All sittings← 2019-04-102019-04-12 →
Thursday, April 11, 2019 · sitting No. 403
House advances budget bill amid time allocation and opposition attacks
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on second reading of Bill C-97, the budget implementation act, 2019. Liberal MP Darrell Samson opened the debate by highlighting measures for veterans, seniors and first-time homebuyers. Conservative MP Dan Albas and NDP MP Linda Duncan pressed the government on the shared-equity mortgage program and the absence of a national pharmacare plan.
Question period featured repeated exchanges over alleged political interference in the SNC-Lavalin prosecution. Conservative MP Alain Rayes and Conservative MP Mark Strahl demanded that the Prime Minister testify under oath, while Liberal House leader Bardish Chagger said the government had already waived privilege so Canadians could know the facts.
New Democrat leader Jagmeet Singh and NDP MP Brian Masse accused the government of editing a report on bank sales practices to protect the banks, while Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre charged that the government gives public money to wealthy corporations rather than ordinary Canadians.
Decided that day
- Time allocation for Bill C-92 passed
- Time allocation for Bill C-93 passed
- Motion to proceed to Orders of the Day failed
- Bill C-376 advanced to second chamber
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2019-04-11
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Criminal Records Act
Liberal House leader Bardish Chagger moved time allocation on Bill C-93, prompting Conservative MP Garnett Genuis to ask how much the no-cost record suspensions would cost taxpayers.
Read the exchangeAn Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis Children, Youth and Families
Liberal House leader Bardish Chagger moved time allocation on Bill C-92, drawing criticism from Conservative MP Cathy McLeod that the government was again rushing important indigenous legislation.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
NDP MP Charlie Angus questioned why the government gave $12 million to Loblaws for energy-efficient fridges, citing the company's lobbying and past pricing practices.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
Conservative MP Luc Berthold pressed the government on the month-long Chinese ban on Canadian canola, saying 43,000 producers were paying the price for the Prime Minister's failures.
Read the exchangePoints of Order
Minister Patty Hajdu rose on a point of order to object to members mocking a colleague who answered a question in English.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids question about testifying under oath by restating actions on notice and opposition's tweets.
We did in fact send a letter to the Leader of the Opposition.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps demand to follow through on notice by again focusing on opposition deleting tweets.
He deleted some tweets and statements made online.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer evades when PM will appear in court by repeating that opposition deleted tweets after notice.
Even though Conservatives talk a big game and say there has been no effect of the notice that was provided to them, we have already seen that they have deleted tweets.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives for misleading instead of addressing the contradiction or court timeline.
the Conservatives' only plan is to mislead Canadians.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer again pivots to opposition changing wording after notice rather than confirming court action.
They will not repeat the comments they deleted after they received notice.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.Answer accuses NDP of undermining officers of Parliament instead of addressing OECD monitoring or interference.
I would encourage the member to revisit his wording, because I know he would never undermine the work of officers of Parliament.
- answeredJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states commitment to co-operate with OECD on the matter.
in March, the minister spoke with the chair of the OECD working group and confirmed that we are committed to fully co-operating with the OECD and that we firmly support its work.
- answeredFinancial InstitutionsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses the report outcome by citing new legislation on bank practices.
As a matter of fact, as a result of the report, we have introduced legislation that prohibits the banks from providing misleading information and exerting undue pressure.
- answeredFinancial InstitutionsMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly addresses the question by detailing new legislation on bank practices.
As a result of the work investigating this situation, the government has introduced legislation that prohibits the banks from providing misleading information.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Rachael Harder (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the perjury claim by shifting to public facts and attacking Conservatives.
The Conservatives will continue to represent Conservatives.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the perjury accusation by listing prior Conservative claims that proved false.
The Conservatives said that the justice committee would not meet.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer turns to attacking the opposition leader instead of addressing the perjury question.
this is not the first time that the Conservative leader and his party have misled Canadians with false and defamatory statements.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer focuses on the opposition leader deleting tweets rather than the perjury claim about the Prime Minister.
He changed the words he used and is now repeating the words he changed
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats that notice was given to the opposition leader and avoids the perjury question.
Canadians can rest assured that we will not stand idly by, while those Conservatives continue to mislead Canadians.
- misdirectedJusticeMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks Conservatives on unrelated policy issues instead of addressing the perjury question.
They mislead Canadians because they have no plan for the environment and no plan for the economy.
- partly answeredJusticeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the OECD referral by confirming cooperation but ignores the call for a public inquiry.
Canada is a strong supporter of the OECD and the rules-based international order.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts entirely to climate benefits and budget measures without addressing the lobbying or cash-for-access event.
This decision was based on science, facts and evidence and on the advice of our department.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The answer cites independence and court obligations but avoids confirming whether documents will be released that day.
Counsel for the Attorney General of Canada is fulfilling all of its obligations to the court with respect to third party records applications.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates compliance with records requests but does not address claims of political interference or trial timing.
All documents requested from the priority individuals identified by the defence in February have already been provided to the court.
- deflectedJusticeSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer refers only to following Treasury Board policy and ignores the question about justifying non-payment of fees amid alleged interference.
as I just said, the Treasury Board policy is being followed to the letter, and that is what we are doing.
- deflectedJusticeMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats prior statements on records and policy without engaging the accusation of manipulating proceedings.
With respect to the reimbursement of legal expenses, the Treasury Board policy on legal assistance and indemnification has been applied rigorously.
- answeredFinancial InstitutionsMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly rebuts the premise and details new consumer-protection measures taken against banks.
We took the report very seriously and went forward with measures to prohibit banks from providing misleading information to customers to prohibit banks from exerting undue pressure on consumers to buy products or services, to require banks to have policies in place to ensure consumers receive products that are appropriate for them, and to increase penalties for banks from $500,000 to $10 million, something the Conservatives failed to do for 10 years.
- deflectedFinancial InstitutionsMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's record instead of addressing the call for an independent watchdog.
For 10 years, under Stephen Harper, consumer protection and strong, robust bank regulation were not so much as an afterthought.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes diplomatic steps taken but does not address the demand to confront China or the delay in receiving a delegation.
I have personally asked my Chinese counterpart to receive a delegation of experts led by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Earl Dreeshen (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains actions taken but opens with a jab at the opposition and avoids a timeline.
I am glad that finally my Conservative colleagues care for canola farmers, because we have cared for more than a month now.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts focus to American actions and does not address why the agreement was signed with tariffs in place.
the illegal and unjust American tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum must be lifted.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Dean Allison (Conservative) asked Mr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to Conservative silence rather than addressing the listed trade failures.
The Conservatives have not asked a single question on trade for the last few months, and I am happy to engage him in this debate on this issue.
- partly answeredGovernment PrioritiesMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends the Loblaws grant on emissions grounds but does not address the broader middle-class affordability critique.
If the hon. member is concerned about affordability, I look forward to her support for budget 2019, which is going to continue to put more money in the pockets of middle-class families.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses pharmacare planning and ignores the Loblaws and small-business contrast raised.
That is why I was very pleased that we launched the advisory council on the implementation of a national pharmacare program.
- misdirectedGovernment PrioritiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner's voting record instead of addressing the SNC-Lavalin and Loblaws allegations.
that is a curious argument, coming from the member opposite, who voted against the Canada child benefit, which put more money in the pockets of nine out of 10 Canadian families
- deflectedJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer accuses the member of misleading Canadians and does not promise no further political interference.
That member should stop misleading Canadians.
- answeredJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly states the RCMP's independence in investigations and prosecutions.
the RCMP is completely independent in its decisions about any investigation or prosecution.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesEd Fast (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to climate policy instead of addressing the Loblaws fridge funding question.
I have answered this question a number of times.
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMs. Jenny Kwan (NDP) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains the asylum policy intent but does not address the omnibus bill or committee referral criticism.
The measures that we are proposing are part of a broader package included in budget 2019 that is aimed at ensuring that people who genuinely need asylum receive it quickly and efficiently.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives and lists unrelated record points rather than addressing scandals or PM conduct.
the last people the Conservatives seem to care about are all Canadians.
- answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states the federal position on rights and secularism bill without evasion.
The state must not dictate what people can or cannot wear, regardless of their beliefs.
- partly answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer condemns inflammatory remarks but avoids committing on whether to challenge Bill 21.
We strongly condemn the use of inflammatory remarks, such as those of the mayor of Hampstead.
- answeredIndigenous ServicesJane Philpott (Independent) asked Mr. Dan Vandal (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms ongoing commitment to relocation and current mitigation steps for the community.
our commitment to a long-term relocation plan has not changed.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.Answer provides the requested projected order of business for the House.
this afternoon we will resume debate at second reading of Bill C-97 , the budget implementation act, 2019.