All sittings← 2019-05-132019-05-15 →
Tuesday, May 14, 2019 · sitting No. 416
Commons debates justice spending in committee of the whole
The House spent the largest share of its sitting in committee of the whole examining the estimates for the Department of Justice. Opposition members questioned Minister of Justice David Lametti on the SNC-Lavalin file, including whether he had taken a deferred prosecution agreement proposal to cabinet or issued a directive under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act. Lametti declined to answer, citing ongoing litigation and the sub judice rule.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the Mark Norman prosecution. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer pressed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the government's handling of documents and its choice to name only Norman to the RCMP. Trudeau said the decision to suspend Norman was made independently by the chief of the defence staff and that the government had met its disclosure obligations.
Other exchanges in question period addressed carbon pricing, climate targets and federal-provincial infrastructure announcements, with members from the NDP, Conservatives and Bloc Québécois challenging government policy.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2019-05-14
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Petitions
Conservative MP Michelle Rempel presented a petition from Calgary constituents calling for a review of the equalization formula and a report on its fairness given federal energy policies.
Read the exchangeCanada–Madagascar Tax Convention Implementation Act, 2018
Liberal MP Joël Lightbound defended Bill S-6 as a measure to strengthen tax fairness through a new double-taxation convention with Madagascar.
Read the exchangeCarbon Pricing
Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said British Columbia taxpayers have paid $1 billion more in carbon tax than they have received back and asked whether the same outcome awaits the rest of Canada.
Read the exchangeIntergovernmental Relations
Bloc Québécois MP Alain Rayes accused the government of bypassing Quebec when announcing federal funding for Highway 19.
Read the exchangeFraud Against Seniors
Members debated a private member's motion from Conservative MP Alice Wong calling for better coordination to protect seniors from fraud.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to 2015 contract origins instead of addressing interference or document blocking.
On the eve of the 2015 election, Conservatives decided to rush through a half-billion-dollar, sole-sourced project.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer emphasizes independent suspension decision and repeats document process without addressing coaching or normal behaviour.
Any accusations otherwise are simply absurd.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats contract origin and independent suspension but ignores the request for an apology.
The decision to suspend Vice-Admiral Norman was taken independently by the chief of defence staff.
- misdirectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer claims committees are independent then pivots to attacking Conservatives for not discussing the economy.
This is yet again another example of the Conservatives wanting to talk about anything other than the economy
- misdirectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the question as petty games and shifts to economic numbers instead of addressing the double standard.
They are so desperate to not talk about the economic numbers, the job growth, the impact on Canadians—
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer questions the NDP plan's consistency and criticizes their LNG stance rather than addressing adoption of the plan.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks NDP inconsistency on jobs and environment instead of addressing support for the motion.
The NDP is completely inconsistent in its approach not just on the economy, but on the environment now too.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer accuses NDP of jumping on the bandwagon and slinging mud while restating judicial respect.
The New Democrats are stuck, so they are slinging mud too, like the Conservatives.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the question entirely and attacks the NDP instead.
the NDP says it will be there for the people, but it just announced that it is against a project that would have created 10,000 jobs for British Columbians.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses the document handling claim but avoids the interference accusation.
I remind the hon. member that the government met all of its obligations with respect to the third party records applications.
- deflectedJusticeMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to committee independence and dismisses accusations as absurd without addressing regrets or documents.
Any accusation to the contrary from the opposition is absurd and baseless.
- partly answeredJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains document process but does not address why documents were not given earlier to all parties.
All documents in this case for priority individuals identified in February by the defence were provided to the court as required.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the Harper government and calls accusations absurd instead of addressing the request for an investigation.
I am sure that is hard for him to grasp, considering who was controlling the committees under the Harper government.
- partly answeredJusticeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer details the department's role in document processing but sidesteps the claim of incomplete disclosure.
The process of determining whether documents were relevant and whether any redactions were necessary was made and conducted by civil servants and then verified by the court.
- deflectedJusticeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.Answer expresses confidence in institutions without addressing the cover-up allegation or Norman's questions.
Canadians can rest assured that this process worked and that the justice system is intact.
- answeredJusticeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states the PPSC's independence and the department's lack of role in the prosecution decisions.
My office had no role whatsoever in the handling of this prosecution.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses legal fees policy instead of addressing the demand for an apology.
based on last week's decision, the deputy minister has reviewed the policy in place regarding Vice-Admiral Norman's request to have his legal fees paid as they relate to this case.
- misdirectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks Conservatives and lists projects rather than addressing the refusal to partner with Quebec.
only a Conservative member would be against a project to improve road travel in Montreal.
- partly answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses partnership by citing timelines on one file but ignores the broader accusations of disrespect.
Respect means moving forward on files sent to us by the provinces in time for the construction season.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the Trans Mountain timeline and consultations but does not release a plan as requested.
We are scheduled to make a decision on this project, as long as we are fulfilling our duty to consult with indigenous communities, by June 18.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking Conservatives on science instead of addressing working with provinces on the carbon tax.
when will the Conservative Party listen to the science on climate change?
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer criticizes both Conservatives and NDP rather than addressing ending fossil fuel subsidies or declaring an emergency.
On the other hand, there is the NDP, which is flip-flopping on the LNG project, the largest investment in Canadian history, which will help developing countries phase out carbon.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer outlines the government's plan but does not address supporting the NDP motion or getting serious per the question.
It is unfortunate that the NDP does not understand that the environment and the economy have to go together.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights job creation instead of addressing or apologizing for the broken deficit promise.
Things are going great for Canadians across the country, with over a million jobs created in four years and the lowest unemployment rate in about 40 years.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the specific question about deficits and pivots to defending the government's economic record.
fortunately, when I was in the private sector I had the opportunity to make investments to grow a business.
- deflectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses climate action and rebates but avoids confirming or denying the $1.80 gas price prediction.
Did the member opposite cash his climate action incentive rebate?
- deflectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer disputes the premise on B.C. gas prices and pivots to attacking the opposition's climate plan instead of addressing re-election consequences.
it is probably good to get the facts on the table.
- answeredPublic SafetyMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms that the Canadian Armed Forces will continue supporting flood response efforts.
Canadians can rest assured that the Canadian Armed Forces will support and serve alongside our federal, provincial and municipal partners
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the high-frequency train file but provides no timeline or commitment on action.
I want to assure him that we continue to work on this complex and very important file.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentEd Fast (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' lack of a plan rather than addressing whether the Liberal plan meets Paris targets.
I guess what is advertised is that the Conservatives do not have a plan for the environment.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists unrelated benefits instead of explaining the rationale for high gas prices in rural areas.
The Canada child benefit raised 300,000 children out of poverty.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer blames the opposition for past votes instead of addressing when the pipeline will be built to lower prices.
if the hon. member on the opposition side and his party were really serious on moving forward on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in the right way, they would not have voted to shut down the consultation process
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Glen Motz (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer questions the status of proceedings rather than committing to fight compensation claims.
The member can be assured that the Government of Canada will very strongly defend its position.
- partly answeredTransportation SafetyMr. Wayne Stetski (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses safety measures and reports but does not address committing to a national cycling strategy.
last year we published a report that was the product of 10 provinces, three territories and the federal government putting together 57 measures
- answeredPublic Services and ProcurementSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly addresses the need for a second ship by citing naval advice that there is no immediate requirement.
The commander of the navy publicly stated that there is no immediate need for a second temporary supply ship
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights project approvals but avoids addressing the request for lump-sum funding with no strings attached.
We work closely with our colleagues and respect provincial jurisdictions.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes project approval processes but sidesteps the demand to transfer funds as a lump sum.
we are not in election mode, we are in construction mode.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Erin Weir (Independent) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The answer begins by affirming respect for institutions but does not commit to separating the offices.
our government firmly believes in the institutions of government and respects them deeply.