Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2019-01-292019-01-31 →

Wednesday, January 30, 2019 · sitting No. 374

Divorce act amendments advance to final vote after third reading debate

The House spent the largest share of its sitting on third reading of Bill C-78, an act to amend the Divorce Act and related statutes. Justice Minister David Lametti told members the changes would better protect children and clarify relocation rules, while Conservative justice critic Michael Cooper questioned whether the 60-day notice period for moves would disadvantage parents in remote areas.

Question period featured repeated exchanges on carbon pricing. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer pressed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the possibility of rates reaching $300 a tonne after the election, and Trudeau replied that the plan would return more money to Saskatchewan families than it would cost them.

New Democratic MP Peter Julian raised the national housing shortage and accused the government of favouring corporate tax breaks over new units, while Trudeau pointed to the national housing strategy's $40-billion commitment.

Decided that day

  • C-425 and C-426 introduced

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2019-01-30

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 40%, opposition 60% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodGovernment businessPrivate members▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0515:0016:0017:0018:00Last speech 18:40Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 4 h 35 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
46Bills Tabled Amid Mostly Dodged AnswersThe sitting devoted most time to substantive topics such as the Divorce Act, with two private members' bills introduced and no recorded votes taken. Question Period produced few direct answers while the Speaker issued six calls to order.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Foreign Affairs

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked why the prime minister waited to dismiss the ambassador to China after the envoy briefed his former constituency on the Meng Wanzhou case.

Read the exchange

Indigenous Affairs

NDP MP Charlie Angus described conditions in Cat Lake as a slow-moving humanitarian crisis at minus 50 degrees and demanded an urgent meeting with the prime minister.

Read the exchange

Intergovernmental Relations

Conservative MP Joël Godin asked why Quebec residents must file two tax returns when a single return would reduce red tape.

Read the exchange

Health

Conservative MP Todd Doherty noted that 223 days had passed since the House passed a bill for a national PTSD strategy and asked when the government would act.

Read the exchange

Automotive Industry

NDP MP Brian Masse asked what concrete steps the government would take to support workers after the closure of the Oshawa assembly plant.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. misdirected
    Foreign AffairsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer ignores the firing timeline and pivots to attacking Scheer's Brexit stance.I would recommend that the leader of the official opposition not make an issue of a foreign policy decision because he is the one who took a pro-Brexit stand in an extremely divisive situation for the United Kingdom.
  2. misdirected
    Foreign AffairsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats talking points on rule of law then attacks opposition's foreign policy record instead of addressing the delay.We will take no lessons from the Leader of the Opposition, whose only pronouncement on foreign policy has been to come down on one side of the most divisive, destructive debate to happen in the U.K. for an awfully long time.
  3. misdirected
    Foreign AffairsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again deflects by criticizing Scheer's Brexit position rather than explaining the ambassador firing timeline.the member opposite just did it again: He came down clearly on one side of the most divisive foreign policy debate to hit the United Kingdom in a long time.
  4. deflected
    Carbon PricingAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to climate plan delay instead of addressing carbon tax increase projections.276 days ago the Leader of the Opposition promised he would be delivering a plan to fight climate change.
  5. misdirected
    Carbon PricingAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question includes personal attack on inherited wealth; answer counters with personal remarks critique and pivots to Saskatchewan benefits.we can always tell the Conservatives are on shaky ground when they stoop to making snide personal remarks.
  6. partly answered
    HousingMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses housing investments but does not explain the low number of units built or corporate tax breaks.We established an investment plan for the national housing strategy, which will greatly help Canadians find more affordable housing.
  7. partly answered
    HousingMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer outlines national housing strategy goals but avoids immediate action on current homelessness numbers.We know that reducing homelessness by 50% is something we can achieve, and we are investing to do that.
  8. answered
    Indigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly addresses Cat Lake housing and water issues with specific updates on meetings and progress.We lifted the long-term drinking water advisory just this past December, but we know there is lots more to do, and that is why are continuing to address the community issues, in partnership, together.
  9. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists general investments but avoids the specific Cat Lake mould crisis and trust/leadership question.over the past three years, we have made unprecedented investments, in partnership with indigenous peoples right across this country, to reduce and eliminate many long-term drinking water advisories, to invest in housing, to open up new schools and to make sure we are creating more health care, more mental health and more clinics.
  10. deflected
    FinanceMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to criticizing the prior government instead of naming any new taxes.three years ago, Canadians were sick and tired of the Harper Conservatives' economic approach of giving benefits to the rich and hoping for job creation or economic growth.
  11. deflected
    FinanceMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks the Conservative leader's climate plan instead of addressing planned taxes or spending.I think it is a shame that a member from Quebec is not concerned about the fact that his leader promised to deliver a plan to fight climate change 276 days ago and we are still waiting.
  12. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates the existing plan and rebate without stating the final carbon-tax price.we have laid out our plan for the next four years, which actually puts a price on pollution and ensures that we return to Canadians a greater amount than, on average, they will pay in terms of putting a price on pollution.
  13. deflected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses climate impacts and the need for a plan but never discloses the final carbon-tax price.Canadians know we need a plan to fight climate change, and we need to make it affordable for regular people, and that is exactly what our plan does.
  14. misdirected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to personal attacks on the member and Conservatives rather than answering the cost question.The member opposite has no plan to fight climate change, and indeed, his leader promised it 276 days ago, and still he has not delivered.
  15. misdirected
    Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer dismisses the question as snide attacks and pivots to listing Liberal achievements instead of naming the carbon-tax price.again, the snide personal attacks are all about distracting from the fact that the Conservatives have no plan for the future of our economy, no plan to fight climate change, no plan to help families through the transforming economy.
  16. answered
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states specific budget allocations for northern and Indigenous housing.in budget 2018, we put $600 million toward first nation housing, $500 million toward Métis nation housing, and $400 million for an Inuit-led housing plan.
  17. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges housing issues but pivots to general investments without addressing the national strategy or specific case.We have invested significantly in new housing.
  18. deflected
    FinanceMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids any tax increase figure by accusing the opposition of falsehoods and highlighting past Liberal actions.it is sad to see the Conservatives once again resorting to falsehoods and fearmongering to scare Canadians.
  19. misdirected
    FinanceMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer turns to attacking the prior Conservative government instead of addressing future tax implications of deficits.during the 10 years that Stephen Harper was in office, the Conservatives added $150 billion to the national debt.
  20. deflected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the specific fundraiser questions by shifting focus to Conservative fundraising practices.It is time for the Conservative Party to abide by those rules as well
  21. deflected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer evades details on the Liberal fundraiser by accusing Conservatives of secrecy instead.It is the Conservatives who are continuing to hold fundraisers in secret
  22. partly answered
    HealthMr. Wayne Stetski (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses mental health investments but only broadly touches on housing without linking the two as asked.We have made the largest investment in Canadian history for mental health services, $5 billion in budget 2017
  23. partly answered
    HousingMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references the national housing strategy and investments but does not address the specific delays or boarded-up units.That is why we created a national housing strategy, which includes $40 billion to invest in communities from coast to coast to coast.
  24. deflected
    EthicsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer refuses to engage with the timing or knowledge question by citing the ongoing court matter.Of course, I will not comment any further as the matter is before the courts.
  25. deflected
    EthicsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific claims about withheld documents and undocumented meetings by restating no involvement and deferring to courts.The notion that any politician was involved in those decisions is completely false.
  26. deflected
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' motives and cites past record instead of addressing the new funding or sponsorship closure.once again the Conservatives are playing politics with people's lives.
  27. deflected
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the express entry criticism and repeats the same past backlog talking points without addressing current legal immigration spots.here is what Canada's Conservatives actually did in 10 years in power.
  28. partly answered
    Automotive IndustryMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the issue and mentions meetings but provides no specific actions or plan for Oshawa workers.We continue to work with our partners to support those impacted.
  29. deflected
    Marine TransportationMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to past contracts awarded to Davie instead of committing to immediate icebreaker assistance for the St. Lawrence Seaway.we have awarded more than $1.5 billion in contracts to Quebec businesses, including $700 million to Davie for three icebreakers.
  30. misdirected
    Intergovernmental RelationsMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer accuses Conservatives of inconsistency in French and English and pivots to labour shortages rather than addressing the single tax return request.The Conservatives are saying one thing in French and another in English.
  31. misdirected
    Intergovernmental RelationsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner for fearmongering and claims job losses without engaging the single tax return proposal directly.by calling for a single tax return, the Conservatives are putting 5,500 jobs at risk in Shawinigan and Jonquière.
  32. partly answered
    Intergovernmental RelationsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer offers willingness to discuss but defends the status quo on tax evasion without committing to a single return for Quebec.
  33. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the jobs question by pivoting to past Harper failures and general principles.We know that, for 10 years, the Harper Conservatives failed to do just that.
  34. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the specific question about the former attorney general and restates general indigenous policy.we have moved forward in partnership to both respond to the services needed in indigenous communities
  35. answered
    HealthMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly commits to moving the PTSD strategy forward this spring.this spring we will be moving forward with the plan to fight PTSD that the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness will put forward.
  36. deflected
    Official LanguagesMr. Mario Beaulieu (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the request to condemn the minister or support the bill by restating constitutional commitments.We will continue to defend the Constitution.