General, citing the Parliamentary Budget Officer's reports of underspending.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedPublic SafetyAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses impacts and reconciliation efforts but avoids naming any day the blockades will end.
we will continue the hard work of solving the situation as peaceably as possible.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states a belief that the time has come for barricades to come down while noting RCMP actions.
We believe that the time has come for the barricades to come down and we are working toward addressing the circumstances that gave rise to it
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer corrects a premise about RCMP direction instead of addressing the requested guarantee on the project.
The Supreme Court has said police independence underpins the rule of law, and in these circumstances no direction was given to the RCMP.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes the Prime Minister will speak with premiers that afternoon but provides no plan or deadline.
That is why the Prime Minister will be speaking with Premier Legault and his other provincial counterparts this afternoon.
- partly answeredEmploymentMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges economic impacts and states focus on resolving protests quickly but offers no plan or deadline.
We want to end this as quickly as possible by opening a dialogue to find a peaceful resolution to this problem.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes hereditary chiefs are en route for dialogue but gives no information on commitments the Prime Minister will make.
As everyone knows, the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs are now en route to Tyendinaga to pursue a peaceful resolution, which is the solution we are all seeking.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Yves-François Blanchet (Bloc) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer cites RCMP developments and a clear plan but refuses to disclose details or address specific proposals like suspending work.
we have a very clear plan to defuse the situation, which we are not going to disclose to the public for now, of course.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights positive RCMP developments and states readiness to engage but does not confirm a meeting by the Prime Minister.
The Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and I stand ready to engage with the leadership in Tyendinaga.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general ministerial engagement but avoids any commitment on a direct Prime Minister meeting.
I and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations , as well as other ministers, stand ready to engage on a moment's notice and that is precisely what we will do.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explains jurisdictional limits and mediation efforts but does not address when or how the Prime Minister will act on the blockades.
Our government's role is to try to mediate and reconcile the issues that gave rise to this dispute in the first place.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer emphasizes police independence and non-interference but provides no action plan or timeline for ending the blockades.
They will continue to do that work without any political interference from this government.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges urgency and states conditions are met for resolution but does not directly address standing with the Wet'suwet'en community or removing blockades.
As a result of a very responsive and responsible decision made by the RCMP, I believe the conditions have now been met to allow for a more amenable and peaceful resolution.
- answeredPublic SafetyMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the legal limits on ministerial authority over RCMP operational decisions.
That means we do not direct the RCMP in its operational decisions in the day-to-day policing of the communities that it is responsible for.
- deflectedPublic SafetyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer rejects countenancing law-breaking and stresses reconciliation but does not address contemplated concessions.
at no time have we ever countenanced law-breaking.
- deflectedPublic SafetyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.The answer references past blockades and advocates peaceful resolution but does not address rewarding law-breaking or future incentives.
The best path forward to protect Canadians' interests is a peaceful resolution of this dispute.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMs. Andréanne Larouche (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the crisis magnitude and need for quick action but offers only dialogue as the solution without specifics on urgency or layoffs.
We know we need to find a solution as quickly as possible.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Stéphane Bergeron (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer describes the general approach via dialogue but avoids addressing the specific question about taking action before all lines close.
We are working very hard to put an end to these blockades and to get the trains running again as quickly as possible.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Yves Perron (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the propane shortage and resolution efforts but omits any mention of compensation for farmers.
We are well aware of the propane shortage.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses service disruptions and partial operations but provides no information on costs to the tourism industry.
It is a regrettable situation.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer is incomplete and does not address the economic impact query at all.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer reiterates awareness and partial service resumption but avoids quantifying the impact on tourism.
We want to resolve this issue as soon as possible.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Leah Gazan (NDP) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms the priority of UNDRIP implementation but does not address the stalling accusation or current events.
Our commitment was included in both our platform and our Speech from the Throne.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Marc Miller (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes a plan involving dialogue and de-escalation but does not confirm if the Prime Minister will visit the territory.
There is a clear plan of action for de-escalation, but that involves dialogue.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Kevin Waugh (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges significant economic impact but gives no specific daily cost figure for the blockades.
Yes, they are costing us quite a bit.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Richard Lehoux (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges impact but avoids specifying any tangible plan.
That is why we are working very hard to resolve this problem as quickly as possible in a peaceful and long-term way.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses job impacts and ongoing efforts but provides no numbers on layoffs.
In some cases, there have been layoffs in certain locations with certain companies because of the fact that the trains are not moving.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentKerry-Lynne Findlay (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to correcting a premise about police instead of addressing environmental impact of trucks.
However, when the member suggests that it is our government that is somehow stopping the police from enforcing the injunctions, that is simply not correct.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Luc Desilets (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer recognizes economic harm but offers no concrete game plan for removing blockades.
That is precisely why we are working very hard and as quickly as we can to resolve this issue so that the trains can start running again as soon as possible.
- deflectedThe EconomyMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms responsibility without outlining actions to end the blockades.
That is why we are working very hard to resolve the issue the right way, through dialogue, so that we can find a long-term, lasting way to solve this problem.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.Answer redirects focus to police jurisdiction rather than stating when laws will be enforced.
It is the police of local jurisdiction.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Corey Tochor (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains police independence instead of committing to enforcement timeline.
The Supreme Court of Canada has said that police independence underpins the rule of law and is necessary for the maintenance of public order and the preservation of the peace.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMichelle Rempel Garner (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.Answer reiterates police independence and past experience without addressing enforcement.
Operational decisions on the enforcement of that law are made independently by our police services.
- deflectedThe EconomyEd Fast (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges impacts on farmers but avoids addressing when blockades will end or leadership failures.
I want to assure my colleague from B.C. that we are very aware of the impact that this is having on egg farmers, on grain farmers and on chicken farmers.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Chris d'Entremont (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer recognizes port impacts and mentions working toward a solution but does not specify timing or leadership actions.
That is why we are working so hard to find a durable solution, and a solution that goes through dialogue, so we can resolve this for the long term.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Robert Kitchen (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes some trains are moving and reiterates efforts for a solution but does not detail how grain will reach markets amid blockades.
There are trains that are picking up natural resources and moving them across the country.
- answeredInternational TradeMr. Daniel Blaikie (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the government's commitment to the proposed transparency improvements for trade negotiations.
we will be formally amending the government's policy on tabling treaties in Parliament in line with his excellent suggestions.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Mr. Peter Schiefke (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses the government's climate plan but does not address awareness of the specific methane emissions studies or LNG claims raised.
That is why we put in place the most robust plan in Canadian history, over 50 measures, that will help us meet our Paris targets.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly lists the planned House business for the coming days after a brief clarification.
In answer to her question, we will continue debate on the Conservative Party motion this afternoon.