All sittings← 2019-03-182019-03-20 →
Tuesday, March 19, 2019 · sitting No. 392
Commons debates Champlain Bridge report amid SNC-Lavalin clashes
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on concurrence in the 51st report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. Conservative MP Alexander Nuttall moved concurrence in the report on the Champlain Bridge and said the previous Liberal government had failed to maintain it. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux replied that the Harper government had failed Montreal and that the current government had made historic infrastructure investments.
Question period focused on the justice committee's handling of the SNC-Lavalin matter. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said the Prime Minister had limited the former attorney general's testimony and asked what he was trying to hide. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the government had waived cabinet confidence and solicitor-client privilege so the former attorney general could speak fully and that the Ethics Commissioner continues to examine the matter.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2019-03-19
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis Children, Youth and Families
Indigenous Services Minister Seamus O'Regan said Bill C-92 would provide a path forward on jurisdiction and that the government had doubled funding for child and family services to $1.2 billion since 2016.
Read the exchangeThe Budget
Finance Minister Bill Morneau tabled the 2019 budget documents and moved that the House approve in general the budgetary policy of the government.
Read the exchangePrivilege
Conservative MP Lisa Raitt raised a question of privilege over the leak of a motion from the in-camera meeting of the justice committee and said the matter could not be left to the committee to resolve.
Read the exchangeImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen said the Atlantic immigration pilot program had been extended by two years to help employers settle workers and their families in the region.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses committee process and waivers but evades the core claim of hiding information by restating prior actions.
The committee has been studying this matter for five weeks.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats the waiver claim without addressing the specific gap between firing and resignation.
The matter before the committee was heard over the course of five weeks.
- misdirectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking Conservatives on the budget and economy instead of the attorney general's testimony limits.
What is happening today is that the Conservatives are desperate to talk about anything other than the federal budget.
- misdirectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts entirely to the budget and opposition's supposed lack of economic plan rather than addressing calls for further testimony.
However, the opposition does not even want to talk about it.
- misdirectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of not wanting the budget and pivots to job numbers instead of responding to the shutdown of the investigation.
the member opposite just admitted that he does not want to hear what is in the budget coming up in a few hours.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP for not supporting workers and pivots to job creation rather than addressing the call for a public inquiry.
what is puzzling in this whole thing is that I could see the Conservatives not standing up for workers, but not the NDP not standing up for workers
- deflectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists government achievements on jobs and poverty but does not explain why a former Liberal minister suffices to restore confidence.
We have created over 900,000 new jobs in this country over the past three years.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of not caring about jobs at SNC-Lavalin and pivots to defending institutions without addressing the choice of investigator.
I would like to see the member opposite tell SNC-Lavalin employees across the country, not just in Quebec but also in Newfoundland and Labrador, Regina and Grande Prairie, Alberta, that he does not care about their jobs.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Jagmeet Singh (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends committee processes but ignores the explicit demand for a public inquiry.
on this side of the House, we have confidence in the committees and their work.
- deflectedJusticeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights past committee work and attacks Conservatives rather than addressing the cover-up allegation.
The last time under Stephen Harper was a time when he actually did not waive all privileges, because perhaps the Conservatives had something to hide.
- deflectedJusticeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer emphasizes committee independence but sidesteps the question about robustness after shutdown.
it is important that Canadians know that when it comes to our parliamentary committees, they actually work independently of this place.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to job creation numbers instead of explaining the resignations or allowing further testimony.
Nevertheless, the Conservatives do not want to talk about the more than 900,000 jobs that have been created since our government was elected.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims privilege was waived but attacks the opposition leader instead of addressing the specific post-January 14 period.
I think the member opposite is speaking from experience, since we know that the Leader of the Opposition gives him instructions, but members on this side of the House can make their own choices
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to poverty reduction stats and attacks Conservative plans rather than addressing the shutdown or corruption claims.
They do not want to talk about the 300,000 children who have been lifted out of poverty.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists government achievements on jobs and poverty while ignoring the cascade of resignations and shutdown.
We know that 300,000 children have been lifted out of poverty.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reiterates prior committee work and institutions but refuses to answer the yes-or-no question on a public inquiry.
We on this side have respect for and confidence in our institutions.
- misdirectedJusticeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer evades the yes/no inquiry request by pivoting to unrelated government achievements and attacking the NDP's voting record.
Let us talk about some numbers.
- deflectedJusticeErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses cooperation with OECD but avoids the contradiction about shutting down the committee investigation.
That is why we are co-operating fully with the OECD in its work on this issue.
- deflectedJusticeErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer begins defending the minister's record instead of addressing the rule-of-law accusation or committee shutdown.
as someone who has stood up for the people of Ukraine, as someone who has stood up for the Crimean Tartars, as someone who has stood up for the people of Venezuela, let me say it is—
- partly answeredJusticeSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains actions taken regarding privilege waiver and committee work but does not address the motive for shutting down further study.
we waived solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidence so the former attorney general could testify before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Michael Barrett (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists achievements and criticizes Conservatives for focusing on scandal rather than addressing what the Prime Minister is hiding.
It is really unfortunate that the Conservatives do not want to focus on Canadians.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends institutions and pivots to listing achievements while criticizing both opposition parties' questions.
I understand that the Conservatives do not want to talk about Canadians, but now the NDP is using the same talking points.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms trust in institutions and criticizes the NDP for not asking relevant questions instead of addressing the public inquiry demand.
Let us remember that the NDP members used to ask relevant questions for Canadians.
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer notes the Ethics Commissioner's role but shifts to criticizing Conservatives for not engaging with the budget instead of addressing the corruption concerns.
The Conservatives do not want to hear the budget speech and debate it.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer avoids the query by listing past waivers and pivots to accusing Conservatives of playing politics.
We on this side will focus on Canadians while the Conservatives play politics.
- misdirectedJusticeMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the premise by calling the comparison insulting rather than addressing the OECD or resignation query.
it is both insulting and absurd to the people of Canada, as well as to the people suffering from the dictatorships of Maduro and Putin, to make any comparison between the two.
- deflectedJusticeMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer changes subject entirely to women's rights instead of responding to the cover or shame accusation.
let me talk about what our government is doing to advance the rights of women in the world.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to defending McLellan and attacking expected Conservative tactics while ignoring the OECD hearing shutdown.
these are definitely tactics and approaches I expect from the Conservatives, but the NDP definitely should undertake to return to what they used to fight for.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer begins by labeling the question misleading and cuts off without addressing leadership or integrity claims.
that question and the preamble prior to it was entirely misleading.
- partly answeredJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly notes the dates fall outside her AG tenure, addressing why she could not discuss those meetings.
the former attorney general was not the attorney general on those dates.
- deflectedJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats privilege waivers then pivots to Liberal poverty record instead of addressing the cover-up claim.
We are going to focus on 300,000 children that have been lifted out of poverty.
- deflectedJusticePierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates waivers and committee actions while avoiding the sequence of resignations and cover-up question.
The matter that was in front of the justice committee was with regard to her time as Attorney General, because Canadians should get to hear.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses committee actions briefly then shifts to unrelated poverty statistics.
The Conservatives clearly do not want to talk about the 300,000 children who have been lifted out of poverty.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends supply management stance but does not address accusations of cronyism or multiple trade deals.
our government stood firm on supply management against the Americans, who wanted to dismantle it.
- misdirectedJusticeMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the justice scandal query and pivots to budget achievements instead.
finally a question on the budget.
- answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Michel Boudrias (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly addresses francophone training access by citing reinvestment in Royal Military College Saint-Jean.
I remind the member that we reinvested in Royal Military College Saint-Jean to finally give our service members access to university training
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesMr. Michel Boudrias (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids the RCMP and armed forces promotion issue by inviting consultations and attacking the Bloc's record.
the Bloc Québécois is in no position to teach us anything about protecting Canada's francophones.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsHunter Tootoo (Independent) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses TB and housing by outlining commitments to partners and targets for reduction.
we are committed to working with our partners specifically to address tuberculosis among indigenous populations and particularly in the north.