All sittings← 2018-10-292018-10-31 →
Tuesday, October 30, 2018 · sitting No. 345
Commons advances elections modernization bill amid privacy and tax disputes
The House spent the largest share of its time on the elections modernization act. Liberal MP Bernadette Jordan said the bill would make voting more accessible and transparent, while Conservative MP Pat Kelly said the opposition supported encouraging all eligible Canadians to vote. The bill remained at third reading after debate.
In question period, Conservative MP Lisa Raitt pressed the government on Statistics Canada demands for bank transaction data, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said anonymized data would be used only for statistical purposes with privacy commissioner oversight. NDP MP Guy Caron and Prime Minister Trudeau clashed over Canada Revenue Agency audits of benefit recipients versus wealthy tax avoiders.
Decided that day
- M-155 on Filipino Heritage Month passed
- M-161 on public safety committee passed
- Bill C-76 adopted at third reading
- C-418 introduced
- C-51 sent to second chamber
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-10-30
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Criminal Code
Conservative MP Garnett Genuis moved first reading of Bill S-240 to criminalize trafficking in human organs and thanked the Senate for its work on the file.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
Liberal MP Patty Hajdu said the government would move forward with proactive pay equity legislation to address unequal pay for work of equal value.
Read the exchangeCarbon Pricing
Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said the parliamentary secretary's remark on exempting industrial emitters confirmed that carbon taxes drive jobs out of the country.
Read the exchangePensions
NDP MP Karine Trudel called on the government to end pension theft by changing creditor protection legislation.
Read the exchangeDemocratic Reform
Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie said the Prime Minister was undermining democracy by delaying calls for by-elections in three vacant seats.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedPrivacyLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends data safeguards and utility but avoids any commitment to cease the data collection as requested.
Statistics Canada is actively engaged with the Privacy Commissioner's office on this project and is working with it to ensure that Canadians' banking information remains protected and private.
- misdirectedPrivacyLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' past record instead of addressing the specific TransUnion data demand.
For 10 years under them in government, they chose to govern by ideology and not by facts or science.
- misdirectedPrivacyLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the Conservatives' election loss and past policies rather than responding to the privacy concerns raised.
what we are seeing here is that the Conservative Party of Canada learned nothing from Canadians in the 2015 election.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer reiterates privacy protections and data value but does not address stopping the collection without consent.
Statistics Canada will use anonymized data for statistical purposes only.
- misdirectedPrivacyMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again criticizes the prior Conservative government instead of addressing the Privacy Act violation claim.
once again, we are seeing that the Conservatives learned nothing from Canadians in the 2015 election.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses benefit delivery improvements but does not explain the CRA's handling of Panama Papers versus ordinary audits.
We have made significant progress in getting benefits to eligible Canadians.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the government's tax fairness investments without addressing the two-tier enforcement disparity raised.
our government is taking meaningful action to ensure that tax evaders and tax avoiders are forced to pay taxes.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer focuses on benefit outreach but sidesteps the question of offshore tax enforcement versus targeting regular Canadians.
our government remains committed to ensuring that Canadians receive the credits and benefits to which they are entitled
- partly answeredBy-ElectionsMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer briefly addresses the by-election timing but diverts most of the response to unrelated tax enforcement.
As for the by-elections, we look forward to calling them soon.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends privacy processes without addressing the demand to stop the data requests.
With respect to Statistics Canada, it is subject to the Privacy Act, which means that it must ensure compliance with the privacy principles embedded in the act
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's record on data instead of responding to the privacy concerns raised.
What I find very interesting is the members opposite continue to undermine and attack Statistics Canada.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer praises Statistics Canada and questions the opposition rather than addressing the surveillance or data loss claims.
Again, I fail to understand why the members opposite continue to undermine a statistical agency that is revered by Canadians.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer dismisses concerns by attacking the opposition's ideology on data instead of addressing the privacy invasion question.
Members opposite have a fundamental problem with regards to Statistics Canada.
- deflectedPrivacyCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses future consultations and legislation without addressing the specific surveillance or past breaches mentioned.
Our government understands why it is important to make sure that, in a digital economy when transactions occur online, people have an understanding about privacy, consent, data ownership and data portability.
- deflectedPrivacyCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to criticizing the opposition's stance on the census rather than answering why the data collection is needed or how it will stop.
This is where the disagreement occurs: We support good, quality, reliable data, they do not.
- partly answeredStatus of WomenMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms the legislation announcement but does not address the timeline, resources for the commissioner, or transparency measures.
yesterday I was proud to stand in this honourable place with my colleague, the Minister of Status of Women , and the President of the Treasury Board to announce that our government will be moving forward with proactive pay equity legislation.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes consultations and pride in the bill without addressing the four-year timeline.
We are very proud of introducing this proactive pay equity legislation, the first federal government in the history of this country to take this issue seriously.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The response attacks the opposition leader and party instead of addressing the exemption question.
The Leader of the Opposition is at Queen's Park today getting his marching orders from Doug Ford on Stephen Harper's failed plan to deal with climate change.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer criticizes the Conservative Party and Ford rather than responding to the carbon tax exemption claim.
What they do not expect is for the Leader of the Opposition to get ordered around by Premier Ford, who is pushing Stephen Harper's failed agenda of 10 years of doing nothing to deal with climate change.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The reply pivots to attacking the prior Harper government instead of explaining the Belledune exemption.
When the hon. member was actually sitting around the cabinet table under Stephen Harper's government, they did not plan to take this action until 2062.
- deflectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates the general plan and attacks Harper without addressing the specific 96% coal-plant exemption.
Our plan is actually going to leave middle-class families better off.
- partly answeredPensionsMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the issue and lists related actions but does not commit to a timeline or the NDP bill.
As the member also highlighted, in our 2018 budget, we put a whole-of-government approach when it comes to dealing with pensions in a meaningful way.
- partly answeredPensionsMr. Scott Duvall (NDP) asked Filomena Tassi (Liberal). substantive question.The response notes ongoing consultations and a commitment to a solution but avoids explaining the current failure to act.
We want to continue to get this right.
- answeredDemocratic ReformMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states that by-elections will be called within the time allocated by law.
The Canada Elections Act sets out a time period for elections and by-elections.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes the appointment and past consultations without addressing the accusation of acting like a dictator.
after consulting with Canadians, after round tables organized by the IRPP, after the procedure and House affairs committee conducted an excellent study
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights benefits of the commissioner without addressing the unilateral decision or $5.5 million cost.
we are so proud that the Right Hon. David Johnston will take on this role to ensure that all Canadians from coast to coast to coast
- partly answeredDemocratic ReformMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Karina Gould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims consultations occurred with parliamentarians, Canadians and media but does not explain why the appointment proceeded without further input.
there were all kinds of consultations in the past year
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMs. Jenny Kwan (NDP) asked Ahmed Hussen (Liberal). loaded question.The answer blames the prior government for lack of consultation instead of addressing the three-year review timeline or sharia interpretation.
the Harper Conservatives did not conduct enough consultations to make sure the provinces and territories
- deflectedCanada Post CorporationMr. Daniel Blaikie (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes the collective bargaining process and new mediator without addressing suspended disability payments.
we believe in the collective bargaining process
- deflectedJusticeErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states it is inappropriate to comment due to ongoing proceedings without addressing how the Prime Minister knew only one person would be charged.
while those proceedings are outstanding, it is certainly inappropriate for the government to make comment on the proceedings
- misdirectedJusticeErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as inappropriate innuendo and questions the asker's standing rather than addressing the data request or committee appearance.
the innuendo in the hon. member's question is entirely inappropriate
- misdirectedJusticeMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as absurd innuendo without addressing document destruction or the Clerk's appearance.
again, the innuendo that is buried in that question is absurd
- deflectedInternational DevelopmentMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). substantive question.The minister describes her visit and other funding but ignores the UNRWA funding question.
I also had the opportunity to talk to the Palestinian prime minister and minister of education.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights past reforms but does not commit to future improvements for sickness benefits.
All these benefits, including sickness benefits, now have added flexibility, making them more responsive to families' actual circumstances.
- deflectedGrain TransportationMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.The response focuses on forming working groups without addressing the timing or compensation amounts.
We are forming a working group with dairy processors and dairy farmers, and with poultry and egg farmers and processors.
- partly answeredTransportationMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.Acknowledges safety priority and progress but does not address the slow implementation of recommendations.
We are especially pleased that the Transportation Safety Board removed three major items from the Watchlist yesterday.
- deflectedTransportationMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.Reiterates commitment to safety without addressing specific delays or department fault.
We take transportation safety very seriously.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMr. Erin Weir (Independent) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.Details actions taken but provides no estimate for full resolution.
We have dealt with 100,000 transactions in the backlog since January.
- misdirectedPublic Services and ProcurementCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked The Speaker (Liberal). substantive question.The Speaker's ruling addresses procedure rather than the substance of the privilege claim.
I would like to thank the hon. member for Montcalm for having raised the matter.
- deflectedPrivilegeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal). substantive question.The response moves to procedural motions instead of addressing the denied information.
on a point of order, there have been discussions among the parties, and I would like to move two motions